USA 🇺🇸
(at 1:36:00)
"heartbroken and horrified" by Rafah attack
"do more to protect innocent Palestinian lives" and conduct an investigation
"Israel has a right to defend itself" but has "obligations to protect civilians"
"Israel must do more" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
Sierra Leone 🇸🇱
must "secure a ceasefire"
Rafah operation "exacerbated situation"
There are "breaches of IL" in Rafah
"condemns" Rafah attack. IHL must be complied. "Respect and protect civilians and civilian objects" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
Switzerland 🇨🇭
"outraged" by the events. "condemn" Hamas' indiscriminate attacks. "strongly condemns" the Israeli strike in Rafah.
IHL requires parties to distinguish civilian/military objects; take precautions in attack
"opposition" to Rafah operation webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
France 🇫🇷
"calls for a ceasefire" and expresses "opposition to Israeli operation in Rafah" - operation must end "without delay". Expresses "indignation" with Rafah attack. Israel must "immediately halt its military offensive". Condemns Oct 7 and rockets webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
Russia 🇷🇺
"Bloody military operation of 7 months"
"Israel continues to indiscriminately bomb" Rafah despite the ICJ/UNSC
Rafah "condemned by absolute majority of intl community"
"we condemn" Rafah "war crimes". Israel must comply with IHL webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
Japan 🇯🇵
"unimaginable suffering", "starvation and disease on the rise", "no safe space in Gaza".
"Opposes full scale military operation in Gaza"
Calls for ceasefire
(does not specifically refer to the May 26 attack)
Slovenia 🇸🇮
rejects military operations in Gaza
"our worst fears [re Rafah] have come true" due to the attack.
"Firmly condemns the strike on displaced persons in Rafah"
Rafah strike not an isolated event. Violations not being investigated webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
Ecuador 🇪🇨
"Images [from Rafah attack] are difficult to forget", "time to put an end to the cycle of violence" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
Guyana 🇬🇾
"Displaced Palestinians sheltering in tents were set on fire after Israeli airstrikes"
"there is no safe place in Gaza". Calls for swift independent int'l investigation.
"no justification for killing of innocent civilians" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
South Korea 🇰🇷
"Israel claims that the killing of dozens of civilians in tents ... was a tragic mistake, but when such instances are repeated again and again... it would be difficult to regard them as just mistakes" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
UK 🇬🇧
"appalled by the deeply distressing scenes emerging from Rafah following Israeli airstrikes"
"call on Israel to launch swift comprehensive and transparent investigation"
"do not support" military operation in Rafah without a humanitarian plan webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
Algeria 🇩🇿
"Haunting images from Gaza flood our screens"
"If they don't steer the spirit of humanity in all of us then words will be useless"
Israel "continues to cover up murders and commit what they say are tragic mistakes" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
Mozambique 🇲🇿
Resulting global outrage and condemnation [of Rafah attack] further enhances Israel's int'l isolation.
"condemn Rafah operation"
Israeli offensive "blatant violation of all laws of war" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
Palestine 🇵🇸
instead of halting its offensive Israel "has bombed people it has displaced". It is unbearable "to hold a beheaded child in your arms". "Unbearable human suffering". "There is no red line imposed by legality that Israel has not crossed" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
Israel 🇮🇱
Rafah attack was a "precise strike", done with "extensive verification to avoid civilian casualties". "Fire broke out due to secondary explosions from terror munitions". "It is Hamas who must be held accountable". webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
UAE 🇦🇪
(on behalf of Arab Group)
The Rafah attacks are "unspeakable" and require "special condemnation". "The heinous massacre ... is merely the latest episode in this series of systematic war crimes against Palestinian people". Israel has defied IL webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k…
France 🇫🇷
(Already summarised this one above, but putting it here since it is easier to access than finding it in a 2 hour long live feed of the UNSC meeting)
To give you an idea how the IDF lies, a year ago, The Guardian published a piece quoting an IDF Spokesman that the IDF saw “no difference” between Hamas’ TV network and its military wing. The IDF quickly issued a “clarification” denying this. But now they want to normalise it so:
I agree with @owenjonesjourno here and I’d caution against views that only frame “terrorism” from its problematic uses in the Western authoritarian gaze. These views risk Eurocentrism and the erasure of non-Western experience. Terrorism doesn’t only exist in a West/non-West axis
Indigenous Peruvians talk about the Shining Path in the context of the Manchay Tiempo (the Time of Fear/Terror) and talk about their fight against them as a fight against “the terrorists”. In Argentina, collective memory has framed the Junta’s atrocities as “state terrorism”
Palestinians in the West Bank have every right to call Settlers “terrorists” and to counter accusations of terrorism with evidence of Zionist terrorism too. All of these discourses are not framed in the same problematic West/non-West binary
I can’t believe how incredibly stupid this is. I’m sorry this garbage deserves no scholarly respect. It’s called a *threshold* of harm BECAUSE THERE IS A THRESHOLD. Not every harm counts. If I call an IDF soldier a doo doo head I’m “harming” them, but not in legally relevant ways
Obviously, “shaping a narrative against the IDF” (even if that were what Gaza journalists do - it isn’t) is below that threshold. If Fox had done even the most basic of lit revs he would have come across the ICTY Prosecutor’s Report on the NATO Bombing Campaign of Serbia:
There obviously also is no *DIRECT* causal link between the “narrative” and operational constraints because a tv signal cannot stop a tank. The link is by definition INDIRECT and so journalists are not *directly* participating in hostilities by doing “unfavourable” coverage
I don’t get this viral trend of extremist Zionists sharing long-form testimonials about why they wont go on his show. It’s a bizarro negative-earth virtue signalling where it makes you popular to advertise you care about defending war crimes too much to tolerate any pushback
Yes, he interrupts his guests. Boo hoo, how mean. Are you serious? You’re defending one of the worst atrocities of this century and you’re the victim? Seriously these porcelain dolls would not last a day as Palestinians.
Imagine being genocided for 2 years, literally having your children shot in the head by people looting the underwear of the women they killed to humilliate them. You go on any tv show and before you can even say a word you are asked if you condemn the violence done to them first
This is… not a very good argument? Of course the meaning of the sky has changed over time (and space). From hunter gatherers tracing stars for navigation to the home of [the] God[s] to modern-day astrophysics, the sky has *meant* many different things for many different people
You can argue the “nature” of the sky never changed, that it was a constant regardless of social meaning all you want. When you see a beautiful sunset, you don’t think “this is lovely because it is just a giant ball of gas refracting light through water vapour at an angle”
Most of the time what the sky is and is not for us has little to do with astrophysics. Astrophysics is important, but it’s not the “one true nature” of the social construct we call “the sky”
For many Zionists it is simply methodologically impossible to conclude Israel is committing genocide, in Gaza or anywhere, bc Israel can’t genocide, period. Which is why it is important to be cautious with lists of scholars who say Israel is not committing genocide in Gaza
If they believe this because they believe Israel is incapable of committing genocide, as opposed to their reading of a definition, their view is unreliable. I explain this in further detail here:
“What is the Academic Consensus on the Gaza Genocide?”