Secret weapon deals and failed agreements—here's what really agreed on and what it means for the future.
🧵(1/15)
Putin brought his entire inner circle, including current and former defense ministers Belousov and Shoigu, foreign minister Lavrov, and prominent crony capitalists like Sechin, Timchenko, and Deripaska.
(2/15)
The delegation was so extensive that it became a subject of humor in Russia – with everyone out of the country, people joked about the ease of launching a coup.
(3/15)
Putin and Xi engaged in 2.5-hour talks, covering various topics, including the war in Ukraine and China's potential role as a mediator. However, Xi has shown little inclination to pressure Putin to end the invasion.
(4/15)
While a dozen agreements were reportedly signed with Beijing, they were of minor significance – for instance, Russia agreed to supply China with artichokes and beef offal, but no major breakthroughs were announced.
(5/15)
No solution was found for the issue of cross-border transactions. Due to US sanctions, Chinese banks have rejected about 80% of payments from Russia since late March.
(6/15)
There was also no progress on the Power of Siberia 2 gas pipeline, once touted by the Putin regime as a masterstroke to free Russia from its dependence on the European market.
(7/15)
However, what was made public is less important than what was not. According to British intelligence, China agreed to provide Putin with weapons for use against Ukraine.
(8/15)
This development builds upon the "no limits" partnership Xi and Putin declared in 2022, which set the stage for the Ukraine invasion. Putin likely had this declaration in mind when he announced the full-scale invasion days later.
(9/15)
China has been instrumental in sustaining Putin's war effort and undermining the effectiveness of Western sanctions and boycotts, with Beijing's support continuing to grow.
(10/15)
Despite maintaining that it would not arm either side of the war and rebuking Ukraine's Western allies for providing weapons and "fanning the flames of the conflict," China has been fueling Putin's assault with "dual-use" technologies.
(11/15)
Trade between the two countries reached $240bn last year and had already grown by almost 5% by the end of last month. The beneficiary is clear: China accounts for a third of Russia's trade, while Russia makes up just 4% of China's.
(12/15)
If Xi has now decided to supply Putin with arms, it takes the collaboration much further. This development should prompt the West to stop making Ukraine fight with one hand tied behind its back and provide all the necessary support to achieve serious successes on the battlefield.
(13/15)
China's supply of arms to Russia eliminates any hope of Russia exhausting its economy and stockpiles, and being forced to withdraw – only serious Ukrainian successes on the battlefield will suffice.
(14/15)
Letting Putin advance and take more territory in Ukraine sends a clear message to dictators around the world: might makes right, that borders can be redrawn by force. It sets an incredibly risky precedent that democracies shouldn't allow to happen.
`
(15/15)
I have decades of experience opposing the Putin regime.
Follow for more insight into how it operates and how it should be countered
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To truly hinder Putin's war effort, we need to get smart about sanctions and take real steps to undermine his regime.
1/12 🧵 Here are some concrete suggestions on how to do it right
One important step would be to grant refugee passports to Russians whose passports have expired. This will allow them to act freely, safe from the need to return and subject themselves to repression
2/12
Secondly, visas should be offered to highly qualified Russian specialists. This has a dual-pronged effect: it adds to the Western talent pool, and deprives Putin of people who could otherwise be exploited to develop new weapons of war
Here's what we know about Putin's new defense minister and what it means for the war in Ukraine.
🧵1/14
A year after Prigozhin's mysterious death, his critiques of Russia's military leadership seem to have resonated with Putin, leading to the replacement of Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu. 2/14
Like Shoigu, Andrey Belousov is not a military man. He hasn't even served in the army through conscription, which most Soviet men did. 3/14
Their methods have evolved to include recruiting local criminals and radicals via platforms like Telegram. 2/4
I am adamant that a stark distinction must be made between intelligence operations and sabotage. Intelligence gathering, despite its intrinsic challenges, fundamentally serves to build understanding and informed trust between nations. 3/4
Unsettling reality behind the pomp of Victory Day parade in Moscow:
Among those honored next to Putin were soldiers from units accused of war crimes in Ukraine.
🧵This event, meant to celebrate victory over fascism, now serves to justify Putin’s own fascistic invasion
The parade featured soldiers who fought in Ukraine, some from units accused of war crimes by Ukrainian authorities, identified @agents_media
For instance, troops from the 55th Motor Rifle Brigade, which allegedly held 350 Yahidne villagers captive in a school basement for a month, were among those marching
Imagine facing 10 years in prison because someone complained about you on social media.
This 67 years old pediatrician from Moscow faces a draconian sentence over ‘spreading fake news about the Russian army’
🧵Here's why this is both important and terrifying
Dr Nadezhda Buyanova will be held in a detention center until June 25 after the widow of a Russian soldier posted to a pro-Kremlin Telegram channel that the doctor had allegedly told a child that his father – another soldier killed in the war – was a ‘legitimate target’
What is remarkable about this is the speed with which the regime responded to the post. The day after the complaint on social media, Russia’s chief investigator Bastrykin launched a criminal case, police raided Dr Buyanova’s workplace, and her boss was fired