Claiming to be a “report on eight months of claim & counter-claim” about the sexual violence against Israelis on Oct 7, @thetimes foreign correspondent @scribblercat & @gabrielle_siviais' story is nothing more than a muddle of victim-blaming & bias. 🧵 thetimes.com/magazines/the-…
The piece claims the atrocities, specifically the sexual assaults & rapes, are Israel’s most “contentious” assertion of what occurred on Oct 7.
The writers evidently don’t believe sexual violence occurred & they'll try their hardest to convince readers not to believe it either.
Much of the piece discusses the UN report by Pramila Patten, which we are told came during a “furious row” in which they suggest allegations of antisemitism were weaponized — and not the fact that it seemed that Jewish women were the only group not believed about sexual assault.
The piece then attempts to suggest there is a kind of overblown fear about rape among “Jewish Israelis” who associate it with the pogroms of Eastern Europe. The piece grossly suggests that it is Arab men who are victims of prejudice as a result of the pogroms.
What the piece doesn’t mention is that Arabs also perpetrated a few pogroms against Jews of their own, like the 1921 Jaffa riots and the 1929 Hebron Massacre, in which Jewish women and girls were raped and children bludgeoned to death. honestreporting.com/unprovoked-car…
The piece's primary contention is that the reports of rape mostly came from “ultra-orthodox” Zaka volunteers who supplied “inaccurate and unreliable forensic interpretations” of what they saw when taking away victims’ bodies.
Such testimonies included women found naked, some women discovered with injured genitals, and semen found on the bodies of victims.
The piece ignores other evidence of sexual violence, including video of the aftermath & victims’ contorted bodies, instead focusing on isolated early incidents of false info shared on social media, even when they were promptly retracted. It ignores how common this is during wars.
The authors say “police have not interviewed a single survivor” of rape on Oct 7. As the UN report made clear, every rape victim was murdered or abducted to Gaza, where they may still be enduring sexual violence. This is only reluctantly acknowledged toward the end of the piece.
Meanwhile, Israel is cast as trying to suppress the truth at every turn, digging in its heels when it comes to a full investigation. It's ironic the very rush to disprove the worst of Hamas atrocities by many in the international community somewhat explains Israel’s reticence.
Notable is @scribblercat's history of animus toward Israel. Well before Oct 7, she called Israel an “apartheid state,” shared her “solidarity with the Palestinian people” & also accused people of using “antisemitism” charges to silence the truth. honestreporting.com/the-times-of-l…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚚 Aid finally makes it to Gazans—but the headlines still miss the real story.🧵
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation successfully delivered aid to thousands of Gazans. Israel only fired warning shots to keep order—no injuries, no deaths. Media spin? “Israel opens fire.”
Then Gazans stormed a flour stockpile. Hamas fired into the crowd, killing five, and boasted about it on Telegram. Media spin? “Deadly break-in at UN warehouse.” No mention of Hamas hoarding the aid or pulling the trigger.
Despite what this photo caption says, it does not show Dr. Alaa al-Najjar, the mother of children killed in an airstrike.
The photo in @guardian actually shows al-Najjar's niece (left) and brother-in-law with an as yet unidentified woman. 🧵
We know this is the niece as she is identified as such in a @Reuters video interview from inside the hospital.
Despite this, Reuters is currently selling the erroneously captioned photo that The Guardian used.
So is this Dr. Alaa al-Najjar in this @Reuters photo, a pediatrician who wears a niqab and is so strictly religious that she was allowed to train in medicine, and still had time to give birth to 10 children in little more than 11 years?
Because for @SkyNews' @AlexCrawfordSky, the barbaric terrorism against Israelis on Oct. 7, including the burning and mutilation of babies, was all just an overblown and exaggerated excuse for Israel to carry out a "genocide."
The UN lied about 14,000 babies dying in 48 hours in Gaza.
So why is the media still reporting it as fact? 🧵
In a @bbcnews interview, UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher claimed “14,000 children will die in Gaza in 48 hours.”
Providing zero evidence to back up his claim.
@BBCNews When pressed, @unocha pointed to an IPC report.
The problem? The report projects 14,100 children could face severe malnutrition over a year — not die within 48 hours.
"Famine" makes headlines, but the math just isn't mathing. 🧵
This is how major outlets frame the crisis. But what aren't they saying?
During the six-week ceasefire, aid trucks delivered roughly 380,000 tons of food into Gaza. According to @WFP, that’s enough to feed Gaza’s entire population for eight months. @cogatonline