☀️👀 Profile picture
Jun 12 16 tweets 10 min read Read on X
BREAKING: The UN just released its first actual investigation into October 7 and ongoing Gaza genocide by Israel. It concludes that though there was violence against women (SVGB), there is no proof of any rape, let alone "mass rape", or that it was "ordered by Hamas". It's over Image
the investigation by the UN's Human Rights Office also concludes the Israeli regime does actually engage in a systematic campaign of sexual and gender violence against Palestinian children, women and men, rooted in the very nature of the occupation and can only end with it: Image
the UN's Human Rights Office, unlike Pramila Patten's office, actually does have an investigatory mandate and abilities, and this is their conclusion from their investigation: The NYT, AP, Reuters, Guardian all lied. And even Patten had concluded the same:
read the UN Human Right's Commission report in full: . There is only one mention of "rape", saying there's no evidence for it, and zero mention of "knives/nails in vaginas and genital mutilation". It was all a genocidal propaganda hoax from start to finishohchr.org/en/press-relea…
now what will the media class do with this first actual UN report? Let me predict it for you. If they report on its conclusions at all, they will lie and claim that the references to "sexual and gender violence" proves their "mass rape" hoax, when it explicitly debunks it in its only mention of rape. The use of "sexual violence" refers to any violence they believe was targeted against women, not referring to rape, sexualized torture or genital mutilation which it again explicitly only mentions once in paragraph 26 I highlighted.

But here is the problem for them. If they go with that obviously and intentionally deceitful reading of the report's use of "sexual violence", then it means they also have to accept that it was not ordered by Hamas as a systematic weapon of war, which is what the NYT, BBC, Reuters, AP and Guardian falsely claimed, whereas in the Israeli regime case it is actually systematic, "part of their operating procedures."

So the actual "mass rape" in that case would not be done by Hamas on October 7 as the New York Times and all the others claimed, but by their precious genocidal Israeli regime, and not just since in the ongoing Gaza genocide, but stretching back to the entire history of the occupation.

But of course they will ignore the term's usage in that context, and simply lie about it to launder their genocidal mass rape hoax, exactly like they did with the Patten report which finally months later The Times of London came out as the first mainstream Western media publication to accurately report on while also confirming it with her directly.

Now watch and see how accurate my prediction is.

I know these scumbags in and out. I know exactly what they're right now writing and putting as their headlines to put on their frontpages: BREAKING, UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION FINDS MASS SEXUAL VIOLENCE ON OCTOBER 7.

This is the lie they will all go with. Just watch.
another crucial part of the report no Western media outlet will report on: There are only two uses of "sexualized torture" in the report. The first in section 26, saying there's no evidence of it on October 7. The second in section 65, saying Israel does it to Palestinians: Image
so to summarize: The entire prestige Western media class fabricated the "mass rape" hoax as genocidal atrocity propaganda on behalf of the Israeli regime to not only launder the ongoing Gaza genocide, but do cover for the actual systematic Israeli mass sexual violence and rape
exactly like they did with the 40 beheaded babies genocidal propaganda hoax. They fabricated it, spread it, and then used it to launder the genocide and cover for their own actual systematic campaign of mass beheading Palestinian babies and children:
now you know why Israel blocks investigations by UN bodies that have an actual investigative mandate and abilities, unlike Patten's office, though again even she concluded there was no Hamas campaign of mass rape, which the media class then lied about
so now you have two UN reports, one by the UN's Human Rights Commission which has an actual investigative mandate, concluding there was no systematic Hamas-ordered campaign of mass rape/sexual violence. The NYT, Guardian, BBC, AP, Reuters: Will you retract your genocidal hoaxes? Image
the Israeli regime and media are going insane. The Times of Israel propaganda rag admits: The UN report doesn't verify a single rape. Then they immediately deflect to Patten's report, and lie about its status which this actually investigative report supersedes per Patten herself Image
hey Times of Israel, it's actually much worse than just that: The actual full and legal investigative report by the UN's Commission for Human Rights, which Pramila Patten herself in her own report defers to as it is the higher body in the UN that actually has an investigative mandate unlike her office, concludes there is no evidence for a single rape on October 7 and of genital mutilation, "nails and knives in vaginas", all the deranged hoax lies that you and the NYT, BBC, Guardian, Reuters, AP, CNN have all been fabricating and spreading, alongside Genocide Joe and the political class.

But it also concludes that there is no evidence for a Hamas-ordered campaign of systematic sexual violence or rape, and even worse for you, it also concludes that it is actually you, Israel, that does systematic mass sexual violence and torture against Palestinian children, women and men.

You depraved genocidal scum have finally been exposed, and all your pathetic deflections, these "OMG BUT PATTEN SUGGESTED IT WAS LIKELY MAYBE SO" are transparent to everyone. Patten herself defers to this report. It's over.
Ruth Halperin-Kaddari's propaganda spectacle with Patten, who she personally recruited for her "fact finding mission" which her office has never done before, blew up in their face, and there is absolutely nothing they can do about it except desperately lie
CNN is now showing how the media class will report on this: They will desperately minimize the UN Human Rights Commission's conclusion that they did not find evidence for a single rape on October 7, ignore that they concluded the same about genital mutilation/sexualized torture and that there is no evidence for a "systematic Hamas campaign of sexual violence/rape", and instead frame this as "well it was probably just because they couldn't go to Israel and verify the genocidal propaganda hoax that we fabricated and laundered."

Then when they move to reporting on the Israeli documented and proven systematic campaign of targeted sexual and gender violence against Palestinian children, women and men, suddenly CNN demotes it to "allegations". It's just "allegations" now.

Patten's report, which by its own admission was not a full and legal investigation and was therefore totally meaningless in whatever it said as it has no investigative mandate and only looked as Israeli provided propaganda, which again Patten herself has reiterated recently in the Times of London (see ), was constantly framed as a confirmed proven report of rape on October 7.

But now when the actual UN body that has an investigative mandate comes out with its full legal investigation and report, it becomes "allegations". It's just "allegations".

Do you see how depraved and genocidal the Western media class really is? How they lie as a routine part of their job? The most grotesque scum alive.Image
the UN Human Rights Commission's report confirms that not just "mass rape" but also sexualized torture/genital mutilation and the claim of a "Hamas ordered campaign" of it is a genocidal hoax with no evidence, exactly as the Times of London concluded:
the pathetic, deranged, hysterical and desperate Zionist smears and attempts to deflect and distract have begun. Again, as the Time of Israel, CNN and others have been forced to confirm, the UN Human Rights Commission report states that they could find no evidence for any rape on October 7, nor for any Hamas plan for sexual or gender-based violence (SGVB).

Those are the accurate, proven statements of fact I made in the first post, and those are the parts of the report I cited to back it up with: Section 26 and the relevant part of section 95 regarding the non-existence of a "Hamas plan". The rest of 95 confirms what I said the report does note, namely that there was indications of sexual violence against women on October 7. I was actually making that stronger by not even using the term "indications", which the report does do in 95.

Now this brings me back to the earlier point I made in this thread about the Zionist and media class propaganda deflection being to try to conflate the use of "sexual violence" with rape (see ), although again the Times of Israel, CNN and others have now definitively preempted that because they didn't want to accept that standard for the part of the report that uses "sexual violence" in relation to Israel, and which is much worse, namely by concluding that it is actually a systematic part of Israeli standard procedure against Palestinian children, women and men.

If they accepted the conflation of "sexual violence" with rape throughout the report, it would mean that the actual systematic mass rape did not come from Hamas, but from Israel, the exact opposite of all their own reporting. So it would not just defy the actual content of the report, which only uses "rape", "sexualized torture" and "genital mutilation" in section 26 to say they found no evidence of it, but also expose themselves directly as genocidal atrocity propaganda hoaxers. So instead they have decided to just downplay that and ignore it as much as possible and desperately hope the news cycle moves on and washes it away. The same tactic they used by lying about the Patten report's status, content and conclusions.Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ☀️👀

☀️👀 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @zei_squirrel

Jun 18
a compilation of Noam Chomsky exposing Western media class "journalists" for the depraved propagandists they are
to be clear, I didn't include any mention of Chomsky's passing as it was just based on one tweet and I was waiting for confirmation. His wife Valeria has just confirmed that Chomsky is still alive and recovering from a stroke he had last year:

here's another reporter from Brazil confirming from Chomsky's wife Valeria that he is still alive and recovering:

Read 4 tweets
Jun 18
I want everyone to know the AP's @apwillweissert is a liar. He just wrote another piece for the AP regurgitating the "Hamas mass rape" hoax, patently lying about Patten's UN report confirming it. Pramila Patten herself has said this is false in the Times of London recently: Image
the Times of London just recently did an interview with Pramila Patten herself and for the first time accurately described her report. Yet other outlets keeps regurgitating the lie that it confirmed the "Hamas mass rape" hoax. It is utterly fucking insane
CNN did it just recently in the piece below. They do it every single day over and over again: "Patten's UN report confirmed Hamas mass rape! SHE CONFIRMED IT BEYOND DOUBT!!!"

It's a blatant lie, yet they repeat it without any consequences over and over
Read 6 tweets
Jun 16
I have a question for any journalists who might be reading this: If you're a journalist, if you're a White House reporter, and if you have any minimal journalistic integrity, how can you allow the White House to screen a film that uses what every human rights organization from Amnesty to Human Rights Watch, the UN, Physicians for Human Rights Israel and B'Tselem says is torture?

It doesn't just mention it vaguely. No, the film prominently and extensively shows the forced tortured "confessions" of Palestinians released by the Israeli regime, and presents it is clear evidence for the "mass rape" hoax.

Now whatever you may think about the "mass rape" claim, if you believe it's actually well-founded, credible, there's good evidence for it, whatever.

But you cannot say that those forced tortured "confession" videos, which every human rights organization in the world, including Israeli as well as the UN says they are, should be cited and used as evidence, because that means you are now complicit in laundering torture everywhere, at any place, at any time, by any one.

You open Pandora's Box if you allow this to continue without even bothering to ask a single critical question about it.

You know those Americans imprisoned in Russia like Evan Gershkovich? If you allow Israel to torture prisoners, put a camera in front of their face, order them to say what they want to hear as they tape it, and then put that out in the world as evidence, and then you yourself cite it as credible evidence and allow the White House to cite it as credible evidence via that Sandberg film which it will screen on Monday, then Putin can do the same. Iran can do the same. Hamas can do the same in Gaza. China can do the same.

Anyone in the world can take prisoners, torture them, put a camera in front of their face and tape them admitting to whatever they want, and then put that out as evidence, and you no longer have the moral, ethical, journalistic or any right to complain about it.

In fact, you are now obliged to accept that as credible evidence, because that's what you did and said for Israel.

I will forever remind everyone of what you did here with these forced tortured "confessions". I will make sure there is a permanent public record of it.

I know you don't care about the proven lies in the Sandberg propaganda film which Haaretz, NBC News, Patten's UN report and the Human Rights Commission report, and the Times of London all prove beyond doubt to be lies, as extensively documented later in the thread below.

But if you cross this line and participate in the laundering of torture, you have shown the world what you really are.Image
if you are a reporter and are going to that White House event or will write a story on it, can you just add: Why is Kamala Harris and the White House promoting what every human rights organization as well as the UN explicitly says is torture? Is that too much to ask of you?
I don't know how many ways I can say this for people to understand how fucking deranged this is: Leading US politicians, the Vice President, members of Congress, are actively promoting a film that includes literal torture. They are promoting torture. And no one in media cares
Read 7 tweets
Jun 15
this is insane. The Israeli regime which has a direct line to the White House and Genocide Joe and Genocide Kamala are doing yet another laundering of the debunked and exposed genocidal atrocity propaganda "mass rape" hoax, featuring Sheryl Sandberg's debunked hoax documentary Image
not only does the hoax by Sheryl Sandberg include explicit proven lies about non-existent photos and other deranged claims from proven hoaxers, IT ALSO LAUNDERS ACTUAL TORTURE. The White House is going to gleefully launder actual torture now for Israel

Image
if you are a journalist and have any integrity at all left in you, are you going to just let the Vice President Kamala Harris and the White House launder a propaganda hoax that every human rights organization in the world, including Israeli, says launders tortured "confessions"?
Read 11 tweets
Jun 14
I want to give a demonstration of how the media, in this particular case the New York Times, fabricates and launders genocidal atrocity propaganda intentionally.

This really does epitomize the depravity of the Western media class.

In its piece on the latest UN report the New York Times uses the term "sexual violence" 10 times. Let's see how they use it to carefully construct a propaganda lie as a way of laundering their own "mass rape" hoax, even though they have to begrudgingly admit later in the piece, for the first time they have done so, that the UN report actually debunks it.

This refers to their use of the term "sexual violence" that is the most relevant and should have come right at the beginning of the piece, or at least right after the first time it is used. Instead it's buried in a section over halfway through the article, where it correctly notes that the UN report was unable to corroborate "claims of rape, sexualized torture and genital mutilation reported in the media."

Of course they don't say that these "news media reports" includes their own "mass rape" hoax articles, including notoriously the Jeffrey "I don't do evidence, I do stories" Gettleman, Adam Sella the food blogger straight of college, and Anat Schwartz the genocidal maniac who served in Israel military intelligence piece "Screams Without Words", which amazingly still has not been retracted after it has been totally destroyed, once again by this latest UN report as they themselves have to admit while burying it so that no one will notice.

I noticed.

In that same section, which again comes late in the article after the term has already been used multiple times, it uses it just once to say the report also "accused Israel" of sexual violence against Palestinians.

Notice the insertion of that phrase: "accused Israel". There is no "accused Hamas" right in the paragraph before that. No, for Hamas the report "says it". Not accused, not alleges it, no, it says it, as if it's a Pure Fact. For Israel it's just a random vague allegation and accusation. Ignore it, it means nothing.

So then we are left with 8 other times the NYT piece uses the term "sexual violence". 6 of them are at the very beginning of the article, one in the subheading, prominently displayed right under the headline, deploying it as a stated fact about Hamas on October 7.

Note again the lack of "accused Hamas", while it says "accused Israel" in the sentence right after. Again, for Israel everything is just an vague allegation to the New York Times and the media class, but everything you say about Palestinians is pure unadulterated fact. Literally from the same report. Astonishing depravity.

But then notice also: No mention of sexual violence by Israel against Palestinians in the subheading, even though the report goes into extensive detail about that, and it is much more damning than what it says about Hamas, because for Israel the report concludes that it actually is deliberate, systematic and planned, and extends to long before October 7 and the ongoing Gaza genocide, and actually does include sexualized torture

I detailed the findings of the report regarding systematic and planned Israeli sexual violence against Palestinian babies, girls, boys, women and men here:

But the New York Times doesn't find that worthy of mentioning in its subheading, or in the entirety of the article, aside from the aforementioned quick nod to it as an vague general "accusation" over halfway through the piece which 0.01% of people read.

No details. No harrowing emotionally manipulative descriptions like they do for the sexual violence claims about Hamas, which are prominently displayed from the sub-heading down to the entire beginning of the article, comprising the 6 other uses of the term "sexual violence".

So the New York Times reader has to go to over halfway through the article before it finally sees the statement that the report could not corroborate claims of rape, sexualized torture of genital mutilation. Again, 99.9% of people who see this piece by the NYT and just read the headline and subheading think that the report actually proved the "mass rape" hoax, when it explicitly does the opposite as the NYT itself had to admit but only buried late in the piece so that no one would read it.

Finally the two other uses of the phrase "sexual violence" are in the conclusion of the piece, where it says that Hamas denied it, and Israel also denied it and said it was horrible and terrible that they dared equate Moral Holy Saintly Israel to those dirty sub-human filthy Palestinians with regard to sexual violence.

This is how the New York Times and the media class fabricate propaganda under the pretense of doing "journalism" and "getting the facts right". Through omission, emphasis and de-emphasis, ordering of claims (in headlines and subheadings, buried late in the piece), presenting as fact versus presenting as allegation, they distort reality and turn it into a mangled propaganda construct.

And they know they're doing this, it's all intentional, and that is what makes them so depraved and vile. They are conscious liars, and the better you are able to distort and lie and fabricate propaganda, the more you get rewarded in the prestige media class.Image
hey @ErikaSolomon, as you can see I read your latest NYT piece on the UN report in great detail.

Can you please explain why there is no discussion at all of the extensive detailed and quite harrowing documentation of what the report says is actual systematic and planned Israeli sexual violence against Palestinian girls, boys, women and men?

I assume you read the report before you wrote this article about it, so you must have read all that extensive documentation of Israeli troops and civilians sexually assaulting, beating, torturing, mutilating Palestinian children, women and men, right?

You read the report, so surely you must have read those parts.

Why is there no mention of that at all, zero, while you do discuss in detail the report's accusations of sexual violence against Hamas, which the report notes, as you yourself later correctly say over halfway through the piece, was not systematic or planned, unlike for Israel? Also, why did you not say that the report concludes that for Israel it was actually systematic and planned, and extends to before October 7 and the ongoing Gaza genocide, to the entire history of the occupation.

Don't you think that's maybe worth a mention? A sentence? You detail the claims about Hamas, so why not add that for Israel?

And why in that section did you use the term "accused" for Israeli sexual violence by the report, but for Hamas in the paragraph preceding, you say the report "says it", as a fact. Why accusation for one, and fact for the other.

That's strange to me. Can you explain that choice?

Can you also please explain why since the report's conclusions about Israel sexual violence against Palestinian children, women and men is much worse than what it says about October 7, you did not include any mention of it in the subheading of your article, while you did include it for Hamas?

If you can answer these questions I would greatly appreciate it.
@ErikaSolomon again, the report documents in harrowing detail the sexual violence, sexualized torture, desecration and mutilation of Palestinian girls, women, boys and men. Why no details of this in your article, and why no mention of it being systematic and planned?
Read 6 tweets
Jun 14
this is amazing. Briahna Joy Gray has revealed that The Hill has banned Norman Finkelstein from appearing on their outlet because they say he is a "Holocaust denier". His parents are literally Holocaust survivors. Briahna also details the sabotaging of the show by Zionists
one of the most known things about Norman Finkelstein is that his parents survived Auschwitz and Majdanek concentration camps, and that the lessons they taught him is exactly why he opposes genocidal apartheid Israel and Zionism. Banning him for "Holocaust denial" is insane
the actual reason The Hill blacklists Norman Finkelstein isn't because of the deranged smear he's a "Holocaust denier", but because he exposed the use of the Holocaust by genocidal Zionists to launder their mass rape, torture and killing of Palestinians:
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(