Post

More from @pepesgrandma

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@pepesgrandma

Dec 10

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1996450174500020239

🚨🚨🚨Breaking! Irelands European Digital Media Observatory (EDMO), that works with the EU DSA in Ireland, is working with a Newsguard partner called Newswhip. Newswhip is now owned by an org in Chicago called Sprout Social. Sprout Social worked Obama’s 2012 campaign, and are now linked to who went after Elon for the fine.

Let’s get a simple hierarchy out of the way first. I almost feel like I am in Soros NGO octopus land.

*Note - There are 14 European Commission funded country hubs at EDMO

- The European Digital Media Observatory (EDMO) monitors for the EU DSA

Two EDMO advisors

🔸Rebekah Tromble of George Washington University😳

🔸Clare Melford - Global Disinformation Index cofounder 😳

- Newswhip of Dublin Ireland is partnered with EDMO Ireland

- Newswhip is partnered with Newsguard

- Newswhip was purchased by Chicago based, Sprout Social, in July 2025 (Obama 2012 camp)

⚡️ EDMO Ireland is partnered with Media Literacy Ireland and runs their website

⚡️⚡️ Media Literacy Ireland is facilitated by Coimisiún na Meán aka the Irish Media Commission . (Irish Media Commission is who went after Elon.)

- EDMO main team includes the Integrity Institute that worked with Biden

*Note - EDMO Italy works with Newsguard specifically.

♦️The EDMO does fact checking monitoring for the EU Digital Services Act ( DSA).

Here’s the call put out for the EDMO hubs creation:

“Contribute to the monitoring of online platforms’ policies to tackle disinformation within the European legal and policy framework defined by the Digital Services Act, including the Code of Practice on Disinformation. The hubs’ work should be equipped with relevant expertise in this regard in order to contribute to related EDMO network investigation and analysis.”

This is from an EDMO Ireland doc:

“EDMO hubs are expected to contribute expertise to the monitoring framework. As noted, it is expected that the EU Code of Practice on Disinformation will essentially
act as a code of conduct under the DSA and pave the way for penalties if a Code signatory and VLOP fails to keep their commitments with the Code. Building on previous work assessing the implementation of the Code in Ireland and across the EU.”

Here’s some additional partners of Newswhip if you aren’t lost yet. 🤭

- Stanford

- Integrity Initiatives Stopfake in Ukraine

- Googles, First Draft News, censorship org

- German Marshall Fund (GMF) which ran Hamilton68 of the Russian bot hoax.

EDMO Italy uses Newsguard specifically. And also, Newsguard uses Newswhip as part of its product. They are solid partners.

Do you realize how much dirt I have on Newsguard, let alone Newswhip? Look at the below linked 🧵 as a small example. The IssueOne founder is a director at Newsguard. And even suggested creating Newsguard to its co-founder, Crovitz.

PS. The Obama Foundation uses Sprout Social, the new owner of Newswhip, and who also ran his campaign in 2012.😬

I’ll post my sources below and some extra info.

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1996450174500020239

Here is the call for the formation of the European Digital Media Observatory (EDMO) hubs. This proves that they are used for monitoring and policies for the Digital Services Act (DSA).

Call Objectives:

“Contribute to the monitoring of online platforms’ policies to tackle disinformation within the European legal and policy framework defined by the Digital Services Act, including the Code of Practice on Disinformation. The hubs’ work should be equipped with relevant expertise in this regard in order to contribute to related EDMO network investigation and analysis.”

web.archive.org/web/2025121022…

Confirmation that the EDMO will work with the DSA. And that Newswhip is included.

EDMO Ireland Hub Briefing Report January 2023

♦️“EDMO hubs are expected to contribute expertise to the monitoring framework (of DSA). “

“It is expected that the EU Code of Practice on Disinformation will essentially act as a code of conduct under the DSA and pave the way for penalties if a Code signatory and VLOP fails to keep their commitments with the Code.

Building on previous work assessing the implementation of the Code in Ireland and across the EU, DCU FuJo has applied to join the EDMO taskforce that will guide how EDMO hubs contribute to the monitoring framework.”

♦️EDMO Ireland is comprised of four partners:

● The Institute for Future Media, Democracy, and Society at Dublin City University
(DCU FuJo) acts as coordinator, analyses disinformation, and develops media
literacy campaigns;

● TheJournal, Ireland’s only national fact-checker, investigates claims and
collaborates on transnational investigations;

● NewsWhip deploys its commercial tools for analysing content trends and
interactions; and

● The University of Sheffield develops new tools to enhance the detection of false
claims and to support fact-checkers across the EU.

web.archive.org/web/2024013009…

Read 14 tweets

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@pepesgrandma

Dec 9

🔥🔥🔥Breaking! Soros Open Society WAS involved in the writing of the European Unions Digital Services Act (DSA) speech censorship laws! In fact, Soros contribution deals with enforcement at Very Large Online Platforms (VLOP), such as Elon Musks, X.

Open Society belongs to the EU High Level Group on combating hate speech and hate crime that wrote the 2016 Code of Conduct. The Code Conduct is a document agreed upon by social media companies for removing hate.

The improved upon “Code of Conduct Plus” continues to be an important tool under the DSA:

“On 20 January 2025, the revised Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online + (the ‘Code of conduct+’) was integrated into the regulatory framework of the Digital Services Act (DSA), following a positive assessment from the Commission and the European Board for Digital Services.

The Code of conduct+, which builds on the Code of Conduct adopted in 2016, strengthens the way online platforms deal with content deemed illegal hate speech according to EU law and Member States’ laws. It facilitates compliance with and the effective enforcement of the DSA in this specific area.”

This new Conduct Code+ was established as a “DSA Code of conduct”. This empowered civil society organisations to act as watchdogs.

“Following its integration, adherence to the Code of conduct+ may be considered as an appropriate risk mitigation measure for signatories designated as Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs) and Search Engines (VLOSEs) under the DSA.”

“The DSA classifies platforms or search engines that have more than 45 million users per month in the EU as very large online platforms (VLOPs)”

Sources will be listed below n the 🧵. 👇🏻

Welp, I knew if I looked, I would find Soros involvement in the European Unions DSA censorship laws.

To explain things more clearly:

- High level Group that Soros was in wrote the Code of Conduct

- Code of Conduct Improved to Code of Conduct+

- Code of Conduct+ incorporated into the EU’s DSA.

*This Code of Conduct+ was made by the “High Level Group on combating hate speech and hate crime”, which Soros Open Society European Policy Institute (OSEPI) belongs to. It was originally called the “EU High Level Group on combating racism, xenophobia and other forms of intolerance”.

🔥Damning part:

“On 20 January 2025, the revised Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online + (the ‘Code of conduct+’) was integrated into the regulatory framework of the Digital Services Act (DSA), following a positive assessment from the Commission and the European Board for Digital Services (‘the Board’).”

🔥This page also discusses the involvement with Very Large Online Platforms:

“Following its integration, adherence to the Code of conduct+ may be considered as an appropriate risk mitigation measure for signatories designated as Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs) and Search Engines (VLOSEs) under the DSA.”
archive.is/m8RP7

This page spells out Soros Open Society European Policy Institute involvement in European Union policy making. EU enlargement? Hmm…

Currently we are engaging in the following EU policies and EU legislative processes:

• European Green Deal
• EU AI Act
• The Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Digital Market Act (DMA)
• EU’s external relations
• Critical Raw Materials Act
• EU Directive on Criminalization of Sanctions Violation
• Rule of law and Article 7 procedures
• EU Eastern Partnership
• European Neighbourhood Policy
• EU Enlargement

archive.is/nVkIh

Read 5 tweets

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@pepesgrandma

Dec 8

🔥🔥🔥Breaking! The European Union is utilizing AI bots and human RESISTANCE to brainwash and re-educate social media users! This is thru their new program called HateDemics, which is also used to counter deportations by politicians.

We will literally have tyrant forced, re-education camps, on social media.

“Hate speech holds a dangerous power, as when used by the wrong politicians, it means deportation, disappearance, etc. Hate Speech is the phenomenon, and Al the technological development.”

And they also coined US social media billionaires as the, “Speech Mafia”.

“What we can call the "speech mafia", meaning a group of bilionaires, are benefiting from the repression of free speech to serve their own economic interests: they are monopolising speech and using it as a weapon.”

Anyways let’s discuss what Hatedemics advertises.

“The Aim is to : strengthen the preventive and reactive measures against hate speech and disinformation online. It aims to empower NGOs/CSOs, factcheckers, public authorities, and youngsters as activists to effectively prevent and combat polarisation, the spread of racist, xenophobic and intolerant speech, as well as conspiracy theories.”

Counter narrative interventions 😏:

“Automatically assess behavioural changes determined by the counter-narrative intervention. The combination of these technologies will allow for more focused and timely online interventions (i.e. advanced targeted search followed by relevant textual suggestions), resulting in a more efficient and effective professional and volunteer effort.”

Acts of resistance 😏:

“Over the long term, counter-narratives must evolve into acts of resistance, with humans playing an active role in this process.”

“The project will empower these target groups (NGO’s, youth activists etc) to counter instances of hate speech and hate crimes that are rooted in disinformation and affect several vulnerable groups. They will have access to a variety of tools that enhance their capacity to effectively prevent and combat polarisation, as well as the spread of racist, xenophobic, intolerant speech, and conspiracy theories online in an impactful manner.”

And they are quite literally going to have the RESISTANCE wrecking havoc online. The original name for these types of trolls are Elves, as I have previously exposed. They were first used for the UK spook led Integrity Initiative.

Here’s what we have to look forward to:

Recall for the CTI League files, they used Reality Team elves on folks. Reality Team turned out to be quite vicious if you thought differently. A totally psychotic moral superiority complex prevailed. My entire house was hacked as a result because they were after some of my research.

Similar ops resulted in bullycide, mental disorders, and institutionalization of their victims. They actually celebrated when they bullied a conservative to death. I’ve seen it.. You get what appears to perfect ladies and gentlemen who turn into literal tyrants. It’s a power trip.

Key skills needed of their trainees:

“Key skills expected: how to debunk online misinformation that fuels hate speech, CREATING NEW or ALTERNATIVE NARRATIVES.”

Here’s info on their consortium, I’ll show more on this later:

“The Hatedemics Consortium of 13 partners and 1 associated partner representing 6 MSs brings forward a broad European perspective with exceptional expertise.”

“The Hatedemics platform is co-created with the expertise of fact-checkers, NGOs
operators for civil society members. It wil be available in 5 languages (Italian, Spanish,
English, Polish and Maltese).”

Sources and additional info to follow.

Let’s begin with the HateDemics home page. Although this program runs a set time, it aims to continue afterwards in all countries.

This is also where they mention using humans and AI online for narrative and behavioral change.

♦️HATEDEMICS:

“We are pleased to announce our participation as partners in the HATEDEMICS project funded by the European Union CERV fund under Grant Agreement 101143249.”

♦️Aim Of the Project:

“The aim of the project is to strengthen the preventive and reactive measures against hate speech and disinformation online. It aims to empower NGOs/CSOs, factcheckers, public authorities and youngsters as activists to effectively prevent and combat polarisation, the spread of racist, xenophobic and intolerant speech, as well as conspiracy theories.”

♦️What we will do:

“We will raise awareness and improve skills and critical thinking by advancing AI-based technologies that:

1) monitor, detect and record hate speech and disinformation on social media.

2) estimate the ‘HATEDEMICS risk’ as the sum of the ‘hate speech and infodemics risks’, i.e. the online exposure to (potential) hate and mis informative messages

3) create dialogue-based counter-narratives that support professionals and activists and facilitate advanced reporting activities by implementing an effective human-in-the-loop approach, whereby automated suggestions are always validated by human operators, who always have the final say on the posted content.

4) automatically assess behavioural changes determined by the counter-narrative intervention. The combination of these technologies will allow for more focused and timely online interventions (i.e. advanced targeted search followed by relevant textual suggestions), resulting in a more efficient and effective professional and volunteer effort. This approach is based on maintaining fairness and balance and ensuring adherence to legal and ethical standards.”

web.archive.org/web/2024041810…

Before we get to the good doc, I’ll share their consortium. I’ve never checked who these folks are associated with including funding. But betcha lots are linked to Soros.

“The Hatedemics Consortium of 13 partners and 1 associated partner representing 6 MSs brings forward a broad European perspective with exceptional expertise. All the partners and associated partners have a wide network of relevant stakeholders This network stems directly from the involvement in hundreds of international, EU and nationally funded research projects.
The Consortium is coordinated by Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK). Top research institute in Italy, FBK is a research non-profit public interest entity. It consists of a community of over 400 researchers and 120 doctoral students. FBK participates in the project with its Digital Society Centre, a multidisciplinary group of 100+ researchers and technologists., All partners can be seen below”

web.archive.org/web/2025042606…

Read 4 tweets

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@pepesgrandma

Dec 6

🔥🔥🔥Breaking! Soros Open Society European Policy Institute (OSEPI) has visited EU officials 102 times since 2014! These meetings included DSA discussions. Open Society also belongs to the European Commissions High Level Group on combating hate speech and hate crime.

I kept thinking there had to be some mistake with 102 meetings. But nope, I downloaded a list of all 102! And I do believe these are in addition to the High Level Working Group meetings.

This Soros involved High Level Group started in 2016 with an announcement from Vera Jourová, so yeah increasing censorship is explained by this.

The EU High Level Group on combating racism, xenophobia and other forms of intolerance, set up in 2016, was renamed to the High Level Group on combating hate speech and hate crime.

“The High Level Group on combating hate speech and hate crime will foster the further exchange and
dissemination of good practices between national authorities and concrete discussions on how to fill
existing gaps and better prevent and combat hate crime and hate speech. The High Level Group will also
be a platform for dedicated discussions on how to tackle specificities of particular forms of intolerance, also
in light of the experience of civil society and communities.”

I’m like on information overload here! They even have meeting agendas and minutes you can download.

I will follow up with sources and feel free to download and read as much as you like!

Let’s start with the download for the Open Society and EU meetings first. And actually it’s 103 meetings.

Search for both DSA and Digital Services Act. Plus whatever else you like.

ec.europa.eu/transparencyre…

So, Soros has been in the disinfo business with the European Commission since 2016 and we wonder why they have turned to little dictators?

High Level Group on combating hate speech and hate crime (E03425)

Feel free to click around and download stuff. There’s lots here.

ec.europa.eu/transparency/e…

Read 7 tweets

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@pepesgrandma

Dec 4

🔥🔥🔥BK Presents The Big Tamale! During the Biden admin, we had tons of ex CIA, DHS, and military working with IssueOne for social media censorship and much WORSE!

⚡️ And they are partnered with New Politics that five of the seditious six belong to!

IssueOne is a Soros Democracy Alliance Aligned Partner Organization (APO). The list of other donors is massive, but the Protect Democracy Project stands out.

IssueOne is very capable of censorship. The founder, Nicholas Penniman, claims responsibility for getting Newsguard off the ground. Nicholas is also on the Newsguard Board Of Directors. Yes a program circulated to US schools. Plus British Telecom BT hands this out to the UK public too.

Imran Ahmed, founder of the Center For Counteting Digital Hate org that was targeting Elon Musks X is there too. As is Renee Diresta from the Trump resistance, Election Integrity Partnership, and the Hamilton86 Russian bot hoax etc.

IssueOne started the No Kings effort FOUR MONTHS before we even heard of this. And they admit to organizing it too.

Better yet? They work with Chamberlain Network. Chamberlain worked along with ex Lincoln Projects Steve Schmidt to create the first ever video telling the military to defy Trump. (June 2025)

IssueOne was also mentioned in The Times election fortification article. I can see why, but that will be in a later installment.

Let’s get into this impressive list of names at this org, for shock value. Then we will delve into the evidence and materials in the 🧵. Greater things will be coming later for this org. 😬

Names of folks that worked here:

- Leon Panetta: Former Director of the CIA (2009–2011); former Secretary of Defense (2011–2013); former White House Chief of Staff

- Porter Goss: Former Director of the CIA (2004–2006); former Congressman (R-FL). Oversaw intelligence reforms post-9/11

- Chris Krebs: Former Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA, DHS, 2018–2020). Managed election security and cyber threats, with ties to broader intelligence coordination

- Michael Chertoff
U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security (2005-2009)

- Chuck Hagel
Secretary of Defense (2013-2015); President’s Intelligence Advisory Board (2009-2013)

- Wesley Clark U.S. Army General (Ret.); NATO Supreme Allied Commander, Europe (1997-2000)

- Bill Owens: Former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (2001–2005); retired U.S. Navy Admiral. Led joint military operations and strategy

- Michael Rogers: Former Director of the NSA (2014–2018); retired U.S. Navy Rear Admiral. Focused on signals intelligence and cybersecurity

- Farah Pandith: Former Member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council; former Special Representative to Muslim Communities (State Department); former Director for Middle East Regional Initiatives (National Security Council). Expertise in counter-extremism and intelligence-community diplomacy

- Nicole Tisdale: Former Director of Domestic Policy (National Security Council, White House). Handled interagency policy on national security issues

- Imran Ahmed Founder and CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH)

- Renée DiResta Associate Research Professor for the McCourt School of ublic Policy's Tech Public Policy prograr and Massive Data Institute

- Frances Haugen Facebook Whistleblower and Tech Expert

- Claire Woodall (zuckerbucks colluder)

- Etc

Interestingly they also seem to hang around the SNF Agora and Arena folks a lot. Such as Peter Pomerantsev. Well this is no accident.

Here’s the partners working together at “Unite America”!

IssueOne
New Politics
Protect Democracy
R Street
Vote at Home (zuckerbucks)
SNF Agora
Etc

Even more interesting is that IssueOne partners with all of these at “Perfect US”.

-CTCL Tiana Epps Johnson
-IssueOne Nick Penniman
-Brennan Ctr Wendy Weiser
-SNF Agora Scott Warren
Etc

CTCL was zuckerbucks and Brennan Center was involved in the Soros Partnership For Safe Voting. And recall my SNF Agora exposé too.

TBC

Let’s begin with IssueOne being a part of the Soros Democracy Alliance.

♦️Evidence A

This ➡️2020⬅️ Soros Democracy Alliance Investment Portfolio was handed out at the Oriental Mandarin Hotel for their 2016 meeting.

This gathering was like a week after Trumps 2016 election win, and included a live meeting with Soros for the Trump Resistance.

influencewatch.org/app/uploads/20…

♦️Evidence B

Now deleted, IssueOne was listed on the Democracy Alliance website.

archive.is/WEvZS

This IssueOne Impact Report has a ton of info including on their donors. Protect Democracy Project was a noteworthy major donor.

You’ll also find the usuals like Rockefeller, Packard, Hewlett, and Omidyar etc.. Plus a bunch of new ones. 🤔

You’ll also find tons of staffer names here too. But I have various other pages with names already selected for the job.

web.archive.org/web/2025010323…

Read 22 tweets

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@pepesgrandma

Dec 1

🔥🔥🔥Breaking Seditious Six News! I have found the entire Oct 29, 2025 Elissa Slotkin and Brookings Knight Forum transcript which includes her extra comments and those of other participants too. They had considerable anti Trump discussions.

Highlights?

- Elissa Slotkin claims she has been in communication with at least one officer:

“People are, who are participating in these strikes are doing memos for the record and then taking them to their JAGs and being like, Hey, I don't wanna ever one day be held personally liable on these strikes, so can you kind of cover me legally? I mean, that is some crazy stuff when young officers up and down the chain are seeking legal cover so they don't get sued one day for what could be illegal strikes."

- Robert Kagan views policies like Caribbean strikes as pretexts for domestic power grabs (e.g., enabling arrests and deportations).

- Rep Adam Smith embraces Russiagate:

Smith highlighted the "Putin wing" of the MAGA movement.

—————————————

Here’s analysis of Elissa Slotkins extra comments (Her prev mentioned speech is in this doc too.)

♦️Responding to Sisson's question about the intent behind US military deployments in the Caribbean (e.g., carrier strike groups beyond ship bombings), Slotkin warns of potential escalation to land-based operations, possibly targeting Venezuela. She draws historical parallels to US interventions in Grenada and Panama, critiques the casual nature of Trump's rhetoric, and expresses concern that such actions aren't aligned with public priorities post-9/11 wars. The tone is alarming ("spooking") yet analytical, emphasizing deterrence versus actual use of force and the strain on resources. This ties into her speech's themes of Trump's reorientation toward homeland threats and unchecked executive power.

♦️Addressing Sisson's query on the DoD's health under Trump, Slotkin describes low morale due to firings, retirements, civilian cuts, social policy overreach, and politicization (e.g., using the military for "mythmaking" at Quantico). She shares a personal anecdote about a young female officer questioning her future amid perceived gender-based barriers. She highlights unprecedented actions like NDAs and legal memos for Caribbean strikes, framing them as signs of fear over illegal orders. The tone is urgent and "spooking," underscoring institutional damage and risks to service members, echoing her speech's calls for military resistance to unlawful commands.

♦️In response to Sisson's question on what a national security strategy should include to address Michiganders' concerns, Slotkin recounts town halls she held in August to gauge public views. She highlights evolving threats like cyberattacks (affecting schools and hospitals), economic competition with China (job losses, supply chains), and tech/AI anxieties (social media, job displacement). She criticizes Washington's top-down approach and notes eroded public trust post-Iraq/Afghanistan. The tone is reflective and populist, advocating for citizen input while tying into broader themes of government accountability and adaptation to modern threats.

♦️Answering an audience member (James Stevens from the Stimson Center) on whether the president can unilaterally declare an armed conflict (e.g., near Venezuela) or if it's reserved for Congress under Article I, Slotkin criticizes Trump's "somersaults" to justify actions via secret terrorist lists and withheld legal memos (OLC opinions). She contrasts this with the Global War on Terror's transparency, supports a recent War Powers Resolution by Sen. Kaine, and faults Congress for abdicating oversight since Iraq. She demands evidence ("show me the math") for claims like linking Venezuela to fentanyl. The tone is critical and defiant, highlighting constitutional overreach and lack of accountability, aligning with her speech's warnings about authoritarian tactics.

I’ll also be following with analysis of the other speakers.

Document 👇🏻
web.archive.org/web/2025120117…

I’m going to include the entire Elissa Slotkin speech on this officer before I get into the others.

“I think the thing that killed me the most was I was having a conversation with a young officer last week, who I happened to know from home in Michigan, and she's seven years into her career. And, she said that her entire cohort is looking at, particularly like, women getting removed from their jobs, and just saying like, do I have a future in this military? You know, her dream was to be an admiral and she's now saying like, is that actually, is there a ceiling on what I can do in this organization?

And, I think morale is low, and then I think the thing that is definitely happening that I was,
I've never seen in my time is, you know, people are being asked to sign NDAs who are
participating in these strikes in the Caribbean. People are, who are participating in these
strikes are doing memos for the record and then taking them to their JAGs and being like,
Hey, I don't wanna ever one day be held personally liable on these strikes, so can you kind
of cover me legally? I mean, that is some crazy stuff when young officers up and down the
chain are seeking legal cover so they don't get sued one day for what could be illegal strikes.”

Victoria Nulands husband Richard Kagan spoke too. He actually said elections would be cancelled by Trump. 😹 Here’s a few key quotes.

KAGAN:

“Well, thank you, Jeff. Um, the, the biggest threat to our national security right now
is our domestic problem. I mean, I, I don't, my national security strategy is we have to, uh, elect a different government. Um, but I'm not sure we're gonna have elections. So I don't know whether I have a good strategy for dealing with that.”

“Uh, and you need to ask what are the goals of this regime. If you look at China and you say,
what is the grand strategy of Xi Jinping? Uh, a major component of that grand strategy is to ensure the continued control in power of the Communist party, uh, of China. And that much
of their foreign policy is subsidiary to that.”

“what we're dealing with now is one man rule in this country.”

“So take this question of Venezuela and the bombing of the, of the boats. Personally, I don't think this is primarily about foreign policy. I think it's primarily about domestic policy.”

“we are at war, uh, and therefore we can do whatever we want on a whole host of domestic issues, including
deportations and arrests, and even pursuing, uh, the wrong kind of people here in the United States under the overall blanket of a national security waiver because we are at war.“

Read 4 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @pepesgrandma

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!