2/To conduct this op, @DeptofDefense activated a total of 11 vessels.
4 vessels activated from @DOTMARAD & @MSCSealift: USNS Benavidez, Lopez, Bobo (which suffered an engine fire & returned) & Stockham
1 chartered: MV Sagamore
3 Army LSVs & 3 Army LCUs
Plus pier & lighterage
3/JLOTS is a symphony of movement from ships offloading offshore onto Army and Navy connectors and moving the cargo ashore.
The issue is the open nature of the Gaza beach and the limitation of JLOTS in sea states over Force 3 (>10 kts wind & 3ft seas)
4/Weather, along with ship issues have delayed the implementation of JLOTS and so far, about 1000 tons of aid has been delivered.
That is equivalent to about 50 TEU (twenty foot equivalent units) containers.
5/Now we have several of the watercraft breaking loose and coming ashore.
The image is that of a US Army landing craft medium (LCM) and a powered ligheratge section ashore in Israel. The latter broke loose and came ashore and the LCM attempted to tow it off.
6/The small amount of cargo and the nature of the open water off Gaza should have informed @DeptofDefense to adopt alternative methods than this.
For example, USNS Lopez, a former Maritime Prepositioning Ship, is designed to offload at anchor offshore.
7/Lopez can load and offload any relief aid via its ship cranes. It can carry causeway (barge) ferries which could beach themselves and therefore deliver the aid without the need for an offshore or Trident pier.
Some Army LSVs could have supplemented this evolution.
8/This style of operation is flexible and can be moved more easily than redeploying the Trident pier and nearly a dozen vessels.
There are even more options available from the commercial sector with Tugs, barges and Jack up rigs.
9/Has the Gaza Pier Been Beached? | Army Watercraft come ashore off Gaza and Israel
1️⃣ What is #JLOTS?
2️⃣ US Army Watercraft Ashore
3️⃣ Alternate Scenario to Current JLOTS
Now appears that a section of the #GazaPier is ashore in Israel.
This is either the sea or beach end of the Trident Pier with quite a few vehicles and equipment on board.
This is the difficulty in conducting such an op in an open sea with no protection from seas/wind.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/The @Heritage has released Project 2025 which is entitled Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise. Basically it would be the next Trump administration policy guide. In it is a section on Maritime Policy (p.637-638). Let's take a moment and digest it.
2/A little short on history as MARAD came from the US Shipping Board created in 1916 and then via the US Maritime Commission.
What is also omitted is that MARAD was originally under the Commerce Dept and included @FMC_gov it is purview.
3/This statement is 💯% the wrong choice. While they are correct that MARAD does not regulate its industry, it makes no argument to transfer it to @DHSgov.
MARAD should be reorganized into an entity that has oversight of all maritime aspects, akin to the FAA over aviation.
A temporary jetty was constructed from concrete and landfill to extend out from the shore.
It was done under the supervision of the IDF.
2/The Spanish-flagged tug Echo 1 Open Arms delivered the barge of 200 tons of food from @WCKitchen via Cyprus.
Due to the shallow draft off the jetty the tug could not push the barge alongside.
This is why the US Army Trident pier will extend approximately 1800 feet out.
3/The barge was maneuvered by the use of two small RHIBs.
This is extremely difficult and danger due to the mass of the barge and the power of the RHIBs. Any current or wind would have precluded this operation.
2/According to the @DeptofDefense spokesperson it will take two weeks to construct.
Okay...but where are the causeways?
They are either in Virginia or onboard prepositioning ships at Diego Garcia or in the western Pacific.
These will need to be shipped and this takes time?
3/Also, the throughput of a barge ferry is ridiculously slow. While this may be enough to sustain a few hundred or thousand soldiers in an exercise, the population of Gaza is over 2 million.
This is going to require a lot of cargo to move quickly and efficiently.
1/A quick snapshot of all containerships over 16,000 TEUs (or Ultra Large Container Vessels). You can see that they are used exclusively between Europe & Asia as US ports cannot accommodate them, either due to water/air draft or crane capacity.
2/Only a few ports can handle them - Tangier in Africa; Algeciras, Genoa, Piraeus, Istanbul, Port Said & Gioia Tauro in the Med; Hamburg, Bremerhaven, Rotterdam, Antwerp, Felixstowe & Antwerp in Northern Europe & in Asia, multiple ports in China, Singapore, Columbo & Khalifa.
3/Noticeably missing are any US ports - on either the East, Gulf or West Coasts.
The Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCV) were built to just fit in the Suez, hence 399.99 meters in length.
But now with the diversion caused by the #Houthi, questions arise about the ULCVs.
1/MT Marlin Luanda, a 110,000 deadweight ton tanker and owned by a company in the Marshall-Is and flagged in the same, sailed from Greece after loading a cargo of Russian naphtha from tankers via the Black Sea.
The cargo was not sanctioned and sold under the price cap.
2/The ship identified its destination as Singapore but that was probably not its final one.
Over the past year, it has operated over an extensive area, typical of Suezmax/LR2 tanker.
3/The ship has a valuation of $61.3M and its cargo of naphtha was probably similar. A value of $120 million would lead to a war risk of approximately $1.2M for the ship if at 1%.