Alonso Gurmendi Profile picture
May 27 โ€ข 100 tweets โ€ข 23 min read โ€ข Read on X
Tracking State Reactions to Israel's May 26 attack on Rafah ๐Ÿงต
Germany ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช
edition.cnn.com/middleeast/livโ€ฆ
Palestine ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ
Saudi Arabia ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
Palestine ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ
Slovenia ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ
Finland ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ
(via RT) Image
USA ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
(As of min 44:07)
USA ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

nytimes.com/2024/05/28/worโ€ฆ
Lithuania ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น
(Through RT) Image
Qatar ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
(Translation)
USA ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
(at 1:36:00)
"heartbroken and horrified" by Rafah attack
"do more to protect innocent Palestinian lives" and conduct an investigation
"Israel has a right to defend itself" but has "obligations to protect civilians"
"Israel must do more"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Sierra Leone ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
must "secure a ceasefire"
Rafah operation "exacerbated situation"
There are "breaches of IL" in Rafah
"condemns" Rafah attack. IHL must be complied. "Respect and protect civilians and civilian objects"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Switzerland ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ
"outraged" by the events. "condemn" Hamas' indiscriminate attacks. "strongly condemns" the Israeli strike in Rafah.
IHL requires parties to distinguish civilian/military objects; take precautions in attack
"opposition" to Rafah operation
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
France ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท
"calls for a ceasefire" and expresses "opposition to Israeli operation in Rafah" - operation must end "without delay". Expresses "indignation" with Rafah attack. Israel must "immediately halt its military offensive". Condemns Oct 7 and rockets
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ
"Bloody military operation of 7 months"
"Israel continues to indiscriminately bomb" Rafah despite the ICJ/UNSC
Rafah "condemned by absolute majority of intl community"
"we condemn" Rafah "war crimes". Israel must comply with IHL
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Japan ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต
"unimaginable suffering", "starvation and disease on the rise", "no safe space in Gaza".
"Opposes full scale military operation in Gaza"
Calls for ceasefire
(does not specifically refer to the May 26 attack)

webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Slovenia ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ
rejects military operations in Gaza
"our worst fears [re Rafah] have come true" due to the attack.
"Firmly condemns the strike on displaced persons in Rafah"
Rafah strike not an isolated event. Violations not being investigated
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Ecuador ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ
"Images [from Rafah attack] are difficult to forget", "time to put an end to the cycle of violence"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Guyana ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡พ
"Displaced Palestinians sheltering in tents were set on fire after Israeli airstrikes"
"there is no safe place in Gaza". Calls for swift independent int'l investigation.
"no justification for killing of innocent civilians"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ
"condemns bombing of IDP in Gaza"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
South Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท
"Israel claims that the killing of dozens of civilians in tents ... was a tragic mistake, but when such instances are repeated again and again... it would be difficult to regard them as just mistakes"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
UK ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
"appalled by the deeply distressing scenes emerging from Rafah following Israeli airstrikes"
"call on Israel to launch swift comprehensive and transparent investigation"
"do not support" military operation in Rafah without a humanitarian plan
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Algeria ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฟ
"Haunting images from Gaza flood our screens"
"If they don't steer the spirit of humanity in all of us then words will be useless"
Israel "continues to cover up murders and commit what they say are tragic mistakes"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Mozambique ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฟ
Resulting global outrage and condemnation [of Rafah attack] further enhances Israel's int'l isolation.
"condemn Rafah operation"
Israeli offensive "blatant violation of all laws of war"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Palestine ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ
instead of halting its offensive Israel "has bombed people it has displaced". It is unbearable "to hold a beheaded child in your arms". "Unbearable human suffering". "There is no red line imposed by legality that Israel has not crossed"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
Rafah attack was a "precise strike", done with "extensive verification to avoid civilian casualties". "Fire broke out due to secondary explosions from terror munitions". "It is Hamas who must be held accountable".
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
UAE ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช
(on behalf of Arab Group)
The Rafah attacks are "unspeakable" and require "special condemnation". "The heinous massacre ... is merely the latest episode in this series of systematic war crimes against Palestinian people". Israel has defied IL
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
France ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท
(Already summarised this one above, but putting it here since it is easier to access than finding it in a 2 hour long live feed of the UNSC meeting)

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Alonso Gurmendi

Alonso Gurmendi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Alonso_GD

Aug 23
I agree, we do not do enough to end gender apartheid in Afghanistan. So, let's see what is it we do thus far, so that we can understand what "too little" means, shall we? ๐Ÿงต
The Taliban have been subjected to sanctions for their treatment of Afghan women since 1999, through UNSC Resolution 1267. Image
In 2011, this sanctions regime was divided in two by UNSC Resolutions 1988 and 1989, so that it could cover both the Taliban and al-Qaida. The first of these created a Sanctions Committee so that sanctions could be properly updated Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 20
Stares in...
- Fanon's The Wretched of the Earth (1961)
- Pablo Gonzรกlez Casanova's Sociologรญa de la Explotaciรณn (1969)
- Edward Said's Zionism from the Perspective of its Victims (1979)
- Anรญbal Quijano's Colonialidad y Racionalidad/Modernidad (1991)

AND SO MANY OTHERS Image
Um... no. The whole point of the emergence of coloniality as a concept was that it is a set of relations, not a specific political process. You don't need "European settlers claiming res nullius" to establish a colonial relation. That just happens to be common in history. Image
The conclusion here would be that the Spanish colonial empire would not be colonial because Spaniards also "co-existed" (massive quotation marks there) with the indigenous people of the Americas Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 23
Judge Sebutindeโ€™s Dissent has resurrected old claims that Israel is entitled to all of Palestinian Territory under the doctrine of uti possidetis juris. While this has encouraged many anti-Palestinian-rights actors, the argument remains as unconvincing as ever ๐Ÿงต
Uti Possidetis is a doctrine that originates in the early 1800s during the independentist processes in Latin America, whose leaders used this Roman law concept to claim that colonial internal borders would continue after independence as the intโ€™l borders of the new Latin states
In simple terms, therefore, the doctrine holds that the territory of the Viceroyalty of Peru is the same as the territory of the (now independent) Republic of Peru. Its a simple and intuitive way to solve the uncertainty of the transition to independence
Read 22 tweets
Jul 20
Tracking state reactions to the ICJ's Advisory Opinion on Israel's Policies and Practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory ๐Ÿงต
Read 39 tweets
Jul 19
From reading the Separate Opinions, it seems that except for Judge Sebutinde, the Court did not have many profound disagreements. This is important considering prior experience with the Court (remember Comma-Gate). Here, things seemed pretty straght-forward. Some thoughts ๐Ÿงต
Abraham (๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท), Tomka (๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ) and Aurescu (๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด) disagreed with the majority that the occupation could become illegal as a whole. They rather believed that Israel was doing illegal things in the context of an otherwise normal occupation Image
In a very radical and divergent position, Sebutinde (๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ) does not seem to believe that the OPT is occupied at all but that is rather simply a disputed territory. At several points she talks of an "alleged occupation" or territory "considered occupied" Image
Read 32 tweets
Jul 19
"yeah yeah but it doesn't matter anyway"
Sure, this Opinion will not stop Israel in Gaza. But there's some things you should consider before dismissing this historic Opinion... ๐Ÿงต
This case was never meant to be a reaction to Gaza. It began in Jan. 2023 as part of a broader effort to use the law in defence of Palestinian rights. It is meant to help increase the tools at the disposal of Palestinians. In this regard, it has been extremely successful
The ICJ, the highest tribunal on intl law, has essentially confirmed that Israel is an apartheid state, that it must dismantle all settlements and that it must allow the return of those Palestinians it displaced. This alone is huge but not because of what it can accomplish today
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(