Paul Goodman Profile picture
Jun 19 22 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1) Conservatives in Canada after 1993. It’s well known that in that year the Progressive Conservatives won only two seats in the federal election. What’s not always so well known is what followed. A thread…
2) The PCs were a very long way down indeed - but not out. In the federal election of 1997 they crawled their way back to 20 seats…
3) …And in that of 2000, fell back again to 12. But they had a base on the eastern side of the country from which they couldn’t altogether be removed.
4) By the time of the 2004 federal election, they had merged with Canada’s Reform Party. The new force took 90 seats…
5) …And went on to form a government after the 2006 contest (though it didn't gain a majority): the first victory for the right in such an election for 13 years. So what are the lessons for the right in Britain?…
6) …If any - because Canada 1993 and the UK 2024 are very different. In 1993, PC support was eaten up in the west by the Bloc Québécois and in the east by the new Reform.
7) In 2004 in the UK, Conservative support is spread less thinly (though it’s certainly thinned) and Reform’s backing is far, far less concentrated.
8) So, first, the Canadian balance between Conservatives and Reform is unlikely to be repeated. In 1993, the PCs won two seats and Reform 52. It’s hard to see that ratio of 26 Reform seats to a single Conservative one being replicated on July 4.
9) Second, the Conservatives won’t be “destroyed” “wiped out” “eliminated” if they win under 100 seats on July 4. At least if the Canadian experience is anything to go by.
10) Third, the Canadian example post-1993 suggests a long, slow, merger - with plenty of ups and downs and thrills and spills on the way.
11) Fourth, some PC and Reform politicians made it through the 13 years of opposition. But much of the leadership of the new Conservative Party came from a new generation. (The new Prime Minister in 2006, @stephenharper, was first elected to the federal parliament in 1993.)
@stephenharper 12) Fifth, Reform’s original disrupter, Preston Manning, never became Prime Minister. Indeed, he lost out during the turmoil of the opposition years for the right. Take note, @Nigel_Farage.
@stephenharper @Nigel_Farage 13) So what did the merged PC/Reform party in Canada look like? Was the new Conservative Party more like the former or the latter?
@stephenharper @Nigel_Farage 14) Grateful to @Dannythefink for drawing his readers attention to @Plamondontweet's “Full Circle”, an account of what happened.
@stephenharper @Nigel_Farage @Dannythefink @Plamondontweet 15) As the title of his book suggests, Plamondon’s take is that the Conservatives took up, in significant respects, where the PCs left off.
@stephenharper @Nigel_Farage @Dannythefink @Plamondontweet 16) He cites as evidence the founding principles of the new party, the composition of @stephenharper's first Cabinet, engagement with Quebecers, the 2006 Conservative take on public service broadcasting.
@stephenharper @Nigel_Farage @Dannythefink @Plamondontweet 17) It’s only fair to add that @Plamondontweet's origins were in the PC side of the merger…
@stephenharper @Nigel_Farage @Dannythefink @Plamondontweet 18) …And that the Reform side disputes this analysis, citing inter alia the Conservative stance on tax, law and order and the environment.
@stephenharper @Nigel_Farage @Dannythefink @Plamondontweet 19) Whichever or whatever view you take, a couple of points stand out…
@stephenharper @Nigel_Farage @Dannythefink @Plamondontweet 20) First, 13 years in opposition is a long time (roughly that of Labour’s exile since 2010; about the same at the Conservatives post 1997).
@stephenharper @Nigel_Farage @Dannythefink @Plamondontweet 21) Next, 18 years without winning an election is even longer. That’s 1993 to 2011 for the right in Canada - the year in which the Conservatives finally gained a majority.
@stephenharper @Nigel_Farage @Dannythefink @Plamondontweet 22) And finally: though the Conservatives will win more than two seats on July 4, Labour’s majority is set, if the polls are right and replicated come the day, to be much, much bigger than the Canadian Liberals' was in 1993. Draw your own conclusions.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Goodman

Paul Goodman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PaulGoodmanCH

Jun 15, 2021
+ @Jacob_Rees_Mogg is on feisty form in today's @ConHome Moggcast. He's got something to say on taking a knee, the Northern Ireland Protocol and "second rate" Oxford dons. But the most striking bit is about Covid and risk - so here's a thread.
Moggcast Quote 1) "Ultimately, the NHS is there to serve the British people, not the British people there to serve the NHS, and therefore we may need to spend more money on hospitals but...
Moggcast Quote 2) "...You can't run society just to stop the hospitals being full"
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(