My dad's friend is a senior executive at a large pharmaceutical company in China.

During dinner yesterday, he said most of China's economic issues can be solved by more strict implementation of labor laws, AND raising employee benefits to blue collar workers.

Here's why:
1/9🧵 Image
Currently, there's a mismatch between University graduate job seekers and labor market.

Blue collar positions cannot find enough workers, while university graduate cannot find jobs.

Part of it is down to mismatched skills, but people can learn on the job through apprenticeship Image
A lot of it is down to the lax labor laws and inadequate worker benefits.

Many Chinese industries have reached a point where they are not competing on labor cost anymore.

Chinese labor cost have risen consistently, and so has our share of the value added in global manufacturing Image
Better paid and protected blue collar jobs will attract more young job seekers.

With more money and more spare time, the problem of consumption can be solved, so will the issue of low marriage rate and birthrate.

If it were so simple, then why this hasn't happened yet?
The solution sound easy but hard to implement. The government must balance company profit with worker's benefit.

Skewed towards the company means less buying power from the population.

Skewed towards the workers means less profitable company, which may close all together.
This also varies between industries, not every industry in China is medium to high end.

To put it simply, Chinese high end industries have only gotten their foot in the door, and do not have enough market share for high dividend. Image
Anti-China propaganda likes to portray China's economic challenges in a mystical unknowing manner, this way, they can just claim the problems are unsolvable.

In reality, there are clear solutions. Image
It all goes back to having a robust high end manufacturing industry, supporting well paid blue collar workforce.

Which will then have a ripple effect on the service industries.

For example, car sales also support jobs in the car insurance industry.
This is why western propaganda is targeting the non-existent "overcapacity problem" in China.

Because our government is has a clear development path, through Belt and Road Initiative, it involves the Global South more than the imperial core.

Hence their indignation.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zhao DaShuai 东北进修🇨🇳 Commentary

Zhao DaShuai 东北进修🇨🇳 Commentary Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @zhao_dashuai

Sep 27, 2025
Air defense missile knowledge can be very esoteric.

So here's a thread detailing the capabilities of PLA's major air defense systems.🧵

**This database isn't the normally advertised numbers, the data we've compiled take into account of intercept geometries and their roles. Image
HQ-9B

🔹Effective range: ~300km
🔹Flight Ceiling: ~30km
🔹Average speed: Mach 4.5+
🔹Mission profile: Long range air defense against aircraft, with some capabilities against short and medium range ballistic missiles in their terminal flight.

Compared to the HQ-9C listed below⬇️; The HQ-9B has a more sustained power flight path, but slower speed, making them very good against maneuvering targets like aircraft.Image
HQ-9C

🔹Effective range: ~250km
🔹Flight ceiling: ~50km
🔹Average speed: Mach 8+
🔹Mission profile: High-altitude, long range air defense with enhanced capabilities against tactical ballistic missiles.

The missile's slightly slimmer profile compared to HQ-9B gives the C variant much higher speed and longer unpowered cruising range.

The HQ-9C has an estimated burnout velocity of Mach 9.5+, which means it flies fast and burns out quickly, making them less effective against maneuvering aircraft than the B variant, but much more effective against fast moving missiles.Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 14, 2025
With the introduction of the diesel-electric hybrid tank by China; The ZTZ-100, we now can have sci-fi systems like:
♦️Electromagnetic armor (EFA)
♦️Electrothermal Chemical Gun (ETC gun)

Detailed thread on the future of land/armored warfare developed by China.
🧵 Image
The Type-100 family is made up of serval platforms, including the ZTZ-100 tank and the ZBD-100 fire support vehicle and they are only the start.

There will also be a 50 ton class heavy main battle tank with 125mm electrothermal chemical(ETC) gun with electromagnetic armor (EFA) Image
Image
Image
Image
We will also have a long range fire support vehicle with vertical launch systems (VLS), capable of storing 20+ long range (10km+) heavy anti-tank missiles.

They together create a network of systems on land, capable of first detection, first shot and first kill.
Read 12 tweets
Sep 7, 2025
A thread detailing the speed, range and trajectory of China's anti-ship hypersonic missiles.

Our potential enemies have no way of intercepting these missiles, so it's only fair to let them know, how their billion dollar ship will be destroyed.
🧵 Image
YJ-17 Ship launched hypersonic glide vehicle. (HGV launched from vertical launch systems)

Range: over 1000km.
Warhead: 300kg
Cruise speed: Mach 5-8.
Terminal speed: Mach 8+

Launch trajectory; Boosted to 50km altitude, glide in the upper atmosphere, then dive down at Mach 8+. Image
Image
YJ-19 submarine launched Scramjet hypersonic missile.

Range: over 600km.
Warhead: 160kg.
Cruise speed: Mach 5-6.
Terminal speed: Mach 6+

Launch trajectory; Boosted to 20km, cruise at a flat trajectory at 20km, then dive down from above at Mach 6+. Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Aug 30, 2025
How China's 4th gen tank exemplifies the differences in force design between China and the US?🧵1/8

The US military has global projection needs, their weapons are not specialized to do certain tasks in certain regions against certain enemies. It's a case of jack of all trade.

Meanwhile, China's ZTZ-201 light MBT is specifically designed to fight in Taiwan and the Himalayas.Image
Taiwan's useful terrain is very flat, dotted with cities and towns that are less than 2km apart.

Hence engagement even for armored/mechanized forces will be that 2km dash over farmlands then into cities.
Short engagements between tanks, if it ever happens, will be from covered position shooting at each other.

This means drones and sensor networks are more important than pure mass in armor. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 12, 2025
Comprehensive minute-by-minute illustrative thread, on how the Chinese aircraft carrier Fujian conducts cyclical attack operation.
🧵1/15

The optimal air wing composition:
⏺️24x J-35(green & red), divided into 2 attack waves of 12 each.
⏺️24x J-15T (blue & purple), divided into 2 attack waves of 12 each.
⏺️4x J-15D electronic warfare fighter (orange).
⏺️4x J-600 AEW&C (light blue).
⏺️~10 helicopters (black) for anti-submarine, search and rescue missions.Image
Cyclical operations are the most common attack mode of aircraft carriers, they divide the carrier airwing into attack waves and launch them with intervals in between.

This allows sustained operation for a long periods of time. Image
🔹Wave 1 (green J-35 stealth fighters) takes 12 minutes to launch 12x J-35, + 2 min to launch 1x KJ-600 (light blue) + 1 min to launch 2x J-15D EW fighter (orange).
= 15 minutes.

**Catapults can launch aircraft with 30 second intervals.Image
Read 15 tweets
Jul 5, 2025
A comprehensive thread about Chinese aircraft carrier operations.

How do we compare to the US aircraft carrier operations?

For the PLA navy, there are 2 main types of carrier attacks:
🔹Full-deck strike (Full deck sortie).
🔹Cyclical operation.
1/11🧵 Image
Full-deck strike is when we launch all fighters in a single strike package.

Cyclical operation is when we divide the fighters into attack waves, and launch them sequentially.

Full-deck strike is used when you want overwhelming firepower delivered in the initial phase of combat.
However, full-deck strike cannot be sustained for long, since all the fighters would need to land in a short span of time, which puts immense pressure on the deck crew to rearm and refuel.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(