a compilation of Noam Chomsky exposing Western media class "journalists" for the depraved propagandists they are
to be clear, I didn't include any mention of Chomsky's passing as it was just based on one tweet and I was waiting for confirmation. His wife Valeria has just confirmed that Chomsky is still alive and recovering from a stroke he had last year:
of course the Zionist scum were all celebrating, as Chomsky revealed their genocidal depravity in all its sadistic grotesqueness and exposed their propaganda:
BREAKING: The "mass rape" hoax collapses even further. Chaim Otmazgin, a senior Zaka cult commander which is the main source of the "mass rape" and other genocidal propaganda hoaxes, and who is himself a star witness in the Sheryl Sandberg documentary, has just been further exposed as a pathological grifter by Israeli media. For years he falsely claimed to be a lawyer to scam clients out of money, with one client being scammed out of half a million shekels (over $400,000).
This depraved scumbag has been touring around the world on behalf of the Israeli regime with his rape hoax lies, and again is prominently featured in the Sandberg hoax documentary, recently screened at the White House by Kamala Harris (see ).
His lies are also prominently included in the "Israeli Rape Crisis Center" report, which continues to be cited as a credible source as it just gathers together all the deranged and debunked hoax lies from the Western media (see ). In that report and elsewhere, Otmazgin lies about personally seeing and having photos of "bodies with nails and knives in their vagina". This was debunked by NBC News, Haaretz and the UN, who saw the same photos and said he lied. Then the AP debunked a lie of his about a body of a teenage girl he saw with her pants pulled down as evidence of rape. The body had been moved by Israeli troops and the pants were pulled down because of that.
Will they now add corrections and retract their pieces relying on this proven fraud huckster grifter's deranged propaganda lies? Of course not.
Only Israeli media is allowed to expose him for what he is for their domestic audience. For the Western media class he is still a Credible Serous Source. Even the AP in the piece debunking that rape hoax lie of his desperately defends his credibility, and says he just made an honest mistake because he was "traumatized". These depraved scum have no shame.
here are some of the scenes of proven pathological liar and grifter senior Zaka commander Chaim Otmazgin in Sheryl Sandberg's hoax "documentary". Remember, Kamala Harris screened this at the White House just three days ago. It's utterly insane
Simcha Greinman is another Zaka propagandist featured by Sandberg as a star "witness", and has been a main source for the "mass rape" hoax, cited by the New York Times, Guardian, BBC. The UN and others proved that he too is a liar. Look at how he lies:
I want everyone to know the AP's @apwillweissert is a liar. He just wrote another piece for the AP regurgitating the "Hamas mass rape" hoax, patently lying about Patten's UN report confirming it. Pramila Patten herself has said this is false in the Times of London recently:
the Times of London just recently did an interview with Pramila Patten herself and for the first time accurately described her report. Yet other outlets keeps regurgitating the lie that it confirmed the "Hamas mass rape" hoax. It is utterly fucking insane
CNN did it just recently in the piece below. They do it every single day over and over again: "Patten's UN report confirmed Hamas mass rape! SHE CONFIRMED IT BEYOND DOUBT!!!"
It's a blatant lie, yet they repeat it without any consequences over and over
I have a question for any journalists who might be reading this: If you're a journalist, if you're a White House reporter, and if you have any minimal journalistic integrity, how can you allow the White House to screen a film that uses what every human rights organization from Amnesty to Human Rights Watch, the UN, Physicians for Human Rights Israel and B'Tselem says is torture?
It doesn't just mention it vaguely. No, the film prominently and extensively shows the forced tortured "confessions" of Palestinians released by the Israeli regime, and presents it is clear evidence for the "mass rape" hoax.
Now whatever you may think about the "mass rape" claim, if you believe it's actually well-founded, credible, there's good evidence for it, whatever.
But you cannot say that those forced tortured "confession" videos, which every human rights organization in the world, including Israeli as well as the UN says they are, should be cited and used as evidence, because that means you are now complicit in laundering torture everywhere, at any place, at any time, by any one.
You open Pandora's Box if you allow this to continue without even bothering to ask a single critical question about it.
You know those Americans imprisoned in Russia like Evan Gershkovich? If you allow Israel to torture prisoners, put a camera in front of their face, order them to say what they want to hear as they tape it, and then put that out in the world as evidence, and then you yourself cite it as credible evidence and allow the White House to cite it as credible evidence via that Sandberg film which it will screen on Monday, then Putin can do the same. Iran can do the same. Hamas can do the same in Gaza. China can do the same.
Anyone in the world can take prisoners, torture them, put a camera in front of their face and tape them admitting to whatever they want, and then put that out as evidence, and you no longer have the moral, ethical, journalistic or any right to complain about it.
In fact, you are now obliged to accept that as credible evidence, because that's what you did and said for Israel.
I will forever remind everyone of what you did here with these forced tortured "confessions". I will make sure there is a permanent public record of it.
I know you don't care about the proven lies in the Sandberg propaganda film which Haaretz, NBC News, Patten's UN report and the Human Rights Commission report, and the Times of London all prove beyond doubt to be lies, as extensively documented later in the thread below.
But if you cross this line and participate in the laundering of torture, you have shown the world what you really are.
if you are a reporter and are going to that White House event or will write a story on it, can you just add: Why is Kamala Harris and the White House promoting what every human rights organization as well as the UN explicitly says is torture? Is that too much to ask of you?
I don't know how many ways I can say this for people to understand how fucking deranged this is: Leading US politicians, the Vice President, members of Congress, are actively promoting a film that includes literal torture. They are promoting torture. And no one in media cares
this is insane. The Israeli regime which has a direct line to the White House and Genocide Joe and Genocide Kamala are doing yet another laundering of the debunked and exposed genocidal atrocity propaganda "mass rape" hoax, featuring Sheryl Sandberg's debunked hoax documentary
not only does the hoax by Sheryl Sandberg include explicit proven lies about non-existent photos and other deranged claims from proven hoaxers, IT ALSO LAUNDERS ACTUAL TORTURE. The White House is going to gleefully launder actual torture now for Israel
if you are a journalist and have any integrity at all left in you, are you going to just let the Vice President Kamala Harris and the White House launder a propaganda hoax that every human rights organization in the world, including Israeli, says launders tortured "confessions"?
I want to give a demonstration of how the media, in this particular case the New York Times, fabricates and launders genocidal atrocity propaganda intentionally.
This really does epitomize the depravity of the Western media class.
In its piece on the latest UN report the New York Times uses the term "sexual violence" 10 times. Let's see how they use it to carefully construct a propaganda lie as a way of laundering their own "mass rape" hoax, even though they have to begrudgingly admit later in the piece, for the first time they have done so, that the UN report actually debunks it.
This refers to their use of the term "sexual violence" that is the most relevant and should have come right at the beginning of the piece, or at least right after the first time it is used. Instead it's buried in a section over halfway through the article, where it correctly notes that the UN report was unable to corroborate "claims of rape, sexualized torture and genital mutilation reported in the media."
Of course they don't say that these "news media reports" includes their own "mass rape" hoax articles, including notoriously the Jeffrey "I don't do evidence, I do stories" Gettleman, Adam Sella the food blogger straight of college, and Anat Schwartz the genocidal maniac who served in Israel military intelligence piece "Screams Without Words", which amazingly still has not been retracted after it has been totally destroyed, once again by this latest UN report as they themselves have to admit while burying it so that no one will notice.
I noticed.
In that same section, which again comes late in the article after the term has already been used multiple times, it uses it just once to say the report also "accused Israel" of sexual violence against Palestinians.
Notice the insertion of that phrase: "accused Israel". There is no "accused Hamas" right in the paragraph before that. No, for Hamas the report "says it". Not accused, not alleges it, no, it says it, as if it's a Pure Fact. For Israel it's just a random vague allegation and accusation. Ignore it, it means nothing.
So then we are left with 8 other times the NYT piece uses the term "sexual violence". 6 of them are at the very beginning of the article, one in the subheading, prominently displayed right under the headline, deploying it as a stated fact about Hamas on October 7.
Note again the lack of "accused Hamas", while it says "accused Israel" in the sentence right after. Again, for Israel everything is just an vague allegation to the New York Times and the media class, but everything you say about Palestinians is pure unadulterated fact. Literally from the same report. Astonishing depravity.
But then notice also: No mention of sexual violence by Israel against Palestinians in the subheading, even though the report goes into extensive detail about that, and it is much more damning than what it says about Hamas, because for Israel the report concludes that it actually is deliberate, systematic and planned, and extends to long before October 7 and the ongoing Gaza genocide, and actually does include sexualized torture
I detailed the findings of the report regarding systematic and planned Israeli sexual violence against Palestinian babies, girls, boys, women and men here:
But the New York Times doesn't find that worthy of mentioning in its subheading, or in the entirety of the article, aside from the aforementioned quick nod to it as an vague general "accusation" over halfway through the piece which 0.01% of people read.
No details. No harrowing emotionally manipulative descriptions like they do for the sexual violence claims about Hamas, which are prominently displayed from the sub-heading down to the entire beginning of the article, comprising the 6 other uses of the term "sexual violence".
So the New York Times reader has to go to over halfway through the article before it finally sees the statement that the report could not corroborate claims of rape, sexualized torture of genital mutilation. Again, 99.9% of people who see this piece by the NYT and just read the headline and subheading think that the report actually proved the "mass rape" hoax, when it explicitly does the opposite as the NYT itself had to admit but only buried late in the piece so that no one would read it.
Finally the two other uses of the phrase "sexual violence" are in the conclusion of the piece, where it says that Hamas denied it, and Israel also denied it and said it was horrible and terrible that they dared equate Moral Holy Saintly Israel to those dirty sub-human filthy Palestinians with regard to sexual violence.
This is how the New York Times and the media class fabricate propaganda under the pretense of doing "journalism" and "getting the facts right". Through omission, emphasis and de-emphasis, ordering of claims (in headlines and subheadings, buried late in the piece), presenting as fact versus presenting as allegation, they distort reality and turn it into a mangled propaganda construct.
And they know they're doing this, it's all intentional, and that is what makes them so depraved and vile. They are conscious liars, and the better you are able to distort and lie and fabricate propaganda, the more you get rewarded in the prestige media class.
hey @ErikaSolomon, as you can see I read your latest NYT piece on the UN report in great detail.
Can you please explain why there is no discussion at all of the extensive detailed and quite harrowing documentation of what the report says is actual systematic and planned Israeli sexual violence against Palestinian girls, boys, women and men?
I assume you read the report before you wrote this article about it, so you must have read all that extensive documentation of Israeli troops and civilians sexually assaulting, beating, torturing, mutilating Palestinian children, women and men, right?
You read the report, so surely you must have read those parts.
Why is there no mention of that at all, zero, while you do discuss in detail the report's accusations of sexual violence against Hamas, which the report notes, as you yourself later correctly say over halfway through the piece, was not systematic or planned, unlike for Israel? Also, why did you not say that the report concludes that for Israel it was actually systematic and planned, and extends to before October 7 and the ongoing Gaza genocide, to the entire history of the occupation.
Don't you think that's maybe worth a mention? A sentence? You detail the claims about Hamas, so why not add that for Israel?
And why in that section did you use the term "accused" for Israeli sexual violence by the report, but for Hamas in the paragraph preceding, you say the report "says it", as a fact. Why accusation for one, and fact for the other.
That's strange to me. Can you explain that choice?
Can you also please explain why since the report's conclusions about Israel sexual violence against Palestinian children, women and men is much worse than what it says about October 7, you did not include any mention of it in the subheading of your article, while you did include it for Hamas?
If you can answer these questions I would greatly appreciate it.
@ErikaSolomon again, the report documents in harrowing detail the sexual violence, sexualized torture, desecration and mutilation of Palestinian girls, women, boys and men. Why no details of this in your article, and why no mention of it being systematic and planned?
this is amazing. Briahna Joy Gray has revealed that The Hill has banned Norman Finkelstein from appearing on their outlet because they say he is a "Holocaust denier". His parents are literally Holocaust survivors. Briahna also details the sabotaging of the show by Zionists
one of the most known things about Norman Finkelstein is that his parents survived Auschwitz and Majdanek concentration camps, and that the lessons they taught him is exactly why he opposes genocidal apartheid Israel and Zionism. Banning him for "Holocaust denial" is insane
the actual reason The Hill blacklists Norman Finkelstein isn't because of the deranged smear he's a "Holocaust denier", but because he exposed the use of the Holocaust by genocidal Zionists to launder their mass rape, torture and killing of Palestinians: