Dan Neidle Profile picture
Jun 24 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Scotland is about to create an amazing new legal vehicle for money launderers, tax evaders and sanctions-busters. By accident. Image
"Private purpose trusts" have been widely used abroad for tax evasion, money laundering and sanctions-busting. They've never been permitted in the UK.

But Scotland is about to introduce them. This seems a serious mistake.
Scottish limited partnerships have been widely abused.

But the potential for abuse of private purpose trusts is far greater - not least because there will be no public disclosure that the trust even exists.transparency.org.uk/tackling-abuse…
We have a very complex series of tax rules dealing with trusts, which (mostly) make trusts useless for tax avoidance (with the exception of non-doms, and that's about to go).

None of the existing rules expect UK private purpose trusts to exist.
If we *really really* want to introduce private purpose trusts, we first need consequential changes in other laws (particularly transparency and tax).

Without that we'll see a wave of tax avoidance, tax evasion and criminality. We'll be picking up the pieces for years.
It's particularly disappointing that these issues aren't raised anywhere in the Scottish Law Commission report that inspired this change. Not even mentioned. scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/4014/090…
This needs careful thought. The Scottish government should hold-off implementation until appropriate safeguards are in place.
Many thanks to Alan Eccles (@WillsCharityLaw) for alerting me to this - his article is here: …tishcharityandwealthlaw.wordpress.com/2024/06/20/wha…
Alan's LinkedIn thread here: linkedin.com/posts/alan-ecc…
One final controversial point: the impact Scottish private purpose trusts will have upon the whole of the UK means that the UK Government should IMO have considered using its powers to block the Trusts and Succession (Scotland) Act 2024. It's now too late.
Oh, and how did this get through the Scottish Parliament without scrutiny?

Because they used the special procedure for measures "not likely to generate substantial controversy"

(thank to @ncsmiff) Image
There is still time. The Act is, I believe, not yet in force - that requires Scottish Ministers to make regulations.

They should hold-off. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Neidle

Dan Neidle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanNeidle

Jun 22
Exclusive report: new data reveals that HMRC's failure to close the small business tax gap costs £15bn/year. Image
Our report is here:

Summary thread belowtaxpolicy.org.uk/2024/06/22/hmr…
The difference between the tax that should be paid and the tax HMRC actually collect is the “tax gap”. HMRC say it’s £39.8bn.

There are a large number of uncertainties, but HMRC’s tax gap estimate work is generally regarded as world-leading.
Read 32 tweets
Jun 21
Fun point: if Labour *isn't* planning to raise capital gains tax, then newspaper reports like this (saying they are) will result in additional tax revenue.

theguardian.com/politics/artic…
Why?

Imagine I have £50,000 in a fund that tracks US stocks. It's gone up £25,000 since 2020.

If I sell now, I'll pay CGT of £5k (20% x £25k)

If Labour equalise the rate, I'll pay twice that.
So, if I think Labour will win the election and put up capital gains tax, I should sell right now, and buy a different fund that tracks US stocks.

I'll pay £5k now, but I avoid paying £10k.

It's called "accelerating" the gain.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 20
Okay, here’s what I don’t understand. Why are the amounts so small?
I’m not being funny, or trying to make a point. But if Evil Dan had inside information, and wanted to bet on it, he would get his mate to put a large large bet. Untraceable and worth doing.
A small bet in your own name? It’s just as potentially criminal. But pointless and stupid.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 19
Exclusive report: a series of errors by HMRC let Paul Baxendale-Walker, probably the UK's most notorious tax avoidance scheme promoter, escape a £14m penalty

He's threatening to prosecute me for harassment, sue me for libel *and* sue me for £500,000 if I report this. Here goes:
Our full report is here: taxpolicy.org.uk/2024/06/19/bax…
We've worked together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalists - their report from @edwardsiddons is here: thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2024-0…
Read 58 tweets
Jun 18
What's more surprising?

That the Green Party want to tax graduates with three kids earning £60k at a marginal rate of 72%?

Or that the Tories want to tax graduates with three kids earning £120k at a marginal rate of 78%?
The Greens used to want to abolish student debt. Now it's just a "long term aim". But the interaction of student loans, child benefit, and the Green's tax rise on people earning £50k is truly horrid:

I don't think they understand their own proposal. Image
The Tories sensibly tried to fix the high child benefit marginal rate at 60%, but accidentally created a crazy marginal rate at £120k.

As a child's drawing of a castle, this is passable. As a chart of the Tories' proposed new marginal rates, it's mad. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jun 17
Reform UK plan tax cuts which they say will cost £70bn; however our analysis shows the actual cost will be at least £93bn.

And their funding figures are out by £15bn+

All this means Reform UK have a total unfunded cost of at least £38bn - about two Liz Trusses.
Our complete analysis is here, with links to all sources, calculations and models taxpolicy.org.uk/2024/06/17/ref…
You don't have to trust anything we say in that analysis, or this thread. Check it out yourself. We'll correct any errors right away.

Thread with summary follows (will take a few minutes to put together):
Read 69 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(