Back in May, I explored the likely Russian objectives for its military operations in 2024, and how it was progressing towards them. Russia has built strategic momentum with its assaults on Ukraine in the past six months. However, they have largely failed to exploit their opportunties. 1/12 🧵 🇺🇦
2/ Russia has made some progress on the ground and yet even this has come at massive costs. For the gain of around 513 square km, they have lost around 180 thousand personnel. Losing 360 people for every km is a poor return on investment - in any war.
3/ And, as this graph from @ragnarbjartur shows, Russian casualties have only increased in the past six months during its 2024 offensives.
4/ Russia has failed to stop Ukrainian strikes on Russian bases and oil infrastructure in Russia, and is failing in its campaign to defend against strikes against #Crimea.
5/ Russia does however have a very robust strategic influence and misinformation campaign. But, even that is yet to persuade Ukraine's key supporters to reduce their support.
6/ Russia has probably developed a better approach to strategic adaptation than the Ukrainians have. This is allowing them to out-produce the Ukrainians and to continuously recruit. But these are only providing marginal improvements in the tactical and operational effectiveness of the Russian military, and are disproportionate to the massive losses in manpower and equipment.
7/ The Russian military had a significant opportunity at the end of 2023 after Ukraine's military culminated in its counter offensive in the south and with the shortfalls that in manpower and munitions that began to tell in 2024.
8/ And yet, the Russians over the last six months have generally failed to capitalise on this convergence of opportunities. And in squandering such enormous quantities of troops in lots of smaller actions across the front line, Russia is less able to build a better quality, large force that might be able to undertake larger scale offensive operations.
9/ This was probably Russia’s best opportunity to make significant gains on the battlefield which it could then turn into significantly increased political and diplomatic pressure on Ukraine for peace negotiations.
10/ Russia may still have time to conduct offensive activities against Ukraine before they culminate. But, given Russian losses so far, the lack of any new, wide-ranging offensive doctrine, and that Ukraine’s strategic prospects are improving, Russia appears to have blown what might have been its last chance to strike a decisive blow against Ukraine in this war.
11/ The question now is whether #Ukraine, which seeks to liberate more of its territory occupied by Russia, can build all the different physical, moral and intellectual elements of offensive combat power to do better than Russia has either later this year or in 2025?
There are many aspects of the war in #Ukraine from which we might learn lessons. Strategy, tactics, equipment, technology and organisations are all worthy of study. But there is another aspect of the war also requiring study: #leadership. 1/7 🧵 🇺🇦
2/ In studying these lessons, we should understand the elements of leadership that are changing because of new technologies and different threats. Clausewitz called this the changing character of war.
3/ At the same time we need to learn - or re-learn - the timeless lessons of leadership in war. Generally this involves the uncertainty, the fog and friction of war. Clausewitz described this element of war as its enduring nature. People need to be led in this environment.
There are many lessons from the war in #Ukraine. But to be most useful, these lessons need to be considered through the context of different regions and political environments beyond eastern Europe. 1/7 🧵🇺🇦
2/ Sir Michael Howard wrote in The Use and Abuse of Military History, "without some such knowledge of the broader background to military operations one is likely to reach totally erroneous conclusions about their nature, and the reasons for their failure and success." Context matters.
3/ As such, I am starting a new series to translate the lessons from #Ukraine for application in the #Pacific. The method I will use in this study includes consideration of three key elements.
For a little while now I have wanted to write about the Russian turtle tanks. These weird and unwieldy beasts provide a discrete solution to a contemporary battlefield problem - generating successful offensive operations. 1/10 🧵🇺🇦🇺🇦
2/ On the weekend, the Ukrainian ground forces were able to capture one of these Russian turtle tanks. It will be a useful source of intelligence, particularly the EW suite that it is equipped with. But it will also provide insights into weaknesses that can be attacked with FPV.
3/ These turtle tanks have already appeared in several 'generations': Gen 1: tank with metal tortise shell; Gen 2: tank with metal tortise shell and EW suite; and, Gen 3: tank with metal tortise shell, EW suite, additional cages and mine roller.
In the past 48 hours, the U.S. and Ukraine signed a new security agreement on the sidelines of the G7 meeting being held in Italy. What is the nature of the new agreement between Ukraine and the U.S. and what are the potential implications over the next decade? 1/9 🧵 🇺🇦
2/ There are four key elements of the agreement.
3/ First, the agreement sets out a ten-year horizon. But, the deal won’t be ratified by the US Congress. And hopefully, Ukraine will be in NATO well before the ten year period ends.
I wanted to talk a little more about this great thread from @sambendett One of the interesting aspects of this thread is how it recognises the cycle of adaptation in military affairs. 1/8 🧵 🇺🇦
2/ Richard Simpkin wrote about the 50 year cycle in Race to the Swift - a great book which is still relevant after 40 years. I have also published multiple articles about the ongoing adaptation battle in this war.
3/ But we have also seen much faster adaptation cycles during this war in #Ukraine. As the thread points out, the drone-on-drone fights are happening regularly but we did not adequately prepare for this in western military organisations.
After two years of war, and some early successes in offensive operations, adaptations on both sides have led to an increasingly difficult environment for the conduct of offensive operations. The defence is now the stronger form of war – at least in Ukraine. 1/14 (Image: @DefenceU)
2/ As the Ukrainian counteroffensive last year, and the lack of significant progress in Russia’s 2024 offensives against a much weaker Ukrainian force demonstrate, successful offensive operations are very difficult in the current environment.
3/ This phenomenon has been explored by military theorists in recent years. Brilliant articles by the late Dave Johnson, T.X. Hammes, Frank Hoffman, & Alex Verhinin since the start of Russia’s large-scale invasion have examined the shift to defensive dominance in military operations. I recommend them all.