What will change with the arrival of the F-16 in Ukraine? This fighter made its first flight in 1974, entered service in 1978. It cannot be called the most modern fighter, but there are many modifications and it is very versatile, due to which it has
1/10
🧵by @iljaandreev
become the most widespread fighter of the 4th generation. Ukraine will not receive the latest modifications, but it will still be a big step forward compared to the Soviet Su and MiG fighters that they use. These fighters are inferior to Russian ones because they are not the
2/10
latest modifications of these models that the Russian Air Force has. In addition, by 2024, Ukraine will have only about 75 airworthy fighters left. The arrival of the F-16 will strengthen the Ukrainian Air Force, which it so needs now. It was precisely the advantage in the
3/10
air that largely allowed Russia to advance in Avdiivka and in the Kharkiv direction. But now the advance of the Russian army has been stopped. It lacks resources, and what it has, it uses in meat assaults. The main thing is that with the F-16, Ukrainian pilots will now be
4/10
able to use the capabilities of the modern missiles already delivered to the fullest. Such as HARM. These missiles were developed for use on modern platforms. The missile is guided to the enemy's radar signal, be it air defense or an aircraft with a radar. These missiles
5/10
were adapted to old Soviet aircraft, but their effectiveness was limited due to the lack of suitable radars on them and the impossibility of using all modes. Only the so-called "Pre-Briefed" mode is available. The missiles were programmed for the target in advance and
6/10
launched from a long distance, which gave the Russians time to turn off the radars if they noticed the missile. The F-16 will have the "Self-Protect" and "Target of Opportunity" modes available, for which they were developed. The F-16 will allow it to approach the target
7/10
at a closer distance without the risk of being shot down and to be guided to the target using the aircraft's radar, after which the launched missile is guided based on the data received from the aircraft, and even if the Russians turn off their radar, the missile will reach
8/10
the target. The F-16 is inferior in speed to the Su-35, but the Su is much larger in size and is clearly visible on the radar. The F-16 is not a super weapon, but Russia's fighters are not the most modern either.
9/10
Together with the Airborne Surveillance and Control aircraft (ASC 890), which Sweden will transfer to Ukraine, this will be a serious blow to the Russian air defense and air force.
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The best gift for Russia Day has been prepared by the Armed Forces of Ukraine – one million Russian army personnel neutralized. This figure does not represent the number of Russians killed, but the total losses suffered by Russia, including the wounded. The number of killed
1/13
is estimated at approximately 400,000. However, this is not a reason for joy, because behind every killed Russian there is also a killed, wounded, missing, or captured Ukrainian. Ukraine’s total losses are currently estimated at around 400,000, of which about
2/13
100,000–150,000 are KIA, the rest are wounded. About 10,000 Ukrainians are in captivity. One must not forget the conditions of Russian captivity compared to Ukrainian. It is no secret that Russian captivity is a real concentration camp with torture and murder. The exact
3/13
The threat of "little green men" appearing in the Baltic states is becoming increasingly real amid reports of Russia preparing a hybrid operation involving unmarked soldiers, as cited by German intelligence. Vladimir Putin seems to be growing more confident that with 1/8
Donald Trump in the White House, he can test NATO’s resolve, exploit hesitation among some member states, and probe the reaction to the invocation of Article 5, hoping to sow doubt and create division within the alliance. However, the window of opportunity for such actions 2/8
is rapidly closing for the Kremlin—Russia is exhausted by the war in Ukraine, its combat-ready forces are depleted, and its resources are limited. Yet the risk of such a step remains high, as for a limited scenario involving the deployment of a 30–50 thousand strong group 3/8
Ukraine does not strike at random or hit arbitrary targets. Every operation is a well-planned step. Last year’s series of strikes on oil depots, the drone attacks on military electronics factories in recent months, and now—carriers of long-range missiles. The list doesn’t end 1/7
with the destruction of over 20 bombers. A fuel storage facility for those bombers was also hit in Engels, and for the first time, Ukraine successfully targets Russian Iskanders before launch. They are almost impossible to intercept and extremely deadly. The principle is 2/7
simple: kill the archer, not the arrows—because that archer continues to terrorize Ukraine’s civilian population. On the night of June 6, Russia launched a massive attack on Ukraine using missiles and drones. According to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Russia launched 3/7
Putin responded decisively to the destruction of his air force’s aircraft—he called Trump and every possible politician in the EU. No red button—just whining that Ukraine is escalating the conflict and refusing negotiations. He also released a video accusing Ukraine of
1/12
terrorism, but notably did not mention the airfields; instead, he commented on the collapse of bridges, a story mostly overshadowed by the far more significant events. He claimed it was Ukraine that has no intention of pursuing peace talks. This narrative has been ongoing
2/12
for several months and is aimed entirely at the West, because it works—especially with Trump’s administration, which continues to delay the implementation of new sanctions. This entire propaganda show will continue as long as it remains effective. One of the most recent
3/12
Anyone claiming that Russia will now deliver a powerful retaliatory strike is likely on the Kremlin's payroll. It's been three days since Ukraine's brilliant operation, and Russia's only response has been a long-range rocket attack on Sumy. I mentioned this in my previous
1/20
article, but I’ll repeat it—Russia has nothing left with which to respond. It has already thrown everything it has into the war against Ukraine. According to different sources, destroyed Russian bombers had been preparing for a new massive missile strike on civilian
2/20
cities, which was supposed to be the largest of the war. Ukraine is not escalating—it is defending itself. And there's nowhere left to escalate to. Russia has no hidden secret power, as its propaganda constantly claims. Nuclear weapons? Those too are mostly a product of
3/20
With its strike on Russia’s strategic aviation, Ukraine has shown the world that Russia’s nuclear forces—so feared in the West—can and should be destroyed. Pro-Russian commentators rushed to write about an inevitable retaliatory strike, even a nuclear one, but do you know 1/8
how Russia will really respond? It won’t. It will swallow its shame and send yet another wave of drones and missiles at peaceful Ukrainian cities. But it was doing that even before Operation “Spider Web.” Russia is already using everything it has against Ukraine and has no 2/8
secret stockpiles. It was already launching massive strikes whenever it managed to accumulate enough missiles in storage. Only now it will be even harder to carry out such attacks, because the Tu-95 bombers were the main carriers of long-range missiles like the Kh-101. 3/8