WARNING: Rivian CFO gave an interview full with giant red flags!
Rivian reports deliveries in 2.5 weeks, brace for impact!
On Tuesday (11June), Rivian’s CFO was interviewed at DB’s auto conference. The way she avoided and not answered questions represents giant red flags!
This thread goes through each question in a summarized fashion since several questions/answer are quite verbose.
Question 1. “Can you talk to us about the main changes … were (you) able to liquidate inventories of the old model?”
Rivian CFO completely avoids the question. CFO only talks about the vehicle’s performance specs.
Question 2. The analyst tries a second time “can you quantify for us the cost of margin benefits from these new R1s?”
CFO again avoids the question.
Question 3. Analyst gives up and moves to a different topic.
CFO provides weak answers. Mostly repeats stuff mentioned already.
Question 4. Analyst asks about R1 demand (first time) “Rivian products being impacted … how do you address the current environment?”
CFO starts with some cherry-picked data points neither of which address the question and she immediately moves to the R2 (which only launches earliest in H1 2026). Again, question is not remotely answered.
Question 5. Analyst tries again a demand question (second time) mixed with pricing “what have you assumed about demand trajectory for your product in order to absorb this production? And are you worried at all about the pricing environment for EVs?”
CFO mentions that “deliveries will increase from …in the low-single digit areas” for all 3 vehicles on offer right now (R1T, R1S, and EDV). However, she immediately switches to R2 and R3 and talks about brand building etc. The ‘low-single digit’ was known since Q4 2023 results announcement. However, CFO completely avoided the pricing question.
Question 6: Analyst, to his credit, tries yet again a question targeting demand (third time) “how's demand for the standard pack, R1, which you started producing even before, I think, the -- what is offering before the shutdown and now sort of like started producing maybe with the LFP battery. Can you talk about the trim mix within R1 in terms of your production or demand?”
CFO avoids the question (aside from mentioning a brief mix uptick)
Question 7: DB analyst tries yet again to get some demand info (fourth time) but moves on to 2025. "Looking ahead you've said that after this recent factory upgrade available capacity for R1 will be 56,000 units on two ships before, obviously, any shutdowns, et cetera. If I add a stable number of EDVs, it doesn't necessarily suggest much volume growth in 2025 until R2 is launched the following year. First of all, is this the right understanding that in the 2025 is sort of like stableish type of volume rather than real growth? And if so, is it a function of demand for the R1?”
CFO 100% avoided the question.
Question 8: DB analyst tries yet again a demand question (fifth time) but moves to EDV only. “In terms of the EDV program, can you elaborate on the current capacity for it? And do you expect to accelerate the volume in the out years or will Amazon take steady deliveries until all orders are satisfied?”
See my other post on this question specifically. Bottom line: Rivian is significantly oversupplied in terms of R1/EDV capacity and will be cutting about 50% of capacity.
Question 9: Analyst tries a cost question “so based on what you've seen post retooling and rerate, the input cost now from your new supplier relationship, the rate of the factory, some of the cheaper components that’s not you, this is what gives you confidence in getting to that profitability by the end of the year?”
CFO just says “that’s right” rather than using the opportunity to reassure investors about the cost savings.
Question 10: Analyst tries a profitability question. “How should we think about the trajectory of profitability (for) next year?
CFO repeats the already announced Q4 GROSS (not operating!) profitability target.
Repeats the long term 25% gross profit target. Note: for the 25% target, there is no guidance as to when, ie no in 2024, not in 2025, not in 2026! CFO’s optimism is based on “ongoing commodity cost tailwinds” (which can change any day), and better mix as the quad motor starts selling in 2025.
Question 11: Analyst asks about capex spending.
CFO says Rivian will be spending $1.2B in 2024 and $1.5B in 2025.
Note: this is all a cash out on top of negative operating cash flows which are predominately driven by operating losses. This causes Rivian to generate significant negative cash flows for >2years (minimum!)
Question 12: Analyst asks about potential acceleration of the R2 early 2026 timeline?
CFO basically says we should stick to the “first half 2026” time frame and not assume an accelerated launch.
Question 13: Analyst asks about capital. The key question!
'opportunistic' is the key word in the CFO's repsonds. This means the moment they can raise they will. I've talked about all the ins/outs in great length. They will raise end of 2024/early 2025. This is 90% likely.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In this thread I want to give you an idea just how insane the current government spending is and how far we drifted away from any sustainable fiscal spending.
This is all based on reported numbers and there are no assumptions/forecasts.
In the current fiscal year, the government already spent $4,159 billion. This is for the first 7 months and the fiscal year ends in September.
The latest available data is as of April. The already accrued deficit amounts to over $1 trillion: $1,049 billion.
You can see in the chart how net interest expense has become the #2 largest spending category at $579 billion (for 7 months) after social security ($907 billion) and even exceeded national defense ($536 billion), health ($555 billion), and Medicare ($550 billion).
The deficit is 34% of total receipts! (1049/3110)
In other words: the government spent 34% more than it took in.
Last year, at the same point in the fiscal year (April 2024), the deficit was $855 billion ($194 billion lower) and interest expense was $65 billion lower. Again, this is only for the first 7 months of the fiscal year for an apples-to-apples with the current fiscal year.
The deficit was 29% of total receipts! (855/2964)
The year prior to last year at the same time (April 2023) the government deficit was $925 billion and represented 34% of receipts!
This is a must read for TSLA investors. I shared this thread with subscribers last month.
***
This analysis considers Tesla's existing business (auto, energy, credits, S&O components) but also FSD subscriptions, semi, robotics (Optimus etc), Tesla owner ride hailing , and Tesla ride hailing (Cybercab).
Further, the auto segment includes the LCV (lower cost vehicle) and Cybercab for purchase from 3Q 2026.
1) Scope
The attached is not the full slide pack. I am sharing this shortened version in the interest of time. Outputting all modelled businesses would have delayed this report by a few days.
2) Change in frequency
Since many of you asked, going forward I'll be sharing an updated outlook more frequently in which I'll be adding additional outputs (slides) from the model as they become available.
The primary argument for a more frequent update would be incorporation of latest market data. Market data (ie share price) affect the multiple and hence the implied PT range. Also, more frequent updates help to incoporate lates vehicle sales trends.
3) My PT has changed significantly
My prior PT was based on Elon's October 2024 guidance of "20-30% year-on-year" volume growth in 2025.
The new PT's volume estimate is based on sales trends extrapolation and competitive dynamics by market. I've been using the leading global automotive database to derive a volume estimate based on the world's 11 major sales regions by model based on market share. At time of my prior PT this was not available to me.
Old PT: I will cover all changes separately with a detailed review of key drivers. There are various other drivers, ie not only volume.
4) In this thread
Slide 1-9: summary slides of key financial outputs.
Slide 10-13: step by step derivation of price target.
Slide 14: price target.
Slide 15-16: revenue, gp, and gm overview by business line.
Slide 17-19: auto, energy, S&O key drivers.
Slide 20-21: R&D and SG&A.
This is a 37-page financial deep dive into Tesla's Q1 results. I shared this report with subscribers the day after Tesla released results (April 22).
If you invest in Tesla consider subscribing to my research to be kept up-to-date on the company's financials.
In this thread I explain briefly why Hyundai turned into a zombie company.
Hyundai was the most cash burning automaker globally in 2024 with a negative free cash flow of $11.8 billion. In the fourth quarter of 2024 alone, Hyundai burned $5.4 billion. To fill the capital hole, Hyundai raised net $15B in capital in 2024 (financing cash flow).
Negative free cash flow was driven by a lack of operating cash flow (OCF). Hyundai's 2024 OCF was negative $4.2 billion.
Hyundai's negative free cash flow was further increased by $7.6B in capital expenditures.
The key takeway is that VW is done in China. This business won't provide upside to the group.
VW is simply not competitive in the BEV and quickly growing EREV segment while ICE market is shrinking rapidly.
This makes VW increasingly vulnerable to weakness in other geographies.
How is this relevant to investors?
[🔐subs only]
[the following thread as shared with subscribers on March 11, 2025]
***
VW Group's China business went from a cash cow to a non-needle mover.
This chart shows trailing 12 months China income: you can see how the decrease has been accelerating. VW Group's China JV income dropped to just $0.4B over the last 4 quarters.
This chart shows the quarterly income from the China business. You can see how both 2Q and 4Q were loss-making. 4Q is by far the strongest sales month in China. 1Q 2025 will be likely loss-making as well.