“No musalman ruler forced ppl to follow their religion” is the biggest lie Mohamedans keep peddling including the converts themselves as a cope for not being able to convert 80% Hindus till now.
THREAD 🧵 primary Islamic sources itself debunks such myth. On the contrary Muslim rulers took pride in forceful conversions.
THREAD 🧵 primary Islamic sources itself debunks such myth. On the contrary Muslim rulers took pride in forceful conversions.
1. One of the major reason we still have huge hindu population alive is because most forcefully converted Hindus reverted back to Hindu fold as soon as they got a chance. Others gave them a tough fight.
Here’s my previous Thread 🧵 on it.
Here’s my previous Thread 🧵 on it.
https://twitter.com/sagasofbharat/status/1788932438606917694
2.Jahangir wrote in his memoir, Tarikh-i-Salim Shahi that Hindus never stopped protesting and rebelling against the tyrannical Mughals.
Badaoni of Akbar’s court re iterates the same.
Badaoni of Akbar’s court re iterates the same.
It is this constant fighting spirit of Hindus that kept us 80% Hindus till date not because of some imaginary mercy shown by barbarian Mohamedans.
3. Muhammad Bin Qasim following the advice of his Patron, Hajjaj mercilessly slaughtered almost 26000 Hindus who didn’t convert to Islam as per Muslim historian Al-Baladhuri.
However slaughering multitudes of Hindus who often refused to convert to Islam & put up a fight was a daunting task. Hence he let Hindus remain in their faith on the condition that they pay huge amounts of jizya.
4. Following the Umayyad dynasty, came the more orthodox rulers who often converted Hindus at the pain of death.
Saffaride ruler Yakub Lais captured Kabul in 870 and took the prince of Kabul prisoner.
Saffaride ruler Yakub Lais captured Kabul in 870 and took the prince of Kabul prisoner.
He put the king of Ar-Rukhaj to death, destroyed and plundered the temples and the inhabitants were FORCED TO EMBRACE ISLAM.
He returned to his capital loaded with booty, which included heads of three kings and many statues of Indian divinities.
He returned to his capital loaded with booty, which included heads of three kings and many statues of Indian divinities.
5. In Sultan Mahmud’s conquest of kanauj Hindus either were forced to accept Islam or were slaughtered for refusing to convert. This has been attested by his own secretary Utbi.
It is well known that Sultan Mahmud would slaughter Hindus, enslave their women and force conversion to Islam.
It is well known that Sultan Mahmud would slaughter Hindus, enslave their women and force conversion to Islam.
One such convert was a Prince Nawasa Shah. But as soon as he got a chance he reverted to his faith of polytheism. This enraged Mahmud whose blood thirsty sword then bitchered him.
If this isnt forced conversion enough then what else was it?
If this isnt forced conversion enough then what else was it?
Mahmud not only slaughtered Hindus , but also took them as slaves. The amount of slaves captured by Mahmud was so huge that they were sold at a very cheap rate.
6. According to the testimony of Muhammad Ferishtah, three to four hundred thousand Khokhars (Hindus) were converted to Islam by Muizzuddin and sold as slaves.
7. During Akbar’s time(which is considered the most lenient period for hindus) it became a fashion to raid villages without any reason & carry of Hindus as slaves.
Abdulla Khan Uzbeg, a general of Akbar, had boastfully declared that he imprisoned 5 lakhs men & women, sold them and converted them to Muhammedans. He clearly states the reason for his act was to increase progeny of Muslims.
8. In Shash Fath-I Kangra it is written how Mughal ruler Jahangir devoted go promulgation of the Muhammadan religion.
9. According to Siyar-ul-Mutakhirin, the prisoners caught by Abdali, famished due to deprivation of food and drink, were paraded in long lines before being beheaded and the ‘women and children who survived were driven off as slaves
The number of slaves were 22000.
The number of slaves were 22000.
10. When Nadir Shah plundered, 200,000 hindus were slaughtered & 1000s of women were taken as slaves
11. Spine breaking Jizya was imposed on Hindus for the same reason to forcefully convert.
Aurangzeb levied jizya to rip Hindus of their wealth to such an extent that they convert to Islam. If they converted their jizya would lapse.
Aurangzeb levied jizya to rip Hindus of their wealth to such an extent that they convert to Islam. If they converted their jizya would lapse.
12. Firoz Shah Tughalq did the same as he claims in his memoir Fatuhat-i-Firoz Shahi.
These are only a handful of examples as the thread was becoming too lengthy.
But this is just the tip of the iceberg. There are enough proof that Mohamedan converts like @kamaalrkhan is a liar trying to whitewash his religion. Islamic sources themselves debunks such whitewashing.
But this is just the tip of the iceberg. There are enough proof that Mohamedan converts like @kamaalrkhan is a liar trying to whitewash his religion. Islamic sources themselves debunks such whitewashing.
@kamaalrkhan Sacred rain has written a good thread on the subject too.
https://twitter.com/sacredrain/status/1737372688581366187
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
