America 2100 Profile picture
Jun 4 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Where does the "Q" in "LGBTQ" come from?

Most people know it stands for "queer." But you might not know just how radical the term really is.

To understand the modern "LGBTQ" movement, we have to understand "queer theory"—a revolutionary movement born in the 1990s. (1/11) Image
"Queer," of course, was originally used as a pejorative for gays and lesbians. It was "reclaimed" as a positive identity in the late 1980s and early 1990s, with the creation of radical groups like Queer Nation.

But its meaning remains somewhat ambiguous to this day. (2/11) Image
The institutionalization of the term is generally traced back to the militant LGBT group Queer Nation, founded in New York in 1990.

Queer Nation's manifesto called for "a moratorium on straight marriage, on babies, on public displays of affection among the opposite sex." (3/11) Image
"Straight people will not do this voluntarily and so they must be forced into it," the Queer Nation manifesto wrote of LGBT rights. "Straights must be frightened into it. Terrorized into it. Fear is the most powerful motivator...Straight people are your enemy." (4/11)Image
All this coincided with the rise of "queer theory," a radical conceptualization of LGBT identity that placed itself at odds with the more mainstream, "assimilationist" wing of the LGBT movement.

Queer theory sought to subvert mainstream culture rather than join it. (5/11)Image
Drawing on postmodern and poststructuralist thinkers like Michel Foucault, queer theorists posited that sexuality and gender itself were "social constructs," and attacked what they called "heteronormativity"—i.e., the acceptance of heterosexuality as a social "norm." (6/11) Image
To take one example: More "conservative" LGBT activists argued for "assimilating" into mainstream society through causes such as gay marriage. But queer theorists argued for abolishing the institution of marriage altogether—the entire mainstream culture needed to go. (7/11)Image
Image
They made the same case against gay adoption, gay military service, and various other tenets of the mainstream "gay rights" movement.

Instead, the transgender theorist Mattilda Sycamore wrote, they should push for "new ways of loving [and] lusting for...one another." (8/11) Image
These ideas may have seemed fringe at the time—even now, they might seem distant from all the neutered, corporate "Gay Pride" rhetoric.

But by the end of the 1990s, they had already entered the mainstream, with shows like Queer as Folk.

As one history of the term notes: (9/11)Image
There is a reason that the "Q" was added to the "LGBTQ" acronym—it is a very explicit, and unambiguous, affirmation of the radicalism of queer theory. When activists use the term "queer" today, that set of beliefs and political objectives are what they're referencing. (10/11) Image
"Queer theory and politics necessarily celebrate transgression," wrote the queer theorist Jay Stewart.

We should take them at their word: The modern LGBTQ movement isn't about assimilation. It is about subversion—dismantling mainstream norms in favor of radical ones. (11/11)
Like this thread? Great! We're a new account on here. We'll be doing many more threads and videos like this in the coming months.

Our philosophy is simple: America first. America forever. 🇺🇸

If you like our content, give us a follow: @America_2100

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with America 2100

America 2100 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @America_2100

May 31
It's a familiar dance: The Left abuses its power, and the Right responds by feebly warning that someday, when the roles are reversed, their opponents will come to regret it.

But they rarely do — because Republicans almost never follow through.

A quick thread. 🧵 (1/10)
For more than a year now, conservatives have been angrily predicting that this time, the Left had really gone too far.

When the Left first launched its lawfare campaign against Trump last year, that was the Right's response: "This is going to come back to bite them." (2/10)Image
Image
But recent history suggests that the Left has no reason to take the Right’s threats seriously — at least thus far.

"Precedents" always seem to bind the Right. They rarely, if ever, bind the Left.

This, from @willchamberlain, is exactly right: (3/10)
Read 11 tweets
May 22
This is a big deal.

Another far-left, Soros-funded prosecutor was just defeated by a tough-on-crime challenger.

This happened in Portland, Oregon — one of the most left-wing cities in the country.

The soft-on-crime era is coming to an end.

Voters have had enough. 🧵(1/14)
Mike Schmidt, the hard-left Portland DA, won with 77% of the vote in 2020.

Last night, he lost by double digits — despite receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars from Soros groups.

His opponent was a lifelong Republican.

Yes: A lifelong Republican won in Portland. (2/14)Image
Schmidt is the latest scalp in a tough-on-crime revolution that's happening across the country.

In the wake of BLM, far-left prosecutors swept into office in many major cities — and immediately began implementing soft-on-crime policies.

The results were devastating. (3/14)
Image
Image
Read 15 tweets
May 20
"We're going to have to do something dramatic to remove people from this country that are here illegally."

This is now the mainstream position among voters.

For months, the Left has tried to cast the GOP's position on immigration as "extreme."

But it hasn't worked. 🧵 (1/7)
The Left's response to these comments from @marcorubio yesterday was predictably hysterical.

But on this issue, Rubio — and Donald Trump — are far closer to the center of gravity in American public opinion than progressives.

Voters have moved right on immigration. (2/7)
Image
Image
The number of Americans who rank immigration among their top issues has surged over the past six months.

And U.S. public opinion is more hawkish on this issue than it has been in years. Support for Trump's border wall is higher than it has ever been before. (3/7) Image
Read 8 tweets
May 15
Share this far and wide.

NFL star Harrison Butker is being attacked by the Left for telling the truth about feminism in this speech.

Harrison is a devout Catholic, a patriot, and a loving husband and father.

Let's show our support. 🇺🇸

(Thread…🧵)
Butker, the star kicker for the Kansas City Chiefs, hasn't shied away from his conservative beliefs. This week, his commencement speech at Benedictine College, he criticized gender ideology, feminism, abortion, and COVID tyranny.

The Left reacted exactly as you'd expect.
Image
Image
Butker has helped the Chiefs win three Super Bowls — and is ranked among the best kickers in NFL history.

He's also a devout pro-life Catholic who regularly attends Latin Mass with his family.

He spoke candidly about his faith in this 2019 @EWTN segment:
Read 5 tweets
May 10
Radicals understand that symbols matter.

Our traditions, monuments and memorials are part of the story we tell about ourselves.

That's why they're targeting the symbols of the West: To transform a society, you have to transform the way it understands itself.

A quick 🧵 (1/9)
Image
Every civilization has a "mythology": We observe holidays and traditions; celebrate great heroes and deeds; and commemorate symbols and stories. It's what shapes our understanding of ourselves.

The Left wants to delegitimize that mythology—and replace it with their own. (2/9) Image
Today's attempt to deface the Magna Carta — the founding document of the Anglo-American political tradition — is the last in a long line of museum attacks.

Over the past two years, left-wing activists have targeted paintings from Monet, Van Gogh, and even the Mona Lisa. (3/9)


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
May 6
Elon is one of the last representatives of a distinctly American archetype: The eccentric maverick entrepreneur.

So much of American business today is just bureaucracy—what James Burnham famously described as "managerialism."

But @elonmusk built something radically new. (1/11)
In the 1940s, the political theorist James Burnham described a "managerial revolution" in advanced developed societies: Old, entrepreneurial capitalist economies were being replaced by a new system of technocrats who coordinated and "managed" the process of production. (2/11) Image
This was neither socialism (in which "the masses" collectively own the means of production) nor capitalism (in which the capitalists own them).

It was a bureaucratic in-between, led by a new ruling class of "managerial elites" in both big government and big business. (3/11) Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(