In this thread, I’m going to go into some detail about what the phrase “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be Free” means to many Jewish people. You may not agree, but I hope that it may enlighten those who simply don't understand the almost visceral reaction to it.
🧵
2) For the benefit of a number of students at some of America’s most expensive higher education institutions, let’s start by clarifying - the river is the River Jordan, the sea is the Mediterranean.
3) So what do those chanting it mean? When asked, a bunch of them will say they want a single state in this area in which all people can live together in dignity and equality. Sounds great, right? Who would argue with that?
4) That claim is somewhat muddied when one particular version of that chant is used in Arabic, as has been heard and seen at various protests - من المية للمية / فلسطين عربية “From water to water, Palestine is Arab”. But let's leave that aside for the moment.
5) Note that the protesters are not calling for Israel to be *changed* into what they see as a free and equal society. For them this can only be achieved by Israel being *ended* and replaced by Palestine.
6) Objectively, you can say that the reason for this is that the protestors believe that Israel (and Zionism) is fundamentally incompatible with what they see as equality and freedom for all, which is why for them it has to go in its entirety. But...
7) But there is a significant degree of ambiguity as to what the end result *actually* means. And it’s that question mark which is why so many Jewish people see this slogan the way they do.
8) Because Jewish people have lots of different examples of what happens to Jewish communities who are minorities in countries in the MENA region. They get destroyed. I'll give you some examples.
9) Egypt. 1948 - 75,000 Jews. 2024 - 30 Jews.
10) Lebanon. 1948 - 9,000 Jews. 2024 - 20 Jews.
11) Syria. 1948 - 15,000 Jews. 2024 - 4 Jews.
12) Yemen. 1948 - 55,000 Jews. 2024 - 1 Jew.
13) Iraq. 1948 - 156,000 Jews. 2024 - 1 Jew.
14) Iran. 1948 - 150,000 Jews. 2024 - 8,750 Jews (under the strict control of the Iranian regime).
19) The anti-Zionist narrative is that this mass Exodus was the fault of the Zionists, who created Israel. No Israel, goes the refrain, and all those communities would still be there.
This ignores a very simple point.
20) In every single one of these countries, to a greater or lesser extent, Israel’s independence was followed by significant repression of local Jewish populations.
Every one.
21) Remind me, what’s the way to describe holding members of an ethnic or racial group responsible for what other members of that group may have done elsewhere?
22) By doing so - oppressing the local Jewish population via pogroms, repressive laws, denying Jewish people full citizenship, confiscation of land and property - these MENA countries made a more effective argument for Zionism than Israel ever could have done by itself.
23) What that said, very clearly, was that Jews as a minority in a MENA country lived there strictly on sufferance. That at any time they could be deprived of everything - including their lives.
This had been clear pre-Zionism too, but the reaction post-'48 put the seal on this.
24) Which brings us back to now. The one-state Palestine being dreamt of is one where, at best, Jews will be allowed to live as a minority.
25) I put it to you that the experience of more than half of Israel’s Jewish population - descended from those who had to leave MENA countries, means that they *know* what the end result of such a Palestine will be.
A land without Jews.
26) This, by the way, given most Israeli Jews now are descendants of MENA Jews is also why the “post-colonial” depiction of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as some sort of “white vs brown” battle is so utterly brainless. And that’s before we discuss Israel’s many Ethiopian Jews.
27) I’ve gone on too long, I know, but just one final point. If the anti-Israel protestors really wanted to assure Jews - all Jews - that there would be a real future for Jews in their hoped for future one-state Palestine - they would be doing their best to engage with Zionists.
28) They would be saying “Zionism is an ideology built on numerous examples - in MENA and in Europe - that Jews are, in the long term, only safe in their own country. Let us show you that this isn’t necessarily the case. Let’s talk. Find common ground. Try for friendships.”
29) Instead Zionists are told they are Nazis. The same age-old antisemitic conspiracy theories about Jewish control are applied to “Zionists”. “Zionists” are excluded from the Community of the Good.
30) Congratulations!
You’ve just proved every single Jewish Zionist’s point for them - and you’ve helped create new ones. In a very similar way to those MENA countries post 1948.
*Thread ends*
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A short thread on the favourite slogan of anti-Zionist Jews - and how it very powerfully expresses a very basic disconnect from the rest of us.
🧵
2) The words you see here feature prominently in the rhetoric deployed by anti-Zionist Jews (those who can actually read Hebrew, unlike 'Jewish Voice for Peace').
It translates as "Righteousness, righteousness, you shall pursue". It's from the book of Devarim (Deuteronomy).
3) The words have become a rallying cry - a call for the fearless pursuit of "righteousness" - which of course is identified by such people as being obsessively anti-Israel.
Just one small problem. It's a third of a full sentence.
I want to respond to this with a thread, because I don’t feel like a tweet will do it justice. I will share this screen grab in each tweet in the thread, so that people can see what I am responding to.
🧵
2) Paragraph 1 isn’t wrong. There will always be problematic elements of student protest groups: eg. The SNCC was extremely sexist, despite the incredible work by women in that group. Women fought to change that culture from within.
This “anti-Israel” movement is very different.
2) The language around lack of awareness & education in paragraph 2 is *extremely* telling. The OP fails to understand this “antisemitic shit” is a *feature*, not a bug. It’s what the SJP chapters, “Within Our Lifetime”, Samidoun etc - all the groups energising this -all believe.
The New Yorker has published an interview with someone who has released a paper with their findings of evidence of the sexual assaults carried out by Hamas on October 7th.
The issue is in the choice of the person the New Yorker has decided to speak to - and who they didn't.
A🧵
2) The person the New Yorker writer *should* have spoken to was Dr Cochav Elkayam-Levy, who has been directly involved in the gathering of testimony from survivors of the Hamas attacks.
Instead they spoke to someone from Physicians for Human Rights Israel.
3) I have no issue with Physicians for Human Rights Israel. I am sadly all too sure that their report on Hamas' behaviour on October 7th is accurate.
But, unlike Dr Cochav Elkayam-Levy, they didn't speak directly to any survivors when they put it together.
In the last 8 weeks, you'll have seen reports from first responders who came to places in Southern Israel where massacres were carried out by Hamas.
Some come from an organisation called Zaka. I want to describe what Zaka does.
A 🧵
2) Hamas was founded in 1988.
It's no coincidence that Zaka was founded in 1989, during the 1st Intifada, when terror organisations started bombing Israeli buses.
Under Jewish law, bodies need to be buried.
But what happens when bodies have been torn apart? Eviscerated?
3) The answer was to create an organisation whose job it would be, after every such terror attack, in the wake of forensics, to gather up every body part on the scene, no matter how small.