Biden’s DHS intel group uses the phrase "quietly making democracy work" to describe their mission of combatting the "domestic terror threat" of Trump supporters in order to “rebuild faith in the federal government.”
#DeepStateDiaries PART 4:
/2 Today, we are releasing the fourth tranche of internal files from the “Homeland Intelligence Experts Group,” obtained exclusively through our litigation with @RichardGrenell against the Biden DHS:
/3 Today’s release shows how the Brennan-Clapper intel committee admits the existence of a Deep State that works “quietly” to “make democracy work” in the face of “domestic terrorism threats,” or in their eyes – “supporters of the former president.”
/4 During the September meeting, the group revealed its true colors in a discussion about the “Administration DT Strategy and DHS Role in Countering DT,” or “domestic terrorism.”
/5 Against the backdrop of claiming that “Domestic Terrorism” only comes from supporters of former President Trump, the Group revealed the existence and mindset of the Deep State: thwarting the will of the American people through their elected representatives by.
/6 A far cry from The Washington Post’s longtime slogan, “Democracy Dies in Darkness,” the Deep State now appears to claim that darkness and secrecy are necessary parts of “making democracy work.”
AFL filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to overrule Humphrey’s Executor and uphold President Trump’s constitutional authority to direct and remove executive officials.
/2 AFL, in partnership with Mitchell Law PLLC, filed a brief in Trump v. Slaughter, asking the Court to restore the President’s constitutional control of the Executive Branch.
/3 For nearly ninety years, the Court’s 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (Humphrey’s Executor) has stripped presidents of control over so-called “independent” agencies like the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) — allowing unelected bureaucrats to wield executive power without accountability to the American people.
/1🚨VICTORY — AFL just DEFEATED the @ACLU in a landmark immigration enforcement case.
A Pennsylvania court THREW OUT the ACLU’s lawsuit attacking a local sheriff for working with ICE.
Major victory for the rule of law and public safety.
/2 The ACLU and its activist allies sued Bucks County Sheriff Fred Harran for partnering with ICE under the 287(g) Program, which allows trained state and local law enforcement officers to assist federal immigration enforcement efforts.
/3 The ACLU’s lawsuit sought to block local law enforcement from helping federal agents remove criminal illegal aliens and keep Americans safe.
AFL and @WallyZimolong defended Sheriff Harran and fought back against the ACLU’s attack on the rule of law.
AFL filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Chairman @Jim_Jordan and 17 members of @JudiciaryGOP.
The brief urges SCOTUS to RESTORE the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment and its limits on U.S. citizenship.
/2 The Fourteenth Amendment grants citizenship only to those born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction — meaning total, exclusive allegiance and lawful presence.
Simply living within our borders is not enough.
/3 Allegiance isn’t geography — it’s a bond.
It requires loyalty from the individual and consent from the nation.
When that consent is broken, citizenship cannot be claimed.
AFL has uncovered that MULTIPLE states suing President Trump over his Executive Order on birthright citizenship appear to have NO EVIDENCE to support their claims.
/2 On January 21, 2025, the states of Washington, Oregon, Illinois, and Arizona sued the Trump Administration over Executive Order 14160, which ends birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens.
The states allege the order will cost them money in programs like Medicaid, CHIP, and adoption assistance.
/3 There’s just one problem.
When AFL filed public records requests seeking clarity from these states on their claims — to show ANY DATA linking the order to actual costs — they came up empty-handed.
AFL is fighting for a fair and lawful Census — alleging that the 2020 Census used FLAWED statistical methods that FABRICATED population counts and STOLE representation from the American people.
/2 The U.S. Constitution requires an actual count of every person every ten years.
Federal law explicitly prohibits the use of “statistical sampling” or other methods that risk inaccurate results.
No models.
No estimates.
No statistical tricks.
/3 In 2020, the Census Bureau ignored this mandate.
Instead of counting real people at their real addresses, it used two deeply flawed and unlawful methods: