NEW: In leaked text messages obtained by the Free Beacon, top Columbia administrators—including the dean of the college—mocked and dismissed concerns about anti-Semitism on campus and even used vomit emojis to refer to a Columbia rabbi’s op-ed.
Scoop w/@elianayjohnson.🧵
The messages were sent in real time during a panel on anti-semitism at Columbia’s alumni weekend, which included the head of Columbia Hillel, Brian Cohen, and was attended by some of the school’s most senior officials. freebeacon.com/campus/columbi…
The officials spent much of the panel texting among themselves about how horrible they thought it was. Matthew Patashnick, the associate dean for student and family support, complained that Cohen, the Hillel rabbi, was exploiting the moment’s “fundraising potential.”
Other administrators in the audience included Josef Sorett, the dean of Columbia College; Susan Chang-Kim, the vice dean and chief administrative officer of Columbia College; and Cristen Kromm, the dean of undergraduate student life.
Throughout the panel, which unfolded over nearly two hours, Chang-Kim was on her phone texting with her colleagues about the proceedings.
As the panelists offered frank appraisals of the climate facing Jewish students, Columbia's top officials responded with mockery and vitriol.
"This is difficult to listen to but I'm trying to keep an open mind to learn about this point of view," Chang-Kim texted Sorett, the dean of the college. "Yup," he replied.
The text messages, which were captured by an audience member sitting behind Chang-Kim who photographed the vice dean tapping away on her phone, also used vomit emojis to describe an op-ed about anti-Semitism by Columbia's campus rabbi.
Chang-Kim's messages and those of her colleagues are clearly visible in the photographs. The Free Beacon verified the authenticity of the photographs with the person who took them.
The text messages betray an attitude of ignorance and indifference toward the concerns of Jewish students on a campus where protesters have called to "burn Tel Aviv to the ground" and said that "Zionists don't deserve to live."
The exchanges also raise questions about Columbia's ability to combat anti-Semitism if its top administrators not only dismiss the problem but also sneer at those who speak out about it.
When a student on the panel was asked to dilate on "the experience of Jewish and Israeli students on campus," Chang-Kim fired off a text to Kromm and Patashnick: "Did we really have students being kicked out of clubs for being Jewish?"
At one point, Kromm used a pair of vomit emojis to refer to an op-ed penned by Columbia's campus rabbi, Yonah Hain, in October 2023. Titled "Sounding the alarm," the op-ed, published in the Spectator, expressed concern about the "normalization of Hamas" that Hain saw on campus.
"Debates about Zionism, one state or two states, occupation, and Israeli military and government policy are all welcome conversations on campus," the rabbi wrote. "What's not up for debate is that massacring Jews is unequivocally wrong."
Patashnick, the associate dean for student and family support, also chimed in to say that one of the panelists—it is not clear to whom he was referring—is capitalizing on the crisis at hand to raise money.
"He knows exactly what he's doing and how to take full advantage of this moment," Patashnick wrote to Chang-Kim and Kromm. "Huge fundraising potential." Chang-Kim responded: "Double Urgh."
Among the comments Chang-Kim offered to Kromm and Patashnick: "This panel is really making the administration look like jokers." Patashnick replied, "Yep."
SCOOP: The dean of Columbia College, Josef Sorett, said today that the dismissive and vitriolic text messages he and his colleagues exchanged about a panel on anti-Semitism do not "indicate the views of any individual."
He also complained about the “invasion of privacy.”🧵
In an email to Columbia's Board of Visitors, an alumni body that advises the dean, Sorett apologized for the "harm" the exchange caused and pledged that "it will not happen again"—though he did not acknowledge his own texts were captured in the exchanges.
Sorett also took a swipe at the "unknown third-party" who photographed the messages—sent in real time during the panel—decrying the "invasion of privacy" and suggesting that the exchange, while "upsetting," had been taken out of context.
EXCLUSIVE: Congressional Republicans have introduced a bill that would ax all DEI positions in the federal government AND bar federal contractors from requiring DEI statements and training sessions.
It would also ban DEI requirements in accreditation.🧵
The Dismantle DEI Act, introduced by Sen. J.D. Vance (R., Ohio) and Rep. Michael Cloud (R., Texas), would also bar federal grants from going to diversity initiatives, cutting off a key source of support for DEI programs in science and medicine.
Other provisions would prevent accreditation agencies from requiring DEI in schools and bar national securities associations, like NASDAQ and the New York Stock Exchange, from instituting diversity requirements for corporate boards.
NEW: For 5+ years, UCLA medical school refused to give its own faculty data on the link between MCATs and student performance.
And when whistleblowers tried to come forward about illegal admissions practices, UCLA refused to give them a written guarantee of non-retaliation.🧵
Since at least 2018, the school has refused to provide members of its faculty oversight board data on the relationship between admitted students’ academic credentials and their performance in medical school, two former members of that board said. freebeacon.com/campus/ucla-wa…
It has also slow-walked, since November of last year, its response to a public records request for similar data, pushing back the estimated date of availability four times over the course of six months, according to emails from UCLA’s public records office.
NEW: The dean of UCLA medical school, Steven Dubinett, has spent the last week claiming that UCLA does not discriminate based on race and follows state and federal law.
But his own center within the medical school runs a minorities-only fellowship that experts say is illegal.🧵
The med school was hit with allegations last week that its admissions office holds black and Latino applicants to lower standards than their white and Asian counterparts.
Dubinett told an obscure Los Angeles Times columnist on Thursday that the allegations are "fact-free."
He also wrote in an email message to the school that hiring and admissions decisions are "based on merit," not race, "in a process consistent with state and federal law."
NEW: Today the dean of UCLA medical school denied allegations that the school lowers academic standards for minorities, asserting that admissions decisions are "based on merit."
Notice: His statement refers to "false allegations" without saying which ones are false.🧵
The dean also claimed that "medical student final exam scores are well above the national average." It's not clear whether he was referring to the shelf exams—standardized tests that up to 50 percent of some UCLA cohorts now fail, per the school's own data—or to some other test.
The defiant message comes in the wake of whistleblower allegations from eight UCLA professors—four of whom have served on the medical school’s admissions committee—that the school holds black and Latino applicants to lower standards than their white and Asian counterparts.
UCLA medical school hired a new dean of admissions, Jennifer Lucero, In 2020. Since then, the number of students failing their shelf exams—standardized tests taken after each clinical rotation—has exploded, rising as much as tenfold in some subjects.
That wasn't a coincidence.
Race-based admissions have turned UCLA into a "failed medical school," said a former member of the admissions staff. "We want racial diversity so badly, we're willing to cut corners to get it."