Scotland is about to create an amazing new legal vehicle for money launderers, tax evaders and sanctions-busters. By accident.
"Private purpose trusts" have been widely used abroad for tax evasion, money laundering and sanctions-busting. They've never been permitted in the UK.
But Scotland is about to introduce them. This seems a serious mistake.
Scottish limited partnerships have been widely abused.
But the potential for abuse of private purpose trusts is far greater - not least because there will be no public disclosure that the trust even exists.transparency.org.uk/tackling-abuse…
We have a very complex series of tax rules dealing with trusts, which (mostly) make trusts useless for tax avoidance (with the exception of non-doms, and that's about to go).
None of the existing rules expect UK private purpose trusts to exist.
If we *really really* want to introduce private purpose trusts, we first need consequential changes in other laws (particularly transparency and tax).
Without that we'll see a wave of tax avoidance, tax evasion and criminality. We'll be picking up the pieces for years.
It's particularly disappointing that these issues aren't raised anywhere in the Scottish Law Commission report that inspired this change. Not even mentioned. scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/4014/090…
This needs careful thought. The Scottish government should hold-off implementation until appropriate safeguards are in place.
One final controversial point: the impact Scottish private purpose trusts will have upon the whole of the UK means that the UK Government should IMO have considered using its powers to block the Trusts and Succession (Scotland) Act 2024. It's now too late.
Oh, and how did this get through the Scottish Parliament without scrutiny?
Because they used the special procedure for measures "not likely to generate substantial controversy"
(thank to @ncsmiff)
There is still time. The Act is, I believe, not yet in force - that requires Scottish Ministers to make regulations.
They should hold-off.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Fun point: if Labour *isn't* planning to raise capital gains tax, then newspaper reports like this (saying they are) will result in additional tax revenue.
I’m not being funny, or trying to make a point. But if Evil Dan had inside information, and wanted to bet on it, he would get his mate to put a large large bet. Untraceable and worth doing.
A small bet in your own name? It’s just as potentially criminal. But pointless and stupid.
Exclusive report: a series of errors by HMRC let Paul Baxendale-Walker, probably the UK's most notorious tax avoidance scheme promoter, escape a £14m penalty
He's threatening to prosecute me for harassment, sue me for libel *and* sue me for £500,000 if I report this. Here goes:
That the Green Party want to tax graduates with three kids earning £60k at a marginal rate of 72%?
Or that the Tories want to tax graduates with three kids earning £120k at a marginal rate of 78%?
The Greens used to want to abolish student debt. Now it's just a "long term aim". But the interaction of student loans, child benefit, and the Green's tax rise on people earning £50k is truly horrid:
I don't think they understand their own proposal.
The Tories sensibly tried to fix the high child benefit marginal rate at 60%, but accidentally created a crazy marginal rate at £120k.
As a child's drawing of a castle, this is passable. As a chart of the Tories' proposed new marginal rates, it's mad.