BREAKING: The UN just released its first actual investigation into October 7 and ongoing Gaza genocide by Israel. It concludes that though there was violence against women (SVGB), there is no proof of any rape, let alone "mass rape", or that it was "ordered by Hamas". It's over
the investigation by the UN's Human Rights Office also concludes the Israeli regime does actually engage in a systematic campaign of sexual and gender violence against Palestinian children, women and men, rooted in the very nature of the occupation and can only end with it:
the UN's Human Rights Office, unlike Pramila Patten's office, actually does have an investigatory mandate and abilities, and this is their conclusion from their investigation: The NYT, AP, Reuters, Guardian all lied. And even Patten had concluded the same:
read the UN Human Right's Commission report in full: . There is only one mention of "rape", saying there's no evidence for it, and zero mention of "knives/nails in vaginas and genital mutilation". It was all a genocidal propaganda hoax from start to finishohchr.org/en/press-relea…
now what will the media class do with this first actual UN report? Let me predict it for you. If they report on its conclusions at all, they will lie and claim that the references to "sexual and gender violence" proves their "mass rape" hoax, when it explicitly debunks it in its only mention of rape. The use of "sexual violence" refers to any violence they believe was targeted against women, not referring to rape, sexualized torture or genital mutilation which it again explicitly only mentions once in paragraph 26 I highlighted.
But here is the problem for them. If they go with that obviously and intentionally deceitful reading of the report's use of "sexual violence", then it means they also have to accept that it was not ordered by Hamas as a systematic weapon of war, which is what the NYT, BBC, Reuters, AP and Guardian falsely claimed, whereas in the Israeli regime case it is actually systematic, "part of their operating procedures."
So the actual "mass rape" in that case would not be done by Hamas on October 7 as the New York Times and all the others claimed, but by their precious genocidal Israeli regime, and not just since in the ongoing Gaza genocide, but stretching back to the entire history of the occupation.
But of course they will ignore the term's usage in that context, and simply lie about it to launder their genocidal mass rape hoax, exactly like they did with the Patten report which finally months later The Times of London came out as the first mainstream Western media publication to accurately report on while also confirming it with her directly.
Now watch and see how accurate my prediction is.
I know these scumbags in and out. I know exactly what they're right now writing and putting as their headlines to put on their frontpages: BREAKING, UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION FINDS MASS SEXUAL VIOLENCE ON OCTOBER 7.
This is the lie they will all go with. Just watch.
another crucial part of the report no Western media outlet will report on: There are only two uses of "sexualized torture" in the report. The first in section 26, saying there's no evidence of it on October 7. The second in section 65, saying Israel does it to Palestinians:
so to summarize: The entire prestige Western media class fabricated the "mass rape" hoax as genocidal atrocity propaganda on behalf of the Israeli regime to not only launder the ongoing Gaza genocide, but do cover for the actual systematic Israeli mass sexual violence and rape
exactly like they did with the 40 beheaded babies genocidal propaganda hoax. They fabricated it, spread it, and then used it to launder the genocide and cover for their own actual systematic campaign of mass beheading Palestinian babies and children:
now you know why Israel blocks investigations by UN bodies that have an actual investigative mandate and abilities, unlike Patten's office, though again even she concluded there was no Hamas campaign of mass rape, which the media class then lied about
so now you have two UN reports, one by the UN's Human Rights Commission which has an actual investigative mandate, concluding there was no systematic Hamas-ordered campaign of mass rape/sexual violence. The NYT, Guardian, BBC, AP, Reuters: Will you retract your genocidal hoaxes?
the Israeli regime and media are going insane. The Times of Israel propaganda rag admits: The UN report doesn't verify a single rape. Then they immediately deflect to Patten's report, and lie about its status which this actually investigative report supersedes per Patten herself
hey Times of Israel, it's actually much worse than just that: The actual full and legal investigative report by the UN's Commission for Human Rights, which Pramila Patten herself in her own report defers to as it is the higher body in the UN that actually has an investigative mandate unlike her office, concludes there is no evidence for a single rape on October 7 and of genital mutilation, "nails and knives in vaginas", all the deranged hoax lies that you and the NYT, BBC, Guardian, Reuters, AP, CNN have all been fabricating and spreading, alongside Genocide Joe and the political class.
But it also concludes that there is no evidence for a Hamas-ordered campaign of systematic sexual violence or rape, and even worse for you, it also concludes that it is actually you, Israel, that does systematic mass sexual violence and torture against Palestinian children, women and men.
You depraved genocidal scum have finally been exposed, and all your pathetic deflections, these "OMG BUT PATTEN SUGGESTED IT WAS LIKELY MAYBE SO" are transparent to everyone. Patten herself defers to this report. It's over.
Ruth Halperin-Kaddari's propaganda spectacle with Patten, who she personally recruited for her "fact finding mission" which her office has never done before, blew up in their face, and there is absolutely nothing they can do about it except desperately lie
CNN is now showing how the media class will report on this: They will desperately minimize the UN Human Rights Commission's conclusion that they did not find evidence for a single rape on October 7, ignore that they concluded the same about genital mutilation/sexualized torture and that there is no evidence for a "systematic Hamas campaign of sexual violence/rape", and instead frame this as "well it was probably just because they couldn't go to Israel and verify the genocidal propaganda hoax that we fabricated and laundered."
Then when they move to reporting on the Israeli documented and proven systematic campaign of targeted sexual and gender violence against Palestinian children, women and men, suddenly CNN demotes it to "allegations". It's just "allegations" now.
Patten's report, which by its own admission was not a full and legal investigation and was therefore totally meaningless in whatever it said as it has no investigative mandate and only looked as Israeli provided propaganda, which again Patten herself has reiterated recently in the Times of London (see ), was constantly framed as a confirmed proven report of rape on October 7.
But now when the actual UN body that has an investigative mandate comes out with its full legal investigation and report, it becomes "allegations". It's just "allegations".
Do you see how depraved and genocidal the Western media class really is? How they lie as a routine part of their job? The most grotesque scum alive.
the UN Human Rights Commission's report confirms that not just "mass rape" but also sexualized torture/genital mutilation and the claim of a "Hamas ordered campaign" of it is a genocidal hoax with no evidence, exactly as the Times of London concluded:
the pathetic, deranged, hysterical and desperate Zionist smears and attempts to deflect and distract have begun. Again, as the Time of Israel, CNN and others have been forced to confirm, the UN Human Rights Commission report states that they could find no evidence for any rape on October 7, nor for any Hamas plan for sexual or gender-based violence (SGVB).
Those are the accurate, proven statements of fact I made in the first post, and those are the parts of the report I cited to back it up with: Section 26 and the relevant part of section 95 regarding the non-existence of a "Hamas plan". The rest of 95 confirms what I said the report does note, namely that there was indications of sexual violence against women on October 7. I was actually making that stronger by not even using the term "indications", which the report does do in 95.
Now this brings me back to the earlier point I made in this thread about the Zionist and media class propaganda deflection being to try to conflate the use of "sexual violence" with rape (see ), although again the Times of Israel, CNN and others have now definitively preempted that because they didn't want to accept that standard for the part of the report that uses "sexual violence" in relation to Israel, and which is much worse, namely by concluding that it is actually a systematic part of Israeli standard procedure against Palestinian children, women and men.
If they accepted the conflation of "sexual violence" with rape throughout the report, it would mean that the actual systematic mass rape did not come from Hamas, but from Israel, the exact opposite of all their own reporting. So it would not just defy the actual content of the report, which only uses "rape", "sexualized torture" and "genital mutilation" in section 26 to say they found no evidence of it, but also expose themselves directly as genocidal atrocity propaganda hoaxers. So instead they have decided to just downplay that and ignore it as much as possible and desperately hope the news cycle moves on and washes it away. The same tactic they used by lying about the Patten report's status, content and conclusions.
a Zionist asks Chomsky what he thinks about the statement that Israel should not exist, and whether he is horrified by it and thinks it's anti-Semitic and genocidal.
He responds: "Actually, I agree with that." And adds that Zionists are the actual genocidal ones.
here a hysterical Zionist angrily asks Chomsky about the "Hamas charter" and if he is horrified by it and it proves they and Palestinians are to blame for not having peace. He responds: Actually the charter is irrelevant and Israel and Zionists are to blame for everything
a reporter asks Chomsky if Hamas and Hezbollah are evil terrorist monsters who are to blame for all the violence, as is claimed by the entire Western media and political class. He replies: Actually the real terrorist extremists responsible for the violence are Israel and the US
Israeli soldiers in Gaza keep taking photos in the dresses of the girls and women they have raped and killed, they proudly post it on their social media, it's been going on for over a year, it's official Israeli policy, and the Western media and political class couldn't care less
Israel is a rape and death-cult masquerading as a society, and the entire Western media and political class, from Bernie Sanders to Genocide Joe, momala and Trump, NYT, Guardian, BBC to Fox News and Daily Wire, are in on it with glee and pride:
did you know Bernie Sanders and his genocidal Zionist handler Matt Duss have repeatedly laundered the genocidal atrocity propaganda rape hoax while having never, not even once, said anything about the actual systematic rape of Palestinian children, girls, boys, women and men?
Israeli occupation troops in Gaza found a Jewish cemetery for soldiers killed in WW1, maintained in pristine condition in the "Hamas-run Gaza". And they proudly posted photo-ops in front of it without even realizing it undermines their main propaganda about Hamas
it's so strange. The Western Zionist media class keeps saying that Hamas are pure evil rabid anti-Semitic spawns from hell who want to kill all Jews. Meanwhile testimonies from Israelis totally ignored in Western media destroy that deranged propaganda:
all the hysterical propaganda about Hamas being pure evil spawns from Hell, not only "worse than ISIS" but even "worse than Nazis" which Bari Weiss, who killed Refaat Alareer, said on MSNBC with zero pushback, is totally incoherent and deranged:
this is one of the most deranged genocidal Zionist talking points, and it's unsurprising Ethan and Hila Klein have fully embraced it. The genocidal Israeli death-cult has bombed every hospital, school, refugee camp, UN shelter, WHICH ARE OFFIFIALLY DESIGNATED BOMB SHELTERS FOR CIVILIANS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW.
What the fuck do you think would happen if Hamas built specific tunnels and designated them as bomb shelters for civilians? Do you think Israel wouldn't bomb those and say Hamas is hiding there and using them as shelters, you fucking deranged piece of shit Zionist freaks?
Israel bombed all the officially designated bomb shelters under international law for civilians, which even have the symbolic protection of the UN and other international aid organizations, but if Hamas made some and put a big sign in front of them: OFFICIAL HAMAS-MADE BOMB SHELTER FOR CIVILIANS, those definitely wouldn't be bombed and laundered with the "human shields" propaganda. Ethan Klein is a sub-human cunt
if you watch the exchange between Ethan and Sam, you can see his lifelong Zionist brainwashing just oozing out of every disgusting greasy ozempic pore of his body. He's on the verge of crying that his Zionist mania he desperately tries to hide is exposed
Virginia Giuffre was brutally raped and sex-trafficked by Zionist Mossad pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and passed around to among others Prince Andrew and Zionist fanatic Alan Dershowitz. Dershowitz is such a vile scumbag that he sued her into silence to hide his pedophilic rapist nature. Now she has died, reportedly by suicide
Alan Dershowitz is one of the most depraved scum alive. He killed Virginia, as did all the others in the Zionist Epstein pedophile rape-trafficking ring like Clinton, who to this day gets invited to the DNC to give speeches as Dems and the liberal media class heap praise on him
that includes Zionist pedophile rapist billionaires Peter Thiel, Bill Ackman and Trump, who were all best friends with Epstein and a core part of his Mossad Zionist pedophilic rape-trafficking blackmail operation. All the tapes are in Tel Aviv vaults:
Tim Pool and his fellow hosts actually think the Suez Canal is in Israel, and that is the main reason the US supports Israel and why it is a good argument to keep supporting it. The Suez Canal is in Egypt which has had a pro-US puppet regime for decades, and the only times it has been closed, including right now as one of the hosts points out, is exactly because of US support for Israel
Tim Pool also says that if it weren't for US support of Israel, China, Russia, Iran and BRICS will take over the Suez Canal. Egypt has already joined BRICS. The guy who brought this up is still posting about it as if it's a brilliant argument in defense of US support for Israel:
in the same segment that guy says the fascist US puppet dictator Shah of Iran was "democratically elected" and the US overthrew and replaced him with Khomeini and the Islamic Republic, and Tim Pool thought that was a great point. The idiocy on display is just astonishing