Beefeater Profile picture
May 29 13 tweets 21 min read Read on X
The Game of Clans in Russia. A deep dive into the deadly game involving clans of the Kremlin.

This is a 10 page thread - skip to the end for an audio narration if you want to listen to it at your convenience!

In the last month, five high-ranking Russian military officials have been arrested on corruption charges in what amounts to an unprecedented purge, coinciding with the dismissal of longtime Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu.

Sources close to the Kremlin say that the Defense Ministry shake-up and Vladimir Putin’s post-inauguration personnel changes are largely the result of an “inter-clan war” among elites in President Vladimir Putin’s inner circle.

Despite the fall of communism nearly three decades ago, Russian leaders have continued to pursue illiberalism and authoritarianism – especially Vladimir Putin, whose popularity remains high even as he plunders the country’s financial assets. Putin’s ability to strengthen and manipulate the power vertical and its accompanying clan system are crucial to his control of Russia as a whole.

Contemporary Russian politics, starting in 1990 when the country declared its sovereignty and de-facto independence from the Soviet Union, has experienced all types of regime shifts.

The newly post-Soviet Russia began as a fragile democracy, albeit one that leaned more towards illiberalism than freedom and continued to endure hard authoritarian governance. Over the years it travelled down the path of greater totalitarianism

Meduza ran a thread (below) on how these clans operate behind closed doors, how they influenced Putin’s government reshuffle, and what clan dynamics can tell us about Russia’s future. You may find this an interesting read.

Two weeks before Vladimir Putin’s May 7 inauguration, Deputy Defense Minister Timur Ivanov was arrested on suspicion of accepting more than $10 million worth of bribes in the form of construction services.

Reportedly known as the “king of kickbacks” behind the scenes, Ivanov wasn’t exactly discreet about his dealings; he flaunted his extravagant lifestyle online, which eventually landed him the starring role in a 2022 investigatory video by Alexey Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation.

1/10
Next 👉 Corruption DNA in RussiaImage
Corruption is part of Russian DNA and culture, so the question is why this and why now?

The pattern started unfolding two weeks later when Ivanov’s patron and boss, Sergey Shoigu, was removed from his position as defense minister as part of Putin’s post-inauguration personnel reshuffle. Overnight, Shoigu went from leading the ministry in charge of implementing Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine to overseeing the Security Council — an advisory body that lacks any power to make political decisions.

In the days and weeks that followed Shoigu’s departure, four more Defense Ministry officials — Lieutenant General Yuri Kuznetsov, Major General Ivan Popov, Lieutenant General Vadim Shamarin, and procurement head Vladimir Verteletsky — met a fate similar to Ivanov’s and were arrested on corruption-related charges.

What is clear now is the Ministry of Defense is now going through a cull, and a lot of these people who were linked to Shoigu have been charged with corruption. In less than six weeks, six high-ranking Defense Ministry officials have fallen from grace. It might be argued that this is the result of an “inter-clan war” within Putin’s inner circle.

Putin has long been averse to change when it comes to the makeup of his inner circle and those at the top of his “power vertical.” Rather than refreshing his ranks with those who might prove more capable at effectively governing, he opts to keep his most-trusted allies in power — even if it means sending them to less-prestigious roles, as he did with Shoigu, and bloating his cabinet with newly crafted positions, like he did with Dyumin.

Such an arrangement, after all, has allowed him to preside over a thriving kleptocracy, insured by his ability to balance clan interests and their deeply entrenched patron-client networks. So, Putin’s decision to counterbalance the feuding clans through cabinet appointments shouldn’t come as much of a surprise since providing any one clan with too much power risks threatening his own.

However, Putin’s conservative modus operandi for personnel selection only serves to exacerbate any future succession conflicts that may arise when the curtain finally falls on him. His power vertical has grown ever more top-heavy since his recent appointments, and, although he might be dangling a few carrots in front of the Patrushev and Kovalchuk princes, Putin continues to obfuscate any indication of who he believes should become his successor.

2/10
Next 👉 Collapse of Russian societyImage
Collapse of Russian society

Moral degradation has engulfed not just the so-called elites in Russia, but the broader public, as well. The majority of the country’s population supports the barbaric aggression against Ukraine, and these same people wonder why Putin hasn’t wiped Ukraine off the face of the earth yet.

The war has divided Russian society: parents, poisoned by propaganda, call their children traitors for refusing to support aggression against a neighboring country.

Russia’s most successful and educated residents — scientists, entrepreneurs and developers — are leaving en masse. Those who oppose the war, who can’t or don’t want to leave, are paralyzed by fear, suspicion and apathy. As if Dementors have drained them of their strength and deprived them of hope.

The destruction of the foundations of the state

Putin turned 70 years old last year. We don’t know how true the many rumors about his serious illnesses are, but still few doubt that he will die relatively soon, based on life expectancy standards if nothing else.

In states with functioning institutions, the departure of a leader — whether from politics or to the next world — is an event worthy of the front pages of newspapers, but it does not determine a country’s very survival.

Reality is quite different in countries with broken institutions, like Russia. In eliminating all possible competitors and canceling elections, Putin has deprived Russia of guarantees for a legitimate and peaceful transfer of power. He has hung the future of the country on a very unreliable hook: his own life.

It will be difficult for Putin and his fragmented inner circle to agree on a successor, whomever they end up selecting. The war in Ukraine — or rather the military defeats there — have aggravated internal conflicts between Russia’s ruling clans to an extreme. It’s now obvious: we await a fierce struggle for the throne of an aging dictator - and it will be a clan based struggle.

3/10
Next 👉 Clans of the KremlinImage
The Clans of the Kremlin

Contrary to the pervasive myth that Russia is run by Putin alone, what truly drives the political and economic machinery in Russia today is competition between “clans,” or factions of government officials and/or business magnates.

Since the early 2000s, clans have consolidated around elites like former Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, Rostec CEO Sergey Chemezov, former Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev (now a presidential aide), and Putin’s purported “personal banker” and longtime friend Yuri Kovalchuk.

Each of these clan leaders has built up an extensive patron-client network of cronies whose government or corporate appointments and access to plundered state assets depend not on merit but on personal loyalty.

The rules of the game in this informal system are quite simple: clan leaders who gain access to Putin’s ear and stay in his good graces are rewarded with managerial control over institutions like state-owned enterprises, security agencies, and government ministries that manage the country’s most lucrative assets.

In turn, clan leaders distribute access to those assets amongst their own patron-client networks — for the guarantee of a kickback, of course — to bolster their own loyal power bases.

There is a view that Putin’s role in this corrupt bargain - is the arbitrator, balancing clan interests to ensure no single clan gains enough power to eventually jeopardize his own. Timur Ivanov’s arrest, however, threatened to throw this equilibrium into disarray.

St. Petersburg economists and lawyers

According to Associate Professor of Political Science John P. Willerton of the University of Arizona in the United States, reformist St. Petersburg economists and lawyers constitute a prominent group in the Putin team. Many of them have career and personal ties to Putin dating back to the early 1990s.

The Siloviki

Much foreign attention has been given to the security-intelligence elements, what Russians refer to as the siloviki. They began coming to power under Yeltsin, but this accelerated during Putin's premiership and presidency. A common view in Russia is that these siloviki are generally non-ideological, are corrupt, have a pragmatic law and order focus and have Russian national interests at heart.

They do not form a cohesive group. It is worth noting that Putin himself is a retired Lieutenant Colonel of the KGB.

Many of the members of the economic reform team, both in the presidential administration and the government, are drawn from the St Petersburg group. They are academically qualified, have significant administrative experience, and are often focused on the technical complexities of the country's system transformation.

They are - in general - committed to market development, privatization and the continued diminution of the state's role in the country's socioeconomic life. The liberal economists contend that the consolidation of democracy comes with improving the population's standard of living and developing the private sector. Prominent St Petersburg economists include Alexei Kudrin, Herman Gref and Putin's economic adviser Andrey Illarionov.

4/10
Next 👉 Yeltsin Family, Ozero and Shoigu clansImage
Yeltsin family clan

Another identifiable group are the remnants of the so-called "Family" - a term which originally referred to relatives and associates of the former president Yeltsin. Most senior members of the group have left the highest corridors of power, but some have been able to survive and secure influential positions.

During the final years of Boris Yeltsin's presidency, Alexander Voloshin, chief of the Presidential Executive Office, was considered to be the most influential figure within the Family group. Despite his obvious connections to Russian commerce, he was dominating Russia's politics of that time.

The Family group has also almost entirely lost its influence by 2004 after the dismissals of Alexander Voloshin (October 2003), Prime Minister Mikhail Kasyanov (February 2004) and some key figures of his Cabinet, but some of the group's members secured their political survival. Vladislav Surkov, initially being an aide to Voloshin, gained much influence, as well as Prosecutor General Vladimir Ustinov, who had leaned towards new Saint Petersburg elites and whose son had become Igor Sechin's son-in-law. Tycoon Roman Abramovich, who had leaned towards the Family group in the 1990s, also remained influential, as well as former Mass Media Minister Mikhail Lesin. Each of them, however, had already distanced away from the Family group by that time.

Ozero

Ozero is the name of a co-operative society headed, inter alia, by Putin. The co-operative administers Putin's substantial personal wealth generated over the course of his presidency. The immense financial power of members of the co-operative fundamentally creates a wealthy clique of new oligarchs capable of replacing the financial power of Yeltsin era oligarchs.

The Shoigu clan

Timur Ivanov wasn’t just a close protégé of Shoigu. According to experts like Hall, Ivanov was the Shoigu clan’s “wallet”: the figure responsible for keeping Shoigu’s riches safe and ensuring they’re “stuck away” in a tax haven somewhere.

“Generally, there had been an unwritten gentleman’s agreement that you didn’t go after “wallets” like Ivanov,” because they might decide to spill the beans about what their clan has been doing. It would also highlight quite how corrupt and kleptocratic the regime actually is.”

To be sure, the Defense Ministry’s deep-rooted corruption under Shoigu isn’t the only stain on the former defense minister’s record that likely factored into his reassignment. He is credited as being one of the staunchest advocates of launching Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, promising Putin a quick victory — something that clearly didn’t go according to plan.

As the war dragged on, Kremlin insiders and pro-war bloggers increasingly laid responsibility for the war’s hefty economic and human costs at Shoigu’s feet.

This criticism reached a boiling point in June 2023, when Wagner Group founder Yevgeny Prigozhin publicly accused Shoigu and the head of the Russian Army’s General Staff, Valery Gerasimov, of gross incompetence and intentionally deceiving Putin and the Russian public about the state of the war.

Although that standoff largely resolved itself after Prigozhin’s failed August 2023 mutiny and subsequent “mysterious” death, Shoigu’s rivals smelled blood in the water. Against this backdrop, Meduza’s Andrey Pertsev argues that Ivanov’s arrest can be seen as the first strike in a larger battle to topple Shoigu and attenuate his clan’s influence in the Kremlin.

5/10
Next 👉 The Chemezov clanImage
The Chemezov clan

The list of figures who had plausible motives for undermining Shoigu’s clan isn’t exactly short — there are many elites who would have stood to benefit from his ouster from the Defense Ministry. Nonetheless, one clan of elites embedded in Russia’s military-industrial complex stands out both for its long-term efforts to remove Shoigu from power and its public interactions with him following Ivanov’s arrest.

The key figure in this clan is a former KGB officer who worked with Putin back in his Dresden days — Sergey Chemezov. Since the early 2000s, Chemezov has overseen Russia’s key exports in the military-industrial sector, first as the CEO of Russian state-owned arms seller Rosoboronexport, and then in his current position as the CEO of Russian state-owned defense conglomerate Rostec.

Over the years, Chemezov’s influence in Russia’s military-defense complex has helped neutralize the ambitions of Defense Ministry officials like Shoigu, who might seek to monopolize the ministry’s assets and use those spoils to accrue political power.

Another staunch Shoigu rival and prominent figure in Chemezov’s clan is Viktor Zolotov, the head of Russia’s National Guard (Rosgvardiya). Zolotov had long endeavored to extend his influence over the Defense Ministry by lobbying for members of his own clan to replace Shoigu as defense minister.

Evidence of this inter-clan rivalry previously surfaced in a leaked April 2023 phone call, in which a Russian billionaire and a former senator discussed how Chemezov, Zolotov, and Rosneft head Igor Sechin had “teamed up” to “tear Shoigu the fuck down.”

Sources close to Putin’s administration believe it was this inter-clan conflict that ultimately became the deciding factor in Shoigu’s May 12 dismissal. After months of complaining privately to Putin that the defense industry’s slow weapons deliveries were to blame for the Russian army’s measly territorial gains in Ukraine, Shoigu brought this conflict into the public eye — a big faux pas in Kremlin infighting etiquette.

During a Joint Group of Forces meeting on May 1, Shoigu ordered the defense industry to increase the quantity and quality of weapons production, intimating that the army’s success — or failure — depended on it.

Because Rostec is the army’s largest defense contractor, Chemezov was none too pleased with Shoigu’s apparent effort to deflect responsibility onto him. That same night, a Russian politics Telegram channel cited government insiders as saying that Shoigu, in reference to Ivanov’s arrest, had accused Rostec (and, by extension, Chemezov), Chemezov ally and then-Deputy Prime Minister Denis Manturov, and Russian Security Council Chairman Dmitry Medvedev of “creating additional difficulties and interfering with the [army’s] plans.”

But Shoigu’s dismissal wasn’t quite the victory that the Chemezov clan had in mind. Firstly, the Chemezov clan’s ultimate goal was to replace Shoigu with one of their own, not simply to remove him from the Defense Ministry. Instead, Putin replaced Shoigu with Andrey Belousov, a Putin loyalist who doesn’t belong to any clan, thus denying the Chemezov clan an opportunity to make inroads into the Defense Ministry.

Secondly, although the Chemezov clan’s efforts likely influenced Putin’s decision to remove Shoigu, they by no means forced Putin’s hand. Shoigu’s dismissal ultimately served a strategic purpose for Putin: many began to attribute the army’s failure to achieve a speedy victory in Ukraine to Shoigu’s Defense Ministry, not least because of its reputation as a breeding ground for corruption.

Putin’s appointment of a technocrat economist as defense minister only further amplifies this message. As Hall notes: “[Putin] can’t afford to lose this war. And Belousov is going to be the man who [can] potentially reform the Ministry of Defense — if it can be reformed — to sufficiently continue this war for a while.”

6/10
Next 👉 The Patrushev and Kadyrov clansImage
The Patrushev clan

Another key switch-up that came from Putin’s post-inauguration appointments was Nikolai Patrushev’s transition from leading the Security Council — the position now occupied by Sergey Shoigu — to overseeing shipbuilding as one of Putin’s aides. Patrushev has amassed a significant power base of elites within Russia’s security services since climbing the ranks of the KGB in the 1970s.

However, because the makeup of Patrushev’s clan has ebbed and flowed over the years, which has resulted in more conditional alliances than long-lasting ones, many are left wondering if Patrushev’s new position might indicate that his clan’s influence is fading.

On paper, Patrushev’s new role is certainly a demotion, but he’s still going to be close to Putin. He’ll still see him relatively often, if not every day. So, I think for Patrushev […] maybe [it’s a demotion], but he still has access to the Tsar, and that, ultimately, is the important thing for him.” This might have been a more pragmatic play by Putin: because it’s a way to get access to new information, which is important for any autocracy in order to adapt.

But even if Putin’s intention was to limit Patrushev’s power, his clan moved up in the “power vertical” through another member’s appointment as Deputy Prime Minister of Agriculture: Dmitry Patrushev, Nikolai Patrushev’s son.

The Kadyrov Clan

The Kadyrovs are a political dynasty in Chechnya. The first generation, Akhmad Kadyrov, supported Moscow during the Chechen War and helped secure control of the region. The second generation Kadyrov, Ramzan, leads Chechnya now has benefitted from remaining loyal to the Moscow government, expanding his personal power greatly. During the war in Ukraine, he also sent troops to fight on the frontline and actively commented on course of the war.

However, rumors concerning Kadyrov’s health have been a consistent feature of late. Earlier on, the rumors claimed Kadyrov had suffered from kidney failure. More recently, reports suggest that Kadyrov was suffering from pancreatic necrosis in 2019, and his condition has worsened in the meantime. While Kadyrov released a clip of him exercising to divert public attention, speculation concerning his health is still rife.

Yet whether Kadyrov is healthy or not, one thing is sure: Chechnya will remain suppressed, even in a post-Ramzan Kadyrov situation. The stronger-than-expectation control of Moscow, Kadyrov’s dynastic strength, and the lack of sufficient opposition inside Chechnya will combine to sustain the status quo.

Kadyrov and his relatives have obtained great political trust in Moscow. Over the past 25 years, Kadyrov managed to build a dynastic rule in Chechnya, and one way or another this dynasty will play a key role in maintaining Chechnya’s stability after Ramzan Kadyrov.

Some reports indicated that more than half of the critical positions inside the Chechen government are held by relatives of Ramzan Kadyrov or members of his village. Besides politics and the military, the Kadyrov family also makes massive profits in Chechnya.

For example, in 2015 it was claimed that Kadyrov and his family imposed an unofficial tax upon Chechens. The French dairy company Danone also has plans to sell its Russia operations to a management team directly linked with the Kadyrov family.

Meanwhile, Kadyrov still shares the same interests as the Moscow government. Kadyrov’s family has gained massive economic and political privileges under the current system. It’s obvious that Kadyrovs are thriving under Moscow’s goodwill; thus, there is no practical reason for the family to challenge Moscow’s authority.

Ramzan Kadyrov is also preparing for the next generation to take over. Kadyrov’s elder son, Akhmad Kadyrov, has met with Putin. Although it was an unofficial meeting, the move seems a clear indication that Kadyrov intends to secure his son’s position in future Chechen politics.

7/10
Next 👉 The rise of the PrincesImage
The rise of the princes

Dmitry Patrushev is one of several “princes” — men with familial connections to Putin and his inner circle — to have received government postings since Putin’s fifth inauguration in early May.

Putin’s relative, Sergey Tsivilev, and Boris Kovalchuk —whose father, Yuri Kovalchuk, has been called the second-most powerful person in Russia and leads the banking and media asset-rich Kovalchuk clan — have also secured prominent appointments as the chairman of the Accounts Chamber and energy minister, respectively.

Putin’s decision to dole out key positions to the most powerful elites’ offspring not only harks back to Russia’s imperial era, as journalist Mikhail Zygar recently argued, but also hints at how Putin might be preparing for his eventual exit from power. Hall suggested that the appointments might be a kind of trial run for the young princes, adding that “the inner circle is, to an extent, perpetuating itself.” “It’s now passing its wealth and its control to its future generations.”

Against the backdrop of the inter-clan conflicts, the princes’ appointments also serve to hamper any sentiments of disloyalty or overreach within Putin’s inner circle. The Patrushev and Kovalchuk clans are particularly incentivized to play by the rules now that their princes’ stars are on the rise. As for Putin, he can sit back and resume his role as the main arbiter of clan interests while the princes and their respective clans compete to prove their loyalty as much as their competency.

8/10
Next 👉 The final TallyImage
The final tally

Sergey Shoigu’s departure from the Defense Ministry — along with the arrests of five high-up Defense Ministry officials — appears to be the most salient change in the recent Kremlin shake-up.

Although Shoigu’s new position as Security Council secretary is still considered a coveted role within the government, it’s most certainly a demotion for the former Defense Minister. In his new role, Shoigu has a drastically smaller staff than before and lacks any enforcement authority. Most importantly for Shoigu’s clan, the Defense Ministry is no longer their cash cow: “Because he’s been moved to the Security Council, there’s less money to be made now, so that will be very hard for him in terms of how to keep his side happy.”

But despite his own clan’s recent misfortunes, analysts also consider Shoigu to be a key ally to Yuri Kovalchuk’s clan — a factor that could potentially soften the blow against the former defense minister. Many in the Kovalchuk clan fared well in the reshuffle, including Chairman of the Accounts Chamber “prince” Boris Kovalchuk, First Deputy Chief of Staff Sergey Kiriyenko, and Mikhail Mishustin, who held onto his position as prime minister.

As for the Chemezov clan, although its members succeeded in removing Shoigu from the Defense Ministry, their efforts to install one of their own in his place proved unsuccessful. Nonetheless, the Chemezov clan still has a high profile in the Kremlin: Rosgvardiya head Viktor Zolotov maintains close proximity to Putin, and two Chemezov allies, recently appointed First Deputy Prime Minister Denis Manturov and presidential aide Alexey Dyumin, were given prominent roles in the reshuffle.

Dyumin is also thought to be close to the Patrushev clan, so his recent promotion also plays well for Patrushev. What’s more, Patrushev’s “prince,” Dmitry Patrushev, has been elevated to a deputy prime minister position, and, while some interpret Patrushev’s new role as a clear demotion, he still has Putin’s ear.

Despite each clan endeavoring to tip the scales in its favor, Putin selectively rearranged his cabinet to ensure that no single clan achieved a relative victory over another.

9/10
Next 👉 Game of clans summaryImage
Clans that had been eyeing the throne in anticipation of Putin’s expected 2024 departure were already forced to shift their timelines in 2021 when Putin rewrote the constitution, allowing him to remain in office until 2036.

Putin’s continued insistence on balancing clan interests and playing his retirement cards close to the chest — especially as clans become ever more emboldened, breaking unspoken rules like going after another clan’s “wallet” — suggests that the inter-clan fighting within the Kremlin might just be a hint at what’s to come.

The path least bloody is guaranteed by the “Coalition of the Cronies”. Should it win, the victors would repress only the leaders and active members of the opposing clans. Russia’s future would be determined by the children of the leaders of this coalition.

Judging by what their acquaintances tell me, these young people would rather enjoy dance parties in Monaco and the ski slopes of Courchevel, than the prospect of becoming another North Korea, with an ongoing war at the border.

If the “Coalition of the Patriots” wins, Russia will become a military dictatorship. Victory requires a firm hand at the front, and a ruthless war against traitors in the rear. How long this dictatorship would last, no one can say. North Korea has been living this way for more than 70 years.

And if the “Coalition of the Bloodthirsty” emerges victorious, both the West and China will have to answer a very difficult question: are they ready to reckon with the fact that one of the largest nuclear arsenals in the world will be in the hands of a “holy trinity”: a strangler of women, who today heads an army of sadists with sledgehammers; an academic from Chechnya who tortures his victims and arranges extrajudicial killings; and a former presidential bodyguard.

However this Game of Thrones ends, it’s evident already that Putin does not play a major role. The worst that can happen to a dictator has befallen him: people view him with contempt, not fear.

👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇

Folks, I self-fund my equipment, research and subscription costs. I would appreciate your coffee support ! If you enjoy my threads, please help me keep the threads free, it takes just a few minutes to support my work on Patreon or BuymeACoffee - in any currency.

Informative, evidence lead research for the price of a few coffees!

10/10Image
Thank You! to those who have supported me on Patreon or buymeacoffee, you are simply awesome.



buymeacoffee.com/beefeaterfella
patreon.com/Beefeater_Fella
Image
@Trinityaudiobot audio

For my visually impaired followers and for easy listening on your daily commute, my threads are narrated too! - see the reply to this tweet for an audio narration of the thread: Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Beefeater

Beefeater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Beefeater_Fella

May 25
FROZEN RUSSIAN ASSETS - UPDATE - May 2024

The United States, European Union (EU), and other governments are considering whether to use seized Russian assets to fund Ukraine’s reconstruction and recovery, the cost of which could top $1 trillion. Although an end to Russia’s war in Ukraine could be years away, the country requires some critical infrastructure investments immediately.

Conversation on multilateral fundraising is gathering steam as public support for aid to Ukraine in the United States, its largest donor, is waning among some groups.

Rebuilding Ukraine and helping its people recover is expected to cost hundreds of billions of dollars—potentially exceeding $1 trillion, depending on how long the war lasts, its intensity, and its geographic spread.

A recent assessment from the European Commission, the Government of Ukraine, the World Bank, and the United Nations estimated that at the one-year mark of the invasion, rebuilding Ukraine would cost $411 billion, with aid coming in from both the public and private sectors.

This is more than double the size of Ukraine’s pre-invasion economy. The government says it needs some $14 billion to fund critical infrastructure projects in this year alone.

Priority number one Ukraine is in desperate need of more weapons and ammunition to survive the Russian aggression and eventually regain control over its territories and win the war.

Priority number two, is to make sure Ukraine has to money to win the war – not only in theory and in principle, but actual money available when it is needed in a predictable manner and at a scale that ensures that the government of Ukraine does not have to resort to unstainable alternatives when foreign financial support does not materialise at the pace promised.

The Ukrainian private sector investments, both domestic and foreign, require macroeconomic stability. There has been a lot of attention on war risk insurance for trade and investment focusing on the physical risks associated with doing business in a country that is being attacked by a brutal neighbour.

However, macroeconomic stability is also needed to ensure that the value of the currency is maintained and that local markets for goods and services function, otherwise there will be very little private investment and economic growth will suffer.

In the initial months of the war, the debate mainly focused on sanctions and other measures to hurt Russia, with less attention being devoted to measures in support of Ukraine. Recent months, however, have a series of important contributions on aid to Ukraine and the required reconstruction efforts. Systematic data remains scarce.

The Ukraine Support Tracker by the Kiel Institute of the World Economy lists and quantifies the support of 40 donor governments plus that of the EU institutions. In the most recent update on the tracker records aid commitments between 24 January 2022 (the day several NATO countries put their troops on alert) and May 2024.

The tracker quantifies the scale of aid to Ukraine in millions of euros or as percent of donor GDP, which allows for systematic comparisons across countries. (See the link in the references).

1/6
Next 👉 Actions taken by the EU so far..Image
ACTION TAKEN BY THE EU SO FAR

EU diplomats agreed Wednesday to use income from frozen Russian state assets to aid Ukraine – paving the way for the war-torn country to get around €3 bn for arms purchases and reconstruction before the summer. Since the full-scale invasion of 2022, €210 billion in assets of the Moscow central bank have sat frozen within the bloc – chiefly at the Euroclear depositary in Belgium.

The deal was agreed “in principle” at a regular meeting of national representatives, according to a tweet by Belgium, currently chairing talks in the European Council.

Talks were also held up by concerns over how many of the assets would be retained by Euroclear as an administration fee, a figure that was originally as high as 13%, as well as Belgium’s right to tax the profits gained by the Brussels-based securities depository.

Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo has already promised to send some €1.5bn directly to Ukraine, though that appears to be a result of applying existing corporate tax law to the unexpected windfall Euroclear gains by having frozen central bank assets on its books.

The final deal allows Euroclear to keep a provisional buffer worth 10% of the profits, in case of litigation over the funds. It can also keep 0.3% as an incentive, while 90% of the funds will be sent via the European Peace Facility to help Ukraine buy weapons.

Commission President @vonderleyen previously suggested Ukraine could receive the first funds under the mechanism by July (what she failed to acknowledge is that Hungary’s pro-Putin Victor Orban is hell bent on frustrating this aid)

If passed with Orban being confined to the toilets again with yet another @vonderleyen €10Billion brine, the calculation will be backdated to February, when Euroclear formally segregated the assets. Ambassadors today also formally agreed on the reforms Ukraine will have to make to receive funds from a separate €50bn facility of EU grants and loans.

The European Union countries formally adopted a plan on 21st May 2024 - to use windfall profits from Russian central bank assets frozen in the EU for Ukraine's defence. It is the first in what could be a series of moves by the G7 group of large Western nations to utilise the near $300 billion worth of Moscow's assets that have been immobilised, but it remains a highly complex and controversial precedent.

Extraordinary revenues have accrued to central securities depositories in the EU from their management of Russian Central Bank assets that were immobilised as a result of the EU’s sanctions against Russia.

Faced with "net profits stemming from unexpected and extraordinary revenues" generated by those frozen assets and reserves, the EU says 90% of the money will be used for military support to Ukraine. Under the agreement, 90% of the proceeds that the bonds generate will go into an EU-run fund for military aid for Ukraine, with the other 10% going to support Kyiv in other ways.

The European Union plan to use as much as $3.25 billion in profits from Russian sovereign assets — frozen by sanctions due to Russia's war on Ukraine — to fund Ukraine and its military.

A portion of the money is also designated to go toward Ukraine's defense industry infrastructure and reconstruction efforts. The funds will be collected from the Russian accounts on a twice-yearly basis, the EU said. It should be noted that per the EU decision, it is not the Russian Central Bank’s assets that will be used to benefit Ukraine, but rather the extraordinary revenues accruing to the central securities depositories as a result of EU sanctions against Russia.

2/6
Next 👉 The EU actions cont, and ORBAN’s attempts to frustrate all aid to UkraineImage
The terms ‘freezing’ and ‘immobilising’ refer to the measures taken against Russian assets in response to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Private assets that must not be used or transferred are commonly referred to as being ‘frozen’, whereas State assets are referred to as being ‘immobilised’.

The EU expects the assets to yield about 15-20 billion euros ($16-$22 billion) in profits by 2027. Some are still wary, though, including the European Central Bank, which has said that any seizure of the Russian assets should only be done in concert with other G7 powers.

The European Central Bank is concerned about the impact to the Euro if other countries such as China start repatriating their reserves as a precaution against their being frozen.

But opponents of the push for the EU to redirect Russian assets to Ukraine have questioned the legality of such a move, and they warn of setting precedents that could create complicated ripple effects — and possibly undermine the euro's international standing. And if the EU appropriated the assets, it would raise the likely possibility that Moscow could retaliate by seizing European holdings in Russia.

By choosing to siphon the profits rather than redistribute Russia's assets, the EU looks to avoid the thorniest of those questions, while still offering a lifeline to Kyiv.

VICTOR ORBAN (HUNGARY) FRUSTRATING AID ATTEMPTS

The pro-China, pro-Russian Orban is doing his level best to frustrate and delay any aid to Ukraine, which was a predictable frustration since the beginning of the war. He is holding up legislation that would allow the European Union to send billions of dollars in profits from frozen Russian assets for Ukrainian aid, the Financial Times reported on May 25th, 2024.

Hungary's envoy is preventing legislation that would allow payments to be fast-tracked, according to five people who were briefed on a meeting of EU ambassadors, the FT reported. “For the time being they are blocking everything connected to military support to Ukraine,” one told the FT, suggesting that the situation wouldn't change before next month's European elections.

The last time Orban frustrated support by the EU to Ukraine, @vonderleyen paid Orban a tranch of EU funds amounting to €10 Billion - for Orban to leave the room during the final voting so support cold be passed. I set out a thread warning that this did not solve the problem - it merely delayed it and allowed Orban to receive €10 Billion - part of EU funding that has been held back because of clearly identified breeches by Orban’s regime, of the principles of the European Union set out under Article 2 of the treaty.

Von Der Luyen, after being challenged by MEP’s in the EU around this payment, claimed that this was because Hungary had made progress on the breeches identified in the Art 7. Notice some years ago. This is complete tosh.

Hungary has not remedied the identified breeches - in fact the position on the suppression of the judiciary and human rights has gotten progressively worse under Orban’s corrupt leadership, which has rewarded him with untold personal wealth and corrupt influence.

To solve this impasse - Orban needs to be muted with the enforcement of voting rights sanctions under Article 7, or Von Der Luyen needs to be kicked out of her position and someone with the fortitude to tackle Orbanovich take over.

Please read my threads on Orban, @vonderleyen ‘s failure to reign this pro-genocide Vatnik in, and Hungary’s on-going and persistent breeches of the principles of the European Union here 👇





3/6
Next 👉 The US position and historical precedent..
Image
Read 9 tweets
May 20
Stolen grain and illegal russian trafficking through the Bosporus Straits - with the full knowledge of Turkey.

An in-depth report from Public Eye highlighted the illegal business of trading in stolen grain from Ukraine (link in the references). Ukraine is commonly referred to as 'the breadbasket of Europe'.

According to trade databases, prior to the Russian invasion, the country accounted for nearly 10% of global wheat exports, 13% of global corn exports, and 40% of all sunflower oil traded. Thanks to its fertile black soil, the south-east of Ukraine is particularly crucial for the cultivation of grain. Part of this region has been under Russian occupation since 2014.

Particularly since the beginning of the war in 2022 and the expansion of the occupied Ukrainian territories in particular, the Russian government has been operating a highly organised system for controlling local agricultural production and the export of agricultural goods.

A central part of this is the systematic and sometimes violent theft of grain and the appropriation of infrastructure. Under international humanitarian law, such appropriations by an occupying power principally constitute an act of plunder and are therefore prohibited.

The plundered grain ends up on the world market via several routes. On the one hand, it is transported by road and rail – often via Melitopol - to the ports of Sevastopol or Feodosia on the occupied Crimean peninsula and from there, to Russia or directly to third countries.

On the other hand, it is moved via the occupied port of Mariupol to Sevastopol or to Rostov-on-Don in Russia. Moreover, the Russian occupiers have expanded the port in Skadovsk (Kherson) in order to increase the export of grain to Russian ports from there.

Ukrainian grain becomes Russian grain

Various methods are employed to disguise the true origin of the plundered grain. For example, the grain is transported to Russia and mixed with Russian grain in their Black Sea ports. Another strategy uses so-called ship to ship transfers.

Research by the BBC, the Associated Press and investigative collective Bellingcat demonstrated that Ukrainian grain is loaded onto small Russian ships in Crimean ports and transferred onto large bulk carriers off the Russian coast, especially in the Kerch Strait.

For this purpose, the preferred location seems to be a certain anchorage outside the port of Kavkaz. According to a Russian grain exporter, this has been used for years to conceal the export of Ukrainian grain from Crimea.

This is also where stolen grain is mixed with grain from Russia and subsequently sold as Russian grain. The larger ships then transport these cargoes to Egypt, Libya, Iraq and Saudi Arabia, Syria, or Turkey, in particular.

1/
Next 👉 International LawImage
International law sets clear rules for the violent appropriation of the property of the civilian population of occupied territories by an invading or conquering army. Such acts are defined as pillage (or plunder) and are, with a few exceptions, prohibited.

International humanitarian law applies in international armed conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine, and classifies pillage as a war crime. Moreover, the Rome Statute, the founding document of the Hague-based International Criminal Court, lists pillage as a war crime in international armed conflicts.

The Hague Regulations on War on Land of 1907 already prohibit pillage under all circumstances, as does the Fourth Geneva Convention on the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. After the ratification of the Rome Statute by Switzerland, the war crime of pillage was also incorporated into the Swiss Criminal Code.

In the assessment of the responsibility of companies for plundering, indirect appropriation is also relevant and can itself represent an act of plunder. Thus, a company does not necessarily have to be involved in the original unlawful act of appropriation; the purchase of plundered goods alone may be sufficient for a company to be considered as a “perpetrator” committing pillage, as stated in the manual Corporate War Crimes:

Prosecuting the Pillage of Natural Resources from the Open Society Justice Initiative. It lists over two dozen court cases, in which companies or their representatives were convicted in the past for purchasing plundered goods during wartime.

2/7
Next 👉 May 17, 2024 updateImage
May 17, 2024 update:

Ukraine's ambassador to Turkey has called on the Turkish government to prohibit cargoes of stolen Ukrainian grain from crossing the Bosporus. Ukraine asserts that Russian forces are stealing wheat and other commodities from inside occupied territories in Ukraine, then trucking them into Crimea for export to overseas destinations.

One such cargo has already been tracked to the port of Latakia, Syria. Ukrainian officials claim that the Russian bulker Matros Pozynich loaded a cargo of 27,000 tonnes of stolen grain in Crimea, then transited to Latakia, where the AP and Planet Labs spotted her via satellite imaging.

Syria's isolated and sanctioned government is closely aligned with Russia; Ukrainian intelligence assesses that the stolen grain will be laundered through the Syrian market for sale in neighboring countries.

In a statement on Sunday, Ukrainian ambassador to Ankara Vasyl Bodnar claimed that a second vessel had taken on a load of grain at Sebastopol and was headed for the Bosporus.

He identified the ship as the Syrian-flagged Finikia, a small geared bulker of about 19,000 dwt. Bodnar called on Turkish authorities to take measures to prevent the vessel from transiting the Bosporus or calling at Turkish seaports.

Finikia is one of three ships owned by Syriamar, the state-owned shipping agency of the Syrian government. The company is blacklisted on the United States Treasury's sanctions list for its connections to Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad and his military forces.

Despite U.S. sanctions, Syriamar's vessels have a long history of operating between Turkish ports and Sebastopol.

Over the past two months, Finikia has twice transited north through the Bosporus and disappeared from satellite AIS tracking, indicating that her crew has turned off AIS upon entering the Black Sea. Her signal reliably reappears upon her return to the Turkish Straits VTS zone, where AIS transmission is required.

Though AIS data is not available for Finikia's Black Sea voyages, Ukrainian open-source intelligence researchers obtained webcam footage of the vessel entering Sebastopol's harbor and calling at a grain terminal on May 11. Her AIS reappeared in the Black Sea on May 14, and she was photographed passing through the Bosporus on the following day.

Despite Amb. Bodnar's request, Finikia completed her transit and headed south, bypassing Turkish seaports. As of Tuesday evening, her AIS signal showed her located north of Cyprus, headed east on a previously-used route towards Syria.

In addition to sanctions and alleged theft, Finikia has a history of deficiencies. She was detained at Iskenderun last September due to a range of issues, including faults with her auxiliary power, EPIRB and pollution-prevention equipment.

Port state inspectors in Russia, Tunisia, Lebanon, Turkey, Romania and Egypt found deficiencies at every previous boarding of the Finikia since 2017.

3/7
Next 👉 A Bellingcat report..Image
Read 10 tweets
May 14
Georgian MPs approved controversial plans to brand hundreds of NGOs and media outlets as foreign agents on May 14th, 2024, paving the way for the bill to become law despite growing domestic dissent and condemnation from the U.S. and EU.

This is all happening because of a Vatnik Oligarch called Bidzina Ivanishvili, who created and finances the Pro-Russian Georgian Dream Party.

Tens of thousands of Georgians have taken to the streets in recent weeks to protest against the bill, which campaigners have branded the “Russian law” given its similarity to rules used by Moscow to shutter civil society groups and suppress critics. Riot police used tear gas, shields and batons to disperse the crowds who gathered outside parliament

In a vote, parliamentarians supported the proposals brought forward by the governing Georgian Dream party by 84 votes in favor and 30 against, after weeks of contentious debate that saw several brawls break out in the assembly chamber and one senior lawmaker assaulted. Crowds gathered outside the graffiti-daubed parliament building with whistles, vuvuzelas and even hitting pots and pans in a bid to make themselves heard by the lawmakers inside.

Under the new rules, civil society groups receiving more than 20 percent of their income from abroad will be required to register as “organizations serving the interests of a foreign power,” a label that critics fear will be used to silence anti-corruption campaigners and others critical of the government.

European Parliament, MEPs representing the EPP, S&D, Greens and Renew groupings have written to Borrell urging him to prepare “targeted” sanctions against Georgian Dream politicians who pushed the foreign agents law — including Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze — as well as the MPs who voted for it.

Not long ago, any comparison of the Georgian regime’s trajectory with that of Belarus was alien to expert thinking and public imagination. However, the current state of affairs in Georgia is so dire and is deteriorating so fast, that this course of events remains imaginable and rationally possible. All authoritarian regimes were, at some point, unfathomable before their consolidation. The art of authoritarian regime-making lies in realizing what was previously deemed unthinkable.

It is likely that Ivanishvili always held deeply anti-Western views and believed in wild conspiracies hatched in Russian propaganda factories. But he and his party had to camouflage as pro-Western and reluctantly follow the path of Georgia’s European integration – because this was a firm choice of the majority of Georgians.

This is no longer relevant. Ivanishvili and key figures of his party and government (which increasingly became one) communicated a manifest intention to peel off the remnants of a crumbling facade. Ivanishvili’s anti-Western manifesto of April 29 foreshadowed the rapid consolidation of a substantively anti-western authoritarian regime.

That manifesto defined all political opponents and civil society as hostile foreign agents and contained the direct announcement of repressions against them, a clear indication of his use of authoritarian methods to maintain power.

Once the decision is taken to abandon the pretense of requiring popular legitimacy, there is nothing irrational in the choice of mass violent repression as the primary tool to achieve the objective.

1/8
Next 👉Image
Ivanishvili’s anti-Western manifesto of April 29 foreshadowed the rapid consolidation of a substantively anti-western authoritarian regime.

That manifesto defined all political opponents and civil society as hostile foreign agents and contained the direct announcement of repressions against them, a clear indication of his use of authoritarian methods to maintain power. Once the decision is taken to abandon the pretense of requiring popular legitimacy, there is nothing irrational in the choice of mass violent repression as the primary tool to achieve the objective.

Throughout the last 18 months, representatives of Georgian Dream and the government have increasingly begun to make hostile statements about their Western partners. News organisation OC Media reports that, between February and July 2022, Georgian Dream chair Irakli Kobakhidze made only nine comments critical of Russia but a total of 57 negative remarks about the West and 26 about Ukraine.

Georgian Dream leaders have often presented their criticism of the US and the EU in the last year as warnings against foreign interference in Georgian domestic politics.

Yet the fact that they have done so in ways seemingly designed to offend suggests that they want to push representatives of Western powers to leave Georgia.
It is clear that something has altered in the firmament of Georgia’s governing elite in very recent times. To understand what might have changed, it is important to consider the background and career of Ivanishvili, whose presence has dominated the country’s political scene for a decade.

As one Georgian Dream MP recently confirmed, Ivanishvili is “the key decision-maker in Georgia, especially about sensitive questions such as Russia.” Ivanishvili is not just any oligarch but one of a small group who in 1996 became part of the Semibankirschina. This group of ‘seven bankers’ – which was, in reality, made up of more than seven people, not all of whom were bankers – financed the re-election of Boris Yeltsin as Russian president.

At the time, Yeltsin’s approval rating stood at just 3 per cent, and the Communists looked set to return to power. Ivanishvili’s mission in this group was to finance the electoral campaign of Alexander Lebed, a kind of artificial candidate positioned to split the vote for Communist leader Gennady Zyuganov.

Ivanishvili was born in 1956 in the remote village of Chorvila, near the Russian border. Despite his modest background, he graduated in 1980 from Tbilisi State University’s Faculty of Engineering and Economics.

He would later move to Moscow, where he met Vitaly Malkin – a Russian businessman and politician with whom he would, during perestroika, set up a successful business selling computers and other electronic devices. The fortune they made in this trade allowed them to later enter the lucrative metals and banking sectors.

Ivanishvili and Malkin founded Rossiysky Kredit, a bank that would rapidly grow to become the heart of their business empire. Ivanishvili took a cautious approach to the chaotic Russia of the 1990s, avoiding profitable but politically dangerous sectors such as hydrocarbons.

He set his sights on mineral extraction and processing complexes, which he bought up at low cost to later sell at a huge profit. Ivanishvili progressively diversified his business activities in Russia to areas such as real estate, pharmaceuticals, and agriculture, before transferring some of his wealth abroad.

It is surprising that Ivanishvili was invited to join the Semibankirschina (along with Malkin), given that he was less wealthy and influential than other members, such as Boris Berezovsky, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Mikhail Fridman, Vladimir Gusinsky, Vladimir Potanin, Alexander Smolensky, and Vladimir Vinogradov. But, regardless of why Ivanishvili made the cut, he moved to the centre of Russia’s ruling elite.

2/8
Next 👉Image
👉 Ivanishvili’s links to Russia:

After making his corrupt fortune in tumultuous post-Soviet Russia, Ivanishvili, 56, returned to Georgia shortly before the peaceful 2003 Rose Revolution catapulted Saakashvili to power. Upon returning to Georgia in 2003, he rebuilt his native hilltop village of Chorvilla into a personal fiefdom, giving fellow villagers generous monthly allowances and equipping each household with a stove.

For years after he quietly financed Saakashvili. But his friendship with Saakashivli soured after the U.S.-educated president cracked down on dissent, imposed controls over the media and led his nation into the 2008 war with Russia.

Saakashvili stripped Ivanishvili of his Georgian citizenship on the grounds he was still French — and Georgia doesn't allow dual nationality. Parliament swiftly passed a law allowing Ivanishvili to run as an EU citizen.

A new report by the Transparency International (TI) Georgia, a local corruption watchdog, said that the ruling Georgian Dream party founder and billionaire Bidzina Ivanishvili is the beneficial owner of at least one company in Russia, while his inner circle continues to do business with a U.S.-sanctioned former KGB general.

Ivanishvili owns the firm in question, Aqua-Space Ltd., through his offshore company Vanity Overseas Ltd., TI Georgia said. The Aqua-Space is currently active and operates in the commercial property, buying and selling, as well as renting and managing non-residential buildings, according to the report.

The document noted that Olga Borovikova has served as the General Director of the company. She also serves as the director of Dolgovoe Agentstvo, a legal successor of Unicor, a company founded by Ivanishvili to manage his assets in Russia, the watchdog added.

The study findings said that in 2013 when Ivanishvili served as the Georgian Prime Minister, his Aqua-Space Ltd. took merged with two other Russian companies — Enterprise Service Ltd. and Prestige Market Ltd. Later in 2014, the company also merged with Transforming Group Ltd., another Russian firm.

Besides operating in Russia, the offshore-based Vanity Overseas Ltd. owns Aqua Center Ltd. in Georgia, run by GD founder’s nephew Kakha Kobiashvili, the watchdog noted. As per the report, Kobiashvili officially represents Ivanishvili’s offshore companies in Georgia.

Despite making a promise to dispose of his Russian assets upon entering politics in 2011, the Georgian billionaire remained a beneficial owner of at least 10 companies — branching out into a wider network of subsidiaries — in Russia through offshore firms between 2012 and 2019, per the report.

The report said that until 2015, Ivanishvili held through offshore company Wellminstone S.A., a Russian firm called Industrial TechGlobal Ltd. This company had previously merged with other Russian firms of the offshore holding — with ResourceFutures Ltd., in 2014 and TransFinanceActive Ltd., Securities Market Financial-Analytical Group Ltd., MetProm Holding Ltd., Telecomnetwork ltd.., SpecPromTrans Ltd., and ServiceTechAlliance Ltd. in 2008.

TI Georgia reported that Ivanishvili’s other offshore company Wenigen Management Ltd. also owned multiple firms in Russia during different periods — Firm AVEK Ltd. until 2019, TERS Ltd. until November 2015, KMA-HoldingTrans Ltd. until June 2015, and MK-Holding Ltd. until November 2013.

When Ivanishvili entered Georgian politics in 2011, he presented himself as a patriot who, having made his fortune, could now use his experience in the service of his homeland. He really believes in a regional or even world order, shaped more by Russia than by the West.

In an interview in April 2013, he claimed to have sold his assets in Russia in just a few months at market price. At the time, Ivanishvili strove to put some distance between himself and the Kremlin. This helped him on his way politically, and he became prime minister, serving between October 2012 and November 2013.

3/8
Next 👉Image
Read 10 tweets
May 13
Who is Nikolai Patrushev (Snr)?
A deep dive and potted history..

Nikolai Patrushev, a Kremlin hawk, career intelligence officer and close associate of the Russian president. Patrushev belongs to the siloviki of Putin's inner circle. Patrushev, is the "most dangerous man in Russia" because of his "paranoid conspiracy-driven mindset."

He is one of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s closest advisers and wields considerable influence on government policy as the head of the powerful Security Council of Russia.

The council is where Russia’s security policy is formulated, and it is the center where intelligence from Russian sources and networks from abroad are received.

Patrushev is the one who interprets that intelligence. Patrushev often gives interviews to state-owned media about his conspiratorial views of the West and what the Kremlin describes as Russia’s “special military operation” in Ukraine.

👉 His views on colour revolutions, threats that worry Moscow the most and UKRAINE.

Per the Guardian interview in 2015:

“Colour revolutions are another form of destabilisation that represent an equally serious threat – the latest iteration of which occurred in Ukraine.

It is clear that behind the campaign to destabilise Ukraine lies an attempt to manufacture an instrument with which to weaken Russia dramatically. It was with this aim in mind that the preconditions were created in Ukraine for maintaining constant tension, further developing extreme forms of nationalism and sabotaging the Minsk agreements. At the same time, the task of keeping EU member states on a short leash was fulfilled: anti-Russian sanctions and positions are imposed upon them in disregard of their [own] opinions and national interests.

“You have to look at events objectively. The US are trying to prove that Russia is party to the conflict in Ukraine, but that is not the case. Moreover, the US themselves started the conflict in Ukraine.”

In August 2021, during the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, Patrushev told Izvestia newspaper that the United States had abandoned its Afghan allies, and that the reason was the incompetent work of the intelligence services of the United States, Britain and other NATO countries and the misplaced belief of the West in the correctness of its decisions. He predicted that the United States would also abandon its allies in Ukraine:
"...Kyiv is obsequiously serving the interests of its overseas patrons, striving to get into NATO. But was the ousted pro-American regime in Kabul saved by the fact that Afghanistan had the status of a principal U.S. ally outside NATO? (No). A similar situation awaits supporters of the American choice in Ukraine."

In early November 2021, CIA Director William Burns and U.S. Ambassador to Russia John Sullivan met in Moscow with Patrushev and informed him that they knew about Russia's invasion plans. Burns warned that if Putin proceeded down this path, the West would respond with severe consequences for Russia. Sullivan recounted that Patrushev was undeterred and "supremely confident" that the invasion was going to succeed. However, in late January 2022, just before the invasion, Patrushev publicly denied that Russia was prepared to attack Ukraine.

On April 26, 2022, Patrushev gave an interview to the state Russian newspaper “Rossiskaya gazeta. He began with his favorite topic – the evil intentions of the West in general and the United States in particular. Patrushev said that while other countries are intimidated by the U.S. and "can’t even raise their heads,” Russia has “not only dared, but publicly declared that it would not play by the imposed rules” of the U.S.

1/9
Next 👉 Wild theories on human organ trade in Ukraine..Image
Indeed, the Russian government has been true to its word as evidenced by the brutal war it is waging against Ukraine and its people, which is in flagrant violation of all conventions of war. During the interview, Patrushev talks about a made up “criminal community who fled Ukraine” and “who are now engaged in the widespread business of the sale of orphans taken out of Ukraine.”

Meanwhile, the West, Patrushev asserts, “has already revived the shadow market for the purchase of human organs from the socially vulnerable segments of the Ukrainian population for clandestine transplant operations for European patients.” The West, Patrushev continues, “is giving support to Ukrainian neo-Nazis, by continuing to supply Ukraine with weapons.”

Patrushev then quotes Putin, who called the West an “empire of lies” once sanctions had been imposed. In Patrushev’s world view, the West seeks to reduce the “world’s population in various ways.” One of which is the creation of “an empire of lies, involving the humiliation and destruction of Russia and other objectionable states.”

In October 2022, Patrushev accused the United States and its allies of wanting to "fight to the last Ukrainian". He said that Anglo-Saxons "are exploiting Ukraine as an instrument of struggle with our country ... The goal is to suppress Russia, retain their imaginary supremacy, keep their unipolar world, ensure themselves the opportunity to live at the expense of others.

In November 2022, Patrushev accused the West of inciting Ukraine to attacks on the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant and of assisting in the production of a "dirty bomb". He also accused the United States of wanting to recruit terrorists from Afghanistan and use them in the fight against Russia in Ukraine. He claimed that the West wants to destabilize the world to maintain its global dominance, saying that the "reckless policy of Washington, London, and their allies resulted in bloody adventures in the Balkans, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan and Ukraine, which have already claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of people."

In January 2023, he claimed that Russia was fighting NATO in Ukraine and that the West was trying to destroy Russia.

In February 2023, during a meeting with CCP Politburo member Wang Yi in Moscow, Patrushev claimed that "the bloody events in Ukraine staged by the West" are just one example of the West's attempts to maintain its global dominance.

In May 2023, Patrushev blamed the United States and Ukraine for the number of attacks in western Russia and said that "the terrorist attacks committed in Russia are accompanied by an information campaign prepared in advance in Washington and London, designed to destabilise the socio-political situation, and to undermine the constitutional foundations and sovereignty of Russia."

On 15 September 2023, Patrushev claimed that Russia had identified and "neutralized" hundreds of foreign spies in recent years. In September 2023, he met the Chinese foreign minister in Moscow for the annual security talks.[54] On 10 October 2023, he arrived in Baku, Azerbaijan, where he met with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev.

On 22 December 2023, The Wall Street Journal cited sources within the Western and Russian intelligence agencies as saying that the Wagner Group plane crash was orchestrated by Patrushev. The paper alleged that Patrushev presented to Putin a plan to assassinate Yevgeny Prigozhin in August 2023, which led to intelligence officials inserting a bomb under the wing of Prigozhin's plane during pre-departure safety checks.[57]
In March 2024, Patrushev claimed that Ukraine was behind the Crocus City Hall attack in Moscow.

On 12 May 2024, Putin nominated outgoing Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu to replace Patrushev as the Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, effective as of 14 May 2024.

2/9
Next 👉 His known beliefsImage
👉 His known beliefs..

Patrushev considers the 2014 Revolution of Dignity in Ukraine to have been started by the United States and believes that the United States "would much prefer that Russia did not exist at all."

The Guardian ran an article about his views in July 2015, saying his country is under threat – from terrorists, from colour revolutions and, particularly, from America. Ahead of a recent conference to discuss global instability, Patrushev spoke to Kommersant about civil liberties, Syria, and western aggression. He says that global instability is growing precisely because the west continually seeks to solve its problems at the expense of others. This has led to sovereignty and territorial integrity being undermined in a series of Middle Eastern and North African countries. That, in turn, gave extremists and terrorists the opportunity to gather their forces and entrench their positions.

The consequences of the spread of chaos across the world are now entering a new phase. We have witnessed a highly dangerous development whereby extremist cells operating in different regions of the world unite under the auspices of the so-called Islamic State (Isis), which is in fact a terrorist organisation created from one of the branches of al-Qaida.

This pseudo-government has secured the allegiance of such odious groups as Boko Haram in Nigeria, al-Shabaab in Somalia and part of the Taliban movement in Pakistan. A whole string of terrorist organisations in central Asia and the north Caucasus have also sworn loyalty to Isis, including the Turkistan Islamic Party and Caucasus Emirate.

👉 He opined “anti-terrorist coalitions forged by the US are essentially being used to intervene militarily in the affairs of sovereign states.

You can see this in Syria where the attempt to depose the lawful president, Bashar al-Assad, resulted in support being leant to opposition forces. That explains why airstrikes on Isis positions occur only intermittently. It just so happens that if the terrorists are fighting against Assad, they can be considered legitimate, whereas if they harm American interests, as, for instance, in Iraq, they must be annihilated. [The Americans] define which terrorists you can parlay or have dealings with, and which not, solely on the basis of their own interests.

I would like to underline the fact that fighting international terrorism as a single country or narrow coalition is ineffective by definition. Terrorism cannot be defeated alone or by separate groups because it doesn’t obey neatly defined geographical boundaries and can strike these groups without warning. In this regard, Russia is prepared to cooperate with the security services of any country on any continent, including the US.

Countering terrorism is a task for the whole international community without exception. For any state today to believe that it can remain on the sidelines, unaffected by this threat, is naïve. Russia insists on principle that the UN and its security council should take on the role of chief coordinator in resisting terrorism.

3/9
Next 👉 His views on “terrorism” in Russia and neighboursImage
Read 17 tweets
May 5
If you follow my threads, you will know that I regularly assert that the principle of “bad data in = bad data out”, is the key basis for NOT believing any economic data and information put out through “official channels” in both Russia and China.

After almost every reputable news outfit in the West has parroted GDP and trade figures from both China and Russia, they have failed to question and challenge this information as the basis for economic trends and forecasting.

Putin and Jinping are thugs in charge of brutal and dictatorial regimes, that mislead, misdirect, misinform and they have both weaponised economic data for their own ends, to push out overly optimistic economic messages in their failing regimes - to maks their weaknesses.

Now Forbes has run an analysis piece - saying that China’s official messaging over the past two years on it’s economic performance, does not match up with reality, and is now at odds with other forecasting from the IMF.

The IMF itself is an active distributor of unverified and unreliable economic information, Russia stopped reporting economic data to them back in December 2022. They have since relied on thumb sucking guess on the Russian economy, yet still parrot fabulously optimistic and nonsense claims on the Russian economy.

1/3
Next 👉 Unpicking China’s economic propagandaImage
China:

The case of economic propaganda painting a picture of GPD growth, when in fact it has seen a decline over the past two years, since it covered up the extent, origins and impact of COVID-19, and since it began supporting Russia in it’s illegal invasion of Ukraine.

China’s economy is showing multiple signs of weakness. Actual growth seems below the official figures; there is substantial deflation; the housing market has yet to stabilize; and the domestic stock markets have fallen significantly. Domestic confidence is flagging, and foreign investment in 2023 was at a three-decade low. Are we witnessing the early days of an emerging full-blown economic crisis, is this just a deeper than unusual cyclical downturn, or are the worries vastly overblown?

According to the dictatorial communist regime led by Xi Jinping, the Chinese economy grew about 5% annually in 2022 and 2023, measured in local currency.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) adjusts for the fact that the renminbi lost 12-14% of its value over that period, and comes up with a different picture. Real GDP actually declined from 2021 to 2023. (Other Western sources, including the World Bank and the Federal Reserve cite similar numbers.)

Western economists tend to focus on the usual economic drivers, the indicators and trends that regularly factor into their models – trade figures (mixed signals), debt loads (high), price trends (deflationary), consumer demand (weak), consumer savings (excessive), industrial capacity (overbuilt), fiscal stimulus (inadequate), monetary policy (incoherent).

Some see a parallel to the long period of economic stagnation that Japan experienced following its economic crisis in the late 1980s. References to the “Japanification” of China have begun to proliferate.

All that may be true. But – there is another factor driving the Chinese downturn, which is not part of the Japanification scenario. It is missing from most economists’ explanations because lies outside the parameters of economic science as such.

The Chinese economy is suffering from the continuing impact of Covid-19.

Chinese public health policies were severe. For almost three years following the outbreak of the pandemic, China pursued a “zero-Covid” policy aimed at “maximum suppression” – which meant aggressive contact tracing, frequent mass testing, border shutdowns, large-scale internal quarantine programs, and ultimately lockdowns of entire cities.

Factories and businesses struggled to maintain operations. Consumption patterns were disrupted as consumers were restricted from many of their normal activities. Supply chains serving Western customers broke down.

What is becoming clear is that the scope of Covid’s impact on the Chinese economy has been much more severe than the official data describe. At first reflexively, then as a matter of proactive design, the Chinese government set out to conceal the reality of the pandemic from its own citizens and from the outside world.

The motive was an instinctive need to defend the Communist Party’s reputation for competency, upon which its practical legitimacy is based. In the end, they deceived themselves as well.

👉 Read George Calhoun’s analysis in the Forbes publication (May 2024), the links are as always, provided in the references tweet below.

2/3
Next 👉 Read my previous threads on Economic disinformation from dictators and indicted war criminals.Image
Image
My previous threads on dismissing any economic data washed through dictator or war criminal propaganda outlets:
Read 6 tweets
May 3
For decades, Cyprus has attracted Russians, Russian Intelligence and corrupt Russian wealth - stolen or embezzled out of Russia by thieves and Oligarchs (…well they are really one and the same).

Now approximately 120 thousand Russians live on the island, both from Russia and from the countries of the former USSR, half of whom have already received Cypriot citizenship.

👉 This is 10% of the country's population - a significant political force capable of significantly influencing the situation in the state. She is also extremely wealthy and often favorably disposed towards the Russian authorities.

This is primarily due to the fact that the “golden passport” program, in effect from 2002 to 2020, allowed hundreds of Putin officials, businessmen and, quite possibly, Russian intelligence agents to enter Europe. In total, about 2,900 Russians received such passports .

In addition, Cyprus was a convenient place to store capital for Russian businessmen, including those close to the Kremlin: in 2018 alone, the outflow of investments from Russia to Cyprus amounted to almost $21 billion.

This opens up opportunities to influence the politics of Cyprus and, as a result, the general policy of EU countries: it was the Cypriot authorities who were the first in Europe - back in 2016 - to talk about lifting sanctions on Russia for the annexation of Crimea and involvement in the war in eastern Ukraine.

This picture is confirmed by a recent investigation by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists into the leak of documents from several Cypriot financial campaigns.

👉 In addition, Cyprus is a popular place of residence for Russian intelligence officers who have gone into business or retired: take, for example, former Prime Minister and ex-head of the SVR Evgeniy Primakov, who spent a lot of time on the island in the last years of his life.

It is not surprising that with such initial data, Cyprus firmly entered the sphere of interests of the Kremlin and became an important springboard for the work of intelligence services against the backdrop of a full-fledged conflict between Russia and Western countries.

While other European countries are expelling Russian diplomats in batches and cutting off contacts with Russia, Cyprus remains on the sidelines. In words, he follows the course of Brussels and bans RT; in fact, any of the more than 120 thousand Russians in Cyprus can watch Russian channels here .

The island state not only has not expelled a single diplomat since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, but also received a new ambassador with security experience - Murat Zyazikov.

In small Cyprus , the Kremlin’s influence is clearly visible. As in other countries, it finds itself under the cover of various pseudo-public organizations under the auspices of Rossotrudnichestvo and other Kremlin departments .

This includes the Russian-language press , which either openly works in partnership with the embassy or is secretly controlled from Moscow, but invariably supports the pro-Kremlin narrative.

At the beginning of 2024, a new party, Elpis, appeared in Cyprus, which immediately set a course for friendship with Moscow. It’s not surprising: one of its founders, Marios Fotiou, not only has ties to Russia - he traveled to Donbass in 2017 with a load of optical sights for local militants together with Vitaly Milonov.

Another attempt to create a pro-Russian party was exposed when it turned out that its leaders openly said at meetings that they coordinated all their steps with the Russian Embassy.

1/10
Next 👉 Diplomatic safe haven for the FSBImage
After the outbreak of a full-scale war in Ukraine, EU countries expelled hundreds of Russian diplomats, banned Russian propaganda channels, and introduced visa restrictions and sanctions. It may seem that the path to Europe is now closed to Russian intelligence services - but this is not so.

An important outpost of the Kremlin in the European Union remains Cyprus, a state with a reputation as an offshore zone and more than a hundred thousand Russians and immigrants from Russia and the countries of the former USSR.

👉 Not a single diplomat has been expelled from the island, unlike most other EU countries, since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, and in 2022 the Russian embassy was headed by an FSB lieutenant general. The Dossier Center tells how Russian influence works in Cyprus.

In October 2023, Rossiyskaya Gazeta correspondent Alexander Gasyuk was arrested in Cyprus on suspicion of espionage. Gasyuk was caught red-handed while spying on a certain object and was subsequently sent to Russia.

When he was detained, the journalist was not alone - he was covered by an employee of the Russian embassy, ​​Danil Doinikov, who even tried to fight him off from the Cypriot police officers; he was also detained. Gasyuk appeared in Cyprus in the spring of 2022, shortly after the Russian invasion of Ukraine began, and before Cyprus he worked in the United States and Greece.

It was the American intelligence services that conveyed information to their Cypriot colleagues about the journalist’s undercover work for Russian intelligence.

This deportation is perhaps the only noticeable attempt by the Cypriot authorities to interfere with Russian intelligence services on the island. For example, the current head of the TASS representative office in Cyprus, Andrei Surzhansky, who came here with Gasyuk, is mentioned in the press as an employee of the Foreign Intelligence Service.

While other EU countries were expelling dozens of Russian diplomats for spying, Cyprus, although following the EU foreign policy course regarding war and supporting sanctions, did not interfere with the activities of Russian diplomats and propaganda: the authorities limited RT cable broadcasting, but Russian channels are still available on the Internet.

Not a single Russian diplomat was deported. In total, there are about 300 employees in the Russian embassy and the “Russian House” in little Cyprus, several sources familiar with the activities of the diplomatic mission told the Dossier Center. They note that since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, the number of diplomats has only grown. The number of various antennas on the roof of the embassy and the residential building belonging to it has also increased sharply.

Even the Russian ambassador to Cyprus is a security officer without any diplomatic experience.

In September 2022, the Russian embassy was headed by FSB Lieutenant General Murat Zyazikov. He went into civilian life in 2002, when he changed the post of deputy director of the FSB for the Astrakhan region to deputy plenipotentiary representative of the Russian President in the Southern Federal District, and two months later, in extremely dubious elections, he was elected president of Ingushetia and served in this post until 2008 .

Later, Zyazikov held various government positions - he was an adviser to Dmitry Medvedev when he was president, he joined the embassy in the Central Federal District, but had nothing to do with diplomacy.

Probably, when Zyazikov was appointed, his connections with the security forces were much more important than his diplomatic career, especially in conditions when diplomatic contacts in Europe are kept to a minimum. Already in December 2023, Putin awarded Zyazikov the Order of Honor “For his great contribution to the implementation of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation and many years of conscientious work.”

2/10
Next 👉 Russian Embassy in Cyprus, den of corruptionImage
One can draw a conclusion about Zyazikov’s work in Cyprus based on several factors. For the first time in history, the Russian embassy opened a representative office in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, unrecognized by anyone except Turkey.

The second, much more noticeable factor is the flourishing of various cultural and patriotic events under the auspices of the Russian diplomatic mission. While many other EU countries are fighting against such propaganda, Russian diplomats are coming up with more and more unexpected reasons for them.

Traditional Soviet-Russian celebrations like May 9 were supplemented, for example, by an event in honor of the lifting of the Leningrad blockade on January 26. Moreover, on September 30, 2023, a celebration was held in front of the Russia House in Nicosia in honor of the “annexation” of the annexed regions of Ukraine to the Russian Federation.

The grand opening of the Ayia Napa - Gelendzhik view park in November 2023 can be considered an unconditional diplomatic success for Zyazikov and his subordinates: the Cypriot and Krasnodar resorts are linked by twinning.

The event was attended by the mayor of Ayia Napa, Christos Zanettou, and other local officials. This ordinary event for the pre-war situation could hardly be carried out without serious work with Cypriot officials, whose participation in such a celebration was clearly compromised: by May 2022, more than 150 cities around the world had already severed their sister-city relations with Russian cities.

Judging by the rank of guests among Cypriot officials at embassy events, the embassy's recruitment activities have now reoriented from the highest political elite, which due to circumstances have become especially cautious, to local municipal authorities, and the celebration in Ayia Napa may be one example of such recruitment.
Russian Cyprus

The management of the intelligence activities of various Russian departments (FSB, SVR, GRU) is concentrated in the diplomatic missions of the Russian Federation - embassies and consulates. The main work with agents of influence among emigrants is carried out by a special department - Rossotrudnichestvo, which is the successor to the Soviet All-Union Society for Cultural Relations with Foreign Countries (VOKS).

Rossotrudnichestvo has 85 foreign representative offices, and 72 Russian centers of science and culture, the so-called “Russian Houses,” operate in 62 countries. Unlike embassies, “Russian Houses” are open to everyone and are extremely convenient for contacts with agents of influence and the recruitment of new agents during all kinds of cultural events, and among their leaders you can find people with a biography that speaks of a possible connection with the intelligence services.

In many countries (for example, in Germany ) all sorts of pseudo-public organizations are concentrated around Russian embassies and “Russian houses”. They are created on the initiative of Moscow, and their activities are controlled, planned and financed either by Moscow directly or by the embassy and the Russian Houses.

Each such organization works with its own target group, and in general they strive to cover all social, age, ethnic and religious groups of “compatriots” in the country. In little Cyprus, their activities are visible, and they themselves and their members play a much more significant role in the social life of Russian migrants than, for example, in Germany.

3/10
Next 👉 Using Religion to influence society in CyprusImage
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(