SagasofBharat Profile picture
May 31, 2024 15 tweets 6 min read Read on X
THREAD 🧵 ALGEBRA : A gift of Hindus to the world

Mohammedans often falsely take credit for the invention of Algebra. Even though treatise on bījagaṇita (the correct term for algebra) existed & was extensively used in India much before the birth of Mohamedan religion itself. Image
In popular culture Algebra gets wrongly credited to Al khwarizmi for his book Kitab Al-Jabr. However all three of His books Kitab Al-Jabr, Kitāb al Hisāb al-Hindī (Book of Indian Mathematics), and Zīj al-Sindhind (Astronomy Table from India) are plagiarised from the works of Hindus, the last 2 books directly mentioning Indian mathematics as his source.

The myth that he invented Algebra is wrongly believed due to the influence of his books in Europe.Image
HOW MATHEMATICS REACHED BAGHDAD:

Iranian scholar Al Beruni writes Indian scholars carried with them Brahma Siddhanta of Brahma Gupta to Baghdad during the rule of Khalif Mansur who patronised Al Khwarizmi to write his books from the knowledge they gained from these Indian scholars.Image
In the very translation of Al Khwarizmi’s book, the translator mentions in the preface that he was not the INVENTOR OF THE ART(ALGEBRA)

That itself dismisses the claim that Algebra was invented by Mohamedans. It was rather a blatant plagiarism.
Image
Image
Infact he deduce from the manner of Al khwarizmi’s own words that he himself never claimed to be the inventor of Algebra. Image
He says that the Caliph Mamun encouraged him to write on a popular work on algebra which implies the other treatises on Algebra were already extant. Image
He concludes from the work that the information contained in it is derived from indian source. Image
Muhammad Ben Musa Al Khwarizmi was conversant with Hindu science is further evident from the fact he abridged at Al Mamun’s request, The SindHind translated by Al Fazari from the work of an Indian astronomer who visited the court of Al Mansur. Image
Translator of Al Khwarizmi’s work is the same as taught by Diophantus & Hindu Mathematicians.

However he rejects that Khwarizmi learnt his treatise from Diophantus on the premise that he wasn’t known to them. He concludes that the work was plagiarised from Hindus.
Image
Image
H.T ColeBrooke was the first to introduce it to more general notice. Guess what, his work itself was named Algebra with Arithmetic & mensuration from the Sanscrit of Brahmagupta & Bhascara. Image
In the book Colebrooke completely dismisses Arabs of any credit for Algebra and affirms that they learnt algebra from Hindus as Greek works weren’t known to them by then. Image
Colebrooke also confirms that earliest knowledge of Algebra comes from Aryabhata but even he credits his work to much earlier Hindu writers.

So the Hindus & Greeks were contemporary in terms of invention of Algebra.
Image
Image
However, in comparison Hindus had a much advanced algebra that wasn’t known to Greeks.
Image
Image
Many other Mathematicians have come to the same conclusion that Mohamedans Plagiarised Algebra from Hindus.

One such Mathematician John Wallis, in his Treatise of Algebra both Historical & Practical writes how Arabs learnt Algebra from Indians. Image
Another Polymath Hieronymus Cardanus, in his Ars Magna mentions that the work of Al Khwarizmi is merely a translation.

Therefore it leaves no doubt that it is wrong to credit a mere plagiarist to be a creator of Algebra and history needs to be corrected. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SagasofBharat

SagasofBharat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SagasofBharat

Jul 6
I am surprised so many people didn't even read Ramayana?

Let me try & educate:

Myth 1: Ram never cared about surpanakha's appearance.

Reality: Shri Ram & Lakshman literally made fun of Surpanakha's appearance in Aranya Kanda sarga 18. Image
Image
Image
Myth 2: Sita was from Nepal & naturally brown skinned

Sita was from Mithila mentioned in Ramayana many times.

Shri Ram explicitly described Sita In Ramayana having smooth skin & complexion like rose apple.

(So She was Definitely not pimple faced like Sai pallavi.) Image
Image
Myth 3: There is no mention Surpanakha was ugly/ she initially went undetected by shape shifting.

Reality:
1. In Shurpanakha's 1st appearance in front of Shri Ram She is described as:
-facially unpleasant
-Pot bellied
-Coppery haired
-ugly featured
-brass voiced
-deplorably oldish
-crooked talker
-uncouth
-ill mannered
-abominable.

She appeared in the scene in her real ugly self & only mentioned she can shape shift. She didn't go undetected. She honestly mentioned who she wasImage
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Jun 24
Do u know?

Sometime back Amir Khan's son Junaid made a propaganda movie, criticizing social practices of Hinduism.

In the movie Junaid's character questions why Hindu women wear Ghunghat.

Have u seen them questioning Burqa the same way? Image
Image
Image
Of course the father son duo will never question the practice of Burqa but want Hindu women uncovered.

I don't have to tell you the history why Mohamedans always want Hindu women uncovered.

Then he goes on to question the harmless Hindu practice of Agni-ahuti implying it's a superstition.

Never seen them questioning their evil practices of Halala though. Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 19
Is it a new trend now to paint Portuguese colonization as romantic?

Cute.

Meanwhile in Goa, the Portuguese Inquisition was a 250-year-long horror show of public burnings, mutilations, and mass conversions.

Let’s break the fantasy. Image
When Portuguese Inquisitors landed in Goa, their mission was clear: uproot Paganism and replace it with Catholicism.

The natives—proud and rooted in Dharma— obviously resisted.

So what did the church do? Image
Jesuit saint Francis Xavier converted thousands of native fishermen—not through love, but fear.

Threats to burn their boats.
Starvation.
Brutal deaths.

Imagine losing your livelihood,your life or your faith.

How romantic. 🙃 Image
Read 9 tweets
Jun 8
1. The concept of Ahimsa comes from Vedas itself before any other religion existed. Ahimsa is considered a virtue in many Hindu scriptures.

2. There are Many Verses in Vedas that suggest the prohibition of Cow slaughter. Image
The concept of Ahimsa was first mentioned in Rig veda. Image
Image
Image
Here is a verse from Chandogya Upanishad that lists Ahimsa as a virtue.

Someone whose source is only secondary sources like Wendy Doniger & D.N Jha ofcrs has not studied any primary sources like this. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jun 7
"Hindus used to eat beef before the Muslim invasion" ?????

Meanwhile Ibn Battuta:
"Killing or eating a cow was strictly forbidden; anyone caught doing it should be punished with death"

This is how Bharat has always functioned.Image
Manu needhi Cholan ran a chariot on his own son to give justice to a cow whose calf his son killed mistakenly.

Hindus haven't spared their own children when it came to the protection of cows.

That's how much Hindus Rever cows. Image
While Ellalan cholan sacrificed his son, Bira Gowda gave his own life to protect cows. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 3
Do you know?

Bengal once produced a fabric so fine, you’d “scarcely know what it was you had in your hand.”
-Tavernier

The British didn’t just destroy the muslin industry-they mutilated weavers, severing their thumbs to cripple India’s global trade.

A Tale of Colonial crime🧵 Image
Once upon a time, Bengal’s muslin was coveted across the world. From Romans and Chinese to Indonesians, Arabs, and Jews—everyone swore by Indian muslin. Image
Image
From Megasthenes to the Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, Indian muslin was widely documented and admired.

Its export made Bengal immensely wealthy.

That was... until 1757.Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(