Vladimir Lossky's chapter on Original Sin in 'Orthodox Theology,' does a great job of explaining the Orthodox position. Namely, how our doctrine is tied into correct Christology. We do not accept the Latin view because they reject the distinction between essence & energy. 🧵
Correct Christology leads naturally into why there is only a Divine person in Jesus Christ. He has two unique natures, of course, but there is only one divine subject.
Correct Christology helps us battle the errors of Monothelites, Monoenergism, etc...
Correct Christology explains the two wills in Christ and sheds light on our own will as man. All this informs our doctrine of the fall of man.
Correct Christology then helps explain redemption in Orthodox theology. All this shows why we don't share our theology with the Reformed, Calvinists or Rome.
Lossky dos well to explain why there is legal language in Soteriology, but correct Christology removes any need for us as Orthodox Christians to include other heretical beliefs like Calvinist atonement theories.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Fr. Pomazansky puts forward the Orthodox teaching on Original Sin:
When and if the term “Original Sin” is used by the Orthodox Church, we refer to the inheritance of death through Adam, not his guilt.
This is why the Greek fathers prefer the term Ancestral Sin. See below…
He explains precisely why the Orthodox Doctrine of Ancestral Sin is different from the Augustinian views of the Latin Church and the Reformed churches. He shows how St. Augustine refuted Pelagius but his fell into the opposite extreme, which we see in the modern West.
He wraps it up here. Hopefully, the more people are catechized properly, the more this constant confusion will die out.
This is from Orthodox Dogmatic Theology. Footnotes are by Fr. Seraphim Rose & the editor.
“The essence-energies doctrine is Eastern woo-woo mystical pagan nonsense!”
No. The energies doctrine is Biblical. The Greek translation of the Bible speaks of God’s energies in terms of work, virtue, operation, etc…
Here is a thread of scripture references:
Col. 1:29
“Whereunto I also labor, striving to his working (energy), which worketh (energize), in me mightily.”
Eph. 1:19-20
What is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working (energy) of his mighty power, which he wrought (energize) in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places.”
We figured out why Five Sola’s guy is unhinged: he has his own version of the Bible. Eg.
“Whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven… as long as it is written down.”
Matt. 16:19
“Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle, but really only by epistle.”
2 Thess. 2:15
“Having many things to write unto you, I would not write with paper and ink: but I trust to come unto you, and speak face to face… but you only have to follow what I say if I eventually write it down.”
Starting a list of Orthodox books I’ve read & recommend to others - a 🧵.
After starting my journey from Protestantism to Orthodoxy in 2015, I began working my way through history, the canon, the fathers & theology. I still have a long way to go.
So I’ll add chronologically…
I started with these two books: Early Christian Writings & The History of the Church by Eusebius.
These books gave me an intro level overview of the early church. I recommend starting with these to get your appetite wet. You can get into much more detail later.
Philip Schaff Ante-Nicene Fathers volumes 1 & 2.
Sts. Polycarp, Ignatius, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tatian, Theophilus of Antioch & Clement of Alexandria.
You can purchase each volume separately on Amazon if you can’t afford the original hardcover series in full.