Climate alarmists are annoyed that global climate-related disaster deaths have declined dramatically
Then they discovered how to cherry-pick deaths to look like they’re increasing
— just (indefensibly) remove the top 50 most deadly mega-disasters and rig the scales
🧵+refs
After manipulating their stats, they have the temerity to claim “Misinterpreting statistics could be harmful if it supports a discourse minimizing the importance of climate action”
I’m pretty sure misinterpreting statistics is wrong no matter what
They show low death numbers from 1900s and 1910s, but these are likely wrong ()
They have left out at least two major catastrophes, likely missing at least 20-25 million deaths from the Chinese flood in 1906, leading to famine in 1906-07, and at least 2-10 million deaths from the Persian drought leading to famine in 1917-19
Global greening happens over most of the world, but especially in China, India, Europe, African Sahel (the greening of the Sahel), Southern Brazil and across US/Canada
Much of this is from forests and increased cropping in croplands
But global climate-related disaster costs are declining
This decline is not just evident globally but also for rich and poor countries, and for flood, flash flood, coastal flood, cold, drought, wind, and all damage
Why don't we hear this?
Notice, damage is measured in % GDP, as even the UN insists on measuring it (e.g. SDG 11.5.2, )
This is because the same flood or storm will create much more damage in a much richer world:
If there are twice as many houses, a flood will tend to damage twice as many houses