I see lots of Right wingers are using places like Denmark as a shining beacon of why National service is great.
It’s funny, cos they don’t ever seem to champion all the OTHER aspects of life for young Danes.
Little 🧵
1/12
Free education.
Thats free education to whatever level you chose to go to, in whatever area you want to study
For as many years as you want to study
And not just free education - you get paid a grant to cover your living expenses, while you study.
2/12
Heavily subsidized child care
Generous parental leave and child benefits
Generous sick pay, disability pay and unemployment cover
Just a decent safety net available for all so you know that if the shit hits the fan in your life, you’ll be OK.
3/12
A well functioning health service
Specific psychological care for 18-24 year olds
Housing allowance - yes young people are supported with their housing costs!
With a decent social housing system that works.
4/12
Subsidised youth schemes and sports initiatives.
Under 25s can get financial support for sports fees and camps, equipment and even travel.
They actually encourage young disadvantaged kids to take part in arts and culture! (Imagine that!)
5/12
They have a Danish Youth Council designed to strengthen youth engagement in democracy and civic society.
(A little different to the Tories deliberately trying to make it HARDER for young people to vote!)
6/12
The list goes on…..
7/12
So yes, Denmark does have a National Service scheme.
But you know what?
Civic pride, national responsibility, a sense of community - that comes from living in a society that you KNOW has your back.
8/12
In Tory Britain, young people have been robbed of youth schemes and Sure start centers.
Libraries decimated, mental health services almost non existent.
Most of this generation will be in expensive, unstable housing for years to come
Saddled with exorbitant student debts
9/12
A cohort damaged by the COVID years - with no meaningful effort put into supporting them to catch up (unlike most of the rest of the western world).
They KNOW they live in a society that, not only does NOT have their back, it actively demonises them.
10/12
So by all means take National Service from the Danish system.
But then provide the other part of that social contract - the support, the housing, the education, the involvement in democratic and civic society, that comes with it.
11/12
Because otherwise, this is just another stick to beat young people with and has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with fostering civic duty and National Pride.
But we all knew that before I wrote this thread, didn’t we! 😉
This is less of a “debunk” and more an explainer to dampen down the pearl clutching and lower the temperature of the rhetoric against asylum seekers.
NONE of this is on them!
2/25
So, the claim itself relates to details in this court case suggesting that PTS-247 provided taxi services to asylum seekers under a contract from Clearsprings but haven’t been paid.
The papers show there were 6000 journeys per month totaling ~ £350K
Following Farage’s announcement that he plans to make “serious cuts to the welfare budgets” if he wins the next election, I’ve seen this claim being repeated from last year’s headlines again.
So let’s take a look at the the reality rather than the weaponised version
🧵
1/20
The stat comes from an ONS report published last December, which found that:
“The proportion of people living in households receiving more in benefits than they paid in taxes decreased from 53.6% to 52.6%”
Cool. Job done 👍🏼
The headlines are correct, right?
Not exactly…
2/20
In this case you need to dig even deeper than the ONS statement and look at what they classed as a benefit.
Because I can guarantee that what people reading those headlines conjure in their minds and what the ONS meant won’t be the same!
Headline: Rayner’s family home was valued at almost twice the amount of other recently sold properties on her street.
Article: Behind a paywall so most people will take that insinuation at face value
The reality?
🧵1/10
The house was valued in 2023, by a third party, independent, professional valuer who would have visited the house, taken in all the information and gone away and found local comparables.
It was valued at £650,000.
So is it only actually worth £325K as the headline suggests?! 😱
2/10
Nope.
They bought the house for £375K nine years ago and then built and extension on it.
To suggest it’s now worth £50K LESS than what they paid for it is ridiculous.
And funny enough, despite the headline, the article DOESN’T actually suggest that🙄
The desperation by those on the Right to smear Angela Rayner is wearing thin🙄
And no - don’t bother replying UNTIL you’ve read the thread!
I’ve trawled through multiple versions of this “story” in the Telegraph and Daily Mail to try and piece together what’s going on!
🧵1/17
So let’s lay out the facts.
It is complicated, which is why the Right Wing media can have such a field day throwing around claims and insinuations to make you believe something dodgy has gone on.
To be clear - there is no suggestion she has broken any laws or failed to pay what she needed to pay - and they know that!
2/17
Ok, let’s look at her property “empire”👍🏼
Rayner owned a home in Ashton-Under-Lyme (her constituency) with her ex-husband until a few months ago, when she removed her name from the deeds.