Undead Odalisque🧞‍♀️ Profile picture
Jun 6 3 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Beauty technology like makeup, hair dye, and surgery doesn't benefit everyone equally. Some women age worse than others, some lack curves, some have less popular coloration, and some have a bad attitude. In your opinion, who can benefit from today's cosmetic technology the most? Image
Here's a link to the section of Dispelling Beauty Lies that discusses the most impactful cosmetic surgery.

jsanilac.com/dispelling-bea…
In time cosmetic technology will improve, and we'll be able to bring all women up to a similar level. Of course, that day isn't quite here yet--hence the question in the OP.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Undead Odalisque🧞‍♀️

Undead Odalisque🧞‍♀️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EvilVizier

Jun 7
BOTS, RATED

A thread about what bots get wrong about feminine beauty. Let's have some fun.

--

BOT #1

Makeup looks cheap. Stiff pose. Unconvincing "smile." Skin tone looks bad with her hair color. Uninspiring top. Next! Image
BOT #2

Umm... why exactly can I see your roots?

Next! Image
BOT #3

Seriously? This is just a first-gen AI girl. Next. Image
Read 14 tweets
Apr 19
Smarts aren't sexy. But that doesn't mean smart men don't prefer smart women as mates. Typically they do. The thing is, displays of smarts still interfere with erotic moods. So be clever in conversation, but when it's sexy time, turn it off and act girlish--even airheaded.
Acting girlish isn't the only way to be seductive, I just ran out of space. You can still do the "sophisticated seductress" thing. But when it's sexy time you need to give the impression that you're driven by eros and feminine instinct, not intellectualism. Same principle.
You can read more about seduction here, or in the expanded section on seduction in my beauty article (link in bio).

Read 4 tweets
Apr 18
Several cosmetic surgeons have written to me about my beauty research. You might be surprised to hear what they had to say...👇 Image
(For the record, I am not a cosmetic surgeon nor affiliated with the industry in any way.)
They explained to me that they can't tell their own clients the complete truth about feminine beauty. Because their clients just don't want to hear it, and to stay in business they have to give their clients what they want. Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 18
If AI boyfriends were to catch on, they'd be MORE destructive to the mating market than AI girlfriends.

Why?

Think about who they'd cause to drop out: low-maintenance girls who just want someone to listen and tell them they're pretty.

Leaving more gold diggers in the market.
Image
Image
More gold diggers makes men more cynical. More wonder: why not just have an AI gf and occasionally pay for an escort. Causes more men to drop out, which causes more women to become dissatisfied with their choices and drop out too. Pretty soon everyone is alone in their pod.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 18
Journalists are there to propagandize you and sell advertisements. Telling the truth about anything, let alone feminine beauty, is the last thing on their minds.

"Gell-Mann amnesia" is irrationally trusting journalists even after they put out magazine covers like this. Image
Influencers aren't better. They may not be as innately wicked as journalists, but they crave fame and will say anything to get it. Plus, plenty of them are stooges paid by three-letter departments of the government or NGOs.

Not even kidding. Image
Never forget. Influencers are less trustworthy than the LEAST TRUSTWORTHY PERSON you've ever met.
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Apr 17
Why does the fashion industry promote such a twisted vision of feminine beauty? It's not JUST because designers are gay. It's because they're not actually rewarded for creating beauty! They're rewarded for selling you clothes...

But what's the difference? Image
If you can sell more expensive clothes with psychological manipulation, that's what designers will do. If you can sell more expensive clothes by emphasizing status signals, that's what designers will do. Regardless of whether these tactics conflict with beauty (which they do). Image
When aesthetic culture degenerates to a point where status, trends, and purchase triggers all contradict beauty, we can expect designers to sell ugliness.

Because that's what they profit from.

Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(