Will comment on this fit since Gavin asked for feedback. Also think this photo illustrates some potentially useful things regarding dressing for your body type, the specialness of tailoring, and why custom clothing can be bad. 🧵
Before I go on, I should note there's a lot of body shaming on Twitter. This thread is not meant to do that, but instead the opposite: show that anyone can dress stylishly if they know a few things.
When people see comparisons like this, they think: "Oh, Bryan Ferry looks better bc he possesses some magnetic aura," or "Oh, Gavin McInnes looks bad because I hate him." Some may also attribute the difference in weight (e.g., "Ferry is svelte; McInness is not"). This is wrong.
Too much attention is paid to whether someone is fat (and Gavin is not fat). In the context of dressing for your body type and wearing tailored clothing, a more important dimension is the shape of your shoulders in relation to the rest of your body.
Gavin has very narrow shoulders, such that the upper half of his body is shaped like a tube. This can be true of anyone: heavy guys, skinny guys, and anything in between.
His shoulders are also very sloped, as you can see when he's wearing a t-shirt.
As I've mentioned many times before, this is why tailoring is special. Suits and sport coats are made from many layers of haircloth, canvas, and padding, which are sewn together using special techniques (e.g., pad stitching, darts, wedges, etc.).
This allows a tailor to create a garment with a unique form. While you can create unique shapes in casualwear, it's harder to build up the V-shaped figure in suits and sport coats because there's no structure underneath.
This is not a perfect comparison bc I can't put Gavin in a different jacket. But see how the Levis Type 3 makes him look like a tube. A better choice would be Lee 101J since it has dropped shoulder seams, a cropped body, and a strong taper, giving the illusion of a V-shaped body
A similar, but not exact, principle is happening here. Gavin doesn't look as good as Ferry because:
1) his clothes are too small 2) he is not dressing for his body type
The result is that his silhouette is tube-like, whereas Ferry has a V-shaped figure.
This outfit would look better if
1) The shoulders were slightly extended 2) The jacket was longer 3) By lengthening the jacket, you can lower the buttoning point, allowing for a bit more waist suppression (and thus creating that V-shaped figure)
As the jacket grows, so should the pants to maintain proportions. Thus, raise the front rise and widen the leg. By raising the front rise, Gavin can fasten the jacket without his shirt peeking beneath the buttoning point. By widening the leg, he can also hide those shoes.
Gavin's trousers barely cover the opening of his shoes. Compare this to the King of Spain, who maintains a better ratio between leg opening and shoe length. When you wear very skinny trousers (in a tailored context), it will look clownish when you see your side profile.
Gavin says he got his suit from Nita Fashions (although he Nita size up). I don't know anything about Nita's business, but they appear to be a Hong Kong-based custom clothier that does trunk shows in the US. Two-piece suits made from VBC fabric start at $980.
Again, I don't know anything about their business, but they advertise themselves as bespoke. Perhaps they are. I would ask them: "How do you draft your patterns?" and "How many fittings are there?" $980 seems awfully low for quality bespoke.
The best Hong Kong tailor I know is WW Chan. Their sport coats start around $2,500; two-piece suits are about $3,000. The price reflects how much work goes into the garment, which is why I don't know how someone can make a VBC suit for $980, assuming the same amount of work.
However, I don't think Gavin needs to buy custom, as he looks like a 40 chest with a 32 waist. And this is my final point in this thread: custom does not mean better, and most people are better off shopping ready-to-wear.
The advantage of ready-to-wear is that you can put it back on the rack if you don't like it. All you need is to train your eye for what looks good. Will you have the same magnetism or talent as Ferry? Prob not, but you can dress as cool as him if you know a few things.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the 1950s, Irving Penn traveled across London, Paris, and NYC to take portraits of workers in their work clothes. These clothes at the time were not considered glamorous — they would not have shown up on fashion runways — but they demonstrate a simple aesthetic principle 🧵
Consider these outfits. How do you feel about them? Are they charming? Repulsive? Stylish?
If you consider them charming and stylish, as I do, then ask yourself: what makes them charming and stylish? Why are you drawn to the outfits?
As I've mentioned before, I think outfits look better when they have "shape and drape." By shape, I mean the outfit confers a distinctive silhouette. If these men took off their clothes, we can reliably guess their bodies would not be shaped like this:
If you're just dipping your toes into tailored clothing, start with a navy sport coat. This is something you can wear with a button-up shirt and pair of trousers, or something as casual as a t-shirt and some jeans. It's easily the most versatile jacket.
Key is to get something with texture so it doesn't look like an orphaned suit jacket. Spier & Mackay has great semi-affordable tailoring. Their navy hopsack Moro is made from pure wool and a half-canvas to give it shape. Classic proportions and soft natural shoulder
There's a pervasive belief that we no longer produce clothes in the United States. This is not true. In this thread, I will tell you about some great made-in-USA brands — some that run their own factories, while others are US brands contracting with US factories. 🧵
I should first note this thread focuses on well-made, stylish clothes produced in ethical conditions. For me, producing in the US is not enough. It means nothing if the clothes are ugly, crappy, or produced in sweatshop conditions. My article for The Nation below.
JEANS
Gustin produces MiUSA jeans using raw Japanese denim. "Raw" means the fabric hasn't been pre-distressed, allowing it to naturally fade with use, reflecting your actual body and lifestyle. I like their fuller 1968 Vintage Straight fit. They also do lots of other stuff.
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.
Watch these two videos. Then answer these two questions:
— Which of the two men is better dressed?
— How does each come off?
I think Carney is better dressed, partly because his clothes fit better. Notice that his jacket collar always hugs his neck, while Pierre Poilievre's jacket collar never touches him.
The level of craftsmanship that goes into a lot of Japanese menswear simply doesn't exist in the United States. You can do this for many categories — suits, jeans, hats, etc.
In this thread, I will show you just one category: men's shoes 🧵
For this comparison, I will focus on Japanese bespoke shoemaking vs. US ready-to-wear. The level of bespoke craftsmanship shown here simply doesn't exist in the US, so a Japanese bespoke vs. US bespoke comparison would be unfair. US bespoke is mostly about orthopedic work.
So instead, I will focus on the best that the US has to offer: ready-to-wear Alden.
On a basic level, top-end Japanese shoes are better because they are handwelted, whereas Alden shoes are Goodyear welted. The first involves more handwork and can be resoled more often.