The 2016 era planned Ukrainian A2AD munitions capabilities were to be as follows:
Vilkha 300mm GMLRS 180 km,
Neptun derivative GLCM/ALCM 300+ km,
Hrim 2 TBM ~400 km,
Korshun GLCM [a Tomahawk GLCM lookalike] at 1000+ km.
3/
The PSU Su-24MR [FENCER E] was to be given a long range Shtyk side looking radar (SLAR) to play "Mini-JSTARS," as well as 100 km long range visual band cameras, to be a "ISR-strike complex."
4/
Only the Vilkha GMLRS in 70km and 120km versions and the Neptun ASCM were built in any numbers by Ukraine before February 2022.
It was likely Putin's fear of the full Ukrainian A2AD capability being fielded that drove his invasion timing.
5/
Ukrainian OWA Drone/Propeller cruise missiles are filling most of the Neptun & Korshun deep strike roles.
Meanwhile Ukraine's unplanned for USV's are shouldering most of the anti-ship role of the Neptun.
6/
The US GMLRS has replaced the Ukrainian Vilkha GMLRS family and, finally, ATACMS is filling the Grom/Hrim 2 slot.
Ukraine has in 2024 the range of A2AD capabilities it's 2016 doctrine called for to shut down Crimea as a Russian forward base.
And it is doing so.
7/7 End
@threadreaderapp unroll please
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Russo-Ukrainian War cycle time between drone control frequency changes and jammers for the new frequencies had been two weeks.
It used to take something like 20 weeks for a US theater commander to properly staff out such a EW procurement request with all the Congressional bells and whistles.
1/
US Electronic warfare used to be better:
"In all, over 300 quick reaction capability efforts were initiated during the Vietnam War. The U. S. counter-countermeasure systems developed and installed in 1966 and 1967...
...included radar and missile guidance warning receivers, jammers and deception repeaters, standoff jamming by support aircraft, chaff, and anti-radiation missiles."
3/
It utterly sickens me that senior US Army flag ranks got rid of 4,500 MRAPs in 2013 because they thought there was no conceivable use for a fast wheeled troop transport, armored against mines, in a medium intensity war.
Flag rank leadership in medium intensity warfare🧵 1/
We have a generation of "forward operating base" flag ranks running the US Army like UK had "Imperial policing" army flag ranks vs Japanese bicycle logistics at Malaya in 1942.
Medium intensity war was outside both their frames of reference.
Calo Kopp's "Parasitism as an Abstraction for Organisational Dysfunctions" makes for bracing reading on the Flag rank organizational dysfunction leading to the UK surrender at Singapore
A lot of Western analysts haven't noticed Iran has both deployed & exported a jet powered drone as an anti-drone munition against high altitude long endurance drones.
This is utter bad news for Western airborne/helicopter assault/marine infantry.
The Iranian 358 loitering drone that can kill a MQ-1 at up 25,000 altitude, can also kill a UH-60 or a V-22 delivering troops or a C-130 dropping paratroopers.
100% of all Western VTOL or fixed wing troop carriers will need a blinding laser infrared countermeasures system.
2/
The Iranian 358 loitering munition debuted in 2020 in numbers with a highly publicized specific anti-US Special Forces MV-22 Osprey mission in the marketing.
_BEFORE_ the jet powered US Coyote Block 2 anti-drone munition was deployed.
I've seen a lot of accounts touting this Bain and Company consulting report Sky News is publicizing about Russians beating the West 3-to-1 shell production.
I don't buy it because the text shows a lot of typical consulting tricks (See text⬇️) ...
...aiming to get non-technically educated reporters and policy makers to reach a conclusion that open source data on the Russian shell supply chain simply doesn't support.
Bain & Company is a global consulting firm like McKenzie group.
As a retired US DoD Quality auditor who spent about 40-to-50 hours piecing together the open source State Dept, DTRA & declassified CIA data for the Soviet/Russian shell supply chain in August 2022...
This graph is a wonderful way to exhibit Russian Lanchester square collapse in progress. Look at the time it took to reach the first 100K Russian losses.
Now do that for 200k, 300k 400k and 500k.
The 'next 100k' of losses happens faster the farther right...
Lanchester smiles🧵
1/
...you go in the graph.
"More and more military effort for less and less military result."
We are seeing the same with RuAF T-55 tanks, BTR-50 APC and T-62's turned into tin sheds/Bylatmobile/Turtle tanks as APC/mine clearing vehicles being destroyed in 2024
2/
Unlike the Western intelligence yo-yo's who are claiming publicly that the Russian military is bigger, and thus stronger, now than when it first invaded Ukraine.
I've worked in wartime military vehicle reset programs.