I don't know who Milo is talking about here, but since he has expressed pride in British culture, here are the ways in which his outfit violates British traditions. 🧵
The first and most obvious is that Milo has fastened the bottom-most button on his jacket, something that British men have known not to do since King Edward VI supposedly left his undone (and his courtiers followed). This button is a vestigial detail—not meant to be used.
The second is that the jacket is entirely too small. Look at this suit by Anthony Sinclair, a legendary British tailor who created a pared-down style known as the "Conduit Cut" (called so bc Sinclair was located on Conduit Street when he tailored for Connery). Note clean lines.
A distinguishing mark of quality British tailoring—and, indeed, tailoring all over the world—is that the jacket doesn't pull, particularly around the buttons. Caine can comfortably fit his hand into his coat, but Milo's coat barely contains him.
Milo's outfit violates another basic principle of British dress. Here, he's wearing a brown tweed with navy chinos.
As I've noted many times in the past, our understanding of traditional tailoring largely derives from British culture, particularly that period in which men had wardrobes divided between city and country. Every detail conveyed something. Navy was city; brown country.
Anyone familiar with British culture knows that brown tweeds should be worn with things such as taupe trousers cut from rustic materials such as cavalry twill or whipcord. Not blue chinos.
Similarly, button-down collars are an Americanism. The more British choice here would be a semi-spread collar shirt. Milo's shirt collar is especially bad because the collar points are small and dinky. The buttonholes are also made with contrast thread—a mark of bad taste.
His jacket also demonstrates a lack of familiarity with British culture in that it has peak lapels and three patch pockets—two at the hips and one at the breast.
In traditional British tailoring, every detail has meaning. Peak lapels are a formal detail primarily reserved for dinner suits, business suits, and "city attire." Patch pockets are a casual detail typically reserved for country and leisure clothes.
English actor Edward Fox understood this. See how his grey worsted suit with cloth-covered buttons has peak lapels (all formal details) while his rustic tweed has notch lapels. Certainly, he wouldn't be ignorant enough to put peak lapels on a triple-patch pocket jacket.
There's also the tie. In British culture, regimental striped ties typically denote membership in some organization, often a school or part of the military. For example, The tie below signals that the wearer is part of The Rifles, an infantry regiment of the British Army.
In the early 1900s, Brooks Brothers introduced their version of regimental stripes, which are purely decorative. Not wanting to copy the British, they flipped the direction of the stripes. See how they run in the opposite direction.
Milo here is wearing a faux regimental stripe that runs in the American direction. It is an odd choice for a British patriot, but it may also be the only option if no British organization will have you.
In any case, I write this as a non-white immigrant living in an English-speaking country. However, I love British tailoring and American culture. I hope this shows that immigrants can offer something to native-born citizens.
Here are some photos of British men who know about traditional British dress practices. I hope Milo can absorb the information presented in these photos.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Have you ever noticed that people dressed better in the past? Even in the summer, when it was scorching hot?
Why is this? 🧵
I want to first dispel some myths.
Contrary to popular belief, people didn't look better because they were slimmer. We see many corpulent men in the past who dressed better than the average man today. It's not true you can look good in anything if you have an athletic body.
Dressing well was also not limited to the rich and famous. A reader sent me pics of his grandpa, born in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) to a working-class Chinese family. He immigrated to London and then Canada, where he worked in an auto parts store and by installing light fixtures.
Let's start with an experiment. Here are two men wearing tailored jackets with jeans.
Which do you think looks better?
If you choose the outfit on the right, then we have the same taste. But why does he look better?
The answer stems fro a basic rule of classic tailoring: the jacket needs to have a certain relationship with the trousers so as to form a harmonious whole.
On April 30th, Josh Smith of Montana Knife Company said you won't have to worry about tariffs if you buy American.
Last week, he realized his costs are going up bc he imports equipment and steel. And so do his suppliers.
IMO many people aren't aware of how much they import.
Genuinely not posting this to gloat, but hoping that people reevaluate how much of their life is connected to an international supply chain. Many small businesses, including artisans, will see their businesses shutter because of these tariffs, regardless of how they voted
Extremely long, but if you want to hear it, Josh breaks down the challenges he's facing. I hear similar stories in menswear (e.g., 3sixteen needing to import the best denim, which comes from Japan). All this now faces tariffs.
Glad I bought a Sebenza in MagnaCut before all this.
In this thread, I will tell you, definitively, whether Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.
This way, you will be more informed when shopping for your wardrobe . 🧵
I should state two things at the outset.
First, I never comment on womenswear because I don't know anything about it. This thread isn't actually about Sweeney's jeans (sorry, I lied). But in the last few days, I've seen grown men buying American Eagle jeans and I can't abide.
Second, while clothing quality matters, it's more important to develop a sense of taste. Buying clothes isn't like shopping for electronics — you don't "max out" specs. It's more like buying coffee — you sample around and identify what notes you like. Develop taste.
Sometimes I think about the closure of G. Lorenzi, a Milanese gentleman's shop that had been around for almost 100 years until their closure in 2014. The shop was special because it carried so many one-of-a-kind items from artisans — total handmade craft production, not factory.
At the time of their closure, they still carried over 20,000 items of 3,000 models, including speciality knives, picnic sets, and nutcrackers. They had over 100 styles of nail clippers and 300 different hairbrushes alone. Proprietor Aldo Lorenzi scoured the world for artisans.
There's nothing wrong with factory production. But as more of our lives get taken over by machines — including art and writing — this sort of production feels special.
Trailer for "A Knife Life," a documentary about the store by my friend Gianluca Migliarotti, available on Vimeo
I spent 15 yrs on a menswear forum. The longest argument I had was over a tiny detail that can be seen in this photo. For 6 months, I argued with the same five guys non-stop every day. The argument got so heated the forum owner banned one guy for life.
As I've mentioned before, there's a lot of coded language in menswear. Navy suits can be worn with black oxfords because this was the uniform of London businessmen. Brown tweeds go with brogues because these clothes were worn in the country. In this way, we get formal vs. casual.
The same is true for shoes. Tiny details come together to communicate something, much like how words form a sentence. Black is more formal than brown; calfskin more formal than suede or pebble grain; plain design is more formal than broguing. All of this stems from history.