Byzarchi☦︎ec☦︎ Profile picture
Jun 7 6 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Vladimir Lossky's chapter on Original Sin in 'Orthodox Theology,' does a great job of explaining the Orthodox position. Namely, how our doctrine is tied into correct Christology. We do not accept the Latin view because they reject the distinction between essence & energy. 🧵


Image
Image
Image
Image
Correct Christology leads naturally into why there is only a Divine person in Jesus Christ. He has two unique natures, of course, but there is only one divine subject.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Correct Christology helps us battle the errors of Monothelites, Monoenergism, etc...


Image
Image
Image
Image
Correct Christology explains the two wills in Christ and sheds light on our own will as man. All this informs our doctrine of the fall of man.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Correct Christology then helps explain redemption in Orthodox theology. All this shows why we don't share our theology with the Reformed, Calvinists or Rome.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Lossky dos well to explain why there is legal language in Soteriology, but correct Christology removes any need for us as Orthodox Christians to include other heretical beliefs like Calvinist atonement theories.


Image
Image
Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Byzarchi☦︎ec☦︎

Byzarchi☦︎ec☦︎ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @archisoteric

Mar 15
Fr. Pomazansky puts forward the Orthodox teaching on Original Sin:

When and if the term “Original Sin” is used by the Orthodox Church, we refer to the inheritance of death through Adam, not his guilt.

This is why the Greek fathers prefer the term Ancestral Sin. See below…
Image
Image
He explains precisely why the Orthodox Doctrine of Ancestral Sin is different from the Augustinian views of the Latin Church and the Reformed churches. He shows how St. Augustine refuted Pelagius but his fell into the opposite extreme, which we see in the modern West.

Image
Image
Image
He wraps it up here. Hopefully, the more people are catechized properly, the more this constant confusion will die out.

This is from Orthodox Dogmatic Theology. Footnotes are by Fr. Seraphim Rose & the editor.

Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 14
“The essence-energies doctrine is Eastern woo-woo mystical pagan nonsense!”

No. The energies doctrine is Biblical. The Greek translation of the Bible speaks of God’s energies in terms of work, virtue, operation, etc…

Here is a thread of scripture references:
Col. 1:29
“Whereunto I also labor, striving to his working (energy), which worketh (energize), in me mightily.”
Eph. 1:19-20
What is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working (energy) of his mighty power, which he wrought (energize) in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places.”
Read 22 tweets
Feb 12
Some highlights from St. Justin Popovich’s Dogmatics. They are being published soon in English by St. Herman’s Monastery.

Very much anticipated. 🧵
Read 12 tweets
Feb 7
St. Dumitru Stăniloae
Orthodox Dogmatic Theology
Volumes 1-6

On the Divine Hypostasis of the Logos being the only hypostasis of the Logos. There is no human hypostasis in Christ.

A thread 🧵
Volume 3.

Standard Neo-Chalcedonian Christology,

Image
Image
Image
Several more emphatic statements of NeoChalcedonian Christology in this same chapter of volume 3.
Image
Image
Read 18 tweets
Dec 29, 2023
We figured out why Five Sola’s guy is unhinged: he has his own version of the Bible. Eg.

“Whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven… as long as it is written down.”

Matt. 16:19
“Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle, but really only by epistle.”

2 Thess. 2:15
“Having many things to write unto you, I would not write with paper and ink: but I trust to come unto you, and speak face to face… but you only have to follow what I say if I eventually write it down.”

2 Jn. 1:12
Read 6 tweets
Dec 14, 2023
Starting a list of Orthodox books I’ve read & recommend to others - a 🧵.

After starting my journey from Protestantism to Orthodoxy in 2015, I began working my way through history, the canon, the fathers & theology. I still have a long way to go.

So I’ll add chronologically…
I started with these two books: Early Christian Writings & The History of the Church by Eusebius.

These books gave me an intro level overview of the early church. I recommend starting with these to get your appetite wet. You can get into much more detail later. Image
Philip Schaff Ante-Nicene Fathers volumes 1 & 2.

Sts. Polycarp, Ignatius, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tatian, Theophilus of Antioch & Clement of Alexandria.

You can purchase each volume separately on Amazon if you can’t afford the original hardcover series in full. Image
Read 76 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(