BREAKING: The UN just released its first actual investigation into October 7 and ongoing Gaza genocide by Israel. It concludes that though there was violence against women (SVGB), there is no proof of any rape, let alone "mass rape", or that it was "ordered by Hamas". It's over
the investigation by the UN's Human Rights Office also concludes the Israeli regime does actually engage in a systematic campaign of sexual and gender violence against Palestinian children, women and men, rooted in the very nature of the occupation and can only end with it:
the UN's Human Rights Office, unlike Pramila Patten's office, actually does have an investigatory mandate and abilities, and this is their conclusion from their investigation: The NYT, AP, Reuters, Guardian all lied. And even Patten had concluded the same:
read the UN Human Right's Commission report in full: . There is only one mention of "rape", saying there's no evidence for it, and zero mention of "knives/nails in vaginas and genital mutilation". It was all a genocidal propaganda hoax from start to finishohchr.org/en/press-relea…
now what will the media class do with this first actual UN report? Let me predict it for you. If they report on its conclusions at all, they will lie and claim that the references to "sexual and gender violence" proves their "mass rape" hoax, when it explicitly debunks it in its only mention of rape. The use of "sexual violence" refers to any violence they believe was targeted against women, not referring to rape, sexualized torture or genital mutilation which it again explicitly only mentions once in paragraph 26 I highlighted.
But here is the problem for them. If they go with that obviously and intentionally deceitful reading of the report's use of "sexual violence", then it means they also have to accept that it was not ordered by Hamas as a systematic weapon of war, which is what the NYT, BBC, Reuters, AP and Guardian falsely claimed, whereas in the Israeli regime case it is actually systematic, "part of their operating procedures."
So the actual "mass rape" in that case would not be done by Hamas on October 7 as the New York Times and all the others claimed, but by their precious genocidal Israeli regime, and not just since in the ongoing Gaza genocide, but stretching back to the entire history of the occupation.
But of course they will ignore the term's usage in that context, and simply lie about it to launder their genocidal mass rape hoax, exactly like they did with the Patten report which finally months later The Times of London came out as the first mainstream Western media publication to accurately report on while also confirming it with her directly.
Now watch and see how accurate my prediction is.
I know these scumbags in and out. I know exactly what they're right now writing and putting as their headlines to put on their frontpages: BREAKING, UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION FINDS MASS SEXUAL VIOLENCE ON OCTOBER 7.
This is the lie they will all go with. Just watch.
another crucial part of the report no Western media outlet will report on: There are only two uses of "sexualized torture" in the report. The first in section 26, saying there's no evidence of it on October 7. The second in section 65, saying Israel does it to Palestinians:
so to summarize: The entire prestige Western media class fabricated the "mass rape" hoax as genocidal atrocity propaganda on behalf of the Israeli regime to not only launder the ongoing Gaza genocide, but do cover for the actual systematic Israeli mass sexual violence and rape
exactly like they did with the 40 beheaded babies genocidal propaganda hoax. They fabricated it, spread it, and then used it to launder the genocide and cover for their own actual systematic campaign of mass beheading Palestinian babies and children:
now you know why Israel blocks investigations by UN bodies that have an actual investigative mandate and abilities, unlike Patten's office, though again even she concluded there was no Hamas campaign of mass rape, which the media class then lied about
so now you have two UN reports, one by the UN's Human Rights Commission which has an actual investigative mandate, concluding there was no systematic Hamas-ordered campaign of mass rape/sexual violence. The NYT, Guardian, BBC, AP, Reuters: Will you retract your genocidal hoaxes?
the Israeli regime and media are going insane. The Times of Israel propaganda rag admits: The UN report doesn't verify a single rape. Then they immediately deflect to Patten's report, and lie about its status which this actually investigative report supersedes per Patten herself
hey Times of Israel, it's actually much worse than just that: The actual full and legal investigative report by the UN's Commission for Human Rights, which Pramila Patten herself in her own report defers to as it is the higher body in the UN that actually has an investigative mandate unlike her office, concludes there is no evidence for a single rape on October 7 and of genital mutilation, "nails and knives in vaginas", all the deranged hoax lies that you and the NYT, BBC, Guardian, Reuters, AP, CNN have all been fabricating and spreading, alongside Genocide Joe and the political class.
But it also concludes that there is no evidence for a Hamas-ordered campaign of systematic sexual violence or rape, and even worse for you, it also concludes that it is actually you, Israel, that does systematic mass sexual violence and torture against Palestinian children, women and men.
You depraved genocidal scum have finally been exposed, and all your pathetic deflections, these "OMG BUT PATTEN SUGGESTED IT WAS LIKELY MAYBE SO" are transparent to everyone. Patten herself defers to this report. It's over.
Ruth Halperin-Kaddari's propaganda spectacle with Patten, who she personally recruited for her "fact finding mission" which her office has never done before, blew up in their face, and there is absolutely nothing they can do about it except desperately lie
CNN is now showing how the media class will report on this: They will desperately minimize the UN Human Rights Commission's conclusion that they did not find evidence for a single rape on October 7, ignore that they concluded the same about genital mutilation/sexualized torture and that there is no evidence for a "systematic Hamas campaign of sexual violence/rape", and instead frame this as "well it was probably just because they couldn't go to Israel and verify the genocidal propaganda hoax that we fabricated and laundered."
Then when they move to reporting on the Israeli documented and proven systematic campaign of targeted sexual and gender violence against Palestinian children, women and men, suddenly CNN demotes it to "allegations". It's just "allegations" now.
Patten's report, which by its own admission was not a full and legal investigation and was therefore totally meaningless in whatever it said as it has no investigative mandate and only looked as Israeli provided propaganda, which again Patten herself has reiterated recently in the Times of London (see ), was constantly framed as a confirmed proven report of rape on October 7.
But now when the actual UN body that has an investigative mandate comes out with its full legal investigation and report, it becomes "allegations". It's just "allegations".
Do you see how depraved and genocidal the Western media class really is? How they lie as a routine part of their job? The most grotesque scum alive.
the UN Human Rights Commission's report confirms that not just "mass rape" but also sexualized torture/genital mutilation and the claim of a "Hamas ordered campaign" of it is a genocidal hoax with no evidence, exactly as the Times of London concluded:
the pathetic, deranged, hysterical and desperate Zionist smears and attempts to deflect and distract have begun. Again, as the Time of Israel, CNN and others have been forced to confirm, the UN Human Rights Commission report states that they could find no evidence for any rape on October 7, nor for any Hamas plan for sexual or gender-based violence (SGVB).
Those are the accurate, proven statements of fact I made in the first post, and those are the parts of the report I cited to back it up with: Section 26 and the relevant part of section 95 regarding the non-existence of a "Hamas plan". The rest of 95 confirms what I said the report does note, namely that there was indications of sexual violence against women on October 7. I was actually making that stronger by not even using the term "indications", which the report does do in 95.
Now this brings me back to the earlier point I made in this thread about the Zionist and media class propaganda deflection being to try to conflate the use of "sexual violence" with rape (see ), although again the Times of Israel, CNN and others have now definitively preempted that because they didn't want to accept that standard for the part of the report that uses "sexual violence" in relation to Israel, and which is much worse, namely by concluding that it is actually a systematic part of Israeli standard procedure against Palestinian children, women and men.
If they accepted the conflation of "sexual violence" with rape throughout the report, it would mean that the actual systematic mass rape did not come from Hamas, but from Israel, the exact opposite of all their own reporting. So it would not just defy the actual content of the report, which only uses "rape", "sexualized torture" and "genital mutilation" in section 26 to say they found no evidence of it, but also expose themselves directly as genocidal atrocity propaganda hoaxers. So instead they have decided to just downplay that and ignore it as much as possible and desperately hope the news cycle moves on and washes it away. The same tactic they used by lying about the Patten report's status, content and conclusions.
Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, just posted a deranged screed wherein he repeats all the debunked genocidal atrocity propaganda hoaxes, from the 40 beheaded babies in ovens to the rapes, and even claims it's all on video. No such video exists. He's just openly lying.
Now he did the classic mistake with his regurgitation of the hasbara scripts, because he added the 40 beheaded babies in ovens burned alive hoax alongside the others, which proves all of it is a fabricated atrocity propaganda hoax as even Israeli media and police records confirmed that no baby was beheaded and there's of course no video of that or any rape or burning anyone alive in a wheelchair or whatever deranged lunacy was implanted in that crazed freak's mind by his Zionist handlers.
He also adds the original twist that Blinken and Biden loved so much, "in front of their parents". That's the hasbara cherry on top: The non-existent babies were beheaded in front of their non-existent mothers. The non-existent women were raped in front of their non-existent children. You see, they couldn't just leave it at the basic level of hoax. They had to up the ante, because hey, when we're making shit up that the NYT and BBC and Guardian reprint because we own them, let's go all the way, and say, "in front of their parents/children", to evoke this image too Schindler's List style.
Now a very simple question arises from this: If they are willing to lie about this so openly and shamelessly, without any fear that any media outlet will hold them to account for it even though they also know it's a lie, what won't they lie about?
The answer is nothing. They will and do lie about everything.
not only is there no video evidence of any non-existent babies being beheaded in front of their non-existent mothers even though Time Magazine, BBC and others all printed this, but there's also zero video/photo evidence of any of the non-existent rapes: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…
The Guardian, under the name of Bethan McKernan, stated that such video footage does exist, alongside a series of other genocidal atrocity hoax claims and laundering the forced "confessions" of Palestinian prisoners who were rape-tortured to death by Israelis:
She still works for them and is a colleague in good standing of Owen Jones and Yanis Varoufakis, who have never said a single word of criticism about her or their employer for fabricating and spreading this genocidal atrocity propaganda, nor for firing cartoonist Steve Bell over a drawing critical of Netanyahu, or for deleting a review of a Israeli propaganda film that included a single line humanizing Palestinians; after all, they need their cash and sinecure at the Guardian.
it wasn't just Time Magazine and BBC that helped fabricate and spread the 40 beheaded babies and fetuses in ovens hoax, but also Jake Tapper, who did an entire series of interviews with the main hoaxers in question while spouting openly genocidal screeds:
the podcast Yanis Varoufakis runs that's funded by the Zionist billionaire Paul Marshall, who is the Larry Ellison of UK media, is now also going to be promoted by Hasan, who will appear on it live. Marshall also funds Bari Weiss' Free Press. Why are you doing this @hasanthehun?
how can you support BDS and promote a Zionist propaganda rag founded and run by the most odious genocidal Zionist media baron who literally funds Bari Weiss' Free Press and other hasbara rags that launder genocide on a daily basis @hasanthehun? x.com/decensorednews…
I am going to assume you were unaware of Unherd being a Paul Marshall funded Zionist media operation, and now that you have been told you will pull out of this event.
Yanis is a sick depraved grifter who has shown that he happily takes money from whomever throws it at him like the cheap whore that he is, whether it's the fascist GCC Zionist slave regimes or genocidal Zionist billionaire Paul Marshall, but I expect better of you.
not only is Paul Marshall a fanatical genocidal Zionist, but he's of course also a rabid Islamophobic racist, who has singlehandedly fabricated and spread the most murderous racist anti-Muslim propaganda in the UK mediasphere through his media assets. Yanis doesn't care and happily works for him, lending his reputation as as pseudo-radical to launder his media ventures for cash.
In the Guardian piece on the launch of Unherd, Yanis was touted as a "heterodox leftist voice" to help promote it. How much money has genocidal propagandist billionaire Zionist Marshall put into Yanis' pockets to use him as PR? How much blood-soaked cash is in Yanis' pockets? Is it millions? How many millions?
Matt Duss the self-described Christian Zionist J-Street Israel lobbyist is desperately trying to launder his reputation again and pretend like he opposed the genocide all along when in reality he fully backed it, and to this day launders it with lies and deception to block an arms embargo and sanctions on his precious genocidal Israeli death-cult
Matt Duss, whose organization is funded by the CIA/Mossad via the Rockefeller, Tides and Open Society foundations and who is the Israel lobby handler of AOCIA, Ro Khanna and every Dem elected, is the most odious dangerous Zionist scumbag in politics:
more receipts on Matt Duss being a proud self-described Christian Zionist J-Street Israel lobbyist Azov Nazi enthusiast in this thread: He also praised the murderous terrorist mass bombing "pager" attack that killed and maimed toddlers and children and blamed the genocide continuing on KHAMAS.
Elon Musk's Mossad handler Nikita Bier is systematically banning accounts critical of the genocidal Zionist Epstein regime and exposing propaganda against Iran. This comes after he changed Iran's flag and removed verification from official government accounts
Nikita Bier, who is a repulsive depraved freak, has been given an Iranian "girlfriend" as some sort of sick reward for his systematic manipulation of the algorithm and the platform generally to push Mossad propaganda against Iran. This scumbag is doing all this out in the open
large accounts recently banned by Nikita Bier for no reason whatsoever include @Jedaal, @AryJeay, @Ahmed_hassan_za. What he did with the Iranian flag is by itself more consequential than the entirety of the bullshit "twitter files" combined, but of course it gets zero attention
Eddie Vedder of Pearl Jam on Israel: "I swear to god there's some people out there just ready to kill and go across borders and take over land that doesn't belong to them, and they should get the fuck out. We don't want to give them our taxes to drop bombs on children. No more!"
when Eddie Vedder said this all the Zionists went insane with rage and called him an evil monstrous anti-Semite who should be boycotted for daring to expose and boycot the Israeli death-cult, and they demanded he apologize. Instead he doubled down and has never gone to Israel:
this was during the 2014 massacre and destruction of Gaza when the genocidal Israeli death-cult killed over 550 children and 2300 overall, and their rape-soldiers said they were "killing anything that moves", one of their routine "mowing the lawn" massacres. All before October 7
Bill Maher is a rabid Islamophobic racist who has spewed the most depraved bile imaginable against Muslims for years. If Hasan or anyone else said about Jews what he says about Muslims, Slotkin and the rest of the media and political class would end their life in a second
just try it out. Change every mention of Islam and Muslim in that Maher clip for "Judaism" and "Jew", and see what happens to you. See what Slotkin and Jake Tapper and Dana Bash do to you. See how long you can stay employed, let alone have an HBO show frequented by scum elites
Bill Maher is also a rabid genocidal Zionist Jewish supremacist who has advocated for and laundered the ongoing Gaza genocide and every other murderous war by his precious Israeli death and rape-cult. Oh and he's also a proud and open pedophile: