Many believe that Russia is invincible, but they are wrong
There are important early signs that the ridiculously high losses of Russian soldiers are unsustainable 1/
But, first, how high are these losses?
The NYTimes reports, citing the U.S. intelligence, the losses of about 1000 per day. That’s 30 000 per month, 365 000 a year. A lot! It should be a lot! 2/
NYTimes: But despite its losses, Russia is recruiting 25,000 to 30,000 new soldiers a month — roughly as many as are exiting the battlefield, U.S. officials said. 3/
This is sign 1.
Russia is killing all people it can recruit
So, it isn’t capable of accumulating sufficiently more troops for any meaningful operation
And that’s why it need ceasefire - to get the numbers of troops up 4/
But the significant part here is that Russia does it by choice. In principle, if it can recruit 30K a month, it can choose to kill 10K a month, and within a half a year, it will have 200K more combat ready troops 5/
So why doesn’t kill them all instead? I think it is logic it’s. It cannot maintain or control a larger army. So, that’s Russia at its peak. 6/
There is another argument - Russia chooses to push forward with all its might, as hard as it can. But why the rush? Shouldn’t Russia wait until the US elections? 7/
The only reason why Russia is burning all the troops it can recruit now is because it calculates that the victory in the future is more difficult. Moreover, it is so much more difficult that it is worth the risk sacrificing this much troops 8/
What is Russia afraid of? First, that the support for Ukraine, surprisingly, continues to consolidate and improve. Second, that Ukraine has been continuously increasing its capabilities of deeps strikes and bombing. 9/
Once Ukraine reaches par with Russia in terms of bombing, Russia will lose leverage as Ukraine will be able to target its critical infrastructure. So the peace, on Russian terms, has to be reached before that. That’s why Russia is pushing. This is at least one theory! 10X
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
U.S. restricts Ukraine from hitting Russian air bases. Consequently, Russia continues to bomb Ukraine with powerful gliding bombs
This is a controversy. 1. The US and Ukraine disagree about whether this policy is real. 2. the UK allows to hit Russia with storm shadows, so? 1/
The U.S. says it has allowed Ukraine to use certain American weapons to strike Russian territory
The Ukrainian officials, anonymously, say that the limit is less than 100 km from the border
The U.S. officials dispute this figure, but don't disclose the policy 2/
But who cares about the US weapons if Ukraine can strike Russian airbases with Storm Shadows?
The problem is that Storm Shadow missiles are not designed to hit large areas and damage multiple planes at once or when targets' location can be moved. The US ATACAMS are! 3/
Politico writes about the return of the Ukraine’s emergency blackouts, while my friend Mariia Popova in Kyiv tells why this time it feels much worse than in the first winter of the war - basically, we dread what is to come 1/ politico.com/news/2024/06/2…
Ukraine is experiencing a new wave of rolling blackouts due to Russian attacks that have destroyed half of the country's power generation capacity
We are adapting: generators, power banks, and flashlights are back in fashion. But will we freeze in the winter? 2/
Ukraine has lost 9.2 gigawatts or 50 % of electricity generating capabilities. We currently are importing 1.7 gigawatts from European countries and this is the max due to technological restrictions.
With the help of the world we can rebuild a couple of gigs, but not more 3/
Putin recently challenged Zelensky's legitimacy, claiming it is unclear who to speak with in Ukraine. Zelensky countered, stating that unlike in Russia, where Putin's legitimacy is self-determined, his legitimacy is decided by Ukrainians 2/
It might seem bizarre to foreigners, but Russia believes it has jurisdiction over Ukraine. To Russia, the Ukrainian government and armed forces are merely domestic terrorists. Once you accept this perspective, Russian actions begin to make sense 1/
For Russia, this isn't a war with Ukraine, but a special military operation to eradicate terrorists. From this perspective, it's very similar to what happened in Chechnya in the 1990s. That wasn't seen as a war to suppress independence, but a campaign against terrorism 2/
No one negotiates with terrorists in good faith. The goal is to trick them into surrendering their weapons, hostages, and territory, ultimately to weaken and eliminate them. This is why Putin's peace proposals are not about sustainable peace 3/
For the first time, we have documents detailing the 2022 Ukrainian-Russian peace negotiations. What's new, and what did we get wrong? Contrary to Biden's opponents in the U.S., it wasn't Boris Johnson who derailed the deal, but Russia's last-minute conditions 1/
The NYTimes published the documents and their analysis from interviews with those involved in the negotiations. The timing appears strategic just before the peace summit in Switzerland and right after Putin issued another 'peace deal' ultimatum 2/ nytimes.com/interactive/20…
The 2022 negotiations timeline makes it evident that Boris Johnson had no involvement and was never a relevant factor
However, the analysis notes that U.S. officials had serious concerns, saying, 'We quietly said, ‘You understand this is unilateral disarmament, right?’'