1. I think it is very important for anyone who is considering standing or voting for POW to watch this video and understand exactly what is being said.
It is against the law (Equality Act 2010) to discriminate against anyone at work, or when buying and renting a property,
2. on the basis of a protected characteristic. We can legally discriminate against all male people (and this of course includes those who identify as trans) in some circumstances, and it is essential that we are able to do so for purposes that we are all familiar with: single sex
3. services, sports, prisons etc.
The protected characteristic is gender reassignment, not identity, although the wording is woolly and open to interpretation ie the law also protects those who 'propose' to undergo a process to 'change sex'.
This is not the point, however.
4. Whether or not it is always illegal, denying an entire demographic such things that are necessary for basic survival, such as employment or housing, on the basis of their belief or identity, and at the same time smearing them as being all the same - in this case lazy,
5. unemployable, and unlikely to pay their rent - is unethical, prejudiced, and downright dangerous.
People cannot 'discriminate as much as they like'. It is against the law and with good reason. Because historically it has made life for certain groups unliveable. Does POW
6. advocate the ripping up of the entire Equality Act? Would it like to see a return to signs on businesses making clear that certain groups are not welcome? Voting women are entitled to know.
Next: people *can* wear and call themselves what they like. Nobody needs KJK's
7. permission, or mine. And yes, there will be some people who think it's weird. So what? Nobody is entitled to deprive others of the basic necessities of life on the grounds that they find them a bit weird. Or on the grounds that they may hold a set of beliefs we judge to be
8. ridiculous, sexist, and wrong.
This video is pure hatred whipping from an illiberal, retrograde populist who wishes to ride a general wave of anti-woke culture war in the hopes of gaining power, status and money.
I would sooner spoil my ballot.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Not looking for a fight (I'm tired, it's Christmas) but I do want to say that I don't relate to this idea that it is now popular to believe in the reality of sex.
For women whose political and social roots are embedded in the left, it has never been less popular. When I first
started writing and speaking out publicly against self ID in 2017 it was difficult, but I was able to persuade some friends that the social and political erasure of sex was not the progressive project it was being painted as. My friends knew who I was and were, in some cases,
prepared to listen.
Two of my most precious friendships have been strained more recently due to the right wing drift of the GC movement. Because I'm no longer able to say that women fighting for sex based rights do not ever align with the alt-right. Because old friends think
I. I know that recent views expressed by KJK and others supporting a decision by Italy's far right prime minister Meloni to remove lesbian mothers from birth certificates has sparked a whole new conversation about homophobia, anti-feminism and social conservatism.
2. A sudden obsession with knowing who the exact biological parents of a child are (as though that has ever been possible) has become mashed up with a familiar discourse about the sanctity and superiority of the nuclear family.
On her 4th podcast with Carl ‘I wouldn’t even
3. rape Jess Phillips’ Benjamin there is a conversation about knife violence claiming the lives of young black boys in London, which Benjamin blames on ‘fatherlessness’. Not racism, not poverty, - fatherlessness. KJK responds that she is "inclined to agree." So not only lending
An attempt to redefine rape as a crime of inequality, based purely on ideas of power differential, is absolutely terrifying when the redefiner believes that some men can be women and that some women are in a position of power over some men.
No, please think about it. Because as feminists we have an analysis of rape as a crime that is committed almost exclusively by men with women and girls the large majority of their victims. This is backed up by crime statistics globally.
We also have an analysis of rape as a
brutal crime of patriarchy - one that serves to keep all women and girls in line through threat and fear.
Don't go out at night - you'll be raped. Don't get drunk - you'll be raped. Don't be too friendly - you'll be raped. Stay at home. Make yourself small. Don't make trouble.
the same time period. Paula Lamont was pushed, jostled, and verbally abused off her own picket line. Helen Steel was ambushed at the Anarchist Book Fair. I narrowly avoided being physically assaulted by an angry male at Goldsmiths book fair. At the Jam Jar I was trapped by TRA's
on a stairwell along with Julie Bindel and Heather Brunskell Evans.
But many women are new enough to the movement to be ignorant of this history. And so they can be fed the lie that no women were assaulted until left wing feminists started to complain of right wing alliances
And just as men were attacking trans women long before feminists began criticising self ID, Antifa and TRA's were attacking women opposed to gender ideology long before some of us began voicing concern at the direction of travel.
And just as I refused to be silenced by TRA's
claims that I was responsible for the murder and suicide of trans people, I refuse to be silenced by people now claiming I am responsible for violence and threats made to women by men, because that is not true either.
1. A thread in response to Heather Brunskell-Evans’ article: Policing Adult Human Females.
First, a preface: I understand conflict within the women’s movement is unpleasant to witness, causing annoyance to many, even distress to some. I don’t like that.
2. have no choice but to address an article that cynically takes direct quotes from my work and twists them, misrepresenting my words and giving them meaning I did not intend.
In this thread I will take direct quotes from Brunskell Evans’ article and address them individually.
3. Apparently left-wing feminism is: “More concerned with appeasing its socialist masters than standing up for the sex based rights of women and the protection of children.”
How dare you. Left wing women have been fighting a long time within the Labour Party and other left wing