BREAKING: The UN just released its first actual investigation into October 7 and ongoing Gaza genocide by Israel. It concludes that though there was violence against women (SVGB), there is no proof of any rape, let alone "mass rape", or that it was "ordered by Hamas". It's over
the investigation by the UN's Human Rights Office also concludes the Israeli regime does actually engage in a systematic campaign of sexual and gender violence against Palestinian children, women and men, rooted in the very nature of the occupation and can only end with it:
the UN's Human Rights Office, unlike Pramila Patten's office, actually does have an investigatory mandate and abilities, and this is their conclusion from their investigation: The NYT, AP, Reuters, Guardian all lied. And even Patten had concluded the same:
read the UN Human Right's Commission report in full: . There is only one mention of "rape", saying there's no evidence for it, and zero mention of "knives/nails in vaginas and genital mutilation". It was all a genocidal propaganda hoax from start to finishohchr.org/en/press-relea…
now what will the media class do with this first actual UN report? Let me predict it for you. If they report on its conclusions at all, they will lie and claim that the references to "sexual and gender violence" proves their "mass rape" hoax, when it explicitly debunks it in its only mention of rape. The use of "sexual violence" refers to any violence they believe was targeted against women, not referring to rape, sexualized torture or genital mutilation which it again explicitly only mentions once in paragraph 26 I highlighted.
But here is the problem for them. If they go with that obviously and intentionally deceitful reading of the report's use of "sexual violence", then it means they also have to accept that it was not ordered by Hamas as a systematic weapon of war, which is what the NYT, BBC, Reuters, AP and Guardian falsely claimed, whereas in the Israeli regime case it is actually systematic, "part of their operating procedures."
So the actual "mass rape" in that case would not be done by Hamas on October 7 as the New York Times and all the others claimed, but by their precious genocidal Israeli regime, and not just since in the ongoing Gaza genocide, but stretching back to the entire history of the occupation.
But of course they will ignore the term's usage in that context, and simply lie about it to launder their genocidal mass rape hoax, exactly like they did with the Patten report which finally months later The Times of London came out as the first mainstream Western media publication to accurately report on while also confirming it with her directly.
Now watch and see how accurate my prediction is.
I know these scumbags in and out. I know exactly what they're right now writing and putting as their headlines to put on their frontpages: BREAKING, UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION FINDS MASS SEXUAL VIOLENCE ON OCTOBER 7.
This is the lie they will all go with. Just watch.
another crucial part of the report no Western media outlet will report on: There are only two uses of "sexualized torture" in the report. The first in section 26, saying there's no evidence of it on October 7. The second in section 65, saying Israel does it to Palestinians:
so to summarize: The entire prestige Western media class fabricated the "mass rape" hoax as genocidal atrocity propaganda on behalf of the Israeli regime to not only launder the ongoing Gaza genocide, but do cover for the actual systematic Israeli mass sexual violence and rape
exactly like they did with the 40 beheaded babies genocidal propaganda hoax. They fabricated it, spread it, and then used it to launder the genocide and cover for their own actual systematic campaign of mass beheading Palestinian babies and children:
now you know why Israel blocks investigations by UN bodies that have an actual investigative mandate and abilities, unlike Patten's office, though again even she concluded there was no Hamas campaign of mass rape, which the media class then lied about
so now you have two UN reports, one by the UN's Human Rights Commission which has an actual investigative mandate, concluding there was no systematic Hamas-ordered campaign of mass rape/sexual violence. The NYT, Guardian, BBC, AP, Reuters: Will you retract your genocidal hoaxes?
the Israeli regime and media are going insane. The Times of Israel propaganda rag admits: The UN report doesn't verify a single rape. Then they immediately deflect to Patten's report, and lie about its status which this actually investigative report supersedes per Patten herself
hey Times of Israel, it's actually much worse than just that: The actual full and legal investigative report by the UN's Commission for Human Rights, which Pramila Patten herself in her own report defers to as it is the higher body in the UN that actually has an investigative mandate unlike her office, concludes there is no evidence for a single rape on October 7 and of genital mutilation, "nails and knives in vaginas", all the deranged hoax lies that you and the NYT, BBC, Guardian, Reuters, AP, CNN have all been fabricating and spreading, alongside Genocide Joe and the political class.
But it also concludes that there is no evidence for a Hamas-ordered campaign of systematic sexual violence or rape, and even worse for you, it also concludes that it is actually you, Israel, that does systematic mass sexual violence and torture against Palestinian children, women and men.
You depraved genocidal scum have finally been exposed, and all your pathetic deflections, these "OMG BUT PATTEN SUGGESTED IT WAS LIKELY MAYBE SO" are transparent to everyone. Patten herself defers to this report. It's over.
Ruth Halperin-Kaddari's propaganda spectacle with Patten, who she personally recruited for her "fact finding mission" which her office has never done before, blew up in their face, and there is absolutely nothing they can do about it except desperately lie
CNN is now showing how the media class will report on this: They will desperately minimize the UN Human Rights Commission's conclusion that they did not find evidence for a single rape on October 7, ignore that they concluded the same about genital mutilation/sexualized torture and that there is no evidence for a "systematic Hamas campaign of sexual violence/rape", and instead frame this as "well it was probably just because they couldn't go to Israel and verify the genocidal propaganda hoax that we fabricated and laundered."
Then when they move to reporting on the Israeli documented and proven systematic campaign of targeted sexual and gender violence against Palestinian children, women and men, suddenly CNN demotes it to "allegations". It's just "allegations" now.
Patten's report, which by its own admission was not a full and legal investigation and was therefore totally meaningless in whatever it said as it has no investigative mandate and only looked as Israeli provided propaganda, which again Patten herself has reiterated recently in the Times of London (see ), was constantly framed as a confirmed proven report of rape on October 7.
But now when the actual UN body that has an investigative mandate comes out with its full legal investigation and report, it becomes "allegations". It's just "allegations".
Do you see how depraved and genocidal the Western media class really is? How they lie as a routine part of their job? The most grotesque scum alive.
the UN Human Rights Commission's report confirms that not just "mass rape" but also sexualized torture/genital mutilation and the claim of a "Hamas ordered campaign" of it is a genocidal hoax with no evidence, exactly as the Times of London concluded:
the pathetic, deranged, hysterical and desperate Zionist smears and attempts to deflect and distract have begun. Again, as the Time of Israel, CNN and others have been forced to confirm, the UN Human Rights Commission report states that they could find no evidence for any rape on October 7, nor for any Hamas plan for sexual or gender-based violence (SGVB).
Those are the accurate, proven statements of fact I made in the first post, and those are the parts of the report I cited to back it up with: Section 26 and the relevant part of section 95 regarding the non-existence of a "Hamas plan". The rest of 95 confirms what I said the report does note, namely that there was indications of sexual violence against women on October 7. I was actually making that stronger by not even using the term "indications", which the report does do in 95.
Now this brings me back to the earlier point I made in this thread about the Zionist and media class propaganda deflection being to try to conflate the use of "sexual violence" with rape (see ), although again the Times of Israel, CNN and others have now definitively preempted that because they didn't want to accept that standard for the part of the report that uses "sexual violence" in relation to Israel, and which is much worse, namely by concluding that it is actually a systematic part of Israeli standard procedure against Palestinian children, women and men.
If they accepted the conflation of "sexual violence" with rape throughout the report, it would mean that the actual systematic mass rape did not come from Hamas, but from Israel, the exact opposite of all their own reporting. So it would not just defy the actual content of the report, which only uses "rape", "sexualized torture" and "genital mutilation" in section 26 to say they found no evidence of it, but also expose themselves directly as genocidal atrocity propaganda hoaxers. So instead they have decided to just downplay that and ignore it as much as possible and desperately hope the news cycle moves on and washes it away. The same tactic they used by lying about the Patten report's status, content and conclusions.
reminder that in 2002 the US signed the Hague Invasion Act into law, which states that if any US, NATO or Israeli official is charged with war crimes, arrested and brought to the International Criminal Court, the US will invade and destroy the city and court
Israel is included in the law under "covered allied persons", and that deranged genocidal Zionist maniac Tom Cotton has already vowed to enact it for his beloved fellow death-cult baby beheading mass murdering war criminal rapists Netanyahu and Gallant:
the Netherlands is in NATO. So the US signed into law that it will invade another NATO country and destroy an independent judicial institution if it ever dares investigate and prosecute its beloved genocidal Zionist war criminals. Why? Here's why:
it's incredibly depraved and grotesque that the ICC had to include the warrant against Deif which is fucking insane and regurgitates the rape hoax multiple times alongside the warrants for actual mass rapist, baby beheading, maiming, genocidal torturers Netanyahu and Gallant, just so they and the Western media class could go "see, the evil backward brown Palestinian A-rabs are still worse! Just compare the rap sheets!"
Azov Nazis committed countless actual war crimes, including rape. The ICC didn't "both-sides" it when they issued the warrant against Putin. Actual Nazis. But for the Palestinian resistance, they just had to launder the genocide, even in their warrants
here is a thread of just some of the documented systematic mass rape and sexualized torture of Palestinian children, girls, boys, women and men that the ICC has decided to completely erase from existence as it regurgitates the genocidal rape hoax:
if right after picking Tim Walz as her VP Kamala had explicitly vowed to end the ongoing Gaza genocide by saying she would withhold all arms and funding supplies and diplomatic cover if it did not stop, and then also unveiled an economic package of free college, medicare for all, and a 15 or higher minimum wage, she would have easily won the election. That's just a fact, as all of this would have energized the Dem base and also poll very well among independents and even some Republicans.
Instead she ran on being the new version of Liz and Dick Cheney, vowing to endlessly continue the ongoing mass killing and rape of Palestinians and regurgitating genocidal atrocity propaganda hoaxes constantly, saying Iran is the greatest threat to the US and must be destroyed, having Mark Cuban as her main economic guru vowing to deregulate and cut taxes and "be good to Wall Street", and saying actually the Genocide Joe economy is wonderful and great and if you disagree you're too stupid to be able to properly read charts per Ezra Klein, Matthew Yglesias, Will Stancil and David Shor.
She ran a campaign by and for neo-con neoliberals, David Frum, Jeffrey Goldberg, Yglesias, Shor, and ate shit for it. She was humiliated so badly by a candidate, Trump, who said the most insane deranged shit constantly about Haitians eating dogs and cats, about how she's not really black, not having a plan for doing anything at all.
And you know why she and Democratic leadership did that? Because they didn't care if they lost. Losing is nothing to them. They keep their donor money. The Dem political PR strategist media class keeps its jobs. In fact, they get even more money because they'll switch to being epic based "resistance heroes" again and fleece their base of even more cash.
Kamala Harris and Democratic leadership intentionally threw the election instead of actually running a campaign that could win, because Israel is Uber Alles for them, Zionism sacrosanct, as are their other corporate overlords.
That's what happend in the 2024 election.
and you know who helped Kamala and Dem leadership to not even bother to consider running that kind of actually anti-genocide populist campaign?
Online pseudo-radical YouTubers and Twitch streamers who instead of calling out what the campaign actually was, a genocidal neo-con neoliberal Cheney fan-fest, came up with epic coconut palm tree memes and said she was brat and said those fake bullshit "Palestinians are human too, I guess" lines were a massive major huge shift never said before even though it was an exact verbatim copy of Genocide Joe's script and even George Bush had more radical rhetoric on Israel calling it an occupation:
These vile scum all provided pseudo-radical covering for Kamala and Democrats to continue with their campaign as was, and shift ever further to the right and lean ever more into the Cheney fandom.
And why did these pseudo-radicals do that? Because they wanted to keep their AOC and Bernie interviews. They wanted to keep their Democratic Convention invites. They wanted to keep getting glowing NYT and Atlantic mag profiles about how epic and based they are and are "combatting the alt-right pipeline online".
In short, they wanted to keep the flow of donations and money from "progressive soc-dem" pseudo-radicals going, and explicitly calling out the Kamala campaign for what it was, and calling on their followers to never vote for it or support it, would have immediately ended all that.
There is one rule in online liberal-left media: You can say whatever the fuck you want about being an epic communist, anti-capitalist, socialist, whatever, no one gives a fuck. But when election times comes around, you better shut the fuck up and fall in line and let your audience know that they should vote for Democrats. If you don't, and you instead call on them to abstain and not vote, or vote for a third party, you're done. You will never got those profiles, never got those AOC gaming streams. It's over.
So that's what they all did, aside from a very select few who are of course always smeared as "tankies" and "fringe purists" even though if they had been listened to, if we had been listened to, you would not a second Trump term right now.
That's a fact.
and of course the same applies to AOC, Bernie Sanders, the squad (with the exception of Rashida Tlaib who actually did constantly criticize the campaign and refused to explicitly endorse it), and the "progressive caucus". They all fell in line like good little boys and girls. AOC and Sanders were so pathetic in their obsequence to Dem leadership that they even went out of their way to try to keep Genocide Joe on the ballot after his brain leaked live on stage at the debate.
And then of course once Kamala was anointed, they immediately fell into line with that too. No matter how many Cheney appearances she did, how many times she laundered genocidal hoaxes and vowed to forever arm and fund the Israeli baby-killing rape-regime, how many Mark Cuban media hits about how great and wonderful the economy actually is and how Kamala will fire Lina Khan and deregulate more and cut more taxes and hates economic populism, Sanders and AOC electioneered for her to the max. Not a single word of criticism. Not one.
Not one attempt to try to dissuade her and pressure her and Democratic leadership to not adopt a deranged neo-con neoliberal Dick Cheney fandom campaign that would inevitably lose to Trump.
And then what does Sanders do? After going along with all of it, and not even bothering to withhold his endorsement for one second to extract anything, and saying the Genocide Joe and Harris administration is the most progressive in US history since FDR, lending his own fake populist credentials to them without any cost, any ask, nothing, not even for Palestinians but just for Americans, no free college, no medicare for all, no higher minimum wage, nothing. Absolutely nothing he asked for his total obedience to them.
And then he comes out and says Democrats lost the working class because they refuse to listen to them.
Bitch, you are literally talking about yourself. You and AOC and the squad did not oppose a single Biden/Harris regime policy over the last 4 years, you ran cover for all of it, constantly, up to the very end with all the Dick Cheney fandom.
The primary cause of the inflation was the Ukraine proxy war and the endless funnel of money to literal Azov Nazis in Ukraine for years and years, let alone the human cost of all those killed.
What did Bernie Sanders, AOC, the squad and progressive caucus do? They backed it 100%. They backed the very policy that caused the very inflation that played a key role in their defeat in 2024, and they refuse to say a single word about it. In fact, they have vowed to forever keep that money-funnel to Ukro-Nazis going.
And the same goes for those pseudo-radicals online, none of them have said a word about the massive over 170 billion Ukraine funding that disrupted the supply chains and caused the inflation and also significantly damaged economies in Europe leading to the rise of the far right there.
Go look at all their commentary before and after the loss, not a single one of them have mentioned Ukraine. They all want to keep that money going forever to literal Nazis. The head of Ukraine's military is a literal Nazi: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…
Meanwhile Trump ran on ending that war, in his typical incoherent fashion but he doesn't need to be coherent when the other side just goes "yeah endless Azov Nazi cash supply!", which even the fucking liberal scum at Pod Save America acknowledged played a crucial role in his victory: x.com/briebriejoy/st…
None of these depraved scum will ever acknowledge that they themselves are to blame for Trump's victory. The entire Democratic Party spectrum, from Ritchie Torres to Genocide Joe, Kamala Harris, Schumer, Meg Whitman, Pritzker, to Bernie Sanders and AOC, are all equally responsible for ensuring Trump's second term. All of them. The entire depraved genocidal Zionist party.
the genocidal Zionist regime is mass killing Palestinians in north Gaza through starvation, bombing and executions. They are committing a holocaust in broad daylight with US and Western funds and arms and the entire Western media and political class is laundering it for them
if Russia was doing just 1% of what Israel has been doing in north Gaza for weeks now, it would be top headline news every second of every day and every Western politician would be hysterically shrieking about how we need to immediately nuke them to stop "the new Hitler"
Russia can turn every inch of Ukraine into what Israel has done to Gaza. They can do it right now. They can turn Kiev into a wasteland. Every city into nothing but ashes. But Israel has actually done it, with their funds and arms and total media support:
one of the cringiest and most pathetic parts of Kamala's campaign was when she began pretending she owns and loves guns. Her PR handlers thought this made her look epic, cool and tough. In reality it made her look even more like the inauthentic fraud she is and has always been
"If ya'll break into my house ya'll gettin' shot HAHAHAHAHAHAH" The fake ebonics affect, the sickening cackling howl, it's so gross. Look at her face at the end of the second clip when asked if she has ever shot a gun, "Yes of course I have!" She oozes lying fake phony depravity
and everyone knew it. Even establishment Democrats knew that Kamala is and has always been a total charisma-void, Hillary Clinton on steroids. Just look at her: That's why she had to drop out before a single vote was cast in the 2020 primary. Genocide Joe then picked her to be VP because she's a black woman, that's it.
a few days ago two new detailed testimonies of Palestinians violently raped by genocidal Israelis were published at the UN. You didn't hear about it because the entire Western media class intentionally ignored it and erased it from view. Here they are read out in full:
there are countless testimonies from Palestinians that Israel is systematically raping children, boys, girls, women and men in their rape-dungeons. Kamala Harris, who constantly regurgitates the rape hoax, hasn't said a single word about these actual rapes
Kamala Harris, who profiles herself as a brave fighter against sexual violence, began her career enabling pedophilic mass rape (see x.com/zei_squirrel/s…), and has vowed to forever fund and defend the Israeli pedophile rape-dungeons: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…