Thread by @lasikeyecenter1

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd Will you still be here? When and if Steven King loses his complete empire?

Stephen King strongly promoted the COVID vaccine. Turns out, the vaccine could NOT have provided benefit via a neutralizing antibody in the lung. Turns out? people were horribly damaged & some DIED

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd We did a rough back of the napkin analysis? Stephen KIng could lose up to $30 BILLION for his promotional endorsement of the COVID vaccine IF he doesn't actually have insurance coverage for that promotional activity. yeah, his lawyers are looking into it.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd I bet you so far? they're in agreement with me. probably will advise Stephen King, to not do ANYTHING that further risks losing his vaccine "legal immunity."

I mean, it's true. No one denies it. Stephen King DID strongly promote/endorse the COVID vaccine.

no one denies it.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd Americans, including children, who listened to him & trusted that Stephen's promotion DID have severe damage and some DID DIE.

I mean, NO ONE disputes it. All the damage is there. yeah, no one can win in court IF there weren't damages.

If ONE person died isn't that too much?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd but, it could have been tens of thousands that had severe damage from the vaccine. and his reach? MILLIONS. if only 0.1% had severe damage? Stephen King is wiped out. LITERALLY, he's starting from before his FIRST book, financially, then.

but, his PR team is confused to.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd trying to look out for Stephen King, I explained to them how, what if? the public? actually thinks that Stephen King had this twisted, bizarre, demented horrific fantasy? of turning his FICTION into reality? and having the two MESH together?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd I mean, is that even POSSIBLE? well, I pointed out that stephen DOES have a deranged brain. can't really dispute that now, can we.

and if I, the one who discovered EXACTLY how the COVID vaccine damages and destroys cells as the MAIN EFFECT, if this WAS Stephen's idea?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd Now, I'm trying to explain to Stephen's PR team, "wouldn't it be a good look to let me try to SALVEAGE this situation? and RECTIFY the WRONG that Stephen did?"

Because CLEARLY stephen's promotion of this vaccine was WRONG. Oh, let me show you how I know.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd Anything we do in medicine? any intervention? has what we call a RISK/BENEFIT ratio.

They thought the BENEFIT of the COVID vaccine was huge. Let me show you how it was tiny.

The hypothesis for how the vax gave benefit? was a neutralizing antibody in the LUNG. except?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd the lung is surrounded by a waterproof JACKET we call the lung barrier that can prevent TINY water molecules from passing through (otherwise we would drown in our own fluids). The antibody? a massive 8000 times more mass than a water molecule. NO PATH INTO THE LUNG.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd so, NO BENEFIT of a COVID vaccine that produces a very nice antibody that binds the virus very nicely, IF THE ANTIBODY can get into the lung air space. NO ONE even LOOKED into this.

Here is a member from Fauci's team who tried to explain it to me, back in 2020. yes, back then

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd
Dr. Emily Erbelding EMAIL.

So, I replied with these 73 pages. They were dumbfounded. That was FEB 2021. LONG ago.

US copyright. No. TXu002243916
josephyleemd.substack.com/p/dr-emily-erb…
img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/1a1e…

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd no, no, no. it's not STEPHEN's fault that he didn't know this info. but, it kind of is? he did support the campaign against misinformation, the censorship of the antivaxxers? yeah, so, yeah. It IS kind of stephen's partial fault too.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd NO BENEFIT for the COVID vaccine, via a neutralizing antibody in the lung when it doesn't even have a path INTO the lung.

and when I point that out to Dr. Fauci? his team quotes a 35 yr old article to say that "simple diffusion" helps the antibody cross????????

doesn't work.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd that can't be justification, a 35 yr old article, saying the antibody molecule that's 8000 times heavier than a water molecule, crosses the lung barrier which can stop WATER, and this molecules crosses by diffusion?

sloppy at BEST. deranged at worst. so, NO BENEFIT, clear???

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd last year? I found the EXACT mechanism for how the vaccine causes DESTRUCTION of tissues in the body as the MAIN/DIRECT effect. happens MUCH more than any antibody in the lung binding some virus (benefit).

https://twitter.com/super_spreaders/status/1715220043108069819

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd see the RISK with the vaccine?

EVERY antibody that is created from the vaccine? has a MUCH greater chance of becoming an "immune complex" with a spike antigen molecule from a vaccine than binding a virus that may NEVER be in the blood!!!

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd it's THIS much of a NIGHTMARE for pediatricians. Am I sure? well, I've given the @AmerAcadPeds this information for 8 months? in over 1800 posts? even calling them BABY KILLERS with a perfect thread to explain why? PUBLICLY? and they don't BLOCK ME?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds because the AApeds realizes how SERIOUS my information is and how trying to COVER UP this String mechanism I've found would be WRONG and WILLFUL MISCONDUCT and how is that NOT wrong. I mean, I show THEM this HUGE mistake. they cover it up. then how is that NOT wrong????

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds so, yes. this STRING mechanism? shows PERFECTLY how their RISK for the vaccine is through the ROOF and actually the MAIN EFFECT of the vaccine. no one has scientifically refuted it yet.

oh, the good part. the "string" as I call it? it's in their TEXTBOOKS.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds yeah, imagine THAT. They KNEW about this. They call them PRECIPITINS. google it. it's real.


Kala showing Precipitins, good diagram

soothsayer showing precipitins and polyclonal antibody explanation

https://twitter.com/kalashnikity/status/1732634327840850117

https://twitter.com/SoothSpider/status/1732658578623025521

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds so, now, I showed FOUR YEARS ago, how there could be NO BENEFIT to the vaccine, via a neutralizing antibody in the lung.

and? I show HUGE RISK with the vaccine, via the antibodies sticking to its antigen. hard to refute that happens. that's their STRONGEST science.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds and stephen here, is caught in the crossfire.

now. it's a delicate issue. because of his deranged brain. did he in fact WANT this HORRIFIC damage and death to ensue from his vaccine promotions?

Because NO ONE can argue that damage and death ensued. not now.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds but, will we EVER KNOW if Stephen WANTED this CARNAGE that was always JUST in his fantasy? do we KNOW if Stephen WANTED that all to become a REALITY?????

Because, no one disputes that the DAMAGE and DESTRUCTION DID OCCUR. But, don't stephen's CURRENT actions give a clue?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds so, see? how stephen and I didn't get along at ALL when I had my first account. I used to tease the man and explain in great length how he isn't a genius but just a very dark deranged soul, back then he finally blocked me. but, that didn't cost him anything.

this time???

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds blocking me and muting me? may cost him $30 billion. who knows. but, his lawyers are looking into it.

i'm sure they'll give stephen advise that THEY can't be sued for. becuz if his lawyers tell him to block me? is that willful misconduct? who knows. i think so.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds so I think it's best for stephen if he just comes out and apologizes. it's not in dispute that he strongly promoted the vaccine. it's not in dispute that the vaccine had horrific results and damage and stephen himself probably doesn't get the boosters now.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds maybe an analogy will help.

a gun with a 1000 chambers. only one bullet.

If you PROMOTE pointing this gun at people and pulling the trigger, people WILL DIE, right? eventually?

but there's no BENEFIT to this hypothetical gun, right?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds so, then promoting a hypothetical gun like this? isn't that the EXACT situation with Stephen? Because the hypothetical gun with a 1000 empty chambers and one bullet does NOT have benefit to anyone who its aimed at, right?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds so, compare this hypothetical analogy to what Stephen King promoted.

a vaccine that I show has no benefit via a neutralizing antibody (oh, disregard the many studies showing benefit. that's like rain dancers' data isn't it? doesn't matter if they don't have a hypothesis?)

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds a vaccine that i show has HUGE risk with a perfect mechanism that hasn't been refuted by hundreds of pediatricians/immunologists/vaccinologists for over 8 months. no one even TRIES. Pete Hotez? That famous loser vaccinologist? runs from me.

oh, I have pretty good proof

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds
DAY 1 informing Texas Children's part 1.


DAY 1 informing Texas Children's part 2.




DAY 3 informing TEXAS childrens. paradigm shift

https://twitter.com/lasikeyecenter1/status/1750029635663086047

https://twitter.com/lasikeyecenter1/status/1750032812949004544

josephyleemd.substack.com/p/informing-te…

https://twitter.com/lasikeyecenter1/status/1750637769721024544

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds that's Pete Hotez's hunting grounds. yes, HIS children's hospital. they dare not block me. I just checked. they still are afraid to post.

so, point being? HUGE RISK with the COVID vaccine. I mean, can we call it RISK when it happens EVERY TIME?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds Here's what I mean about RISK.

A side effect? that's something that doesn't happen every time. That's something that, oh him? yeah, he's got some weird genetic make up that made him have that bizarre clot after the vaccine.

that's a side effect. this RISK?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds your particular genetic make up has NOTHING to do with PRECIPITINS forming after your vaccines.

your genetic make up has NOTHING to do with this SIDE EFFECT. that's why I have a problem with the term "side effect" when talking about this VACCINE RISK problem.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds I mean, this SIDE EFFECT? has NOTHING to do with your particular genetic make up.

you can put polyclonal antibodies in a beaker of SALINE with NO GENETICS inside that beaker, add antigen?

and you will see CLUMPING of PRECIPITINS. like, dude. that is the MAIN EFFECT.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds Mothers. ask your pediatrician.
"Dr. Hotez? You DID just give my toddler, johnny, his DTaP vax 2 months ago. My toddler DOES have DTaP antibodies in his blood now, a LOT of them. You are ADDING DTaP antigen into his blood that has the antibodies with a booster vaccine?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds "Dr. Hotez. I know you're the smartest vaccinologist on earth with a daughter that has autism. Why are you ADDING DTaP antigen into my precious son's blood when there are a TON of DTaP antibodies in his blood?

won't they all just BIND?"

hint. yes they will.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds so, perfectly clear? that RISK is not just a mere SIDE EFFECT but that it's IMPOSSIBLE to say that this PRECIPITIN is NOT happening all the time.

sure, block off a few capillaries in some muscle, you may not even NOTICE, just some muscle aches.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds but if it happens to form, this PRECIPITIN, in the brain of a child? in the amydala? now, the toddler has DAMAGE to his brain. just so the pediatrician can make some blood money?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds back to stephen. see everyone? WHY stephen doesn't just block me or mute me?

his PR team would be SOOO stumped as to what to advise Stephen right now.

just a minute. who cares about this guy? stephen king? i'm here in this filth's space because I need to get this info out

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds I think stephen king's lawyers have figured out that the @AmerAcadPeds doesn't block me, texas children's doesn't block me, the @acpeds and their executive director don't block me, all for very good reason.

they're looking out for their own skin.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds meaning, if they DO block me and that is willful misconduct and they then lose their vaccine legal immunity, provided by the PREP ACT which also has a clause to NEGATE their vax legal immunity for willful misconduct? so they don't block me to save their skin??

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds then, stephen, is that why you aren't blocking me? just to not put your fortune at risk?

hmmm.. so you're doing the right thing stephen? for the wrong reason? this is sooo complicated with a demented dark mind.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds so, you think? you did the RIGHT THING (vax promotion) for the WRONG reason? (think string reason)?

But, no one knows your mind stephen.

YOU CLEARLY did the WRONG thing (vax promotion) for WRONG reasons (either your dark fantasies or true bad science).

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds all this? I don't really need to sort out. the moment there is a chance for the masses to come after Stephen's entire fortune? that's for them to decide what they want to do.

my job here is to try to fix the mess that stephen king created. and what a horrific mess indeed.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds stephen. whatever you did out of the darkness of your mind or out of stupidity, it's one or the other, wouldn't you agree?

is there any action you take for any other reason?

so your vax promotional activity. did u do it because you were being EVIL or because you were DUMB?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds (hint, hint stephen, say you did it because you were just being dumb)

why? because if you promoted the vaccine because you were being EVIL and had dark horror fantasies you wanted to bring into this reality and you wanted to HURT and KILL Americans? well, that's EVIL.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds now, this vaccine promotional activity. I think you should say you did it because you were being SUPER DUMB.

Is there any other reason that you can think NOW of doing something so horrifically stupid? I am open to other ideas. the only two I can think of? DUMB or EVIL

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds but, remember, I try to keep an open mind. but, as you can see, I hit all issues in a million different ways to get to the truth.

and the only two reasons I can think of for promoting a vaccine that kills Americans? out of DUMBNESS or out of EVILNESS.

am i thorough?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds dude. stephen. look, I'm trying to help salvage this horrific position you put yourself in.

do you think there was another reason you promoted this vaccine that i perfectly show has no benefit via an antibody in the lung? and has huge risk?

DUMB or EVIL. any other ideas?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds I'll keep an open mind stephen. but it doesn't look like there can be ANY OTHER reason for you promoting the vaccine.

you can say you did it to HELP. but, knowing the science I just explained, it doesn't help, right? so that just falls under the "dumb" category.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds now, the other category? the "evil" category? that seems the most likely. but that doesn't end well for you, so that's why I hinted at you STRONGLY to say you promoted the vaccine because you were being DUMB.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds wow, even IF that was the truth? that you promoted the Vax to see your DARKEST most DEMENTED fantasies come to LIFE and become part of your REALITY that you can FANTASIZE about with your sick mind? Please, even if that IS the truth? Not a good idea to ADMIT that ever, right?

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds so see? How I'm HELPING you stephen? by telling you that you REALLY need to come out and APOLOGIZE for your vaccine promotional activities?

and I advise you? to say that you did it out of the DUMBNESS of your DERANGED DEMENTED brain. NOT out of your EVILNESS. good advise, huh.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds and stephen. you have NO idea how smart I am about all this. just take it on faith for now, that i'm the smartest antivax physician on earth.

this is how difficult it is to be SMART in real life. to be a genius in FICTION? LMAO.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds the rough definition of genius is how well your brain matches up to reality, relative to the next he/she whatever.

well. when you write fiction? your brain ONLY has to match up with the shit your brain spewed out before.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds Now, if you’re gonna try to match up your brain against reality, whew. lots of competition. lots of people who think they know reality better.

so, if you know reality better, then you’re actually really smarter than OTHER people.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds so. stephen king. you excel at the darkness and being in the darkness. very few of us want to do that. so you excel with FEW competition.

see? oh my god. you DO understand. cuz you KNOW you’re not special EXCEPT for liking DARKNESS.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds stephen king? now. people will know. you’re not a genius. you just like really bad dark shit. nothing about that is genius.

it’s just 3 standard deviations depraved. and yeah, you can hold a story line. it’s YOUR shit. Of course you remember.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds Do you know how I know your democrat party is at their philosophical end?

Your party? LOUDLY used YOU to promote THEIR vaccine that has the DIRECT EFFECT of creating PRECIPITINS and CLOTS that DAMAGE and KILL.

Your party? SILENCED ME who would have DESTROYED their vaccine.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds Your party? avoided TRUTH and preferred to use a DARK DEMENTED HORROR FICTION writer.

Science? is the pursuit of TRUTH. are you good at science? You're good at pursuing FICTION, the OPPOSITE of TRUTH.

@linwood_barclay @PeopleforEd @AmerAcadPeds @ACPeds Your party? the DEM party? Is at their philosophical end when they let a pursuer of FICTION have a LOUD voice and completely SILENCE antivaxxers like ME who have TRUTH.

and a million other reasons they're at their philosophical end.