Russia’s operation on the northern side of Kharkiv has lasted over six weeks. There have been serious difficulties at both operational and strategic level.
While the offensive is stuck, satellite images show the Russians have begun fortifying the newly occupied areas. 1/🧵
The Kharkiv operation had three probable goals:
1. Create confusion and tie Ukrainian reserves to a secondary direction, so that progress could be made elsewhere
2. Form a “buffer zone” between Belgorod and Ukraine
3. Possibly get parts of Kharkiv within artillery range
2/
Russia was able to tie some Ukrainian forces to Kharkiv, but it wasn’t able to exploit the initial momentum elsewhere on the front. In this situation, Russia has to divide its forces and spend manpower on a less important area, while progress is slow everywhere. 3/
Ukraine stabilized the front relatively quickly and have began limited counterattacks.
Recently, Ukrainians have taken back areas in Vovchansk, Starytsia and Hlyboke, while Russians have made no additional gains. The city of Kharkiv is still far away from Russian artillery. 4/
The so-called buffer zone is small, and increasing it would require additional forces.
Russia has begun preparations to hold on to their gains. New satellite images reveal they’re constructing fortifications north of Vovchansk, near the border on the Ukrainian side. 5/
The new fortifications are 150-400 meters long trenches, built north and west of Vovchansk.
As the Sentinel images are very low-resolution, I double-checked some these from high-resolution imagery, which I unfortunately can’t publish here. 6/
The newly fortified zone is 2,5 km deep at most, and around 6 km wide - not very effective against Ukrainian operations towards Belgorod.
However, the work has started only recently, and it's very possible there will be more new fortifications in the coming weeks. 7/
The Russians clearly do not want to lose what little they have achieved, which isn't much to begin with. They have transferred a lot of excavators to this area, and Ukrainians have also damaged or destroyed over 15 of them. Rather heavy losses for engineering equipment. 8/
Russia is determined to fortify now, despite the losses. The project seems politically motivated, as there already is a proper defensive line on the Russian side of the border. It hasn’t even been tested yet, as usually border raids don’t go beyond the first villages. 9/
In the West, the Kharkiv situation caused a shift in the narrative. The urgency of supporting 🇺🇦 became a pressing issue, and 🇺🇦 was given the permission to strike 🇷🇺 with long-range western weaponry. One could ask, were the gains on the ground really worth it for Russia? 10/
The future for similar operations seems difficult. Russians might try to launch new attacks in other directions, but Ukrainians now have more opportunities to respond to such attempts. Achieving the same results in a possible next offensive is more challenging. 11/
There are some variables. Ukrainian losses are unknown, so we don’t know what is the price they’re paying for taking back these small border villages. Especially in the Vovchansk direction, throwing the Russians out of the villages doesn’t alter the general situation much. 12/
Our team at @Black_BirdGroup is looking for solutions so that we could continue publishing high-resolution satellite imagery instead of just using them internally, in order to provide more visual and fact-based analysis. 13/13
Here in Finland, the last 24 hours have been geopolitically unusual.
Reports from Russia suggested a unilateral desire to modify their maritime borders in the Gulf of Finland and near Kaliningrad. The Finnish government learned about this through the media. 1/🧵
The government tried to get more information, as the Russians didn't inform Finland.
Suddenly, Russia reversed its previous stance, and there was no more ambitions to check or move the borders. The Finnish politicians assured that there's no drama involved. However... 2/
This incident needs to be put into context. Why did Russia suddenly do this?
Russia is a dictatorship that views Finland as a hostile country. In the recent years, it has conducted several operations against Finland, aiming to undermine security or societal functions. 3/
The Kharkiv offensive has been ongoing for a week. Russia had some initial success, but Ukraine has been able to restrain Russian forces from advancing deeper.
There are many narratives and claims surrounding the situation. First, why was Russia able to advance so quickly? 1/
"Digital scanning" of the border area is almost continuous. The Russian air reconnaissance, electronic warfare and strike teams and are active in many areas. This made it difficult for Ukraine to prepare heavy defences or to concentrate a large amount of troops at the border. 2/
For Ukraine, the reasonable option was to use the depth to their advantage, as they did. A few kilometres from the border, the Russians can rely less on prepared positions and other infrastructure on Russian territory, and they have to bring their supporting elements forward. 3/
One of the most significant current battles in Ukraine is taking place in the small city of Chasiv Yar.
In this thread, I will analyze the current situation, defensive preparations, terrain, participating units, various scenarios and future developments. 1/
Chasiv Yar is an important city. It’s the last somewhat larger built area before the crucial crossroads town of Kostiantynivka and other important cities in Donetsk. Encircling the city is difficult, as the Donets-Donbas canal forms a difficult obstacle for mechanized units. 2/
Ukraine has constructed several layers of trenches and other defensive positions north and south of Chasiv Yar. Even if the Russians managed to cross the canal at some point, they would still need to break through multiple fortified positions to seriously threaten the area. 3/
Russian Telegram channels are flooding with videos of a terrorist attack in Crocus City Hall, a music venue Moscow.
The video material suggests that there were at least four attackers, some sources say five. They were armed with fully automatic AK-type assault rifles. 1/
The building was set on fire during the attack. According to Ria Novosti, a Russian state media, the "fire is getting stronger". This means confirming the amount of dead and injured may take a while. 2/
The third year of the Russian full-scale invasion begins, and Ukraine is facing multiple difficulties. There's no room for optimism, as many problems can’t be solved in the coming months.
In this thread: Issues, threats and the future. 1/
While Ukraine was on the offensive in 2023, Russia silently amassed significant forces. Since mid-October, Russians have been attacking on multiple fronts. At the same time, Ukraine faces both external and internal challenges. Let’s start with the Ukrainian problems. 2/
Ukraine experienced unfortunate losses in 2023. The summer offensive was costly, but it didn’t reach any strategic goals. After the summer, the losses were increasingly difficult to fully replace. The military leadership likely saw the incoming problems. 3/
I watched Tucker Carlson’s interview with Putin. It exemplifies how a person who thinks too much of himself is put into the position of a useful idiot.
Dictators aren't interested in truth or journalism; those who think otherwise are only deceiving themselves. 1/ 🧵
Carlson's bias is well-known. He has repeatedly criticized Western media and leaned towards the Russian narrative.
Even though there was no critical element involved in the interview, he may have genuinely thought he still could get something valuable out of it. 2/
For me, the expectations were low. Everything Putin said was predictable, as is often the case with dictators. All the talking points have been heard before. The end result was a boring lecture, where Carlson was unable and likely also unwilling to challenge Putin. 3/