Just a reminder: the 5th Service, the Operational Info & International Relations Service, has other duties but especially runs agents in ex-Soviet countries and as such was meant to have a massive network in Ukraine, that largely failed to materialise in 2022 2/ rusi.org/explore-our-re…
First of all, despite the reporting, I don’t actually think this is ‘punishment’ for his failures around the start of the Ukraine war. Revenge may be a dish best served cold, but 28 months later seems a tad too cold 3/
Rather, it is that he has reached the compulsory retirement age of 70 and although he could stay in post by presidential decree, where his failings come in is in that he doesn’t have the political capital to get that, even if he wants to 4/
Besides, he is not out in the cold, but is appointed an adviser to the director of the FSB, a usual sinecure. Had the govt wanted to signal displeasure, it would have foregone this courtesy. 5/
What’s important is that Beseda’s replacement is Alexei Komkov, who is a client of FSB 1st Dep Director Sergei Korolev and former head of FSB’s Internal Security (ie: he knows where the bodies are buried). 6/ fontanka.ru/2019/05/17/029/
Korolev has been meant to take over for years, his elevation stymied by a scandal, the war (and Putin’s dislike of churn in the security agency management, but also a strong ‘stop Korolev’ camp, including Beseda 7/
With Beseda gone, and Alexei Sedov, head of the 2ndService (2nd FSB service (political security and counter-terrorism ) turning 70 in August (assuming he survives the current Dagestan crisis), Korolev is likely to have the power base he needs 8/
Besides, 73-year-old Bortnikov is ill and for years has been wanting to retire. This year, surely, he’ll be granted release by Putin, and presumably Korolev will take his place. 9/
As I wrote back in 2021, Korolev will be a dangerous FSB director, active, ruthless, smart and with organised crime connections 10/ platformraam.nl/dossiers/kreml…
He may well be even more dangerous for surviving dissidents at home and abroad, not least as he will have something to prove. However, for a little silver lining… 11/
…this also marks the rise of a newer generation of security chiefs who do not have a personal relationship with Putin. They are not of his era, not necessarily of his mindset. Not for a minute is Korolev a liberal, but would he go to the wall for Putin? I’m not so sure. 12/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Rather depressing that new Defence Minister Belousov is sporting a uniform now for Security Council, even if he has the silver stars of a civil servant, not gold of a general. Performative dress does matter though – a short thread 1/
Until Shoigu, civilian defence ministers wore suits – even Sergei Ivanov, who as a former FSB general did have the legit right to go uniformed. Apart from just being less tacky, it also symbolised civilian control of the military 2/
Shoigu is something of a master of spin (to terrible effect considering how far he fooled Putin as to the state of the Russian military), and his decision to affect a uniform was done for reasons 3/
Nikolai Patrushev becomes a Presidential Aide
We were all wondering where he would go - this is an interesting move, sideways and a little downward, but the exact angle of that downward slide remains to be seen. A few thoughts... 1/ meduza.io/en/news/2024/0…
The position of Presidential Aide (henceforth PrA) is an ambiguous one. It doesn't mean the person who fetches Putin's tea and arranges his pencils (unless that's what Putin wants done!), so much as once of his general purpose henchmen 2/
Former Education Minister Fursenko, for example, seems to spend most of time deputising for his boss at a university event here, a science festival there. He's more a teleoperated factotum than demonstrating any substantive role. 3/
At great threat to my mental wellbeing, another dip into today’s Russian press around the Crocus City terrorist attack. A thread. 1/
The high-circulation Argumenty i Fakty (incidentally where Patrushev most often gives his interviews) has no doubts, as shown by this front page. Islamic State? No, it was the Collective West and their Ukrainian puppets 2/
FSB director Bortnikov has no doubts the terrorists were headed to Ukraine: “And I’ll tell you a little secret: on the other side they wanted to greet them as heroes.” 3/
Reading today's government newspaper Rossiiskaya Gazeta in many ways illustrates the key dynamics around the Crocus terrorist attack. A short thread 1/
We have Putin's remote (in every sense) meeting, at which he reluctantly admits jihadists committed the attack but repeats his claim that it connects to "a whole series of attempts by those who have been fighting our country since 2014 at the hands of the neo-Nazi Kyiv regime" 2/
Insulting, inaccurate and tone deaf, but that's Putin these days. Glancing at social media, the 'jihadists+Ukrainian' scenario isn't landing well 3/ rg.ru/2024/03/25/kto…
Sudden excitement from some quarters: ‘OMG, Russia now admitting war in Ukraine is a war, not a “special military op”’. The truth, as ever, is rather less exciting, but an interesting semantic-political tale 1/
The source is an interview with presidential spox Peskov in AiF in which he does indeed say ‘we are at war…’ 2/ aif.ru/politics/world…
“…Yes, it began as a SMO, but… when the collective West became a participant on the side of Ukraine, for us it became a war. I am convinced of this. And everyone should understand this for their own internal mobilization’ 3/
“Start with yourself, Comrade Dugin”
A broadside attack on Alexander Dugin appears in Moskovsky Komsomolets. A couple of quotes and thoughts... 1/ mk.ru/social/2024/03…
"People want to have an income, a pension and peace of mind in the future. And they are offered an eternal battle and endless belt-tightening in a dystopian society literally divided along Brahminical lines. There is an elite - and everyone else." 2/
It's not the first time Ekaterina Sazhneva has attacked the nationalist-weirdo philosopher in MK, but that's significant in itself, that no "hands off" warning was given. For all the "Putin's Brain" nonsense, Dugin is clearly not under a Kremlin krysha 3/ mk.ru/social/2023/11…