Meet Hind Khoudary. Tonight she's a star reporter for Channel 4. She's also famous for having informed on Rami Aman & other Gaza peace activists, getting Hamas to arrest them for the crime of doing a zoom with Israeli peace activists. Shame on you @Channel4 @C4Dispatches. 🧵🔽 /1
April 6, 2023: Gaza youth group founder Rami Aman holds a Zoom video call with 200 Israeli and Gaza peace activists to open a channel of communication between the two. He encourages participants to believe in peace and continue advocating for change. /2
April 8: Amnesty International’s former research consultant Hind Khoudary denounces Rami Aman in a series of vituperative posts. She tags three Hamas officials to call their attention Aman and his Zoom call. Screenshots here in this thread: /3
April 9: Hamas gunmen arrest Rami Aman. He disappears. His arrest is announced on Facebook by Hamas Interior Ministry spokesman Iyad El-Bozom, and reported by Reuters, Associated Press and AFP. /4 reuters.com/article/us-isr…
April 10: New York Times says @Hind_Gaza informed on the peace activist: “Freelance Gaza journalist Hind Khoudary posted angry denunciations on Facebook of Mr. Aman and others on the call, tagging three Hamas officials including Mr. Al-Bozom, to ensure it got their attention.” /5
April 11: Long-time Human Rights Watch official Peter N. Bouckaert condemns Hind Khoudary for informing on Rami Aman to the Hamas regime — and removes her from his private Facebook group for journalists. “You should be ashamed of yourself,” Bouckaert writes to Khoudary. /6
Bouckaert: “It is disgusting that a so-called ‘journalist’ got an activist for dialogue arrested by Hamas. Hind was in a journalist group I run on Facebook and I kicked her out immediately. Conflicts are resolved through dialogue and understanding, not hatred.” /7 @Hind_Gaza
April 12: At about 2:00 am Gaza time, Hind Khoudary’s Facebook post of April 8th—which denounced Rami Aman to the Hamas regime by tagging three of its henchmen—is deleted. Khoudary subsequently reports that it was Facebook that deleted her post. /8
@AmnestyUK @C4Dispatches @Basement_Films @Hind_Gaza April 12: UN Watch calls for release of Rami Aman, pointing out that Hind Khoudary was affiliated with Amnesty and that her Facebook profile page—even at the time that she denounced Rami Aman—listed herself as working with Amnesty International.
/9unwatch.org/amnesty4hamas/
@AmnestyUK @C4Dispatches @Basement_Films @Hind_Gaza April 12: UN Watch calls on @amnesty to launch an inquiry into why they hired someone with such an overt record of supporting terrorism as @Hind_Gaza.
@AmnestyUK @C4Dispatches @Basement_Films @Hind_Gaza @amnesty April 12: @Hind_Gaza doubles down, justifies her actions, decries “normalization” with Israel, calls dialogue with Israeli peace activists a “crime,” “collaboration with enemies.” /11
April 12: Hind Khoudary lashes out at NYT journalist @IyadAbuheweila for reporting how she informed on Rami Aman to Hamas: “I hope New York Times starts asking people before they highlight them in their articles...” Her denuciation of NYT is then echoed by Hamas TV: /12
Palestinian Journalists Syndicate condemns UN Watch for having called out Khoudary, and censures New York Times’ Gaza reporter @IyadAbuheweila for having reported on @Hind_Gaza's informing on Aman to Hamas “without obtaining her permission” : /13 samanews.ps/ar/post/413559…
April 13: UN Watch’s social media posts on Facebook and Twitter are widely shared.
Many urge Amnesty International to condemn their former research consultant Hind Khoudary for having informed on peace activist Rami Aman to Hamas. This was her post: /14 unwatch.org/amnesty4hamas/
April 13: Hamas-linked activist Ramy Abdu, former regional director of outlawed pro-Hamas lobby group “Council of European Palestinian Relations” (CEPR), supports Hind Khoudary, saying criticism of @Hind_Gaza violated her “freedom of expression.” /15
@Hind_Gaza April 13: Numerous other Hamas-linked social media accounts rally support for Hind Khoudary, as reported in an article attacking UN Watch on the Hamas-linked website Arab 48, a platform blocked by the Palestinian Authority. /16 arab48.com/%D9%85%D9%8A%D…
April 14: Hamas propaganda site Shehab News posts article defending Hind Khoudary. /17
April 14: Hamas bots launch massive campaign for Hind Khoudary with identical posts by fake accounts:
“@Hind_Gaza said nothing wrong”
“@Hind_Gaza said nothing to apologize for”
“I #StandWithHindKHoudary”
More:
April 14: Palestinian entities in print, social media and videos attack UN Watch, PA Minister of Women’s Affairs Amal Hamad praises Khoudary for helping to imprison Rami Aman. “Dr. Hamad expressed her solidarity and full support for Al-Khudari in the face of this campaign...
“Dr. Hamad emphasized the national position of all Palestinians rejecting the issue of normalization, stressing that what Al-Khudari expressed is a national position that expresses the Palestinian national decision.”
“Dr. Hamad added that resisting normalization is important at all times, as it constitutes an effective Israeli weapon used to undermine our struggle for the rights of our people. Anti-normalization, at this time, is an urgent necessity of struggle to protect our cause and its principle.” /19
Two months after PA Minister Amal Hamad openly supported the act of informing on Gaza peace activists to get them jailed and tortured by Hamas, the 🇨🇦 government of Justin Trudeau began to publicly endorse her, again and again:
April 14: Anti-Israel activists in Gaza discover that Hind Khoudary—who handed over to Hamas peace activists for the crime of “normalization” with Israelis—had herself written for an Israeli magazine. Khoudary apologizes. /21
“Regarding the issue of +972, at the time of the return marches, you know how weak our Palestinian media was in the English language, and I was trying to convey the picture as much as I could because I felt that I had a very heavy responsibility. I was trying to write as much as I can, publish as much as I can.
“The communication between me and +972 was a Palestinian editor, and seriously, I only knew that +972 was independent, with the right of return against the Israeli occupation, and I thought that this thing was not normalization, especially since I publish my articles as I want and with the Palestinian narrative and no one changes the terms I use.”
She continued: “I was thinking at the time that communicating with institutions like B’Tselem was allowed, for example, and what encouraged me most was that there were many activists who communicated with them and wrote about their concerns. But after I delved deeper into the issue...”
Khoudary added: “I apologize for my articles that were published on +972, even though they were almost a year ago...” alwatanvoice.com/arabic/news/20…
April 17: Hind Khoudary, still bitter at he New York Times for reporting her role in the arrest, imprisonment and torture of the Gaza peace activists, calls out departing correspondent @adamrasgon. /22
She just deleted it—but lucky we kept the receipts:
Here are screenshots of tweets deleted now by Hind Khoudary—most of them denouncing any dialogue with Israeli peace activists as a crime. @Hind_Gaza, did you delete these so that news organizations won't be ashamed of your complicity with Hamas? /23
Important 🧵 documenting Hind Khoudary's support for and ties to terrorism. We ask @Channel4News @C4Dispatches @Basement_Films: Is this in compliance with your journalistic ethics and professional standards? /24
@EFischberger
Shame on you @Channel4 @Channel4News @C4Dispatches @Basement_Films for giving a platform to a notorious Hamas shill who handed over Gaza peace activists to torturers, for which she was excommunicated even by a Human Rights Watch official who is extremely critical of Israel. /26
Hind Khoudary urged Hamas to “prove that it does not approve” of Gaza peace activists:
“I hope that summoning Rami Aman and his group is not just a summons. All normalization activities must stop and not expand further. I also hope that there will be an explanatory statement of the measures that will be taken to stop these activities. The government in Gaza must prove that it does not approve of the activities organized by Aman and his friends.” /27 facebook.com/HindUsama/post…
After Hind Khoudary's April 2020 posts to Hamas about Gaza peace activist Rami Aman, they arrested, imprisoned and tortured him. She wrote:
“Oh God, how much I hate Rami Aman, I hate him so much, I really hate him.
He has no shame, this person, oh my God.” /28 facebook.com/HindUsama/post…
Hind Khoudary urged Hamas to “prove that it does not approve” of Gaza peace activists:
“I hope that summoning Rami Aman and his group is not just a summons. All normalization activities must stop and not expand further. I also hope that there will be an explanatory statement of the measures that will be taken to stop these activities. The government in Gaza must prove that it does not approve of the activities organized by Aman and his friends.” /27 facebook.com/HindUsama/post…
After Hind Khoudary's April 2020 posts to Hamas about Gaza peace activist Rami Aman, they arrested, imprisoned and tortured him. She wrote:
“Oh God, how much I hate Rami Aman, I hate him so much, I really hate him.
He has no shame, this person, oh my God.” /28 facebook.com/HindUsama/post…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In Torino, 400 leftists attacked La Stampa newspaper, dumping manure, ransacking desks and books, chanting “Terrorist journalist, you're next on the list.”
“I condemn,” said Francesca Albanese, “but let this be a warning to the press to do their job...” ansa.it/sito/notizie/c…
2/ Government & opposition are condemning Albanese. Pina Picierno, progressive VP of European Parliament: “Violence is never a warning, and it condemns itself, without any ‘ifs or buts.’ Surprised but not too much, by the statements of Francesca Albanese.”
3/ Senator Filippo Sensi, also of the center-left Democratic Party: “Francesca Albanese's words about the fascist attack on La Stampa horrify me...” ilfoglio.it/politica/2025/…
TRAGIC: Francesca Albanese, the UN's de facto spokesperson for Hamas, says she can no longer use a credit card, rent a car, or open a bank account, due to the historic U.S. decision to sanction her.
“I am treated almost like Osama bin Laden, and I find it horrible, horrible!”
2/ Albanese: “I'm the first UN person to be sanctioned...
U.S. sanctions are very, very heavy.
The implications are enormous.”
3/ “It's really impairing as a person. It creates a chilling effect around you, because anyone who engages with a
U.S.-sanctioned person risks to be arrested and to be subjected to very heavy fines.”
⚡️ Exposé on UNRWA chiefs Philippe Lazzarini & Pierre Krähenbühl, Lebanon reps Dorothee Klaus, Claudio Cordone, Matthias Schmale, UNRWA deputies Gwyn Lewis, Hakam Shahwan, Thomas White, Munir Manna, Leni Stenseth: unwatch.org/the-unholy-all…
2/ See evidence of UNRWA teachers in a 3,000-member UNRWA Gaza staff Telegram group who cheered and celebrated Hamas’s October 7th massacre while at the same time asking when their UNRWA salaries will be paid.
⚡️ unwatch.org/unrwa-terrorgr…
3/ See the evidence that UNRWA for 30 years employed Fathi Sharif—the Hamas terror chief in Lebanon—to run their entire education system, putting a “teacher of Jihad” (as Hamas eulogized him) in charge of 65 schools, 2,000 teachers and 39,000 students: unwatch.org/wp-content/upl…
Jan. 15, 1964: UN Watch founder Morris Abram drafts UN anti-racism convention as member of UN human rights expert body.
Tomorrow: Loyal servants of Beijing & Tehran to be elected by acclamation to the successor UN human rights body.
2/ Meet 🇨🇳 Ren Yisheng. He served as a mouthpiece for the communist regime—primarily at UN human rights bodies.
Now he's going to switch roles by getting elected as a UN human rights expert.
Same guy who trashed a UN report on China's abuse of Uyghurs: archive.md/NWAtv
3/ Meet 🇮🇷 Afsaneh Nadipour. She's a 33-year veteran of the Islamic regime in Iran who defended their brutal crackdown on women's rights protesters. She’s an enemy of human rights.
Why are all our democracies silent ahead of her UNHRC election tomorrow?
.@GretaThunberg, while you're feasting once again on Israeli Navy sandwiches, remember that under international law—according to the UN—Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza, designed to stop Hamas from smuggling rockets and other weapons, is entirely legal.🧵 blog.unwatch.org/wp-content/upl…
2/ The UN's Palmer Report found that “Israel faces a real threat to its security from militant groups in Gaza. The naval blockade was imposed as a legitimate security measure in order to prevent weapons from entering Gaza by sea and its implementation complied with the requirements of international law.”
3/ “Although people are entitled to express their political views, the [2010] flotilla acted recklessly in attempting to breach the naval blockade. [T]here exist serious questions about the conduct, true nature and objectives of the flotilla organizers, particularly IHH. The actions of the flotilla needlessly carried the potential for escalation.”
Navi Pillay's UN inquiry on Israel just released a report accusing Israel of “genocide.”
We asked legal expert Salo Aizenberg to take a look.
Turns out the report is a complete travesty. See his devastating rebuttal here: 🧵
@Aizenberg55unwatch.org/un-watch-rebut…
2/ @Aizenberg55: “The UN Human Rights Council Commission of Inquiry’s report is fatally deficient: its reasoning is deeply flawed, its evidentiary base unreliable, and its methodology unsound.
It selectively misinterprets statements by Israeli leaders, accepts unverified Hamas casualty figures, disregards Hamas’s systematic use of human shields, relies on unverified media reports (such as by Al-Jazeera), and assumes that civilian deaths in Gaza are only the result of deliberate targeting by Israel.
Its omissions are equally striking. The report erases Hamas as an active belligerent; across its 72 pages, it never acknowledges that the IDF is engaged with a 30,000-strong fighting force that constructed a battlefield fortified with 500 kilometers of tunnels.
Such deficiencies strip the document of legal credibility and render it indistinguishable from propaganda dressed in legal language.”
3/ “Failure to prove dolus specialis: The specific intent to destroy a protected group is the central and extremely high bar in any genocide case. The Commission’s claim of genocidal intent fails on this threshold alone, relying on tortured parsing of statements, selective quotations, and conjecture rather than unambiguous evidence.”