🧵 Setting the record straight on Putin's approach to Ukraine
In early 2014, Ukraine was a neutral country, with a pro-Russian president, and with 70% of Ukraine's population against NATO membership. Yet Russia bluntly violated Ukraine's neutrality and annexed Crimea, then launched a covert invasion of Ukraine in the east
Petro Poroshenko won the presidential election in 2014 having promised a settlement with Russia, keeping a special status of the Russian language in Ukraine. He was initially sceptical regarding NATO accession, underlined Ukraine must rely on its own strength to provide security
Did Putin meet Poroshenko halfway? Not at all. The regular Russian army entered the Ukrainian territory in mid-2014 to fight the Ukrainian troops, which led to the Minsk-1 agreement signed in September 2014
Few weeks later, Ukraine's parliament adopted a law that would guarantee the then Russia-controlled part of Donetsk and Luhansk regions additional economic, financial and cultural powers
How did Putin react? Russia staged sham local elections in the occupied Donbas, and then sent the regular army again to Ukraine in early 2015, which led to the Minsk-2 agreement signed in February 2015
Zelensky was even more sceptical regarding NATO accession. Asked about NATO, he once famously said he never pays anyone a visit if he has not been invited. He won the presidential election promising to compromise with Russia - to stop shooting, sit down with Putin and talk
Did Putin meet Zelensky halfway? Not at all. He actually raised the stakes by issuing the Russian passports on the occupied territories of Ukraine even before Zelensky assumed the office, putting him in a difficult political position since the start
Zelensky was ready to drop Ukraine's NATO bid in an exchange for the Russian troops withdrawing from Ukraine. The talks were held already before 2022. What did Putin do? He launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine
In the first weeks of the invasion, Zelensky was yet again ready to drop Ukraine's NATO bid. But he wanted to obtain international security guarantees. What did Putin do? He demanded that Russia must be consulted before any aid would be given to Ukraine in the event of aggression
To sum up, Ukraine has consistently tried to reach a deal with Russia over the last decade, and was open to giving up on its NATO bid in exchange for the withdrawal of the Russian troops from Ukraine. Russia never reciprocated, never showed a good will, kept raising the stakes
Both Poroshenko and Zelensky were initially sceptical regarding Ukraine's accession to NATO. Both wanted to get a deal with Putin. And Putin himself pushed both of them to seek NATO membership out of no other viable alternatives
Up till now, Putin has shown absolutely no willingness to compromise with Ukraine. His war aims remain maximalist - subjugating Ukraine and changing its regime. He seeks Ukraine's partition, and will turn what is left of Ukraine into Russian protectorate
Russia's imperial self-conception is that of Russian elites at large, and not just Vladimir Putin. The Russian leadership simply cannot reconcile with the existence of a sovereign Ukrainian statehood
Therefore any sustainable Ukrainian-Russian compromise is currently not possible unless the Russian cost-benefit calculus changes. Only credible risk to the stability of the Russian regime would impact this calculus. The easiest way goes through defeating Russia in Ukraine [END]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Dyskusja wybuchła na nowo ze względu na słowa Trumpa i Farage'a, więc polecam ten wątek. Dlaczego potencjalne członkostwo Ukrainy w NATO to jedynie rosyjska wymówka, i jak Rosja planowała agresję na Ukrainę na długo przed szczytem w Bukareszcie w 2008 roku
Już w 2000 r. Putin miał powiedzieć Juszczence, że Krym jako część Ukrainy to dziejowa niesprawiedliwość, którą należy naprawić. Była wiceminister spraw zagranicznych Ołena Zerkał przyznała, że w ukraińskich archiwach jest notatka z tego spotkania (44:50)
Zerkał mówi w tym wywiadzie, że Putin podczas spotkania z ukraińską delegacją w Moskwie w 2000 roku stwierdził, iż:
"как человек, глубоко не согласен с этим, что Крым это часть Украины. Он считает, что это историческая несправедливость, которую нужно исправить"
🧵Seven quick takes on the margins of Ukraine Recovery Conference in Berlin #URC2024
1/ Strikes me the dissonance between celebratory mood of the conference and situation in Ukraine. Western officials keep spinning optimistic visions of post-war reconstruction. Ukrainian authorities worry if they will have enough foreign funding next year to pin down the budget
2/ Behind the scenes, Ukrainians complain that Germans have made a festival out of this conference. Several thousand participants, over a dozen of side events, several panels going on simultaneously. The guests invited without a particular rhyme
🧵 "Russia is ready for negotiations regarding Ukraine (...) but on the basis of the Istanbul agreements, and taking into account the new realities" - announced Putin at Petersburg International Economic Forum. Let's unpack this conundrum 👇
There are three pieces of the puzzle in Putin's statement. 1/ alleged readiness to negotiate; 2/ his repeated demand to go back to Istanbul talks; 3/ "the new realities" on the ground. Let's go step by step
Putin claims, once again, that Russia is ready for negotiations regarding Ukraine. He keeps presenting himself as the party supposedly willing to end the war, while blaming Ukraine for prolonging it
I have previously gone over why there was no chance of a Ukrainian-Russian deal in spring 2022. Today, I will try to answer some of your questions about the "Polish perspective". This is how and why we know what we know
Small retrospective first. A month before the Russian invasion, President Zelensky with his top advisors arrive in Wisła, a mountain residence of Poland's President. War looms on the horizon. Both sides are setting up an informal channel of communication in case of emergency
Jakub Kumoch (JK), advisor to Pres. Duda, and Andriy Sybiha, advisor to Pres. Zelensky, will be the ones to carry the weight. They know each other well, having both served as ambassadors to Turkey at the same time. Now they both advise heads of states
How Russia sought to subjugate Ukraine, the West rightly refused to play the ball, and Putin became personally responsible for the failure of the Ukrainian-Russian talks
Recent days have seen a renewed debate over the Ukrainian-Russian peace talks of spring of 2022. The popular wisdom says that both sides were close to an agreement, but this is simply false. Let's finally unpack it, dyspel the myths and put a stop to the manipulation that abound
FIRST, there was never any single deal that could have ended the war. What is simplistically presented as a deal was meant to combine at least three components - multilateral treaty on the status of Ukraine, bilateral Ukraine-Russia agreement, underpinned by Western guarantees
🧵 This is already making rounds, so I will try to shed some more light on March/April 2022 Ukraine-Russia talks since the article is still far from the point, and because Poland played a much bigger role than anyone is willing to admit publicly foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/talks-…
You can easily Google this photo. This is just a tip of the iceberg
And you can easily Google this photo as well. Resemblance is purely coincidental (until it is not)