Western Lensman Profile picture
Jul 2 2 tweets 1 min read Read on X
“Are you forgetting what you said just two minutes ago?”

As Democrats engage in internecine warfare over Biden’s status as their nominee — important to remember that Democrats openly attacked Biden on the debate stage in 2020 over his "memory issues."

Julian Castro aggressively questioned Biden’s memory lapse in this debate exchange over healthcare plans.

Audible gasps from the audience.

This was clearly a debate strategy for Castro, which means Joe’s cognitive state was already on the table as an avenue of attack.

They knew.
Castro is also now openly calling for Biden to step aside.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Western Lensman

Western Lensman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WesternLensman

Jun 29
Until the hoax went down in flames Thursday night, legacy media had promulgated The Big Lie about Joe Biden’s cognitive decline for years.

To what lengths were they prepared to go?

In the run-up to the 2020 election, PBS produced an entire propaganda film guised as a 'documentary’ to convince you that Biden had a “stutter,” and that he was engaged in a heroic journey to prove his doubters wrong, titled:

"Biden’s Stutter: How a Childhood Battle Shaped Him"

Amazingly, the film did not feature a single video clip of Biden’s lifelong "speech impediment,” and any cursory search of archival Biden clips reveals that no stutter actually exists.

The quick clips they used to demonstrate this 'stutter' were recent gaffes, deceptively edited using photographs instead of featuring the actual video.

Also note the emotional manipulation and narrative sleight-of-hand employed by featuring an interview with a writer from The Atlantic, who actually has a speech impediment.

Below is a short excerpt — which casts Joe’s struggles with cognitive decline and mounting gaffes in the 2020 campaign as the heroic fight of a bullied underdog, “hellbent” on proving his critics wrong and overcoming a lifelong disability.

North Korean state-media propagandists must blush at this level of sycophantic media manipulation.
This angle was resurrected in WAPO as recently as March of this year.

“Biden’s stutter surges into the presidential campaign."

Framed as “Trump mocking an old man with a speech impediment."

The Big Lie. Image
The full documentary (6 minutes), if you are, like me, interested in a study in state-media lies and propaganda.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 16
LEFT: Today, NBC reports Biden mass-amnesty scheme to be officially announced this week.

RIGHT: Yesterday, NYP Story blowing the whistle on how illegals are given voter registration forms in 49 states.

It’s happening. Fast.
Source NYP article.

nypost.com/2024/06/14/us-…
Read 4 tweets
Jun 10
"Fake news on social media is the crisis we’re all ignoring – trust me, I worked for Twitter."

This is an actual headline for an article by former Twitter staffer Marc Burrows, lamenting the fact that @elonmusk’s 𝕏 no longer collaborates with the Censorship Industrial Complex to police speech.

Must be election season. Yep:

"With billions of people around the world going to the polls this year, making sure voters have access to verfied, true information is critical. We cannot afford to disregard the importance of keeping a lid on the lies."

He can’t be talking about the lies like the Dirty 51 letter, right? Nope.

"We worked with Reuters and the Associated Press to debunk rapidly growing and unreliable stories. We coined the term “pre-bunk” for identifying likely misinformation before it spread. Misleading posts were labelled once they reached a certain influence threshold.

We all knew this was mission critical, because Twitter punches above its weight in terms of influence on the news agenda and public conversation – that’s why Musk became so invested. We all wanted to make it safer. Better. A force for good."

A force for good. By working with corrupt legacy media and the US govt to suppress, censor, and ban information that was inconvenient or damaging to their preferred candidates and false narratives.

This piece may as well have been written by US intelligence agencies. Maybe it was.

Full piece linked in thread. Must be read in full to be believed.Image
Image
Full article, if you have the stomach:
independent.co.uk/voices/twitter…
Trust me bro, I worked for Twitter. Image
Read 4 tweets
May 14
This is critical reporting from @robbystarbuck and a must watch.

Followers of this account know that a lot of information on the border/mass migration crisis is posted here — this interview expands in great detail the culpability of US/UN funded NGOs and our own govt.
Further context on human trafficking operations at the border.

More on UN/NGOs and their active role in weaponized mass migration.
Read 4 tweets
May 4
FLASHBACK to the time when Hollywood openly exhorted Republican electors to overturn the 2016 Presidential election results and Donald Trump’s victory.

They called on electors to change their votes, defy the will of the people, and install Hillary Clinton into office instead.
Also worth mentioning that there’s 99% probability that every single one of these people oppose the electoral college - and would love a national popular vote.

But here they adore the EC.

🤡🌎
Read 4 tweets
Apr 28
Howard Stern has a history of disturbing comments that would prevent anyone else from getting in the same room — much less on the same screen for an hour — with the President.

The WH and their media stenographers don’t care, because they think it’s all been swept under the rug.

But, as the videos below reveal -- it hasn’t.

🧵ThreadImage
In 1999, Stern joked about the Columbine shoot*ng, wondering why “good looking” girls weren’t s*xually assaulted by the k*llers before committing suic*de.

Stern says if that had been him, he would’ve done so.
Stern also repeatedly s*xualized the underage Olsen twins.

“This is Howard Stern's fantasy.”

“I was counting down to their 18th birthday so we could have s*x with them.”

“I don't really want to have s*x with them anymore.”
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(