The publication recorded an interview with a Russian occupier who fled to the West. “We really are fucking orcs”: the story of a grenade launcher deserter from “Storm Z”, who is now seeking political asylum. He told them what is happening in these
1/18 Verstka.ru
units. Even during training in the Kirov region, there were problems with equipment - “Everything is f*ked up there. They should have provided us with the basics. At least one set of clothes. By the time they registered us, by the time they took us to the clothing
2/18
warehouse... And all the workers there were drunk as skunks. The officers were 50/50, but the senior staff was just a little short of Yeltsin’s level. All the clothes were from the 60s and did not fit. Extortion began immediately. 500 rubles here, 500 rubles there. We
3/18
chipped in two or three thousand for spare parts for the equipment. They made up some stupid story, like because our reserve battalion is stationed in Kaliningrad, there are problems with delivering spare parts here, so we have to chip in for them ourselves. What kind of
4/18
nonsense is this, guys? " Anton (name changed at the narrator's request) is indignant. Anton managed to get the things he was supposed to get. Among them were the "Kolpak-20" - a repurposed Soviet helmet from the 1960s, a uniform ten sizes too big for him, and combat boots
5/18
four sizes too big. In the end, he bought the ammunition at his own expense. Resellers would come to the unit and sell him everything he needed. Of the six hundred people in his unit, forty remained alive after two months of assaults. "I spent two months in that s*ithole
6/18
near Kupyansk. It was just some kind of extermination. Only five or six people from one squad return alive. They also fu*ked up all the equipment. By the end, they simply mixed us up with the prisoners and just drove, drove, drove. How I survived is a good question.
7/18
I was just a grenade launcher, not an assault soldier, I didn’t go in. We worked from closed positions. Direct fire is not an option in these fields,” Anton recalls. According to him, in an ideal scenario, an assault occurs in several stages. First, the artillery processes
8/18
the terrain, then the infantry storms the positions, followed by a fortification group, and then come the evacuation and supply groups, which must carry out the wounded and dead and deliver ammunition, water and food. But as a rule, they all get mixed up at the front lines,
9/18
and the infantry often scatters on the approaches to enemy positions. “The composition of the assault squad varies. It depends on how many people are added to the prisoners. On average, from 90 to 120 people. Sometimes they drive equipment. We go to storm a forest belt.
10/18
Somewhere there are dugouts and everything is prepared, somewhere everything is hastily. If you get into the "Storm" infantry, you are fu*ked. "In 9 cases out of 10, the infantry gets fu*ked up on the approach." "We heard our comrades talking, but we couldn't answer.
11/18
There was a breakthrough in their area. It wasn't just the "Storm" there, but also the remnants of the border guards. In the meantime, it turned out that an entire platoon had been dismantled in the forest regiment. Four 200s. We were sent there for evacuation. Another
12/18
wounded man later died in the hospital, I personally carried him out. About a week later, two 500s were brought in, they got away under the noise," Anton recalls. Later that day, they went to evacuate the wounded and dead from the battlefield. Anton had not been in the
13/18
evacuation group before, but he replaced his dead comrade. The medics couldn't handle it. After the evacuation, the group abandoned their weapons and armor, which weighed up to 50 kg, on the battlefield and walked five kilometers back to school. There, a space had already
14/18
been equipped for them in the basement, where there was a canteen. They slept off and went back to get weapons where the fighting had recently taken place. Anton marked the location of his grenade launcher on the map with an asterisk. “If you screw up the grenade launcher,
15/18
you’ll be transferred to the infantry, and the infantry is certain death. There are machine guns and assault rifles like garbage, and it’s hard to give birth to something heavier. The commander once opened up and said: “I don’t give a s*it about you, pencils, they’ll
16/18
send me as many of you as I need, and they’ll seriously fu*k me for the equipment I screwed up, a bunch of paperwork.” It’s generally visible. In “Storms,” losses reach 90%,” says Anton.
17/18
So, this interview paints a picture of what’s happening in the Russian troops, supplementing the known facts.
Source:
18/18verstka.media/istoriya-grana…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Russia has once again staged a media stunt with the story about a drone attack on Putin’s residence. In the Novgorod region no one heard air raid sirens, yet according to Lavrov, 91 drones were launched from Ukraine and all of
1/25
them were shot down. There is not a single video and not a single piece of evidence. Why is this needed? This entire performance was staged specifically for Trump. Putin personally called the American president and told him about it. Russia has long convinced Trump that it
2/25
is Zelensky together with the “warmongering shadow government of Europe” who allegedly do not want the war to end. This show was played out so that Ukraine would be blamed for the failure of peace talks. Unfortunately, with Trump, this works. Meanwhile, Lavrov declares that
3/25
Daily strikes by Ukrainian drones and missiles on Russian oil depots, warehouses and refineries have created an image in the information space of a “leaky” Russian air defense system. This image sharply contrasts with what Russian propaganda had been instilling in its audience🧵
for decades, namely the idea of an “impenetrable shield” capable, according to Defense Minister Andrey Belousov, of intercepting up to 97 percent of targets. The reality of a full scale war has proven far more complex. Ukraine has not managed to destroy Russian air defense as a
single integrated system, but it has succeeded in exposing its real limits. As analysis by the Royal United Services Institute shows, the strength of Russian air defense depends not only on missiles and radars, but also on industry, logistics and the ability to replenish losses
Seven German journalism students tracked Russian-crewed freighters lurking off the Dutch and German coast and connected them to drone swarms over military bases. Using public tracking tools, their own drones and even driving 2500 kilometers while following a ship, they produced🧵
a far more coherent picture of the Germany and Netherlands drone mystery than months of official hand-wringing and coordinated stonewalling. “Our trail leads to Russia,” the team concludes. “Not beyond doubt, but it’s currently the most probable explanation. We systematically
laid both things side by side: the secret reports about drone incidents and the routes of the ships. You can at least recognize a pattern.” They did not find a drone on any ship and they cannot prove causation, but they established the following: ships with Russian crews showed
Brussels has found a way to make decisions on blocking Russian assets without the consent of all EU member states, the Financial Times reports. This would allow the assets to be frozen indefinitely rather than having the blockade renewed every six months as is currently 1/9
the case. According to the publication, this is made possible by one of the EU treaty provisions stating that unanimous approval is not required in situations of economic shocks, which Brussels considers the war in Ukraine to be. Until now, when extending the freeze, there 2/9
was a risk that one EU country, for example Hungary, could oppose it, and without unanimous agreement the assets would be unfrozen. In early December, the European Commission approved two options for financing Ukraine for 2026 and 2027. The first plan involves providing 3/9
Russia is laying the groundwork to make the 1990s look like a walk in the park. Everyone says Russia is returning to the nineties, but what does that mean? The collapse of the Soviet Union was driven by many factors. Economic problems had already begun in the 1970s. The USSR
1/16
economy was built on the export of energy resources (oil and gas), metals, timber and grain. Most of the revenue went into the arms race of the Cold War. This is very similar to Russia today, whose military budget has reached record levels. The 1973 oil crisis initially
2/16
worked in the USSR's favor by increasing export revenues, but soon an event occurred that had a greater impact on the crisis of the 1990s than anything else - the war in Afghanistan. Although the Soviet Union spent about $20 billion on the war, this was negligible compared
3/16
US-Russia negotiations will not lead to peace. Diplomacy with Russia does not work and this truth is something the Trump administration refuses to see. The more we learn about the details of the US-Russia deal on Ukraine, the clearer it becomes that this administration 1/9
is pursuing only personal gain, both in the form of stakes in Russian business and in the form of a share of the frozen Russian assets whose unfreezing after a peace deal the US administration insists on. Russia is not striving for any peace and has never done so - this is 2/9
obvious to anyone who truly understands the issue. Russia uses the same old Soviet negotiation tactics that Kaja Kallas described when she quoted Andrei Gromyko. Three things: first demand the maximum. Do not ask but demand something that has never been yours. Secondly, 3/9