We obtained new docs from the Brennan-Clapper DHS intel group revealing the Biden admin developed a classified plan to expand monitoring of political dissent.
#DeepStateDiaries PART 5:
/2 Today, we are releasing the fifth tranche of internal files from the “Homeland Intelligence Experts Group,” obtained exclusively through our litigation with @RichardGrenell against the Biden DHS:
/3 From the day President Biden took power, he has mobilized the national security state to support its censorship program…
/4 In June 2021, the Biden Administration’s National Security Council published its first-ever “National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism,” a 32-page plan that outlined their whole-of-government effort to work with Big Tech, state and local governments, non-profits, and others to censor political speech and surveil political dissent.
/5 AFL has been investigating the Administration’s implementation of this “Domestic Surveillance Strategy” since 2021, including filing a lawsuit against DHS to compel the release of records relating to how DHS uses its intelligence capabilities to target conservative Americans.
/7 Today, AFL’s litigation against the DHS Intelligence Experts Group has obtained never before released documents exposing that the Biden Administration published a classified implementation plan to accompany their public-facing 2021 Domestic Surveillance Strategy.
/8 This classified plan has not been reported publicly until today.
No one in the general public knows what’s in it, what it directs departments and agencies to do, or the scope of agencies involved with it.
/9 This is not the first time AFL has discovered the Biden Administration using classified systems to target political dissent. In January 2023, AFL’s lawsuit against the CDC uncovered that the CDC partnered with the State Department, USAID, the Census Bureau, and others on an NSC classified call to discuss censoring so-called “disinformation.”
An apparent illegal MS-13 gang member who attends Loudoun County Public Schools was arrested for allegedly:
‼️Carrying a gun
‼️Threatening to shoot another student
We sued Loudoun County Public Board for unlawfully silencing parents who voiced their concerns:
/2 For years, the Loudoun County School Board has actively suppressed criticism and silenced dissenting voices at school board meetings under the guise of protecting student privacy. This led to a special grand jury report blasting the school district for hiding behind suspect privacy justifications at the expense of student safety.
/3 On October 8, 2024, a group of concerned parents and community members attended the school board’s public meeting to voice their concerns over reports that the school had decided to reinstate a reported illegal alien student with ties to the transnational MS-13 gang who had previously been arrested for carrying a stolen firearm and threatening to kill a classmate.
Following a @HouseAdmin report, we filed a bar complaint on behalf of Stefan Passantino against former Rep. Liz Cheney for allegedly violating professional ethics obligations by secretly messaging Cassidy Hutchinson prior to her testimony before the J6 Committee:
We're investigating the Biden-Harris DOJ's potential involvement with The 65 Project, a “dark money group with ties to Democratic Party heavyweights” that publicly targets conservative lawyers:
/2 After the 2020 election, then-president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Kristen Clarke called post-election challenge lawsuits “frivolous” and “packed with conspiracy-laden theory and baseless allegations” and suggested that President Trump’s Georgia phone call “is potentially criminal…under both Georgia state law and our federal election law.”
/3 The 65 Project’s managing director, Michael Teter, told CNN that “[c]reating a system of deterrence requires that people know these complaints have been filed.”
/1🚨🔎NEW INVESTIGATION INTO SPECIAL COUNSEL JACK SMITH’S OFFICE —
We just launched an investigation into the Biden-Harris DOJ and FBI to obtain all communications from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s Office throughout its investigation of President Trump:
/2 Recent reports have raised further serious questions about the integrity of the Department of Justice and Special Counsel Smith’s investigation into President Trump...
/3 Former senior Department of Justice officials expressed concern that Special Counsel Smith’s team is coordinating directly with Vice President Harris’ presidential campaign.
These reports are deeply troubling and warrant investigation.
/1🚨KAMALA’S BIG LIE — “The first bill that we offered Congress...was a bill to fix our immigration system.”
Harris’ bill was a mass amnesty for illegals. It would have only further fueled the greatest illegal immigration crisis in history.
🧵We explain…
/2 Kamala has repeated the fallacy long-advanced by the left that providing an amnesty to millions of illegal aliens already in the United States will result in fewer illegal aliens coming to the United States.
But this is totally illogical. As the last 4 years have shown, rewarding illegal immigration encourages more illegal immigration. Catch-and-release leads to more catch-and-release.
AND THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT HER IMMIGRATION BILLS FACILITATE.
/3 Every crime committed by an illegal alien is a crime that, by definition, should never have occurred.
If an alien is on the streets, they pose a risk to the American people.
If the alien is detained pending deportation or the outcome of court proceedings, they do not.
We just filed a brief urging the Supreme Court of the United States to support parent's rights and reject Montogomery County Public School's (MCPS) attempt to indoctrinate students with a mandatory curriculum on sexuality and "gender identity."
Details…
/2 MCPS has adopted a radical program of instruction, including:
🚨Requiring teachers to use books that expose children to radical gender ideology;
🚨Prohibiting parents from opting out of classroom instruction encouraging transgenderism and that the concept biological sex is a social construct;
🚨Disregarding all religious objections to instruction on gender ideology.
/3 Accordingly, the Supreme Court of the United States should review this case because:
As AFL notes that courts have historically deferred to public school curriculum choices on the assumption that schools, through curriculum, “inculcat[e] fundamental values necessary to the maintenance of a democratic political system.” However, this is ahistorical as compulsory state-controlled education was not in the framers’ minds. Thus, school curriculum deserves no deference when it conflicts with constitutional rights.