USA ๐บ๐ธ
(at 1:36:00)
"heartbroken and horrified" by Rafah attack
"do more to protect innocent Palestinian lives" and conduct an investigation
"Israel has a right to defend itself" but has "obligations to protect civilians"
"Israel must do more" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
Sierra Leone ๐ธ๐ฑ
must "secure a ceasefire"
Rafah operation "exacerbated situation"
There are "breaches of IL" in Rafah
"condemns" Rafah attack. IHL must be complied. "Respect and protect civilians and civilian objects" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
Switzerland ๐จ๐ญ
"outraged" by the events. "condemn" Hamas' indiscriminate attacks. "strongly condemns" the Israeli strike in Rafah.
IHL requires parties to distinguish civilian/military objects; take precautions in attack
"opposition" to Rafah operation webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
France ๐ซ๐ท
"calls for a ceasefire" and expresses "opposition to Israeli operation in Rafah" - operation must end "without delay". Expresses "indignation" with Rafah attack. Israel must "immediately halt its military offensive". Condemns Oct 7 and rockets webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
Russia ๐ท๐บ
"Bloody military operation of 7 months"
"Israel continues to indiscriminately bomb" Rafah despite the ICJ/UNSC
Rafah "condemned by absolute majority of intl community"
"we condemn" Rafah "war crimes". Israel must comply with IHL webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
Japan ๐ฏ๐ต
"unimaginable suffering", "starvation and disease on the rise", "no safe space in Gaza".
"Opposes full scale military operation in Gaza"
Calls for ceasefire
(does not specifically refer to the May 26 attack)
Slovenia ๐ธ๐ฎ
rejects military operations in Gaza
"our worst fears [re Rafah] have come true" due to the attack.
"Firmly condemns the strike on displaced persons in Rafah"
Rafah strike not an isolated event. Violations not being investigated webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
Ecuador ๐ช๐จ
"Images [from Rafah attack] are difficult to forget", "time to put an end to the cycle of violence" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
Guyana ๐ฌ๐พ
"Displaced Palestinians sheltering in tents were set on fire after Israeli airstrikes"
"there is no safe place in Gaza". Calls for swift independent int'l investigation.
"no justification for killing of innocent civilians" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
South Korea ๐ฐ๐ท
"Israel claims that the killing of dozens of civilians in tents ... was a tragic mistake, but when such instances are repeated again and again... it would be difficult to regard them as just mistakes" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
UK ๐ฌ๐ง
"appalled by the deeply distressing scenes emerging from Rafah following Israeli airstrikes"
"call on Israel to launch swift comprehensive and transparent investigation"
"do not support" military operation in Rafah without a humanitarian plan webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
Algeria ๐ฉ๐ฟ
"Haunting images from Gaza flood our screens"
"If they don't steer the spirit of humanity in all of us then words will be useless"
Israel "continues to cover up murders and commit what they say are tragic mistakes" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
Mozambique ๐ฒ๐ฟ
Resulting global outrage and condemnation [of Rafah attack] further enhances Israel's int'l isolation.
"condemn Rafah operation"
Israeli offensive "blatant violation of all laws of war" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
Palestine ๐ต๐ธ
instead of halting its offensive Israel "has bombed people it has displaced". It is unbearable "to hold a beheaded child in your arms". "Unbearable human suffering". "There is no red line imposed by legality that Israel has not crossed" webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ
Rafah attack was a "precise strike", done with "extensive verification to avoid civilian casualties". "Fire broke out due to secondary explosions from terror munitions". "It is Hamas who must be held accountable". webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
UAE ๐ฆ๐ช
(on behalf of Arab Group)
The Rafah attacks are "unspeakable" and require "special condemnation". "The heinous massacre ... is merely the latest episode in this series of systematic war crimes against Palestinian people". Israel has defied IL webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโฆ
France ๐ซ๐ท
(Already summarised this one above, but putting it here since it is easier to access than finding it in a 2 hour long live feed of the UNSC meeting)
Thread of Islamophobic and still un-community-noted tweets calling the AfD-supporting, Greater-Israel-advocate atheist attacker an โIslamistโ and/or blaming all Muslims for his crimes.๐งต
This thread is making the rounds, so let's test it. Why is it problematic to craft a standard so narrow that it concludes there was no genocide in Croatia/Gaza? Well, let's apply it to something we know was a genocide and see where we land. Let's imagine it's Germany in mid 1941
I don't think I need to convince you that The Holocaust was a genocide. It obviously was. It is the paradigmatic genocide. But where we may find some disagreement is *when* - when did the Holocaust become a genocide?
If you're like me, and you define genocid *broadly*, you'd say as early as 1935 with the Nuremberg Laws. If genocide is, to quote Lemkin, "the destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group", then it was these laws that made it impossible to be collectively "Jewish"
Many are asking me what is a โPlatt Amendmentโ, so here it goes.
After the 1898 Spanish-American War, the US ended up occupying Cuba. They did not want to annex it, because cheap Cuban sugar was bad for Coloradoโs sugar beets industry, so the Senate came up with a compromise ๐งต
The US would not annex Cuba and end its occupation on condition that the new independent Cuban republic amended its constitution to specifically state the following:
โThat the government of Cuba consents that the United States may exercise the right to intervene for the preservation of Cuban independence, the maintenance of a government adequate for the protection of life, property, and individual liberty (โฆ)โ.
The result was the incorporation of Cuba into a form of US suzerainty. It marked the beginning decades of US imperialism in the Caribbean. By 1904, Roosevelt declared that the US would be the regionโs โpolice manโ, saying:
โChronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention by some civilized nation, and in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United Sates to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an international police powerโ.
This is an incredibly racist worldview. It essentialises Muslims into a single category (โthe dominatorsโ) against the overwhelming evidence that Israelโs own security actually depends on Muslim allies like Jordan, Egypt, the Gulf states
It also discriminates against Muslim Israelis who are looked down as receiving the favour of rights in a non-Muslim state. Democracy is based on the idea that human rights protect minorities from the dictatorship of the majority, not on the mercy of the democratic dictators
It discriminates against Palestinians by erasing their own struggle for survival as they are killed by the tens of thousands and starved by the millions. They are rendered โpotential dominatorsโ that must be contained by the supposed democracy of apartheid
Tracking state reactions to the ICC Arrest Warrants against Netanyahu, Gallant, & Deif ๐งต
Methodology notes:
Except for key actors (Israel, Palestine, US) I will only track MFA, HoS and HoG statements.
Simple retweets of the ICC press release are not counted
Hen likes to portray himself as the friendly face of genocide denial, which is why him joining the talking point du jour, about the CIA estimating population growth in Gaza as proof there is no genocide, is rather out of character. It is a really bad & violent argument ๐งต
Hen doesnโt specifically say it, but the claim is there between the lines: โif population grew, there canโt be a genocide under wayโ. This is of course patently false from the definition of genocide alone. Population decrease is simply not part of it
In fact, only one item of the definition (item a) could potentially lead to population decrease. Items b, c, d, and e can be carried out without any impact on population growth. Whatโs more, they can be committed without a single person dying. Genocide โ mass killing