True Indology Profile picture
May 31, 2024 8 tweets 5 min read Read on X
The sheer audacity to say this. This is shameless approbation and THEFT!

Forget about Algebra, Early Muslims did not not know of any number greater than 400. They did not even know about the concept of "thousand" until 8th century. They thought 14+13=24.

Indians knew Algebra much BEFORE Islamic prophet & religion was even born. Attached is Bakhshali Manuscript dating back to 3rd century CE. It is an Algebraic treatise. Have you anything like this from the Arabian desert? No, you simply plagiarized Algebra from Indians!

The first Muslim who wrote a treatise on Algebra was Al Khwarizmi. The English word 'Algebra' comes from his work. But he was not from deserts of Arabia. He lived in a region which had Hindu past. He studied Hindu sciences and mathematics. It is an academic consensus that Al Khwarizmi's work is taken from Hindu mathematics.Image
The Bakhshali manuscript, carbon dated to 3rd century CE, is an ancient Hindu treatise on Arithmetic and Algebra.

It deals with simultaneous equations, quadratic equations, arithmetic geometric progressions & quadratic indeterminate equations.

Bakhshali isn't earliest Indian Algebraic treatise. Early Algebra is found in Shulba Sutras dating back to at least 800 BC. Traditional Algebra reached its pinnacle in the works of Aryabhata & Bhaskara. What makes Bakhshali special is it offers mathematical proof to its theoriesImage
Image
Image
The earliest work of "Arabic Algebra" is the "Al-Kitāb Al-Jabr wal-muqābala" by Al Khwarizmi. The term "Algebra" comes from this book ("Al Jabr"). Before writing his treatise, Al Khwarizmi visited India. His book is a plagiarism from Indian Mathematics and an obvious one at that.

For example, compare the derivation of PI given in his book Algebra to that given by Aryabhata 300 years before his time.

Left: Aryabhata Right: Khwarizmi

Not just the value but even the terminology used is identical.Image
Image
The fact that Khawarizmi heavily plagiarised from Indian Mathematicians has been known to western scholars since 200 years. Henry Thomas Colebrooke was a historian and Mathematician. Writing in 1817, Colebrook came to the conclusion that Khwarizmi owed his Algebra to Hindus.

After carefully examining the works of Khawarizmi and ancient Hindu mathematical texts, Colebrooke says:

"The inevitable conclusion is that Khawarizmi, being conversant with the sciences of Hindus, must have learnt Algebra from Hindus"

Another European Mathematician Pietro Cossali also came to the same conclusion after diligent research.

He says: "Khwarizmi was skilled in Indian tongue and fond of Indian matters. He translated Indian works. He was first instructor of Muslims in Algebra. Not having taken Algebra from Greeks, Khwarizmi must have either invented it himself or taken it from Indians. The latter (taking Algebra from Indians) seems more probable"Image
Image
Image
Image
In a more recent work, Starr Fredrick provides further insights.

1) Khawarizmi had deep interest in Indian science and math.

2) Indian culture exerted a powerful influence in Khwarizm.

3) Hinduism exerted influence on Khwarizmian calendar. Image
The Arabs were invading nomadic armies from Arabian deserts. They lacked most basic education and literacy.

Even after conquests, Arabs were living in tents.

What made them them take any interest in Indian Mathematics? What made Khwarizmi write his work? Who civilized illiterate desert nomads? This is a question I will answer in my thread.
Until 770, which is almost 140 years AFTER the prophet, there was not a SINGLE Arabic work on science. Not one Arabic work on Math. Not one Arabic work on Medicine. Absolutely nothing.

There is no exception to this rule. Until 770, Arabs produced ONLY religious works or simple poetry. There is no exception to this rule.

What had changed in 770? This is a question I will answer in this thread.
Even after Islamic conquests, most 7th century Arabs lived in tents.

Even the emperor of Arabs, their Caliph Muawiya, lived a very small shack constructed of only brick and timber.
He did not have a proper roof and there were birds all over his 'ceiling'.

This person was not just a desert chief but an emperor who conquered everything from Constantinople until Afghanistan.

Needless to say, there was no knowledge of Algebra among these people.Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with True Indology

True Indology Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrueIndology

Dec 25, 2024
This Portuguese "Saint" used to say that Indians were black and ugly "monsters whose sight is unbearable".

This colonialist destroyed many Hindu temples with his own hands. He wrote many letters to the Portuguese king advocating for inquisition in Goa. He was thus directly responsible for Goan inquisition which kiIIed thousands of Hindus and some Jews.
According to Francis Xavier, Indian women were 'black and ugly monsters whose sight is unbearable'.

According to him, 'black and ugly Indian women' were unfit to be even Portuguese Concubines.

It is amazing that in 21st century, most visitors to his grave are Indian and 'Hindu' women.

[ Source: Celebrated Jesuits by William Harris Rule]Image
Portuguese forcibly converted many Hindu Dalit fishermen. Many of these converts used to worship Hindu Gods secretly.

When Francis Xavier came to know about this, he burnt the huts of these Dalit converts. This was a punishment for secretly worshiping Hindu deities. Image
Read 6 tweets
Dec 6, 2024
Fact check:

This is false. She is deliberately using a CORRUPTED verse to defame Shri Rāma and Sita.

What the corrupted verse reads:

उषित्वा द्वा दश समाः इक्ष्वाकूणाम् निवेशने |
भुंजाना मानुषान् भोगान् सर्व काम समृद्धिनी ||

("I resided at my in laws for 12 years")

However, this corrupted verse (probably a medieval copyist's mistake) is present only in some southern manuscripts.

But in Maithili, Bengali, and Devaganagari as well as calcutta manuscripts of Valmiki Ramayana [N2 – V1 – B – D6-7], the verse reads as:

संवत्सरं चाध्युषिता इक्ष्वाकूणाम् निवेशने |
भुंजाना मानुषान् भोगान् सर्व काम समृद्धिनी ||

("I resided at my in laws for 1 year")

Therefore, Devi Sita was 18-1=17 years old at the time of her wedding and NOT 6 years old as wrongly claimed below:
Here is what the authors and editors of Critical Edition of Valmiki Ramayana had to say:

After noticing the discrepancy between manuscripts, they come to the conclusion that staying at "one year" is not only attested to by many manuscripts(2 Nepali, 1 Maithili, 1 Bengali, Devanagari, Gorresio, Calcutta)
but that it also suits the context.Image
Image
In Valmiki Ramayana (2.17.26 CE), Kausalya laments that Shri Rāma was just 17 years old at the time of exile [दश सप्त च वर्षाणि तव जातस्य राघव].

Let us assume for the sake of argument that exile happened 12 years after wedding.

This makes Shri Rāma just 5 years old at the time of wedding.

He underwent Upanayana (to be conducted at 11 years for Kṣatriyas according to Dharmaśāstras). He then completed his education. He then protected Vishvamitra's sacrifice by his physical prowess. Then broke Shiva's bow. And then married Sita.

All a boy of 5 years? The sheer absurdity of this entire argument!Image
Read 5 tweets
Dec 3, 2024
In my thread, I showed that Sambhal disputed structure was originally a temple, which was not used as a Mosque until 19th century.

Denying all evidence, this apologist produces a painting of the disputed structure from 1789. He alleges the artist of this sketch depicted 'Jama Masjid of Sambhal'.

Is it true? Let us examine the evidence to see what the artist of the sketch himself had to say

Thread 🧵Image
The artist of this sketch was William Daniell. He and his uncle Thomas Daniell had toured India. Apart from the paintings, they also left a description of this structure.

Does the artist say the above structure is a Jama Mosque? The answer is an emphatic NO.

The artist says that in 1789, local Muslims called the structure "the grave of Babur".Image
To begin with. In Muslim religion, a grave is NOT a mosque. A grave is not a place fit for any sort of worship.

According to authentic Hadiths, Prophet Muhammad cursed the Jews and Christians for building places of worship at graves. Prophet clearly instructed Muslims not to construct Mosques at the graves and not to use graves of righteous men as places of worship.

Of course, a few ignorant and illiterate Muslims who are not well informed about their own religion do offer prayers at graves but that doesn't change the fact that a grave is not and cannot be a Mosque.Image
Image
Read 19 tweets
Nov 27, 2024
The truth of Sambhal: 🧵

Muslims claim Sambhal is a historical "Mosque" built by Babur in 16th century.

This is FALSE. Babur did NOT build this mosque . It did not even exist until 19th century,

It was a Hindu temple until recently, before it was stolen by Muslims. Thread Image
Sambhal has been in the news:

Muslims & Liberals have argued that Sambhal is a historical Mosque built by Babur. That it should thus be protected under the places of worship act 1991.

This is TOTALLY false. Sambhal Mosque was NOT built by Babur. It is a recent usurpation.
Sambhal holds great religious significance for Hindus. As great as Ayodhya & Mathura.

In the Mahabharata (3.189), it is mentioned that God Vishnu will take birth in Sambhala as Kalki. Kalki is the future avatara of Vishnu.

Skanda Purana mentions a Vishnu temple in Sambhala. Image
Read 20 tweets
Nov 27, 2024
Shut up. Stop making a fool of yourself.

The Pushyamitra who allegedly destroyed Buddhist temples was NOT a Hindu king.

According to same story, he was a Buddhist. He was NOT Pushyamitra Sunga. Rather, he was Pushyamitra Maurya. A great grandson of Buddhist emperor Ashoka!
The story that Pushyamitra destroyed Buddhist temples comes from a text named Ashokavadana.

However, according to the same book, the Pushyamitra in question was descendant of Buddhist king Ashoka.

Ashoka-> Sampadin(Samprati)->Brhaspati->Vrshasena->Pushyadharman->Pushyamitra. Image
If you claim

A) Pushyamitra destroyed Buddhist temples

Then you must agree that

B) This Pushyamitra was from Mauryan Buddhist family having nothing to do with Hindus/Shungas.

Otherwise,you are misquoting the story.

You cant pick & choose whatever serves you to attack Hindus
Read 5 tweets
Oct 31, 2024
Halloween and Diwali: closer than you think

Thread 🧵 Image
This year, Diwali and Halloween coincided on the same day. But is there more to this 'coincidence'? Since Indian and Western calendars differ, their corresponding dates vary.

Yet, both Hallowen and Diwali occur at the same time. End of Harvest season and beginning of winter. In many regions of India, Diwali coincides with the end of a harvesting season known as the Kharif.

Likewise, Halloween occurs exactly at the end of Harvest season and the beginning of winter. This is traditionally October 31/November 1 on Western calendar.Image
Halloween originated as a festival in the British Isles before its importation to US. It has roots in Hallowtide and Samhain. As such, it is a very ancient pagan festival which was subsequently Christianized and commercialized. Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(