Only one group has the power to decide whether President Biden will end his campaign.
Corporate media.
Voters do not get a say, nor, contrary to popular opinion, does the Biden Family.
American media wants him gone, and it will make it so.
I understand some of you doubt this. You probably haven't been watching CNN.
If you watch CNN, you'll understand that it and the rest of corporate media plans to cover this story until the Democratic Party is so terrified it forces Biden out.
All this is happening in real time.
I have been a journalist since 1994, and I don't believe I've seen corporate media collectively want something as badly as it wants Biden gone. And it knows it has the power to do it, so it's not going to stop until it's done.
I don't think anyone could withstand this onslaught.
The Supreme Court declared Donald Trump King of America yesterday—and media is treating it as a pg. 34 story. Trump and Putin had a "jet date" in a Dulles parking lot for 2 days and media is treating it as a *non*-story. The reason? It has work to do: force a president to resign.
The factual inaccuracies I'm seeing in reporting on the Atlanta debate are truly stunning. This tells me that corporate media has an agenda that it is working on, and that it intends to see through to its conclusion.
And as I said before, nothing can stand against that. Nothing.
You may wonder why the same processes weren't brought to bear on Trump nine years ago and every day since—given that Donald Trump did worse things on the first day of his political career than Joe Biden has ever done in his life. The answer is simple: Trump was great for ratings.
Already you can sense the conversation moving away from *whether* Biden will end his campaign to when and how he will do so. Not surprisingly, corporate media is pushing the alternative scenarios that will cause the most drama and chaos for Democrats and produce the best ratings.
A few weeks ago our updated passports arrived, and I'm sad to say it put our minds at ease. There's no way democracy can survive an onslaught that simultaneously comes from the courts, one of our two major political parties, corporate media and Big Business.
We've been betrayed.
To be clear, we plan to stick it out. But I think there's a broad sense in the country now that very few in America were actually committed to democracy. At least in this century. Corporate media wanted viewers; judges were just partisans; and Big Business sought endless profits.
The absolute chaos and turmoil corporate media is deliberately unleashing on the Democratic Party seems likely to make a victory for democracy in November impossible.
But don't worry: major media will profit from the chaos both pre- and post-election.
Until Trump shuts it down.
I have real admiration for Kamala Harris. Neither she nor Biden were my primary candidate, but I ranked her ahead of him.
But then I saw that for whatever reason, the country didn't like her and wouldn't vote for her.
Yet today CNN told us to ignore our eyes and ears on that.
But it hardly matters. Gretchen Whitmer, Gavin Newsom and J.B. Pritzker don't give a sh*t about democracy. They and their sycophants are just a new gang of power-hungry nihilists. If Biden steps out there'll be metaphorical blood all over the walls of the DNC—it'll be a shitshow.
I have zero faith the Democratic Party can hang together in the midst of a power vacuum.
It never has before—why would it start now?
Because democracy is on the line? Who cares, when a chance to grasp at power is in the offing for every two-bit Democratic politician nationwide?
There's only one way to do this—and no one's going to like it. I have been thinking about writing something on it, but I don't know if I will or not. To be clear, if I do, it will be free to the public. So this is not some big stupid tease or whatever. I just feel... pretty lost.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING NEWS: There's a real chance the SCOTUS ruling from yesterday also invalidated the 34 convictions Trump received in NYC, as if there was *any* introduction of evidence of official presidential acts at trial the trial and its result could be voided. nytimes.com/2024/07/02/nyr…
Yesterday I wrote that the Supreme Court ruling was far more evil than people realized.
Today I find myself writing that the ruling from yesterday is far more evil than *I* realized.
It appears we have a king now, and somehow we have this without the man even being a president.
When you treat the most vile man in American political history better than you treat anyone else on Earth, all you are doing is convincing weak-willed people to believe that that vile man must in actual fact be better than anyone else on Earth.
I'd feel better about this "coincidence" if Trump's jet hadn't been where he secreted stolen classified docs he publicly said he has every right to sell or gift as he sees fit, and if the Kremlin weren't interfering in this election on his behalf and wanting payment for doing so.
Some of you may forget—thinking Trump stored his most valuable stolen classified docs at Mar-a-Lago—but in fact that's not true. He sifted out the most valuable stolen docs and put them on his jet as he was leaving for New Jersey. We have no idea what happened to them after that.
The question is not whether the decision today allows President Biden to use SEALs to eliminate Donald Trump; it does, but he definitely should not. The question is if he can use DHS to preclude Trump from appearing on any ballots, forcing the GOP to select a different candidate.
Certainly he can find that Trump has colluded with foreign powers. And he can find that Trump incited an insurrection. Certainly it is at the outer limits of his official powers to preclude the federal government from sponsoring an election in which Trump appears on ballots.
He is not going to do any of that because he knows this Court is lawless; he knows that to take advantage of this ruling today would be anti-democratic; he knows his party would not go along; he knows it would cost him the election; he knows this SCOTUS would eventually jail him.
Supreme Court decisions cut both ways; they become the law of the land for *all*.
President Biden is *entitled* now—by *law*—to determine what official acts that might previously have been deemed illegal he can take, with presidential immunity, to protect us from insurrection.
I have no idea what those acts would be. I simply know that we are in the midst of an active insurrection that is being led by Donald Trump, and that the Supreme Court has just said that all presidents, including Democrats, have far more power than was ever previously thought.
Again, I do not know where this takes us. But I know that Republicans are discussing this decision as though it will only ever apply to Donald Trump if he attempts to establish a dictatorship in the United States after a hypothetical November election victory.
Inciting an armed rebellion against the federal government is starting to feel pretty legal in America all of a sudden
I guess the theory the conservatives on the Court are working from is that when the next January 6 comes they *personally* will not be targeted, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
As expected, the plan of the radicals on the Court was to delay a decision for many months—until July—then erect a test for presidential immunity that will take months or years to litigate and appeal, ensuring Trump can corruptly end the case against him if he’s elected this fall
The Supreme Court has made coup attempts non-justiciable, it really is that simple
It’s becoming very hard to argue we are still a democracy
(PS) Until you have actually *seen the transcript*, you truly do not know what happened at that debate. You may think you do, but the visuals were *so* powerful that most of us became deaf to the words actually being said.
And those words are not at all what you think they were.