Alonso Gurmendi Profile picture
May 27, 2024 โ€ข 100 tweets โ€ข 23 min read โ€ข Read on X
Tracking State Reactions to Israel's May 26 attack on Rafah ๐Ÿงต
Germany ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช
edition.cnn.com/middleeast/livโ€ฆ
Palestine ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ
Saudi Arabia ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
Palestine ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ
Slovenia ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ
Finland ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ
(via RT) Image
USA ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
(As of min 44:07)
USA ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

nytimes.com/2024/05/28/worโ€ฆ
Lithuania ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น
(Through RT) Image
Qatar ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
(Translation)
USA ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
(at 1:36:00)
"heartbroken and horrified" by Rafah attack
"do more to protect innocent Palestinian lives" and conduct an investigation
"Israel has a right to defend itself" but has "obligations to protect civilians"
"Israel must do more"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Sierra Leone ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
must "secure a ceasefire"
Rafah operation "exacerbated situation"
There are "breaches of IL" in Rafah
"condemns" Rafah attack. IHL must be complied. "Respect and protect civilians and civilian objects"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Switzerland ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ
"outraged" by the events. "condemn" Hamas' indiscriminate attacks. "strongly condemns" the Israeli strike in Rafah.
IHL requires parties to distinguish civilian/military objects; take precautions in attack
"opposition" to Rafah operation
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
France ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท
"calls for a ceasefire" and expresses "opposition to Israeli operation in Rafah" - operation must end "without delay". Expresses "indignation" with Rafah attack. Israel must "immediately halt its military offensive". Condemns Oct 7 and rockets
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ
"Bloody military operation of 7 months"
"Israel continues to indiscriminately bomb" Rafah despite the ICJ/UNSC
Rafah "condemned by absolute majority of intl community"
"we condemn" Rafah "war crimes". Israel must comply with IHL
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Japan ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต
"unimaginable suffering", "starvation and disease on the rise", "no safe space in Gaza".
"Opposes full scale military operation in Gaza"
Calls for ceasefire
(does not specifically refer to the May 26 attack)

webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Slovenia ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ
rejects military operations in Gaza
"our worst fears [re Rafah] have come true" due to the attack.
"Firmly condemns the strike on displaced persons in Rafah"
Rafah strike not an isolated event. Violations not being investigated
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Ecuador ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ
"Images [from Rafah attack] are difficult to forget", "time to put an end to the cycle of violence"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Guyana ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡พ
"Displaced Palestinians sheltering in tents were set on fire after Israeli airstrikes"
"there is no safe place in Gaza". Calls for swift independent int'l investigation.
"no justification for killing of innocent civilians"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ
"condemns bombing of IDP in Gaza"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
South Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท
"Israel claims that the killing of dozens of civilians in tents ... was a tragic mistake, but when such instances are repeated again and again... it would be difficult to regard them as just mistakes"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
UK ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
"appalled by the deeply distressing scenes emerging from Rafah following Israeli airstrikes"
"call on Israel to launch swift comprehensive and transparent investigation"
"do not support" military operation in Rafah without a humanitarian plan
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Algeria ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฟ
"Haunting images from Gaza flood our screens"
"If they don't steer the spirit of humanity in all of us then words will be useless"
Israel "continues to cover up murders and commit what they say are tragic mistakes"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Mozambique ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฟ
Resulting global outrage and condemnation [of Rafah attack] further enhances Israel's int'l isolation.
"condemn Rafah operation"
Israeli offensive "blatant violation of all laws of war"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Palestine ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ
instead of halting its offensive Israel "has bombed people it has displaced". It is unbearable "to hold a beheaded child in your arms". "Unbearable human suffering". "There is no red line imposed by legality that Israel has not crossed"
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
Rafah attack was a "precise strike", done with "extensive verification to avoid civilian casualties". "Fire broke out due to secondary explosions from terror munitions". "It is Hamas who must be held accountable".
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
UAE ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช
(on behalf of Arab Group)
The Rafah attacks are "unspeakable" and require "special condemnation". "The heinous massacre ... is merely the latest episode in this series of systematic war crimes against Palestinian people". Israel has defied IL
webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/kโ€ฆ
France ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท
(Already summarised this one above, but putting it here since it is easier to access than finding it in a 2 hour long live feed of the UNSC meeting)

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Alonso Gurmendi

Alonso Gurmendi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Alonso_GD

Oct 12
The nominal debate about sexual organs is a rather dumb one. You either think gender is assigned or innate and frankly that is of little consequence. The consequential discussion is why you think that: itโ€™s either fragile masculinity or concern over safety in private spaces /1
IMO the latter is the only valid reason. I donโ€™t care if a dude is scared that he will โ€œaccidentallyโ€ be attracted to a trans woman and hit on her. Deal with your own insecurities without trampling on other peopleโ€™s rights. But safety in private spaces or fairness in sports? Sure
Hereโ€™s the thing though: safety and fairness are not โ€œtrans issuesโ€. A fully cis male bathroom can be unsafe for a little boy (hi Catholic Church). Privacy concerns can be addressed with lockable personal booths. Transness is not the reason why private spaces can be unsafe
Read 5 tweets
Sep 21
Piers Morgan approaches taxonomy as an ontological phenomenon. Categories are objective, universal and true. He never worries whether a tomato is a vegetable or a fruit, humans have perfectly taxonomized nature and categories never overlap. Hence he thinks this is a clever gotcha
The problem is @EdwardJDavey apparently agrees with him, but has to assume a pro trans position for political reasons. So he is confronted with an impossible problem: his categories are ontological, but his position is not. He cannot resolve the conflict and this is the result
Gender theory and feminism are not about ontological categories. Women are *not* ontologically (by the very fact of being women) the "weaker sex"; they don't "belong in the kitchen"; or "born to be mothers". This is why de Beauvoir said one is not โ€œborn a woman, but becomes oneโ€
Read 7 tweets
Sep 16
Unsurprisingly, Elliotโ€™s conclusion is based on a misunderstanding of the applicable law. The statement โ€œinference to genocide requires that no other reasonable explanation existโ€ isโ€ฆ letโ€™s say inexact.
The applicable test is not โ€œcan you *explain* what Israel is doing *as a whole* through any reasonable explanation other than genocideโ€, but rather whether intent to destroy can be reasonably inferred from a specific pattern of conduct
So saying โ€œit is more reasonable to explain Israelโ€™s actions as trying to destroy Hamas and save hostages, than commiting genocideโ€ is not really what the test requires. What is the specific pattern of conduct that Elliot is examining here? None. He is making an abstract argument
Read 12 tweets
Sep 12
This is what I call โ€œlegal vulturingโ€. Salo loiters above the text looking for anything he can slap a red underline and claim โ€œhe is the only one who noticedโ€. Itโ€™s bad faith work that deserves no serious engagement. So let me treat this like the piece of disinformation it is ๐Ÿงต Image
Salo claims there is a secret paragraph 141 that scholars ignore on purpose to deny Israel a right to self defence. But article 141 is part of a subsection of the Opinion dealing specifically with self-defence. It goes from ยง138 to ยง142.
As Salo shows, in ยง139, the ICJ concludes that art. 51 of the UN Charter, which sets out the right of self defence, is not applicable to Israelโ€™s actions in Palestine because

1) the threat it claims is not imputable to a state and article 51 only applies between states Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 11
So far Iโ€™ve seen the ongoing collapse of US hegemony as a protracted process of imperial decline, driven by a rally-to-the-flag retreat from the world known as โ€œMAGAโ€. But now Iโ€™m wondering if that rally to the flag will actually lead to a much more violent and sudden process
The US has a heavily armed population which lacks access to mental healthcare and social safety nets. Increasingly, the random and senseless school shooting is being overshadowed by the targeted political assassination as the go-to โ€œexhaust ventโ€ of these social processes
Obviously, this is terrible. A Democratic representative, a healthcare CEO, a conservative commentator and the attempted assassination of the current president canโ€™t be dismissed anymore as fluke accidents. Arguably, some are choosing to do this instead of mass shootings
Read 6 tweets
Sep 6
The IDFโ€™s new international hasbara law excuse to justify imposing conditions of life that make civilian life in Gaza impossible seems to be that the military advantage of destroying a camera justifies the โ€œincidentalโ€ civilian harm of dozens of homes destroyed
Imagine for a second this logic replayed for residential buildings in Tel Aviv. Thereโ€™s security cameras managed by the city hall on top of the building and a Palestinian group is planning to attack the city. Thus, so the IDF does not use it, they blow up the whole building
It would be deemed one of the worst terrorist attacks in Israelโ€™s history. An act of โ€œbarbarismโ€ that should be condemned again and again. The logic behind it โ€œoh but we wanted to make average Israelis turn on the IDF so we need to pummel Tel Avivโ€ would be deemed insane
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(