Was the Kremlin really "afraid" that NATO might attack Russia, or was it more about not being able to imperialistically invade and subjugate neighbors anymore?
Let's see what Russian officials and their propagandists say themselves 🧵
Let's start with the Russian dictator Putin: He called the dissolution of the Soviet Union the "greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century." Further, on many occasions, he denied the legitimacy of Ukrainian statehood, speaks about "de-Nazification," and "helping Donbas."
We all remember his article about the "Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians." Medvedev also wrote about this issue, agreeing with it and stating that there can't be any negotiations until the Ukrainian government is "replaced."
Medvedev, former President and Prime Minister, now Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, is an interesting source to learn about the Russian position. He dreams about a 'Micro Ukraine' and is using the imperialistic term 'Malorossiya' (Little Russia).
He also said that Ukrainians even have a 'choice': join Russia or die. About useful idiots in the West, he said: 'Our task is to actively support such politicians and their parties in the West, helping them achieve worthy results in elections.'"
His outbursts of hate are notorious: 'We must not stop until the current, inherently terrorist Ukrainian state is completely dismantled. It must be destroyed to the ground.'" Look at the map...
Deputy Speaker of the Russian Duma, Petr Tolstoy, recently said that if they 'will not solve the issue with Ukraine,' there will be problems in Kazakhstan and Armenia, criticizing Kazakh policy. He called the Almaty a 'Russian fortress.' Is this someone who is afraid of NATO?
Another member of Putin's party in the Duma is Aleksander Borodai, former 'prime minister' of the 'People's Republic of Donetsk.' Borodai explained that he left his post in Donetsk in August 2014 to support the Kremlin’s fictional claims of a 'Ukrainian civil war.'
In 2022 Duma-MP Yevgeny Fyodorov questions the recognition of independence of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania (Ukraine too of course). Fyodorov is also a member of Putin's party and the coordinator of NOD (National Liberation Movement), a far-right extremist organization.
Oh, back to Medvedev, he also said: "Ukraine is definitely Russia!" Well, that is definitely something someone would say if they were concerned about "security" and "evil NATO," or is it perhaps blatant imperialism?
Also, the state-controlled media is very active in promoting imperialism and hatred against Ukraine. RT Head Editor Simonyan said about Ukrainians: "They are dirty and we need to wash them clean. Those who do not accept this will have a terrible fate."...and brainwash of course
...by the way, if a country is genuinely concerned about its security, why does its leadership invent ridiculous but dangerous stories, like the claim that Ukrainians are 'crucifying kids,' as was reported in a RT headline in 2014?"
In 2020, RT head editor Simonyan said about Armenia: 'After all you have done, Russia has the moral right to spit on you and wipe you off the face of the earth." Just because Armenia attempted some reforms..
Simonyan also does not hesitate to express her nostalgia for the Soviet Union and the Russian Empire, reminiscing about how nice it is to be feared and to 'give a f...' about smaller nations.
About Odesa, she said: "Russia needs to take Odesa to make it 'normal.'" What does she consider "normal"?
These imperialistic views are not only expressed by leading propagandists. Putin also claims 'Odesa is a Russian city,' , for instance. Is that a 'security concern' or imperialism?
These were only a few examples of Solovyov's "work". I suggest following @JuliaDavisNews on Twitter and the channel 'Russian Media Monitor' on YouTube to see more, for instance about Olga Skabeyeva who said already in 2020 that "🇷🇺 will destroy Ukraine"
Oh, I forgot one 'highlight' of Vladimir Solovyov: he also claimed that 'Ukraine needs to be destroyed because satanists live there.' Does that sound like a TV host from a country that is concerned about security?
Not only politicians and state propagandists openly express their intentions for Ukraine, but also 'academics' are very vocal on this issue. One of them is fascist philosopher Aleksander Dugin. n.
Igor Korotchenko, "journalist and military expert", is also prominent for his 'insightful' statements. He said that 'Russia wants to erase Ukraine off the map, because it never really existed in the first place.' Oh, did he forget it was all because of evil NATO?
There many other examples, and I would welcome it if you add more quotes. I want to finish the first chapter with a person who calls himself a Nazi and has been fighting against Ukraine since 2014: "Ukraine must not exist," "there has to be de-Ukrainization.", Alexey Milchakov
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Russian propaganda has different layers regarding the channels, intensity, and quality of the narratives it uses.
Usually, the public and even many "experts" see only a limited range of what is happening, or they refuse to see more because they are even part of it. 🧵
Overt:
Russian media channels, Russian "diplomats and politicians", official Kremlin speakers. Obvious messaging, not only justifying but also praising the full-scale invasion, with extreme demonization of Ukraine and the West.
"Ukrainians have biolabs and are Satanists."
Covert:
Hidden actors, anonymous trolls, Russian-paid or manipulated Western "agents of influence", academics, "experts". They spread pro-Russian narratives, and in many cases are not detected as propagandists. Narratives can range from extreme to subtle.
Thread🧵
5 Myths about Russina influence operations and propaganda that we finally need to get rid of. Works also about Russias authoritarian allies
1) It is always blatant. No, it can be very subtle, more difficult to detect, between the lines, but perfect for Moscow’s benefit
Myth 2: "It is only the far right absorbing it"
Not at all, the far left and the so-called peace movement, like in the Cold War, did not change at all, spreading Moscow’s talking points, especially the anti-NATO and “the West wants war, Russia wants peace” idea...
Myth 3: "It is only social media, bots, websites and AI."
No, it is still also about books, about anti-Western narratives entering our established media, about agents of influence (academics, diplomats, politicians), real people doing propaganda, lobbying for certain regimes.
🧵Eindrücke vom KPÖ Volksstimmefest 2025 -Warnung, es wird heftig.
Wir beginnen mit dem Stand Aufschrift "Frieden schaffen ohne Waffen" mit Peter Kolba, der kürzlich Kickl rechtgegeben hat (siehe Screenshot)
Nicht weit davon entfernt ein Stand oppsitioneller Russinnen, die sich gegen Putin und für das Selbstverteidigungsrecht der Ukraine etc. einsetzen. Als ich diesen Stand besuche, steht gerade in Österreicher dort, der ihnen die "NATO Einkreisung" von Russland erklärt...
Das passiert Ihnen den ganzen Tag über und deshalb, so sagen sie, haben sie als linke, feministische Gruppe auch bewusst diesen Ort gewählt. Sie sind schockiert über stalinistische Symboliken und pro russische Narrative
Aus meiner Sicht gar erschreckende Videotitel (siehe Auszug unten) am YouTube Kanal von Neutralitätsforscher Pascal Lottaz, der nicht nur sehr interessante Gäste auf seinem Kanal sprechen lässt, sondern auch selbst mehrfach bei RT aufgetreten ist auch nach 2022. Jetzt und das hat mich sehr schockiert war Professor Mangott bei Lottaz zu Gast, unter dem Titel:
"Kriegstreiberei an Unis: Die Zerstörung kritischer Akademiker in Europa"
Ich möchte gleich sagen, dass ich damit absolut nicht gerechnet habe und ich Prof. Mangott weder mit Lottaz noch mit den üblichen Gästen auf dem Kanal von Lottaz gleichsetzen möchte; gerade deshalb bin ich so schockiert.
Was allerdings Prof. Mangott über Kolleginnen und Kollegen in der Wissenschaft, über den "Mainstream" und eine "Vorgeschichte" zum russischen Angriffskrieg sagt, hat mich dann noch einmal schockiert und negativ überrascht – man kann das im Video selbst nachsehen.
Dabei sei eines gesagt und auch wenn ich das alles scharf kritisiere; Untergriffige persönliche Beschimpfungen und unsachliche Beleidigungen lehne ich übrigens strikt ab, auch wenn es Anlass zur Kritik gibt; das gilt in alle Richtungen, sollte gesagt sein.
Wie gesagt: Der YouTube Kanal lohnt einen Blick, und gerade deshalb verwundert es mich dann doch, dass Prof. Mangott dort aufgetreten ist, hier einige der Thumbnail Titel und Subheadlines:
"Putin offers Peace - Putin offers incredible Terms for Peace with Ukraine in Interview with Tucker Carlson"
"die NATO droht China - verrückter NATO Gipfel", "die EU ist dem Untergang geweiht",
"Iran entlarvt die westliche Heuchelei", "jetzt dreht die EU komplett durch - er (Anmerkung: ein EX RT Journalist Warweg) deckt die neuesten Heucheleien Deutschlands und der EU auf", "Schweizer Top Professor (Anm. Daniele Ganser) Deckt NATO Kriegs-Lügen auf" , "die NATO stirbt - helfen wir ihr dabei", "Europa zerstört die Demokratie, Europas Niedergang ist jetzt unumkehrbar - sagt Dr. Ulrike Guérot" , "Jeffrey Sachs deckt Europas Kriegslügen auf",
"Als die NATO Russland den Krieg erklärte", "Deutschland will wieder Krieg", "Iran entlarvt westliche Heuchelei", "der kollektive Westen im Eskalations-Hyperloop", "jetzt dreht die EU komplett durch", "die Ukraine provoziert einen Atomkrieg", "worse than the Nazis" (über Israel), "der kollektive Westen ist dem Untergang geweiht" - auch bei diesem Videotitel taucht Frau Guérot auf.
Neben den bereits genannten, waren auch Vertreter des Bündnis Wagenknecht, Roger Köppel, Gabriele Krone-Schmalz und viele viele andere, einschlägig bekannte Persönlichkeiten zu Gast.
Das kürzlich erschienene Video mit Gerhard Mangott finden Sie hier, es können auch die anderen Videos abgerufen werden bei "Neutrality Studies", in unterschiedlichen Sprachen youtube.com/watch?v=N8yLpx…
Interessant, was Pascal Lottaz sonst so von sich gibt, das sprüht nicht gerade vor Sachlichkeit.
"female Dr. Evil", "Horror Uschi"
Ah, der Stellvertreterkrieg "Proxy War", auch ein bekanntes Narrativ
Der verteidigungsablehnende Pazifismus wie auch große Teile der Friedensbewegung sind in ihren Argumentationsketten geradezu gezwungen, den Aggressor, die Gräuel der diktatorischen Besatzung sowie die Konsequenzen der Wehrlosigkeit zu verharmlosen oder gar zu leugnen 🧵
Die systematischen Exekutionen, Vergewaltigungen, Plünderungen und Folterungen wie in Bucha sind nicht während der Kampfhandlungen passiert, sondern unter russischer Besatzung. Genauso wie die systematische Entführung von Kindern sowie deren Gehirnwäsche...
...das zu verhindern klappt pazifistisch nicht. Außer man unterstellt und hier wird es noch abscheulicher, den Opfern, dass sie sich falsch verhalten: "die NATO Absicht war Schuld" oder sie sollen doch die russischen Soldaten überraschen mit Liebe, waren es Kerzen oder Blumen?
Today is the anniversary of the downing of passenger jet MH17 by Russian forces in the occupied Donetsk Oblast of Ukraine. All 298 people on board were killed, and the Russian Federation managed to kill something else that day as well: its last chance for any credibility🧵
Immediately after the jet was shot down, Russian propaganda denied everything: that their “militia” had a Buk SAM system, that they had even bragged about the shoot-down while they still believed it was a Ukrainian military (Antonov) jet… but it got worse.
The Russians not only refused to admit their war crime but also blamed Ukraine and the West. “It was a bomb on board,” “Ukrainians shot it down with a jet,” “Ukrainians shot it with a surface-to-air missile,” and other versions circulated, despite evidence pointing to Russia.