A unique thread with almost fantastic connections you may never thought were possible: we will dive into two opposing species' mysterious origins & ultimate destiny of our planet.
One species is sustained by milk, the other, blood!
/🧵
Let's begin with the Red and their emperor: Mayer Rothschild and his future descendants. The name Rothschild was in fact, given to him, and meant "Red Shield".
Rothschild was a Khazarian claiming to be Jewish. In fact, he was a hybrid of the "pure" Khazar but never mind that.
The Rothschild family itself appeared in Germany 250-300 years priors to Mayer's ascend to dominance via usury. 350 years earlier, Prince of Kiev Sviatoslav the brave destroyed the Khazar empire in today's Ukraine, and they fled to Europe where they mixed with the Ashkenazism.
A hundred years prior to their appearance, a Germanic tale had spread throughout the continent, telling of an apocalypse started by a demonic people: The "Red Jews", who would invade Europe and destroy Christendom, leading to the events of the Apocalypse (i.e. Revelation).
The story would start:
"Far, far away from our areas, somewhere beyond the Mountains of Darkness, on the other side of the Sambatyon River…there lives a nation known as the Red Jews".
This in fact corresponds to both Khazaria and Gog and Magog from the Romance of Alexander!
Namely, north of the Sambatyon River happens to be the city of Ashkenaz (where defeated Jews -- actual Jews -- were routed by the Assyrian empire) and north yet is a special location: the Darial Gorge in modern day Georgia. This was the Southern extent of the Khazarian empire.
Along the Darial Gorge, Alexander the Great was said to seek God's help in building a gate to contain the satanic people of Gog & Magog (later conflated with Scythians by many authors) away from the rest of humanity. These would later become Khazars & are mentioned in Revelation.
Naturally, the Germans saw the rise of the Khazars (disguised as Ashkenazi Jews) as a bad sign, associating them directly with Gog and Magog.
But a curious thing occurs as well, so-called "blood libel" -- Europe saw an accusation never before levelled against Jewish people...
Ritual murder and blood draining.
It would appear that the "Red Jews" would periodically kidnap a small Christian boy and drain him of blood to be used for rites (and baking food). This was actually proven in the case of Simon of Trent (1475) beyond a reasonable doubt.
Anyway, back to the topic of the Rothschild: Him and associated Red Jew bankers would gain a lot of power funding wars between Christian nations, funding the end of monarchies and so on. This is well known.
One case that deserves close attention is the Russian "revolution".
In this war, depicted as a war between a RED army (funded by Rothschild associate Jacob Schiff) and a WHITE army (supported by no one but patriotic Russians themselves).
By the end of the war, the entire family of the white emperor were savagely murdered by a Red Jew.
As the dust of this disastrous war settled, the Red Jews revealed themselves -- they compromised 80% of what became the Soviet government, as revealed by even Putin himself.
They would later commit the red terror, killing up to 1.3 million Christians and starving 10 million more.
In Europe, after two catastrophic "world" wars, the Red Jews also seemed to dominate. Perched on the eastern coast of the United States' banking capital (NYC), they were untouchable, and later took that nation over too.
By the US's hand 10s of millions of people were butchered.
But these direct deaths pale in comparison to the systematic genocide practised by the reds against the whites. Using feminism, mass migration, a debt based economy gone wild & miscegenation media, whites have all but stopped producing babies are are seemingly about to disappear.
Or... are we? Who exactly are we anyway. We spoke at length about the mysterious origin of the reds, and narrowed it down to the legend of Gog and Magog.
Let's take a surprising turn into whites -- and also why these Red Jews are not Israelites at all.
To do that, we're going to return to the Rothschild family. Specifically, Lord Rothschild (LR). LR is known for the Balfour declaration, in which the British government would promise to hand over Palestine to the Zionists, written in 1917 a year before the end of WWI.
The Red Jews, in a predictable pattern, would later flood Palestine and commit one of the worst genocides in history (called the Nakba).
But here's something you probably didn't know. The same Rothschild would address the British government a second and final time...
... asking for raw milk to be banished and for Pasteurisation to be enforced!
This was certainly not a decent man -- his nefarious means and ends prove it. So what exactly is the agenda here. Why Palestine when the world was theirs, and why target something so common like milk?
One of the key strengths of white people lies in their ability to drink milk and digest it effectively thanks to the persistence of lactase enzymes in their body, something the majority of the world lacks.
IMPORTANT NOTE: the map is flawed and no data exists in the Levant.
Meanwhile, 75% of Red Jews are lactose intolerant. Milk doesn't work well with them.
Pasteurisation, pushed by Lord Rothschild, destroys the Lactase in milk, most beneficial microbiome, and turns milk into -- essentially -- poison that promotes many diseases.
The banning of real (raw) milk, turns an advantage into a huge disadvantage for white people. Yet there is an interesting symbolism many would miss if they don't know the history of the world.
Let's look at the history of farming in the "middle east", where Armageddon is near...
A thousand years after a global catastrophe struck our planet (marked by the Younger Dryas), people emerged out of mountain ranges and immediately started farming on the surface. As evidence will show, they had cattle and drank milk from them -- as reliefs, drawings depict.
Surviving the hardships of an event that destroys much of the surface necessitates a source of food that is high in nutrient while not requiring much in terms of precursor ingredients. The humble cow or goat is the perfect instrument for such a requirement: Grass to milk!
It is no wonder then that these survivors were precisely the kind of people who could sustain themselves on milk alone! As conditions improved, they moved towards more and more arable soul, in the rich continent of Europe.
...The origin of the white man and his white fuel, milk!
The curiosity doesn't end there. The reds are about to go to war with Lebanon. Are you aware of the origin of its name?
It means "milky" & "white". Most people attribute this to the snowy Lebanese mountains but this is in fact only half the story!
[To be continued in part 2] /End
Update: This thread preempted the Red Jews by a few hours.
Fine structure constant.
How strange. Accurate to 0.03%. I don't feel confident enough to include this amazing thing in my paper so I'll share it on here. Has anyone encountered this approximation before?
[My head hurts and I want to finish this thing. I'm sorry I tried my best.]
It's bizarre because ln(8R/a) is in the toroid inductance formula. If you identify R/a=1/alpha, then you get something very close to an integer out of the logarithm... What?!
To re-emphasise it's not out of no where. It came from identify the Compton wavelength with R and the classical radius with a. This formula brought out the electron mass to within 3.6% accuracy. The trouble is the R on the outside is different: It has to use a Hopfin fibration and torodial/polodial twists, resulting in Compton wavelength/(4*pi^2).
I can't explain it and my head hurts from all the other stuff which I've worked on (more significant in many ways if I can't close this), so I have to admit defeat and leave this in someone else's hands. Someone smarter than me I hope!
The 8 comes pure from ring geometry.
The "a" is saying physically -- if you had a sphere that contained the charge necessary to produce the field of a electron what radius would it be if it also equalled the energy of the electron.
The R comes from the wavelength we've detected.
The 7? I have no idea. Maybe it's just a coincidence.
Einstein with his ret*rded idea has held back physics for more than a century. Even Robert Millikan, who measured the photoelectric effect's frequency dependence, told him to let go of the idea.
I'm going to explain it, for the first time I've seen explained by others and I spent 3 days making sure no one else has thought of such a simple thing before. I was shocked.
It's not a property of the field, it's a boundary condition on the genesis of an electron-positron pair.
Well, well, @AnthropicAI pulled the rug on all of its users.
It introduced Sonnet 4.5, under the pretense that it was better than Opus 4.1. The benchmarks were all cooked. Opus 4.1 is still superior to Sonnet 4.5.
Yet they used this as an excuse to lower usage limits on Opus!
@AnthropicAI If you subscribe to their non-API plan they're not even transparent about how much usage you're getting.
They got people hooked to this and now they're raising the price by 10x as layoffs continue. This is the expert squeeze happening live.
@AnthropicAI Zero accountability from the so-called government who is meant to regulate this sort of scam.
We will be contacting the @acccgovau, over this rug pull. What a load of sh*t @AnthropicAI. You sell people onto Max x20, you announce an inferior LLM, then reduce their usage by 10x?
There was never a "chosen people" if the context is God.
You're likely thinking of Satan (Yahweh) and the "divine council" where Elohim (plural) got to divide up humanity and Yahweh got assigned the most evil bloodline in the world.
(it's in the Torah lol, several places too)
The funniest thing about arguing with Torah believers is using their own material against them.
The real purity is in the gospel and nothing else but the true words of Jesus Christ our only saviour.
Just wait until you find out what Deutoronomy says Moses's last words were (people were complaining about Yahweh's treatment towards them so he was like, look this was the Elohim assigned to us... don't blame me, then Yahweh killed him. He had just killed his brother)
AI Economic Meltdown: The Coming Expert Squeeze /🧵
There is a frenzy today that is seemingly unstoppable -- the process of replacing human workers with AI. On another front, the idea that AI has now reached a level beyond the smartest human beings is promoted by CEOs like Sam Altman, Dario Amodei and Elon Musk. In cases where humans aren't replaced, they're expected to augment themselves with AI models to increase their productivity.
On the opposing side, there are people who speak of the technology as impractical, overhyped or down right dangerous. This thread is going to take a different angle to these people: I will demonstrate not only this replacement will become a self-fulfilling prophecy, but why we are locked into this process (which has become an inescapable ponzi scheme) and it will culminate in the destruction of western economies.
In this short thread I'm going to show you why, starting with the economic feedback loops, the limitations of the technology, and finally human psychological dependency and the incentive process. To bring it all together, I will explain why the entire western economy is now dependent on this hype, and why the alternative is also collapse of a different kind.
I will start with the main driver of this trend: the economy.
The economic feedback loop
Tech companies and other firms all over the world are in a frenzy to fire as many employees as possible in order to minimise their payroll, keeping investors happy and increasing their stock price even as the real economy around them collapses.
Excluding algorithmic trading, the economy ultimately involves exchange between humans and groupings of humans (i.e. human run entities). The fewer people you have working, the fewer people you have buying things, the less money ultimately flows into large corporations without the public being forced to subsidise them via government grants.
It also goes the other way around, the lower the demand for people with certain skills, the less money groupings of people will offer, and the fewer people will develop these skills. The incentive is thus a feedback loop, the more successful the companies, the more successful the workers, the more both grow upwards.
The promise of AI is to cut this loop open, allowing companies to theoretically lower their payroll to near zero, moving that line item to either data centre costs or the cost of AI models hosted by other companies. This has flow-on effects too: the fewer individual contributors you have, the fewer managers, HR representatives and middle managers you need. Companies are also incentivised to disintermediate and flatten their hierarchies.
With all the hype this seems like a risk-free gamble until you break apart the assumptions and consequences. There are two main assumptions:
1. The cost of using AI models will remain cheap. 2. AI will be able to continuously fulfil the duties of humans in all domains that they replace or augment.
I will disprove assumption (1) later in this section and disprove assumption (2) in the next section.
The up-front cost is seemingly sending many people into unemployment, and driving down the consumer economy. Of course, it is never that simple and rarely linear or even reversible. In taking this gamble, these companies will lose centuries of inherited experience both at the individual contributor and the management level.
This has already been done before. Entering the late 1970s, the United States had a tight grip on world exports and industries with very few exceptions. This was all off-shored over the next few decades until the US was deindustrialised. Today, the US struggles to produce tanks and artillery shells, as the last few workers that still know how retire and the economic incentive for their replacement disappears.
Software engineers, spreadsheet jockeys and other service economy workers will soon be facing the same calculus as industrial workers did during that time. They will quickly move on, or move out of the United States and other western nations. Ironically, these are the very skills needed to keep data centres running smoothly, AI models fed with data (after all it's the information technology that is upstreaming these data feeds and data creation events) and even the AI models developed. Albeit, the full effect of this will not be felt for the time being.
The worst thing is even if decision makers are fully aware of the gamble, they cannot change the trajectory because it has become a multi-level ponzi scheme. The software and hardware companies that are currently leading the economy like Microsoft and NVIDIA are dependent on the hype surrounding AI. If that hype is undermined even a little, as we saw in early January when the open source model DeepSeek R1 was released, the western economies fall into turmoil.
For the moment, AI is subsidised to a degree most people are unaware of. OpenAI is supported by Microsoft, and operates its models at a loss. Anthropic is likewise supported by Amazon and operates its expensive (and somewhat slower) model at a loss. It only gets worse for other players like Perplexity which has to spend 164% of its revenue on cost.
The gamble is as companies become dependent on this technology, and humans are replaced, the companies will be able to afford the real cost. It's like a "trial edition" right now. You can confirm this yourself, sign up to Anthropic's Claude for example, e.g. the Max account for $200USD/month, and watch how you can easily spend $40USD of their money in 5 hours. That should tell you something is seriously wrong.
What's happening is the speculation from both governments and large corporations that are speculating on the end game, gambling their bottom line and also a future without expertise.
Worse yet, to make meaningful gains, they've had to escalate the kind of hardware they use to host these AIs. Terabytes of RAM, insane and exotic networking equipment, brand new architectures, 100s of billions of dollars in one time engineering costs to impedance match currently popular mathematical models that may change dramatically in the near future.
AI is not getting cheaper. On the upper end, where businesses are concerned, it's actually getting more expensive. If you're a gamer you already know this, with the price of RTX3090s, RTX4090s and RTX5090s going through the roof over time. Moore's law is very much dead and inflation has caught up with the otherwise deflationary electronics economy.
But... maybe, despite all these trends, it will eventually work? What if they make it cheaper or cheap enough somehow and the AI exceeds human abilities even without data? Is that even possible in today's technology? That takes us to the next section and assumption (2).
White Christian values explained #1
Why you should never speak ill of the dead. /🧵
Have you ever punched your fist in the air when you're really energetic or angry? Notice how it hurt your muscles almost the same way as making contact with something? Sometimes more, even though it's an empty punch? Every action has a reaction, and of course, your muscles, bones and joints will ultimately have to absorb the energy you used to throw your fist outwards.
When something comes out of you, especially when you attack someone, unless you are fundamentally broken, it's the same deal. If you attack someone and they don't fight back, a normal empathic person would back away or even try to make it up to the person attacked. This is part of why turning your other cheek, to a brother, is the most powerful answer to someone who has wronged you.
[Note: When I speak of "people" here I mean specifically white people. I don't believe neurology, physiology and spiritual essence is universal. In this work I hope to make us more relatable to those who do not understand why we do and say certain things.]
Those who keep attacking after the other side backs away or doesn't respond, are fundamentally broken. Their empathic unit is gone. Without empathy you will not be able to relate to people around you, or even understand yourself. It's an isolated hell that I don't want to even imagine. You can be surrounded by the entire world, but you will always feel alone, even on your interior.
This is why people flee a guilty conscience, often why even murderers turn themselves in or leave clues hoping to get caught. They want that part back after realizing what they have lost. Often, they will even yearn for punishment, feeling that in making a penance perhaps their soul will be redeemed.
Some even take their own lives over this, it is that strong of a force, much like an open punch, when you commit a crime that cannot be reversed, the force of your bloodied hand will ultimately come towards yourself -- inwards.
This is why you'll often see us get enraged when someone harms a small or helpless animal. This is a transference of empathy and a detection of a dangerous person. You see, these animals cannot respond back to whatever we do to them. It's much like an empty punch. None of us could forgive ourselves if we harmed them.
So when we see someone actively harming such animals, that have largely entrusted their safety unto us, we do get enraged for them. We become that inwards force, socially.
It's not "weird", it's actually perfectly predictable given how we think at a fundamental level: a person without empathy is a danger to the rest of us. They must be removed from society for our safety. They'd have no qualms about running us over or murdering us later.
In our experience, quite often, those who harm animals end up turning into sociopaths, serial murderer and worse. I've been to enough third world locations to see the lack of empathy and respect shown towards animals and for me, it is the main litmus test for the true value of a people.