Mohammedans often falsely take credit for the invention of Algebra. Even though treatise on bījagaṇita (the correct term for algebra) existed & was extensively used in India much before the birth of Mohamedan religion itself.
In popular culture Algebra gets wrongly credited to Al khwarizmi for his book Kitab Al-Jabr. However all three of His books Kitab Al-Jabr, Kitāb al Hisāb al-Hindī (Book of Indian Mathematics), and Zīj al-Sindhind (Astronomy Table from India) are plagiarised from the works of Hindus, the last 2 books directly mentioning Indian mathematics as his source.
The myth that he invented Algebra is wrongly believed due to the influence of his books in Europe.
HOW MATHEMATICS REACHED BAGHDAD:
Iranian scholar Al Beruni writes Indian scholars carried with them Brahma Siddhanta of Brahma Gupta to Baghdad during the rule of Khalif Mansur who patronised Al Khwarizmi to write his books from the knowledge they gained from these Indian scholars.
In the very translation of Al Khwarizmi’s book, the translator mentions in the preface that he was not the INVENTOR OF THE ART(ALGEBRA)
That itself dismisses the claim that Algebra was invented by Mohamedans. It was rather a blatant plagiarism.
Infact he deduce from the manner of Al khwarizmi’s own words that he himself never claimed to be the inventor of Algebra.
He says that the Caliph Mamun encouraged him to write on a popular work on algebra which implies the other treatises on Algebra were already extant.
He concludes from the work that the information contained in it is derived from indian source.
Muhammad Ben Musa Al Khwarizmi was conversant with Hindu science is further evident from the fact he abridged at Al Mamun’s request, The SindHind translated by Al Fazari from the work of an Indian astronomer who visited the court of Al Mansur.
Translator of Al Khwarizmi’s work is the same as taught by Diophantus & Hindu Mathematicians.
However he rejects that Khwarizmi learnt his treatise from Diophantus on the premise that he wasn’t known to them. He concludes that the work was plagiarised from Hindus.
H.T ColeBrooke was the first to introduce it to more general notice. Guess what, his work itself was named Algebra with Arithmetic & mensuration from the Sanscrit of Brahmagupta & Bhascara.
In the book Colebrooke completely dismisses Arabs of any credit for Algebra and affirms that they learnt algebra from Hindus as Greek works weren’t known to them by then.
Colebrooke also confirms that earliest knowledge of Algebra comes from Aryabhata but even he credits his work to much earlier Hindu writers.
So the Hindus & Greeks were contemporary in terms of invention of Algebra.
However, in comparison Hindus had a much advanced algebra that wasn’t known to Greeks.
Many other Mathematicians have come to the same conclusion that Mohamedans Plagiarised Algebra from Hindus.
One such Mathematician John Wallis, in his Treatise of Algebra both Historical & Practical writes how Arabs learnt Algebra from Indians.
Another Polymath Hieronymus Cardanus, in his Ars Magna mentions that the work of Al Khwarizmi is merely a translation.
Therefore it leaves no doubt that it is wrong to credit a mere plagiarist to be a creator of Algebra and history needs to be corrected.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Romila Thapar says Omitting Mughals from textbooks is “nonsense.”
Did you know?
There was a scandal in ICHR where a historian's manuscript vanished & later found plagiarised by someone in ICHR itself.
The historian died without recieving recognition & royalty for his work.
This is the same ICHR which chose Romila Thapar as its council 4 times.
Apparently omitting "Mughals" from textbook is Nonsense but omitting credit & Royalty of another Historian who wasn't part of the Marxist ecosystem isn't.
In the 1970s, historian Dr. Parmatma Saran submitted an English translation of Tarikh-i-Akbari to the ICHR under an approved project.
ICHR’s own Annual Reports (1976–77, 1977–78) explicitly list the manuscript as received and completed.
Years later, when questions were raised about publication, ICHR suddenly claimed the manuscript was “not traceable.”
Dr. Saran died without seeing his work published, credited, or paid for.
Hilarious empty rhetoric! U didn't even research primary sources by British themselves
Myth 1: The British provided better education by dismantling Gurukuls.
Fact: 1. Surveys done by the British themselves shows the Indian method of studies in its indigenous schools was superior to the British during the colonial regime.
2. In Contemporary England during the colonial regime there were hardly any thorough studies except in religious spheres.
3. The average period of schooling was hardly 1-2 years.
4. In fact it was the Indian method of studies that actually helped the introduction of popular education in England that existed in India for centuries.
5. In some country schools of England, writing was excluded for fear of evil consequences.
6. The British only wanted to replace Indian schools with their own so that they could uproot indian civilization to bring people to an institutionalised, formal, law-abiding Christianity.
Myth 2: The British built Indians the first true universities
Fact: Vedic universities like Nalanda, Vikramshila, Takshashila, Odantpuri were not only highly formalised, they were famous all over the world & many foreigners used to come to study there.
Myth 3: Indians were able to discover Indus valley due to John Marshall
Fact: It was actually a Hindu Brahmin Rakhaldas Banerjee who first discovered IVC. Marshall got him shifted to snatch the entire credit.
Myth 4: British standardised Indian dialects and Grammar.
Fact: Heard about Panini? He had formalised Sanskrit Grammar in such a superior way that British themselves used to think not learning Sanskrit scriptures will be a dis-service to themselves.
William Jones:
"Sanskrit is of wonderful structure more perfect & refined than Greek or latin"
Modiji: Macaulay ne Bharat ko apne jad se ukhadne ke beej boye the (through English education system)
Ruchika: That never happened.
Macaulay: Clown Ruchika, i exactly said that.
No Hindoo who has ever received an English education ever remains sincerely attached to his religion. Some profess themselves as pure deist, some embrace Christianity. It is my firm belief that if our plan of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater among the respectable classes.
And this will be effected without any efforts to proselytize.
Modiji has more knowledge in History than this self proclaimed Historian. What Macaulay wanted to achieve is evident in illiterate like Ruchika who has no knowledge of history & no sense of her roots.
Her entire video is not based on any primary sources but from writings of British stooges like Phule & Ramabai.
Let's debunk her lies.
Ruchika's claim :
Education was only limited to upper castes
Fact check:
Surveys done by the British themselves debunk this lie as Shudra scholars were the highest in number amongst Hindus.
He erased half the planet because he can’t read a history book😂
Here's you history lesson about Existence of India before British came to loot us.
GREEK SOURCES:
1. Greek ambassador Megasthenes wrote about India in the 3rd century BCE before your Christ was born.
Here's a Map as per the description of Megasthenes.
2. Greco-Roman astronomer Ptolemy mentioned the country as India clearly in the 2nd century CE.