2/ Put another way, 94% of the Capitol riot cases are clearly materially unaffected by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Fischer v. United States.
In this thread, I’ll explain more about what the data tell us.
Here's the key infographic.⤵️
3/ Many in media mistakenly focus on all defendants DOJ charged with obstruction.
The truth: A quarter of them pleaded guilty but NOT to obstruction. They pleaded to other charges.
Those charges and those sentences are utterly unaffected by Supreme Court’s ruling.
4/ The great majority of #January6th defendants convicted for obstruction (via trial or guilty plea) were also convicted for other felonies. Those felonies still stick.
5/ Of the very small number of defendants (48) who pleaded to obstruction and no other offense: a majority of them can be recharged with felonies (per a proviso in plea agreement allowing for this scenario).
The all-important proviso.⤵️
6/ @NPR's @NinaTotenberg reporting on the Court's decision features our study:
"A deep dive into the data concludes the effects will be 'minimal.'"
"The study, published by Just Security...relied on NPR’s detailed data base of Jan 6 Capitol riot cases." npr.org/2024/06/14/nx-…
@NPR @NinaTotenberg 7/ Mary McCord, @AWeissmann_ and I also make this point:
"The Trump administration’s Department of Justice was the first to use this specific obstruction statute – 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) – to prosecute individuals who participated in the Capitol riot."
2/ Report by Director of Economics at Yale's @The_Budget_Lab @ernietedeschi:
Analyzes the risk of a "‘black swan’ event outside of the realm of US experience, such as ... military intervention in domestic politics" with profound impact on US safe harbor investment premium.
@The_Budget_Lab @ernietedeschi 3/ "It is also reasonable to assume mass deportation of millions of migrants, the demolition of departments and agencies, and many other planned autocratic-leaning policies risk producing similar [black swan] results."
Breaking: Trump admitted to probation officials he has a gun in Florida
Convicted felon possessing firearm =felony
Indicted person receiving firearm in interstate commerce =felony
Condition of release for Trump in DC , FL, GA is not committing a felony cnn.com/politics/live-…
2/ Donald J. Trump condition of release in District of Columbia:
"IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's release is subject to these conditions:
The defendant must not violate federal, state, or local law while on release."
3/ Florida arraignment:
THE COURT: Subsection B requires the release to be subject to the condition that the person not commit a federal, state or local crime during the period of release .... I assume the Defendant, former President Trump, has no problems with that condition?
MR. BLANCHE: I assure you he does not, Your Honor.
Explaining why bill to sanction #InternationalCriminalCourt would damage US national security
“I come before you today a combat veteran, a supporter of the American Servicemembers Protection Act, a longtime supporter of Israel's security...”
2/ Congressman Crow outlines several pieces of recent congressional legislation and U.S. government support for the vital work of the International Criminal Court including on #RussianWarCrimes in Ukraine, #Darfur, Cote d’Ivoire, #Myanmar, the #DRC, and elsewhere.
3/ "The ICC’s largest funders are amongst our closest allies -- the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, France, and Japan. This bill puts us at serious risk of being forced to sanction many of our closest allies and partners, including: 30 out of 31 of our NATO allies; 6 of out 9 major non-NATO allies who have obligations to the Court like Argentina, Australia, Japan, Jordan, New Zealand, and the Republic of Korea."