We just filed complaints with the DOJ, EEOC, and Iowa Civil Rights Commission against @TysonFoods for alleged violations of law including:
‼️Employing illegal aliens over American citizens
‼️Racial discrimination
‼️Exploitation of child labor
THREAD:
/2 In light of shocking evidence of significant potential violations of law, our Center for Legal Equality filed a series of complaints related to the employment practices of Tyson Foods.
The complaints include…
/3 1️⃣A federal civil rights complaint filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for alleged discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
/4 2️⃣A complaint filed with the Department of Justice’s Office of Immigrant and Employee Rights Section for alleged discrimination against American citizens by Tyson Foods.
/5 3️⃣A complaint filed with the Iowa Civil Rights Commission based on facts suggesting that Tyson may be discriminating against American citizens and violating Iowa and other laws prohibiting the use of child labor in slaughterhouses and meat packing plants, respectively.
/6 4️⃣AFL also sent a cease and desist letter to Tyson’s CEO and Board of Directors demanding compliance with federal employment, immigration, and securities laws.
/7 The Biden Administration’s mass illegal immigration policy has had a devastating impact on American workers and communities. Notwithstanding the social and economic cost, large corporations, such as Tyson, have supported and encouraged the Biden Administration’s immigration actions.
/8 There is ample reason to suspect that Tyson prefers hiring aliens and, as a “joint employer,” alien minors over American citizens throughout its labor supply chain.
The evidence is…keep reading…
/9 For the years 2023 and 2024, Tyson reportedly committed $1.5 million per year for legal aid services for foreign workers and provided paid time off for when they attended court hearings.
Tyson does NOT provide similar benefits to American citizens.
/10 The Company reportedly employs 42,000 aliens, more than a third of its workforce, and “would like to employ another 42,000 if [it] could find them.”
/11 Tyson is part of the “Tent Partnership for Refugees,” a project of the Tent Foundation, Inc., which “mobilize[s] major businesses to connect refugees to work.” Companies that join the Tent Partnership for Refugees coalition promise to reserve employment positions for refugees – American citizens need not apply.
In 2022, for example, Tyson “committed to hiring 2,500 refugees over three years in the United States.”
/12 In 2023, it committed to “mentoring” fifty “refugee women,” fifty “Hispanic refugees,” and fifty “Afghan refugees” in Northwest Arkansas and across the United States.
/13 In its annual Sustainability Report, Tyson President & CEO Donnie King stated that the Company’s diversity goals include its commitment to continue to hire aliens. He said that the Company “recognize[s] the importance of welcoming diverse voices to the conversation—and then supporting them when they arrive—we have dedicated over $2.4 million since 2020 to support U.S. citizenship for immigrant employees.”
In other words, the special services provided to foreign employees, without equivalent special services being made available to U.S. citizens, unlawfully alter the national origin of the Company’s workforce, and discriminate against Americans.
/14 Tyson’s Security and Exchange Commission filings disclose that it considers race, sex, and national origin in determining executive compensation and in filling board seats:
/15 More below…
/16 AFL will keep fighting to protect American citizens, preserve the rule of law, and hold Tyson and other big businesses accountable for compliance without America’s civil rights, immigration, and workplace safety laws. aflegal.org/america-first-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨EXPOSED — Illegal aliens have had free rein in Fairfax, Virginia.
AFL has uncovered documents showing that Fairfax has refused to honor HUNDREDS of ICE detainers on criminal illegal aliens over the past year and a half.
Releasing lawbreakers has consequences.
Below are some of the horrible crimes allegedly committed by illegal aliens in Fairfax who should have never been in the country — and who could have been deported if localities worked with ICE.
🧵
Abdul Jalloh:
➡️ From Sierra Leone
➡️ Entered the United States illegally in 2012 under Obama
➡️ Charged with stabbing 41-year-old Stephanie Minter to death on February 23, 2026, at a bus stop
➡️ Previously arrested more than 30 times without being deported
🏛️VICTORY: This week, SCOTUS issued its landmark decision in Trump v. Slaughter:
Officials who exercise the President’s executive power must be removable by him at will.
Statutory restrictions on the President’s removal of such officers VIOLATE the separation of powers.
AFL, alongside co-counsel Mitchell Law PLLC, filed an amicus brief in Slaughter, urging the Court to restore constitutional order by overruling Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (Humphrey’s Executor).
By overruling Humphrey’s Executor, the Court:
➡️Reaffirms the separation of powers
➡️Ends Congress’s unconstitutional interference in executive functions
➡️Returns accountability to the American people
AFL and @KenPaxtonTX just secured a federal court order PERMANENTLY ENDING an illegal Biden-era backdoor amnesty program that allowed immigration judges to indefinitely freeze removal proceedings against illegal aliens.
Today, AFL and @TXAG filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas challenging the Biden Department of Justice’s “Administrative Closure Rule,” which allowed immigration judges to indefinitely pause immigration court cases against illegal aliens.
@TXAG The same day the lawsuit was filed, the parties reached a settlement, and the court entered a final consent judgment vacating the rule and permanently enjoining its enforcement.
An illegal rule that allowed illegal aliens to remain in the United States indefinitely is now dead.
America First Legal and @SchaerrJaffeLlp just secured a huge win for parental rights — vindicating the rights of families fighting against California’s radical attempt to hide children’s “gender transitions” from parents.
2/ In City of Huntington Beach v. Newsom, the Ninth Circuit entered a preliminary injunction blocking key provisions of AB 1955.
This law forced schools to keep parents in the dark about their child’s sexual orientation, “gender identity,” or gender expression — unless the child consented. California tried to insert the State between parents and their kids.
3/ The court, reconsidering in light of the Supreme Court’s landmark Mirabelli v. Bonta decision, held that Plaintiff-Parents “very likely have standing” and that parents — not the State — have primary authority over the upbringing and education of their children.
🚨BREAKING — New documents obtained by AFL reveal Biden’s DOJ weaponized federal law enforcement against parents at school board meetings despite warnings from FBI officials and the National Sheriffs’ Association.
AFL obtained the documents from the U.S. Department of Justice in its ongoing lawsuit over Attorney General Merrick Garland’s infamous October 4, 2021 memorandum targeting concerned parents at school board meetings.
On October 4, 2021 — the day the memo was released — FBI Deputy Assistant Director Jay Greenberg emailed the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, stating the FBI had “some concern.”
He requested “additional time to engage” before messaging about the infamous memo went out.
🚨BREAKING — AFL filed complaints demanding federal investigations into Chicago, San Francisco, and Loudoun County Public Schools for illegal policies that socially transition children and keep parents in the dark.
The districts’ superintendents testify before Congress June 10.
AFL’s complaints, filed with the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Education, detail serious violations of federal law by:
🏫 Chicago Public Schools
🏫 San Francisco Unified School District
🏫 Loudoun County Public Schools
The complaints detail violations of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution through radical policies adopted by each of the school districts.