Emma 💛💙🇩🇰🇬🇧🇪🇺 Profile picture
May 27, 2024 17 tweets 5 min read Read on X
I see lots of Right wingers are using places like Denmark as a shining beacon of why National service is great.

It’s funny, cos they don’t ever seem to champion all the OTHER aspects of life for young Danes.

Little 🧵

1/12 Image
Free education.

Thats free education to whatever level you chose to go to, in whatever area you want to study

For as many years as you want to study

And not just free education - you get paid a grant to cover your living expenses, while you study.

2/12
Heavily subsidized child care

Generous parental leave and child benefits

Generous sick pay, disability pay and unemployment cover

Just a decent safety net available for all so you know that if the shit hits the fan in your life, you’ll be OK.

3/12 Image
A well functioning health service

Specific psychological care for 18-24 year olds

Housing allowance - yes young people are supported with their housing costs!

With a decent social housing system that works.

4/12 Image
Subsidised youth schemes and sports initiatives.

Under 25s can get financial support for sports fees and camps, equipment and even travel.

They actually encourage young disadvantaged kids to take part in arts and culture! (Imagine that!)

5/12
Image
Image
They have a Danish Youth Council designed to strengthen youth engagement in democracy and civic society.

(A little different to the Tories deliberately trying to make it HARDER for young people to vote!)

6/12 Image
The list goes on…..

7/12 Image
So yes, Denmark does have a National Service scheme.

But you know what?

Civic pride, national responsibility, a sense of community - that comes from living in a society that you KNOW has your back.

8/12
In Tory Britain, young people have been robbed of youth schemes and Sure start centers.
Libraries decimated, mental health services almost non existent.
Most of this generation will be in expensive, unstable housing for years to come
Saddled with exorbitant student debts

9/12
A cohort damaged by the COVID years - with no meaningful effort put into supporting them to catch up (unlike most of the rest of the western world).

They KNOW they live in a society that, not only does NOT have their back, it actively demonises them.

10/12
So by all means take National Service from the Danish system.

But then provide the other part of that social contract - the support, the housing, the education, the involvement in democratic and civic society, that comes with it.

11/12
Because otherwise, this is just another stick to beat young people with and has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with fostering civic duty and National Pride.

But we all knew that before I wrote this thread, didn’t we! 😉

12/12

#ToryBritain
#ToriesBrokeBritain
And an excellent thread on the Finnish version, highlighting much the same👇🏼

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emma 💛💙🇩🇰🇬🇧🇪🇺

Emma 💛💙🇩🇰🇬🇧🇪🇺 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MonkEmma

Sep 27
There seems to be some *confusion*
amongst Reform supporters over Nathan Gill being one of them.

“But, but, Reform didn’t exist when he took his Russian bribes”

“But, but he was in UKIP then”

“But, but it has nothing to do with Farage, he barely knew the guy”

So here’s a little history lesson 👍🏼🧵

1/14Image
In the 2014 European Elections, UKIP won 24 seats

By the end of that parliament in 2019, they had 3 left!

5 had become Independents
1 had moved to SDP
1 had moved to Conservatives

14 were Brexit Party!

In 2019, UKIP won 0 seats.
Brexit Party won 29

2/14
So yes, we can safely say the bulk of UKIP just morphed into the Brexit Party.

Sure, UKIP still exists…. Just!

In 2019 they lost their deposit in every seat they stood, getting just 0.1% of the vote share

They got 1.56% of votes in the Senedd elections in 2021 - losing their seat

Only 0.14% in the Scottish parliament elections (despite standing in every constituency)

3/14
Read 14 tweets
Sep 26
It was suggested I took a look at this tweet.

Then we all got sidetracked by 🦢s🤷🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️

So, a couple of days late, here you go!

🧵1/25 Image
This is less of a “debunk” and more an explainer to dampen down the pearl clutching and lower the temperature of the rhetoric against asylum seekers.

NONE of this is on them!

2/25
So, the claim itself relates to details in this court case suggesting that PTS-247 provided taxi services to asylum seekers under a contract from Clearsprings but haven’t been paid.

The papers show there were 6000 journeys per month totaling ~ £350K

3/25 Image
Read 25 tweets
Sep 14
Last week the @Daily_Express ran with the following front page.

So obviously I had to take a look!

Is it true?

How does it compare to other professions?

Because anyone familiar with British RW media discourse knows they reserve a special venom for civil servants…🤷🏼‍♀️

🧵
1/25 Image
The article contains a whole section from @the_tpa referring to:

“A simply unbelievable 1.6 million sick days over 3 years”

“Particularly a problem in our tax collector”

“Low-standards culture”

“Staff aren’t expected to turn up to work”

2/25 Image
You get the picture - HMRC workers are lazy, work-shy, always off sick, and not going to work (aka working from home!)

But how do these claims stack up against reality?

3/25
Read 25 tweets
Sep 7
Following Farage’s announcement that he plans to make “serious cuts to the welfare budgets” if he wins the next election, I’ve seen this claim being repeated from last year’s headlines again.

So let’s take a look at the the reality rather than the weaponised version

🧵
1/20 Image
The stat comes from an ONS report published last December, which found that:

“The proportion of people living in households receiving more in benefits than they paid in taxes decreased from 53.6% to 52.6%”

Cool. Job done 👍🏼

The headlines are correct, right?

Not exactly…

2/20
In this case you need to dig even deeper than the ONS statement and look at what they classed as a benefit.

Because I can guarantee that what people reading those headlines conjure in their minds and what the ONS meant won’t be the same!

3/20
Read 21 tweets
Sep 4
This is getting absolutely ridiculous now.

Headline: Rayner’s family home was valued at almost twice the amount of other recently sold properties on her street.

Article: Behind a paywall so most people will take that insinuation at face value

The reality?

🧵1/10 Image
The house was valued in 2023, by a third party, independent, professional valuer who would have visited the house, taken in all the information and gone away and found local comparables.

It was valued at £650,000.

So is it only actually worth £325K as the headline suggests?! 😱

2/10Image
Nope.

They bought the house for £375K nine years ago and then built and extension on it.

To suggest it’s now worth £50K LESS than what they paid for it is ridiculous.

And funny enough, despite the headline, the article DOESN’T actually suggest that🙄

3/10 Image
Read 10 tweets
Aug 29
The desperation by those on the Right to smear Angela Rayner is wearing thin🙄

And no - don’t bother replying UNTIL you’ve read the thread!

I’ve trawled through multiple versions of this “story” in the Telegraph and Daily Mail to try and piece together what’s going on!

🧵1/17 Image
So let’s lay out the facts.

It is complicated, which is why the Right Wing media can have such a field day throwing around claims and insinuations to make you believe something dodgy has gone on.

To be clear - there is no suggestion she has broken any laws or failed to pay what she needed to pay - and they know that!

2/17
Ok, let’s look at her property “empire”👍🏼

Rayner owned a home in Ashton-Under-Lyme (her constituency) with her ex-husband until a few months ago, when she removed her name from the deeds.

So she no longer owns that home

3/17 Image
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(