BREAKING: The UN just released its first actual investigation into October 7 and ongoing Gaza genocide by Israel. It concludes that though there was violence against women (SVGB), there is no proof of any rape, let alone "mass rape", or that it was "ordered by Hamas". It's over
the investigation by the UN's Human Rights Office also concludes the Israeli regime does actually engage in a systematic campaign of sexual and gender violence against Palestinian children, women and men, rooted in the very nature of the occupation and can only end with it:
the UN's Human Rights Office, unlike Pramila Patten's office, actually does have an investigatory mandate and abilities, and this is their conclusion from their investigation: The NYT, AP, Reuters, Guardian all lied. And even Patten had concluded the same:
read the UN Human Right's Commission report in full: . There is only one mention of "rape", saying there's no evidence for it, and zero mention of "knives/nails in vaginas and genital mutilation". It was all a genocidal propaganda hoax from start to finishohchr.org/en/press-relea…
now what will the media class do with this first actual UN report? Let me predict it for you. If they report on its conclusions at all, they will lie and claim that the references to "sexual and gender violence" proves their "mass rape" hoax, when it explicitly debunks it in its only mention of rape. The use of "sexual violence" refers to any violence they believe was targeted against women, not referring to rape, sexualized torture or genital mutilation which it again explicitly only mentions once in paragraph 26 I highlighted.
But here is the problem for them. If they go with that obviously and intentionally deceitful reading of the report's use of "sexual violence", then it means they also have to accept that it was not ordered by Hamas as a systematic weapon of war, which is what the NYT, BBC, Reuters, AP and Guardian falsely claimed, whereas in the Israeli regime case it is actually systematic, "part of their operating procedures."
So the actual "mass rape" in that case would not be done by Hamas on October 7 as the New York Times and all the others claimed, but by their precious genocidal Israeli regime, and not just since in the ongoing Gaza genocide, but stretching back to the entire history of the occupation.
But of course they will ignore the term's usage in that context, and simply lie about it to launder their genocidal mass rape hoax, exactly like they did with the Patten report which finally months later The Times of London came out as the first mainstream Western media publication to accurately report on while also confirming it with her directly.
Now watch and see how accurate my prediction is.
I know these scumbags in and out. I know exactly what they're right now writing and putting as their headlines to put on their frontpages: BREAKING, UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION FINDS MASS SEXUAL VIOLENCE ON OCTOBER 7.
This is the lie they will all go with. Just watch.
another crucial part of the report no Western media outlet will report on: There are only two uses of "sexualized torture" in the report. The first in section 26, saying there's no evidence of it on October 7. The second in section 65, saying Israel does it to Palestinians:
so to summarize: The entire prestige Western media class fabricated the "mass rape" hoax as genocidal atrocity propaganda on behalf of the Israeli regime to not only launder the ongoing Gaza genocide, but do cover for the actual systematic Israeli mass sexual violence and rape
exactly like they did with the 40 beheaded babies genocidal propaganda hoax. They fabricated it, spread it, and then used it to launder the genocide and cover for their own actual systematic campaign of mass beheading Palestinian babies and children:
now you know why Israel blocks investigations by UN bodies that have an actual investigative mandate and abilities, unlike Patten's office, though again even she concluded there was no Hamas campaign of mass rape, which the media class then lied about
so now you have two UN reports, one by the UN's Human Rights Commission which has an actual investigative mandate, concluding there was no systematic Hamas-ordered campaign of mass rape/sexual violence. The NYT, Guardian, BBC, AP, Reuters: Will you retract your genocidal hoaxes?
the Israeli regime and media are going insane. The Times of Israel propaganda rag admits: The UN report doesn't verify a single rape. Then they immediately deflect to Patten's report, and lie about its status which this actually investigative report supersedes per Patten herself
hey Times of Israel, it's actually much worse than just that: The actual full and legal investigative report by the UN's Commission for Human Rights, which Pramila Patten herself in her own report defers to as it is the higher body in the UN that actually has an investigative mandate unlike her office, concludes there is no evidence for a single rape on October 7 and of genital mutilation, "nails and knives in vaginas", all the deranged hoax lies that you and the NYT, BBC, Guardian, Reuters, AP, CNN have all been fabricating and spreading, alongside Genocide Joe and the political class.
But it also concludes that there is no evidence for a Hamas-ordered campaign of systematic sexual violence or rape, and even worse for you, it also concludes that it is actually you, Israel, that does systematic mass sexual violence and torture against Palestinian children, women and men.
You depraved genocidal scum have finally been exposed, and all your pathetic deflections, these "OMG BUT PATTEN SUGGESTED IT WAS LIKELY MAYBE SO" are transparent to everyone. Patten herself defers to this report. It's over.
Ruth Halperin-Kaddari's propaganda spectacle with Patten, who she personally recruited for her "fact finding mission" which her office has never done before, blew up in their face, and there is absolutely nothing they can do about it except desperately lie
CNN is now showing how the media class will report on this: They will desperately minimize the UN Human Rights Commission's conclusion that they did not find evidence for a single rape on October 7, ignore that they concluded the same about genital mutilation/sexualized torture and that there is no evidence for a "systematic Hamas campaign of sexual violence/rape", and instead frame this as "well it was probably just because they couldn't go to Israel and verify the genocidal propaganda hoax that we fabricated and laundered."
Then when they move to reporting on the Israeli documented and proven systematic campaign of targeted sexual and gender violence against Palestinian children, women and men, suddenly CNN demotes it to "allegations". It's just "allegations" now.
Patten's report, which by its own admission was not a full and legal investigation and was therefore totally meaningless in whatever it said as it has no investigative mandate and only looked as Israeli provided propaganda, which again Patten herself has reiterated recently in the Times of London (see ), was constantly framed as a confirmed proven report of rape on October 7.
But now when the actual UN body that has an investigative mandate comes out with its full legal investigation and report, it becomes "allegations". It's just "allegations".
Do you see how depraved and genocidal the Western media class really is? How they lie as a routine part of their job? The most grotesque scum alive.
the UN Human Rights Commission's report confirms that not just "mass rape" but also sexualized torture/genital mutilation and the claim of a "Hamas ordered campaign" of it is a genocidal hoax with no evidence, exactly as the Times of London concluded:
the pathetic, deranged, hysterical and desperate Zionist smears and attempts to deflect and distract have begun. Again, as the Time of Israel, CNN and others have been forced to confirm, the UN Human Rights Commission report states that they could find no evidence for any rape on October 7, nor for any Hamas plan for sexual or gender-based violence (SGVB).
Those are the accurate, proven statements of fact I made in the first post, and those are the parts of the report I cited to back it up with: Section 26 and the relevant part of section 95 regarding the non-existence of a "Hamas plan". The rest of 95 confirms what I said the report does note, namely that there was indications of sexual violence against women on October 7. I was actually making that stronger by not even using the term "indications", which the report does do in 95.
Now this brings me back to the earlier point I made in this thread about the Zionist and media class propaganda deflection being to try to conflate the use of "sexual violence" with rape (see ), although again the Times of Israel, CNN and others have now definitively preempted that because they didn't want to accept that standard for the part of the report that uses "sexual violence" in relation to Israel, and which is much worse, namely by concluding that it is actually a systematic part of Israeli standard procedure against Palestinian children, women and men.
If they accepted the conflation of "sexual violence" with rape throughout the report, it would mean that the actual systematic mass rape did not come from Hamas, but from Israel, the exact opposite of all their own reporting. So it would not just defy the actual content of the report, which only uses "rape", "sexualized torture" and "genital mutilation" in section 26 to say they found no evidence of it, but also expose themselves directly as genocidal atrocity propaganda hoaxers. So instead they have decided to just downplay that and ignore it as much as possible and desperately hope the news cycle moves on and washes it away. The same tactic they used by lying about the Patten report's status, content and conclusions.
the New York Times was the one that first laundered the genocidal hoax that Hamas was working with UNRWA to steal aid. The Israeli regime directly fed this line to NYT Mossad asset Ronen Bergman and Patrick Kingsley, they destroyed UNRWA, and now they admit it was all a lie:
the plan from the beginning was to genocide every baby, child, girl, boy, woman and man in Gaza through bombing and starvation, and the Western media class played the essential role in laundering that with its genocidal propaganda hoaxes. Look at the date:
the war on UNRWA, which everyone knows is the only way to prevent the Israeli death-cult's plan to starve all remaining Palestinians to death, was launched under Genocide Joe and momala's administration, and they fully backed it. The liberal media class like the scum at the New York Times and Democrats spearheaded the genocide and are now trying to distance themselves from it, but we should never let them.
in his Nelk Boys appearance Netanyahu said three times that Hamas burned babies alive. Zero babies were burned alive on October 7. He has been saying this over and over again in every interview he gives. He said it at the White House. At the UN. The entire media class ignores it
everyone who works at the NYT, BBC, AP, Reuters, knows Netanyahu's standard script that he repeats at every event and in every interview is a provable genocidal atrocity propaganda lie. Yet they all launder it for him by never, not even once, reporting it:
in fact the only time I have seen anyone in the media class covering this is when the New York Times wrote a piece on his speech to Congress and laundered his entirely fabricated claim of babies being burned alive on October 7. @anniekarni did that:
got blocked by the liberal Zionist laundering propaganda platform "AIPAC Tracker" which gives Bernie Sanders a "100% pro-Palestine" rating even though he opposes an arms embargo and sanctions on Israel and does not even recognize the genocide. But he has the cool green card
countless have said to the liberal Zionist laundering platform AIPAC Tracker that it is deliberately lying and whitewashing the genocidal Zionism of AOCIA and Bernie Sanders for ages now. What do they do? They lie and block. Because it's intentional:
AIPAC has directly praised Bernie Sanders. Sanders just recently backed an AIPAC Lindsey Graham/Fetterman Senate resolution greenlighting the genocide. But it's cool, he has the 100% Pro-Palestine epic green card from AIPAC Tracker so don't criticize him:
Bernie Sanders told Zohran Mamdani he is creating the appearance that he is "minimizing the fear of Jews" and he "needs to be careful" about how he talks about Israel. His sole function now is to force the entire US left to adopt his laundering of the Israeli death-cult and Zionism even though it goes against the entirety of his own base, the left in general, the overwhelming majority of democrats, and a majority of the broader public
Bernie Sanders also viciously scolded Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib when they dared commit the horrific sin of accepting the conclusion of Amnesty, HRW and B'Tselem (see x.com/zei_squirrel/s…) that his precious Israeli death-cult is an Apartheid state, which he refuses to accept to this day. As with Zohran Mamdani, he also said that this "rhetoric" of theirs was contributing to "the rise of anti-Semitic attacks" and the "fears of Jews"
Zohran recognized the genocide long ago, but to this day Bernie Sanders refuses to do so (see x.com/zei_squirrel/s…) and in fact mocks it, saying in interviews: "What, so now 8 people die and that's a genocide?!?!"
He would never dare deny a genocide recognized by Amnesty, Human Rights Watch, the UN and every other major human rights group in any other context. He would not dare.
But he does genocide-denialism with utter glee and pride for his precious Israeli death and rape-cult.
And he pretends like he has some uber-strict and narrow definition of genocide to justify it, but that's a vile depraved lie. He said both Russia and China are doing genocide so that's a disgusting filthy lie meant to cover up for his precious genocidal Zionist death and rape-cult that he loves so much that he moved to it and lived on stolen land and has now decided to devote all his remaining political capital to defending through deceit even though everyone in his own base despises his precious Zionism.
so Erdogan-Jolani took over Syria for their CIA-Mossad masters, then let them bomb and destroy all the military infrastructure including air defenses and got rid of the Russian protection while Turkey does nothing. Meanwhile their death-squads go around mass killing and raping minorities as they threaten to invade Lebanon, and they happily let the Israelis use their air space to bomb Iran. And now they are being bombed.
Congratulations on your "revolution" that was definitely not about destroying the country and turning it into another Libya so that the Israeli-US-NATO empire could rape, pillage and take from it as they please.
it's amazing, the backers of the Erdogan-Jolani fascist regime are now actually celebrating the Israeli bombings because "they never did that to Assad and that proves we are really epic based revolutionaries!" LOL you dumb cunts, Israel was bombing Syria daily, and they did not strike deeper and harder than they were because Russia was doing what your NATO-daddy Erdogan will never do and providing at least some air cover, while they also still had their own military infrastructure and air defenses.
All of that is gone now. Your Jolani gave it all up for his CIA-Mossad masters and then became their slave puppet and thought they would be happy with just that.
No, you fucking idiots, they always prefer a Libya. Jolani will be allowed to rule over a small fascist fiefdom with his death and rape-squad warlords, and they will handpick the rulers of the other fiefdoms as they please.
Libya is your future. Congratulations, you now have your "freedom" under Israeli-US-NATO tutelage and protection.
everything the anti-imperialist left said about Syria from the beginning has been proven right: It was a Zionist Israeli-US-NATO project to collapse the Syrian state and society and turn it into another Libya permanently: x.com/zei_squirrel/s….
And their project was able to succeed because of the ISIS-Al-Qaeda proxies armed, funded and trained by the CIA and Mossad on the ground, as well as their backers in the West who gleefully began fabricating deranged propaganda (a lot of it funded by the CIA via its NED front and also Al Jazeera and other NATO-proxy outlets: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…) to launder it all as some epic based heroic revolution for secular democracy or true Muslim Islamic Ummah Sunni Power or whatever dumb bullshit they fed their idiotic followers.
Contrapoints is a genocidal Zionist scumbag who views Palestinians as sub-human and believes mean words online about Zionists are much more dangerous and evil because it makes Zionists like her and her close personal friends "feel unsafe". The most lowlife scum alive
Contrapoints also blames "leftists" for having contributed to her precious genocidal Zionist Momala's loss by drawing attention to her genocidal Zionism, which makes her and her friends feel bad in their mansions as they can't go to brunch without thinking about the orange man anymore. That is of course the real tragedy, along with the feelings of unsafety of Zionists like her bestie Ethan Klein
btw Contrapoints also said the genocide was inevitable and everyone should accept that it will happen and continue and no one should protest it, because "there are decades of diplomacy and strategy" behind it. If this was being done to Jews, Contrapoints would call anyone who said this a Nazi. But it's being done to brown sub-humans, so Contrapoints demands you shut the fuck up and stay quiet and do nothing, don't protest, don't say any mean words about her and her Zionist friends as it makes them feel unsafe, don't post photos of the genocide as it "promotes anti-Semitism" to do that (yes, that scumfuck cunt lowlife actually said that).
Do nothing. The only really moral and just thing to do if you are in the US and the West and your regimes are committing this genocide, is nothing.
You have to do nothing.
This is just pure genocidal Zionism dripped in faux fake transparently bullshit morality and pseudo-radical whining because Contrapoints, like her best friends Ethan Klein and other Zionist globe emoji death and rape-cult scum, are too cowardly to come out and openly say what they are, they have to hide behind the thin veneer of "liberal Zionism".