.@SIPRIorg continues to do excellent and rigorous work mapping the autonomous weapon landscape. I think this was the latest, from March 2023, on what the laws of war do and do not permit in this area: sipri.org/publications/2…
This is from @ICRC on AI, decision-making and war. It summarises expert workshops that they held on the topic in 2022. geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-fi…
This paper by @WriteArthur, also for ICRC, is a very good examination of so-called decision support systems (DSS), used to support commanders in various ways. Less sexy that autonomous weapons, but in many ways more consequential shop.icrc.org/decisions-deci…
This recent report by @WarintheFuture and Clint Hinote is good on the interplay between the "trinity" of drones, new civilian-military sensor networks and "new-era digital command and control systems", which increasingly involve AI of one sort of another. scsp.ai/wp-content/upl…
This by @jonrlindsay offers a historically informed and somewhat sceptical take on the future of human-machine systems. "the problems of implementing information systems in complex national security organizations will continue to grow ever more wicked." tnsr.org/2023/11/war-is…
This @DefenceHQ/@MOD_DCDC paper on human-machine teaming pre-dates Ukraine (it's from 2018) but correctly points to the now-obvious relationship between the growing use of uncrewed aircraft & demand for AI-enabled autonomy. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5b02f398…
This book by @HurstPublishers has a great chapter by @kennethpayne01 on AI. "They might not be making decisions for us, but increasingly they will be sharing in the constitution of our imagination. To me, that amounts to a change in the nature of war." hurstpublishers.com/book/beyond-uk…
This set of evidence sessions from @LordsIRCom () is a treasure trove of expertise and insight on the use of AI in weapon systems. I had a few threads on it some weeks ago: committees.parliament.uk/committee/646/…
@LordsIRCom The paper below by @SamBresnick is a very helpful survey of Chinese/PLA views on military AI, which are in many ways not dissimilar to American ones, and certainly do not suggest China is racing ahead in this area.
The @turinginst recently published an evidence-based report on AI in wargaming. "There were a few bleeding-edge AI applications that interviewees believed could constitute revolutionary innovation to the type of data that can be extracted from a wargame." cetas.turing.ac.uk/sites/default/…
@turinginst RUSI has published a few relevant papers, recently. One is this on human-maching teaming. "Though not a panacea, AI can considerably reduce issues surrounding span of control, much as automation does in the context of integrated air and missile defence" rusi.org/explore-our-re…
@turinginst RUSI: "Militaries that make the transition to HMC and HMT could make decisions and conduct operations more effectively, more quickly, and on a larger scale than organisations that do not, all at a lower human cost" static.rusi.org/human-machine-…
RUSI: "To the extent that functions associated with staffs can be automated, staffs can be shrunk – enabling the control of more capabilities at lower echelons." static.rusi.org/human-machine-…
RUSI: "The history of conflict is punctuated with moments of disruptive change that fundamentally alter the character of warfare." Data, Automation and "new modes of producing physical capabilities could mean that we are on the cusp of such a moment." static.rusi.org/human-machine-…
This is @Katarzyna_Zysk on Russian military AI. "The overall deployment of Russian AI-enabled systems indicates that Russian AI appears to be in the early stages of maturity. The primary focus is on incremental evolution" rusi.org/explore-our-re…
@Katarzyna_Zysk Callum Fraser writing for @IISS_org: "Despite the sophisticated use of AI, technological advantage rarely converts into an enduring battlefield advantage given the dialectal nature of warfare, with both sides adapting and counter-adapting in real-time" iiss.org/online-analysi…
Below is a fundamentally sceptical take on military AI, which argues that modern AI just can't do "abductive" reasoning and this can't do real strategy. I don't agree with this conclusion.
@sambendett with another assessment of Russian military AI. "Russian military discourse emphasizes that in the long term, there will be an eventual point where technologies subsume and then replace human involvement in military operations" cnas.org/publications/r…
@sambendett "the Russian military establishment still envisions that humans will be in the decision-making and command and control (C2) loop today and in the near future." s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Christopher Andrew on the difference between the KGB and western intelligence agencies & their priorities. "What it would take for SIS to send 18 operations officers to the Philippines, I really can't imagine—but it wouldn't be a chess championship" cia.gov/readingroom/do…
"the turning point for [Mitrokhin] was the same as for Gordievsky, the same as for Sakharov, the same as for Rastushinskaya, the same as for many more—in other words the [Soviet] suppression of the Prague Spring" cia.gov/readingroom/do…
Andrews on the enormous scale of Soviet SIGINT, which Mitrokhin didn't see as it was in the Eighth and Twelfth directorates of the KGB. "the methodology of HUMINT support for SIGINT collection was...even more effective than maybe we had realised" cia.gov/readingroom/do…
On the 2022 negotiations. “Ukraine’s negotiators offered to forgo NATO membership, and to accept Russian occupation of parts of their territory. But they refused to recognize Russian sovereignty over them.” nytimes.com/interactive/20…
“Russia, stunned by the fierce resistance Ukraine was putting up, seemed open to such a deal, but eventually balked at its critical component: an arrangement binding other countries to come to Ukraine’s defense if it were ever attacked again.” nytimes.com/interactive/20…
“A seven-point list targeted Ukraine’s national identity, including a ban on naming places after Ukrainian independence fighters.” nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Excellent news for Ukraine but a significant logistical challenge alongside F-16s. Macron: “Tomorrow we will launch a new cooperation and announce the transfer of Mirage 2000-5 fighter jets to Ukraine…and train their Ukrainian pilots in France” france24.com/en/live-news/2…
Ukraine’s air force chief flagged this in January. “…it is possible that the combat capabilities of Su-24M bombers will be enhanced by Mirage-2000D, and Su-25 attack aircraft will be strengthened by A-10 Thunderbolt II” reuters.com/world/europe/f…
The Mirage decision looks to have been taken recently, as in February it didn’t seem it would happen. en.defence-ua.com/events/french_…
This looks pretty bad. "The former head of the Mossad, Israel’s foreign intelligence agency, allegedly threatened a chief prosecutor of the international criminal court in a series of secret meetings in which he tried to pressure her into abandoning a war crimes investigation"
"Yossi Cohen’s covert contacts with the ICC’s then prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, took place in the years leading up to her decision to open a formal investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in occupied Palestinian territories." theguardian.com/world/article/…
"Another Israeli source briefed on the operation against Bensouda said the Mossad’s objective was to compromise the prosecutor or enlist her as someone who would cooperate with Israel’s demands." theguardian.com/world/article/…
Having ruled it out in January, Tories now announce plan for “mandatory national service” for 18 yr olds. Choice: “a full-time placement over 12 months in the armed forces or one weekend per month for a year volunteering in their community.” Cost put at £2.5bn/yr by 2029-30.
This @RUSI_org piece below is a very good assessment of the serious challenges of national service and why the state doesn’t presently have the capacity to train a large number of 18 year olds. How fast was this policy thought up, planned and costed? rusi.org/explore-our-re…
Where will the money come from? “£1 billion of this will be funded through our plan to raise an additional £6 billion a year by the end of the next Parliament from cracking down on tax avoidance & evasion.” Rest from ‘UK Shared Prosperity Fund’, part of the ‘levelling up” agenda.
"The International Criminal Court is seeking arrest warrants for Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar and Israeli [PM] Benjamin Netanyahu on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity... the court’s chief prosecutor Karim Khan told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour" edition.cnn.com/2024/05/20/mid…
"The warrants against the Israeli politicians mark the first time the ICC has targeted the top leader of a close ally of the United States...A panel of ICC judges will now consider Khan’s application for the arrest warrants." edition.cnn.com/2024/05/20/mid…
Charges v Sinwar, Haniyeh and al-Masri include "extermination, murder, taking of hostages, rape and sexual assault in detention." Those v Netanyahu and Gallant include "causing extermination, causing starvation as a method of war...deliberately targeting civilians in conflict"