The Russian Defense Ministry continues to be in chaos. Putin has made another reshuffle, appointing his cousin's daughter Anna Tsivileva (née Putina) to one of the positions of deputy defense minister. One of Russia's most corrupt officials. Before that, she managed the
1/13
"Defenders of the Fatherland" fund. This is a fund to help participants in the "special military operation." Now her responsibilities will include organizing social and housing support for military personnel. Construction is almost the biggest area for corruption. Pavel
2/13
Fradkov has been appointed as another deputy. He was the first deputy of the Chief of the Presidential Property Management Department of the Russian Federation. Leonid Gornin has been appointed to the position of First Deputy Minister of Defense. Previously, he was the
3/13
First Deputy of the Minister of Finance. Now he will oversee the financial support of the armed forces. These names may not mean much to an uninitiated person, but this is not so important. What is important is that when Andrei Belousov took the post of Minister of Defense,
4/13
he came without a team and now Vladimir Putin is appointing assistants to him. Since the money began to run out, he decided to bring bureaucrats to these positions. And relatives at the same time. None of them have any idea about the army. Only distantly. Tsivileva became
5/13
famous for the fact that when her "Defenders of the Fatherland" fund received in June 2013 1.314 billion rubles, more than 70% of this fund was assigned to employee salaries. Plus the costs of maintaining the office and training coordinators. In total, 97% of the fund went
6/13
to its maintenance. 3% was allocated for psychological assistance to veterans. Later, the government allocated another 5 billion rubles to the fund. In addition, soldiers complained about the fund that it did not transfer the required payments. So the new team of the
7/13
Minister of Defense, called upon to fight corruption and reduce expenses, will work great. Great for Ukraine. The first thing these people will most likely start doing is conducting audits and calculations. Putting things in order and seeing where and how they can cut
8/13
expenses. Of course, for their own profit. In addition, these people have never worked in the same team and most likely there will be a struggle for funding. And there is less and less finance. Such team building in the middle of the Russian offensive will only add disorder
9/13
and chaos. Again, this does not mean that the Russian army will soon collapse. It still has a lot of cannon fodder. It still has a lot of resources. But the fact that Putin started talking about peace again last week and this time his demands were a little more modest
10/13
than before, says, that he understands that there are problems and he is scared. The more aid to Ukraine and the stronger the unity of the West, the more Putin is afraid. His flight to North Korea, possibly for new ammunition in exchange for technology, also speaks of
11/13
problems. Putin has long been afraid to fly anywhere. This time he removed several fighter planes from the front for escort. The window of opportunity for Russia is closing. The offensive on Kharkiv has failed. There are no successes on other parts of the front either.
12/13
Ukraine has more and more allies and weapons supplies. There is still a difficult and long struggle ahead, but it is obvious that Russia's problems are only accumulating and new people in the army leadership will only worsen the situation.
13/13
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
According to BND estimates, last year Russia’s military spending may have amounted to almost half of the state budget and around 10% of the country’s GDP. According to the German intelligence service, Russia is spending significantly more on the war and its armed forces
🧵
than it has declared in recent years. Since the start of the war against Ukraine in February 2022, Russia’s defense budget has increased sharply every year. In addition, Russia’s interpretation of “defense spending” differs significantly from the NATO definition, German
intelligence officials note. A comprehensive analysis of budget data conducted by BND shows that Russia’s defense budget in recent years was 66% higher than officially reported. Unaccounted expenditures include, for example, construction projects of the Ministry of Defense,
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky explained why he sharply criticized Europe at the World Economic Forum in Davos. He made these remarks during a meeting with journalists in Kyiv, according to a correspondent from European Pravda. Zelensky said he had grounds for critical
🧵
statements toward Europe after a lack of funding led to a shortage of air defense missiles, allowing Russia to strike Kyiv’s energy infrastructure. Zelensky did not deny that his speech may have sounded overly harsh from European capitals and explained this by saying that
Ukraine and the rest of Europe live in different information spaces. He also acknowledged that the differences are not only informational but also emotional in how events are perceived. The president explained that his Davos speech was preceded by heavy strikes on energy
Putin is losing the game he himself started. His bet was placed on a return to the world of the 19th and early 20th centuries - a world of empires and spheres of influence, where Europe, America, Africa, and Asia are divided among several “superpowers.” In Putin’s vision of
1/19
the world, there were supposed to be three such powers: the United States, Russia, and China. However, the real transformation of the global order is unfolding in a completely different way. The key failure is Ukraine. At the end of the fourth year of war, Russia has still
2/19
been unable to subjugate it. The army is visibly degrading, human and technological resources are being exhausted, the economy is held together by military spending and gray schemes, and the state increasingly resembles an overextended empire losing its ability to govern
3/19
Within NATO, the possibility of conducting a special joint mission in Greenland is being considered in order to accommodate the interests of US President Donald Trump. This week, the US president once again stated that he wants Greenland. Military intervention is not being 1/8
ruled out. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen previously said that this would mean the end of the Alliance if the United States were to begin military action against her country. On Thursday morning, the 32 ambassadors of the Alliance gathered for their weekly meeting. 2/8
It took place in a "calm atmosphere." Denmark raised the Greenland issue in a "positive and forward-looking manner," NOS insiders reported. The US ambassador to NATO, Whitaker, also reportedly spoke in a conciliatory tone. As became clear during the meeting, almost all 3/8
Russia has once again staged a media stunt with the story about a drone attack on Putin’s residence. In the Novgorod region no one heard air raid sirens, yet according to Lavrov, 91 drones were launched from Ukraine and all of
1/25
them were shot down. There is not a single video and not a single piece of evidence. Why is this needed? This entire performance was staged specifically for Trump. Putin personally called the American president and told him about it. Russia has long convinced Trump that it
2/25
is Zelensky together with the “warmongering shadow government of Europe” who allegedly do not want the war to end. This show was played out so that Ukraine would be blamed for the failure of peace talks. Unfortunately, with Trump, this works. Meanwhile, Lavrov declares that
3/25
Daily strikes by Ukrainian drones and missiles on Russian oil depots, warehouses and refineries have created an image in the information space of a “leaky” Russian air defense system. This image sharply contrasts with what Russian propaganda had been instilling in its audience🧵
for decades, namely the idea of an “impenetrable shield” capable, according to Defense Minister Andrey Belousov, of intercepting up to 97 percent of targets. The reality of a full scale war has proven far more complex. Ukraine has not managed to destroy Russian air defense as a
single integrated system, but it has succeeded in exposing its real limits. As analysis by the Royal United Services Institute shows, the strength of Russian air defense depends not only on missiles and radars, but also on industry, logistics and the ability to replenish losses