America First Legal Profile picture
May 25 3 tweets 1 min read Read on X
🚨There is no diplomatic way to put it:

Jack Smith is a thug.

@TheJusticeDept is out of control.

They just filed this on the Friday of a holiday weekend to try to silence @realDonaldTrump from stating a fact—deadly force was authorized during the raid on MAL. ⬇️ Image
This has to be one of the most bone-headed moves yet. Yes, deadly force is SOP when executing search warrants. THAT’S THE PROBLEM.

No one at @TheJusticeDept thought, “you know, maybe raiding a President’s house doesn't make a ton of sense, given the standard risks associated with executing warrants.”
@TheJusticeDept If @TheJusticeDept thought there were records it wanted, it could have taken civil action.

IT DIDN’T.

Ask yourself why. Why would they want these records so badly that they knowingly exposed innocent people to potential death because the NATIONAL LIBRARIAN was mad?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with America First Legal

America First Legal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @America1stLegal

May 25
ICYMI—Last night, Jack Smith and Jay Bratt filed yet ANOTHER attempt to gag President Trump.

In short, they say that the court needs to stop President Trump from stating facts because it could endanger law enforcement or prejudice the trial.

This is beyond absurd.🧵
They say that repeating the FACT that deadly force was authorized endangers law enforcement.

But they don't cite any specific threat by Trump or the identity of any specific law enforcement officer threatened.

Because there wasn't one.

How does that even being to make sense? Image
And they further claim that somehow this undermines the integrity of the proceedings.

So they ask the court to modify the conditions to include yet another attempt to gag President Trump. Image
Read 7 tweets
May 24
/1🔍 BREAKING — We just launched a new investigation at the NIH into Dr. Fauci's evasion of the Freedom of Information Act by using a private email address to conduct official business.

We are determined to recover all records that Dr. Fauci has subverted from the public: Image
/2 New evidence uncovered by @COVIDSelect shows that Dr. Morens (Dr. Fauci’s top advisor) wrote in an email, “I forgot to say there is no worry about FOIAs. I can either send stuff to Tony [Fauci] on his private gmail, or hand it to him at work or at his house. He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble.”
/3 After a hearing before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis on May 23, 2024, the committee issued a press release explaining its finding that “Dr. Fauci was aware of Dr. Morens' nefarious behavior and may have even engaged in federal records violations himself.”Image
Read 6 tweets
May 23
/1🚨EXPLOSIVE LITIGATION DOCS: We sued DOD and uncovered a secret Obama memo on presidential records which shows that Jack Smith is the one subverting the law. 

The directive, which legally binds DOJ, vests POTUS with sole authority to determine which records are his.  

More… Image
/2 This secretive memo established by the Obama Administration — and used through the Trump and Biden Administrations — confirms the government may have already had originals of the alleged classified documents involved in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s sham prosecution against President Trump through the Presidential Information Technology Community (PITC).
/3 Some background…

In October 2014, Russian hackers breached the Executive Office of the President (EOP)’s network.

In response, President Obama created, via executive action, PITC. Image
Read 18 tweets
May 22
/1🔎 NEW INVESTIGATION:

We just initiated an investigation to uncover the extent to which Biden’s Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General is compromised by partisan, biased political actors.

THREAD: Image
/2 The DOJ OIG proclaims that it is “a statutorily created independent entity whose mission is to detect and deter waste, fraud, abuse, and misconduct in the Department of Justice, and to promote economy and efficiency in the Department’s operations.” Image
/3 While all administrations have political personnel who come and go, OIG personnel—at least historically—carried the imprimatur of impartiality.
Read 15 tweets
May 21
/1🚨BREAKING🚨

We just filed a formal administrative complaint with @WallyZimolong against the Pennsylvania Department of State regarding patent violations of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 by allowing ineligible voters, and non-citizens, to vote.

THREAD: Image
/2 Under HAVA, an individual registering to vote must supply a current and valid driver’s license number or the last four digits of his or her social security number on the registration form.

In turn, HAVA requires local election officials to confirm whether these numbers are current and valid using available databases.
/3 However, Pennsylvania’s voter registration system blatantly violates this federal law. In fact, the Secretary of the Commonwealth has directed all 67 county boards of election to ignore HAVA’s verification mandate and to register any applicant to vote regardless of whether an applicant’s driver’s license or social security number can be verified.
Read 5 tweets
May 14
/1🚨BREAKING — The FCC ordered all TV & Radio stations in the U.S. to collect and publish the race and sex of their employees.

Today, we filed a petition in the Fifth Circuit on behalf of @NRBAssociation and @AmericanFamAssc to stop this illegal DEI edict: Image
/2 On February 22, 2024, the FCC announced that it would begin collecting “[d]ata concerning the gender, race, and ethnicity of a broadcast station’s workforce” and make the submissions from each television and radio station publicly available.
/3 The FCC claims that this “data will not be used for the purpose of assessing any aspect of an individual broadcast licensee’s or permittee’s compliance with…nondiscrimination or equal employment opportunity requirements.” However, the FCC never clearly explains what this data collection is for, only making vague allusions to using it “for purposes of analyzing industry trends and making reports to Congress.”
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(