🧵 Why Sepharadim in the MENA Didn't Need a "Haskalah"
Ashkenazim experienced a "wake-up call" upon leaving the schtetls during the Haskalah period (1770-1881).
The Haskalah, or Jewish Enlightenment, aimed to modernize Jewish life by encouraging Jews to integrate into European society, embrace secular education, and adopt Enlightenment values. This movement sought to bring Ashkenazi Jews out of the insular life of the schtetls and into broader cultural and intellectual currents.
As always, I am happy to debate and discuss.
🧵 Here are the topics covered in this thread:
❓ Why so Reclusive?
🌐 Broader Engagement
📝 Hebrew Language and Poetry
📚 Contributions to Science
⚖️ Rabbinic Authority
🚀 Embracing Modernity
📜 Continuing with Tradition
🌍 Cultural and Intellectual Exchange
❓ Why so Reclusive?
During the medieval period, antisemitic attitudes were institutionalized through church decrees, such as the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215, which mandated that Jews wear distinctive clothing and live in separate quarters—this awful treatment eventually evolved into schtetls and that reclusive culture.
🌐 Broader Engagement
Sepharadim were always engaged with the broader world, including sciences, mathematics, and philosophy.
This is why haRambam (1138-1204) wrote his "Guide for the Perplexed" to his student—addressing the current issues at the time.
HaRambam wasn't a lone wolf either; other Ḥakhamim like Seʿadya haGaʾon (882-942), Yehuḏa haLewi (1075-1141), Baḥya ibn Paquda (1050-1120), and Aḇraham ibn Daʾud (1110-1180) were part of the same Sepharadi (Geʾonic-Andalusian) Mesora, dealing with these issues for centuries.
This isn't to say it was a Golden Age (Das Goldene Zeitalter) either—a topic for another thread, but very much related to the Haskalah where it gets its name applied to the Jews.
📝 Hebrew Language and Poetry
The ongoing tradition in the Sepharadi world to address philosophical issues is robust. Elevating the Hebrew language and grammar and glorifying it in the face of the 'perfect Arabic' Qurʾan.
What the Wissenschaft des Judentums (Science of Judaism, early 19th century) did post and Eliʿezer Ben Yehuḏa (1858-1922) further advanced was a project built on the shoulders of the Ḥakhamim of the MENA.
This includes people like Dunash ben Labrat (920-990), who revolutionized Hebrew poetry by incorporating Arabic styles, and Yehuḏa haLewi, who adapted his poetic style to elevate Hebrew against the backdrop of Arabic literary excellence by returning to Biblical Hebrew styles.
And all the Sepharadi grammarians! Which are too many to list.
📚 Contributions to Science
The Haskalah primarily affected Central and Eastern European Jews and encouraged integration into surrounding societies, the adoption of modern values, and the study of secular subjects.
Sepharadim were already involved in these pursuits, from solving the quadratic formula (Aḇraham bar Ḥiyya haNasi, 1070-1136) to mapping the stars and advancing medicine of the time.
Yisḥaq ben Shelomo haYisraʾeli (855-955), a physician and philosopher, made significant contributions to medicine, writing influential medical texts that were used in Europe for centuries.
Another example is Aḇraham ben Shemuʾel Zakut (1452-1515), an astronomer who created astronomical tables that were crucial for navigation and mapping the stars, aiding explorers like Vasco da Gama.
⚖️ Rabbinic Authority
The Haskalah movement clashed with traditional Ashkenazi rabbinic authority, while Sepharadi scholars produced works such as the Rif's gloss (11th century), Mishné Torá (1170-1180), and Shulḥan Arukh (1563).
These works aimed to make Jewish law more accessible without excessive power structures, fostering more of a horizontal society.
🚀 Embracing Modernity
The Haskalah movement resonated differently among Sepharadim because our tradition already embraced and engaged with external knowledge and thinkers. This is also why the Nahḍa (later Arab Awakening Period, 19th-20th century) played out very differently for us in the MENA—it was welcomed.
The schism wasn't as deep; it only widened significantly post-1948 and into the 1960s when the Haredification—a topic for another thread took hold.
Sepharadi rabbis, like Ḥakham Ben-Ṣiyon Meʾir Ḥai ʿUziʾel and Raḇ Qooq (Kook), demonstrated an awareness of the modern era's fundamental changes, reflecting in their responses to the Nation-state of Israel.
📜 Continuing with Tradition
This adaptability is evident in Sepharadi rabbis' and intellectuals' continued relevance well into the modern period—there are more names, but this is a short list.
Figures such as Joseph de la Vega (1650–1692), whose "Confusion of Confusions" remains one of the earliest books on stock market dynamics, bridged traditional Jewish scholarship with contemporary economic thought. René Cassin (1887–1976), a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, played a pivotal role in drafting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, showcasing the integration of Jewish values with global human rights advancements. Esther Moyal (1873–1948), a journalist and feminist advocate, contributed significantly to Arabic and Hebrew literature, promoting women's rights and intellectual exchange. All are still very much a part of the Jewish community.
Sepharadi rabbis like Ḥakham ʿAbdallah Somekh (1813–1889) addressed technological advancements within Jewish law and supported women's education in schools, which was looked at differently in that time and place. Ḥakham Eliyahu Bekhor Ḥazzan (1847–1908) reformed Jewish education by incorporating modern subjects, demonstrating flexibility and adaptation to contemporary needs. Similarly, Ḥakham Zaki Cohen (19th century) established a boarding school in Beirut that combined traditional Jewish education with modern languages and secular subjects (through the “eastern lens”), illustrating the integration of modernity with tradition.
🌍 Cultural and Intellectual Exchange
These figures were active participants in broader intellectual and cultural currents, including reading Haskalah newspapers and integrating aspects of European Enlightenment thought without the same level of conflict experienced by Ashkenazi communities (though there are exceptions like in Ḥalab).
Scholars such as Norman (Noam) Stillman and Zvi Zohar document how Sepharadi rabbis and intellectuals responded to modernity in ways that preserved their cultural integrity while embracing new ideas.
This unique engagement highlights how Sepharadim navigated modernity through a continuous, evolving tradition that balanced innovation with deep respect for Tora.
For us, it was always a feature, not a bug.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Pan-Arabism failed us all—those who still hold to that pipe dream need to face its demise, learn lessons, and move on.
There is more to say on this topic, but I just wanted to write enough to entice people to think about it more and to think about it differently.
And as always, happy to debate and discuss.
Here are the topics covered in this thread:
🌍 Pan-Arabism: Origins and Aspirations
🤝🏽 Contributions to Arab Culture
💭 A Nostalgic Dream
👎🏽 The Failure of Pan-Arabism
🧠 Understanding Human Nature
🌍 Pan-Arabism: Origins and Aspirations
Pan-Arabism was a dream conceived by minorities in the MENA region during the Nahḍa period (19th to early 20th century). The Nahḍa, also referred to as the Arab Awakening, was a cultural movement that flourished in Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and the Maghreb.
It sought to modernize Arab societies in the European image while retaining their own identity, seeking equality and emancipation inspired by the Tanzimat Era (1839-1876)—a series of reforms that allowed for some equality for non-Muslims and subjects of the Ottoman Empire.
Arab nationalism emerged as a political ideology asserting that Arabs constitute a single nation, promoting Arab culture and civilization, celebrating Arab history, glorifying the Arabic language and literature, and calling for the rejuvenation of Arab society through total unification. This ideology is based on the premise that the people of the Arab world—from the Atlantic Ocean to the Arabian Sea—constitute one nation bound together by a common identity: ethnicity, language, culture, history, geography, and politics.
🤝🏽 Contributions to Arab Culture
This isn't to say there aren't kernels of truth in pan-Arabism. 'Arab' has evolved into a cultural marker rather than an ethnic distinction. This transformation has seen contributions from Jews and Christians alike, all of whom have enriched Arab culture.
From the Arab legal system's roots in Judaic law, with the early Jewish and Christian communities in Medina shaping Islamic legal thought, to shared philosophical ideas significantly contributing to each other's intellectual traditions, and contributions in music and literature, we have all lived in the MENA under the yoke of Islam.
Hence their support for it to forge a secular path for coexistence among Jews, Christians, and Muslims.
Early pan-Arabism likely resonated with secularists, Jews, Christians, and other minorities as it secularized Arab culture, distancing it from Islam. Promoting a shared language and culture, they transitioned from participants to active contributors during the Nahḍa.
The concept of Arab-Jews was born under pan-Arabism. Before, it was just Jews; you can read our works and poetry to note the distinctions: Ishmaelites/Arabs for Arabs/Muslims.
🧵 Judaism and Governance: Unpacking Misconceptions of Theocracy in Judaism
Judaism is often misconstrued as a theocracy, but this is a fundamental misunderstanding. There is a human tendency to draw parallels with what we know to comprehend the unfamiliar. While natural, this can sometimes misdirect us and oversimplify, especially in understanding the nature of Jewish identity.
A common misperception posits Jewish Law as religious—the term 'Religion' doesn't even exist in Hebrew. This view is shaped more by faiths that emerged from Jewish culture than by the reality of the Jewish experience itself. While well-intentioned, this perspective overlooks Jewish self-understanding.
Torath Moshe, central to Jewish life, is divinely inspired and written by the Prophet, Moshe Rabbenu. Yet, contrary to what some might assume, Judaism does not manifest as a theocracy. Its essence differs significantly from the religious frameworks of Christianity and Islam.
More to say, yet I've said too much in this thread already.
🧵 Here are the topics covered in this thread:
🏔️ "Jewish Governance and the Covenant at Sinai"
👨🏽⚖️ "Role of the Sanhedrin: Philosopher Kings"
⚖️ "Nomocracy in Jewish Law: Equal Before the Law"
📜"Biblical Historical Example: King Aḥaḇ and ʾIzeḇel"
🏛️ "Josephus on Jewish Governance"
📚 "The Rule of Law"
🏔️ Jewish Governance and the Covenant at Sinai
Jewish governance is based on the covenant at Sinai, which establishes the Law as the supreme authority, rather than any individual or group of leaders claiming divine right, or as one put it, a "Theocratic King."
Judaism's structure, established over 2,000 years ago by the Sanhedrin (Jewish Supreme Court), emphasizes key themes found in the ʿAmiḏa (national daily reflections), such as the return to Israel, the rebuilding of Jerusalem, and the restoration of Jewish sovereignty. These themes are deeply rooted in a legal and historical lineage (the messora of Ḥazal) and are not a matter of personal interpretation.
👨🏽⚖️ Role of the Sanhedrin: Philosopher Kings
Selection Criteria and Responsibilities
The Ḥakhamim who serve on the Sanhedrin are akin to Jewish "Philosopher Kings" or today's Nobel Prize winners. They are selected for their exceptional wisdom, virtue, and qualifications. Members must be deeply learned in Tora and proficient in both our culture and history as well as secular knowledge (sciences and philosophy). They are chosen based on their exemplary character, humility, fear of God, and good reputation.
Qualifications and Community Trust
They must also possess strong judicial skills and have received proper Semikha, an unbroken chain of ordination tracing back to Moses, granting them the authority to serve. Additionally, the community must recognize and accept them, ensuring they have the trust and respect necessary to lead effectively (Mishne Tora, Hilkhoth Sanhedrin).
You should consider refraining from engaging in Tafsir at-Tawrat or Sharīʿah Musa.
You excel at educating others about the different madhhabs (schools of thought) within Islam and strengthening the Ummah, which is crucial.
I will provide a detailed response accessible to all readers, and I apologize in advance for the length.
🧵 Here are the topics covered in this thread:
⚖️ "The Three Oaths: Part 1 - The Source and Its Legal Implications"
📜 "The Three Oaths: Part 2 - How Jewish Immigration to the Land Worked - Short History in Relation to the Oaths"
🕊️ "The Messiah in Judaism - A Short Rundown"
📖 "Biblical and Qurʿanic Quotes in Relation to the Land"
⚖️ The Three Oaths: Part 1 - The Source and Its Legal Implications
Regarding "Solomon’s Oaths," I believe you are referring to what's often termed "The Three Oaths," found in the Babylonian Talmuḏ, Kethuboth 110b-111a. There you will find an Midrashic interpretation three separate verses (2:7, 3:5, 8:4) from Shir haShirim (Song of Songs), attributed traditionally to King Solomon (maybe that’s where you picked up ‘Solomon’s Oath’).
The Talmuḏ here employs a type of biblical exegesis known as Midrash, which includes both Midrash Halakha and Midrash Aggadah—the latter being akin (but, I guess not really) to the esoteric interpretation of the Qurʿan known as taʿwil, which doesn't carry legal implications but offers metaphorical interpretations intended to educate or inspire rather than to legislate.
Ribbi Yose ben Ribbi Ḥanina, who lived around 250 CE, is quoted regarding these Oaths – but it’s important to understand the historical context; by then, the Jewish people had already experienced the loss of their temple in 70 CE, the Jewish rebellions of Bar Kokhḇa between 132–136 CE, and the Kitos War from 115–117 CE, which collectively devastated the Jewish nation. Though brief, the Palmyrene Empire's emergence between 260 and 273 CE highlighted a period of Roman weakness, yet Ribbi Yose’s Midrash was a caution against rising up during such turbulent times.
The oaths as outlined: 1. Israel should not return en masse to the land in defiance of global opposition. 2. Jews should not rebel against nations. 3. Nations should not excessively oppress Israel.
Jewish scholars like Seʿadiya ben Yoseph al-Fayyum Gaon of the Talmudic Academy of Sura (892 – 942), Ḥananel ben Ḥushiel (980–1055), Yiṣḥaq ben Yaʿaqoḇ Alfasi (1013–1103), and Maimonides (1138–1204), did not record these oaths as actual law – but for Jews, this underscored a significant historical caution within the Jewish community.
📜 The Three Oaths: Part 2 - How Jewish Immigration to the Land Worked - Short History in Relation to the Oaths
Jewish ʿAliya (immigration to the land of Israel) occurred incrementally across various periods—a large one I could think of off-hand is post-Inquisition with figures like Doña Gracia Mendes (1510 – 1569) negotiating settlements like Tiberias and Safed with the Ottoman, from Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent in 1558, and later during the Ottoman Tanzimat reform era (1839 - 1876), which permitted private land ownership and Jews in the diaspora pooled money to buy and settle the land and ultimately under the British, though at times the Arabs petitioned their arrival with the White Paper of 1939 (limiting Jewish immigration). The Jews constantly pursued international legitimacy, from the Ottomans to the British, as they were the regional owners in the most recent period, reflecting a nuanced fulfillment of these Midrashic injunctions rather than a contradiction.
The establishment of Israel wasn't simply a gift from the British or the League of Nations (UN). While the British played a role in the region's politics, it was the concerted efforts of both Jews and Arabs that ultimately led to the British withdrawal - and the UN's problem. Gaining acceptance from both the British and the United Nations as the state was established. This incremental return and eventual defense of their sovereignty, which was earned rather than granted, align with the first two oaths.
It involved a series of events, including a defensive war following Israel's declaration of independence, as Arab states launched an invasion. The UN alone doesn't decide who a country is, but its ability to defend itself does.
However, the last oath has historically been unfulfilled, as evidenced by consistent oppression over centuries, from the Crusades and the Inquisition to the Shoa (Holocaust) and various pogroms throughout history, from the Kishinev (1903) to Farhud (1941). Thus, while the first two oaths have seen attempts at adherence (slow migration not to offend those in power and permission to establish from the international community), the third has largely been ignored by the nations.
To reiterate, though, the “Oaths” are not legally binding and never have been part of Jewish law, but even if they had been – the History is clear.