Dear fellow very online Democrats, the election is five months away and the world isn’t the same as it used to be.
Here are a few things to keep in mind to try and stay sane and have an accurate view of the race:
🧵
1: - We are the party that benefits from low voter turnout now. Among people who’ve never voted, Trump is up >10%. Among people vote every election, Biden is winning by ~6%.
2: We are the party that benefits from money in politics now. Democrats have reliably outraised republicans since 2008 or so.
3: You read the news and see my posts on social media. That makes you a very strange person. The issues you care most about are not likely to be the ones the marginal voter is most concerned with. Don’t fall for the pundit’s fallacy and assume your interests are representative.
4: The most effective progressive senator of the last decade is Joe Manchin. Not because he took strident progressive positions, but because he won in a R+40 state and gave Biden a senate majority, allowing all kinds of transformative legislation to be passed and judges to be confirmed. Consider that lesson before you demand candidates take unpopular positions.
5: Don’t believe your own side’s propaganda polls. Lots of advocacy orgs put out polls whose goal isn’t to test public support in a scientific way, but rather to drive a narrative. These produce emotionally satisfying headlines like “most Americans support Medicare for All / a ceasefire / my favored gun control plan” that always fall apart when you test the details and counter arguments. Believing them just results in frustration and dissolution.
6: If you find an ad emotionally satisfying or persuasive, it’s almost certainly not resonating with undecided voters. This is just a rule of thumb to remember following politics is very strange and the tastes you and your friends share are not representative of swing voters.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s kind of wild that we’ve put deodorant and shampoo behind lock and key and exposed retail employees to harassment and stress instead of just locking up the 300 people doing all the theft.
Visible social backsliding and disorder is great for the police unions and tough on crime pols. It seems like the criminal justice reform folks might want to consider this trade off. People don’t like disorder. If 300 people are really responsible for 1/2 the theft…
You don’t need to pretend every antisocial psycho is Jean valjean. The cause of criminal justice reform is almost surely best served by jailing the truly anti-social 300 before voters demand a general crackdown
I have 40k miles on my 2020 Tesla. I haven’t been to a super charger yet this year.
Looking at the Tesla app. It looks like the last time I was at a super charger was 6 months ago and aside from a cross country road tip last may, i have been maybe 3 or 4 times in the last year.
I’m guessing Erick has spent more minutes at gas stations than I have charging.
You have major retails closing since their employees are being harassed by meth addicts and they couldn’t stop the looting. sfstandard.com/business/downt…
Most of this is just perennial "is some huge amount of cash really poor" debate, but the thing that jumped out to me is the assertion that "regular overseas holidays" were part of the middle class experience in the 90s.
Passport data from the census doesn't support this.
And sorry to the surprising number of Canadian tourism officials replying to this, but when someone says “overseas trips” they aren’t talking about Canada.
If the poster wanted to say "a trip to mexico every few years" he would have said that. Instead, he specifically said "overseas" to imply something further afield.