Anatomy of a Hoax: The Doomed Voyage of the Biden ‘Cheap Fake’ Narrative.
🧵A thread. 🧵
2/19
First of all, where did the term “cheap fake” originate?
I was surprised to find that this term was coined by “disinformation researchers” Britt Paris and Joan Donovan way back in 2019.
Sunmary of their research here.
“Like many past media technologies, deepfakes and cheap fakes have jolted traditional rules around evidence and truth, and trusted institutions must step in to redefine those boundaries.”
To save Democracy, of course.
3/19
The credentials and political leanings of Paris and Donovan should not come as any surprise.
The Nation. Harvard “Disinformation” studies.
4/19
From the Paris/Donovan report, a spectrum of deepfakes > cheap fakes.
The latter being defined as basically anything media that is manipulated such as speeding up or slowing down footage, photoshopped images (memes), or filters created inside social-media apps.
5/19
It is difficult to find reporting prior to the Biden “cheap fake” hoax using the term.
This NPR piece on the 2020 election discusses the concept, but does not use the “cheap fake” moniker.
6/19
For recall: Here are two of the authentic, unedited videos that ignited the “cheap fake” defense:
7/19
The hoax leaves port:
So how was this term resurrected as a false defense of inconvenient videos showing Biden’s mounting mental glitches?
The first example I can find is this WAPO article from June 11.
Note how the term “cheap fake” is suddenly described as common parlance. It’s not.
This is the mainstreaming of the term into the discourse around the embarrassing Biden videos.
8/19
The hoax picked up steam, and predictably exploded across legacy media, as intended.
9/19
Joe Scarborough stood defiantly at the bow of of the Cheap Fake ship, shouting to anyone who will listen:
“They’re lying about their cheap fakes!”
10/19
June 17. KJP boards the ship. Notice how she also slips later in the clip and says “deep fakes.”
Can’t keep the hoax terminology straight.
11/19
CBS is on board: They want you to know these videos are “Cheap fakes,” not “deep fakes.”
12/19
Fast forward to the debate. Here is one of the moments where you could see and hear the “cheap fake” hoax ramming full throttle into the iceberg.
Man the lifeboats!
Post-debate, the media couldn’t jump ship fast enough.
Video: @CollinRugg
14/19
As the Cheap Fake plunged to the bottom of the sea, the media scrambled to survive the icy, shark-filled waters:
The New York Times, before and after:
15/19
The Washington Post, before and after:
16/19
As recently as July 2, in the wake of the debate iceberg collision, and as the hoax was now resting comfortably at the bottom of the North Atlantic, KJP was defending the use of the term — but claimed she didn’t regret using the term while simultaneously blaming the media for its origination and usage.
“The media said cheap fakes, we just echoed it!”
Incredible.
17/19
The ultimate fate of the doomed Cheap Fake voyage was captured in this stunning raw video.
18/19
In summation:
The media and the White House resurrected the term from obscurity and conspired to use it as yet another media hoax to cover for Biden’s obvious cognitive decline — until they were forced to abandon it by Biden’s notorious debate dumpster fire.
Now that the media has turned on Biden and wants him gone — they will have you believe they were themselves duped by a duplicitous White House who hid the truth from them for 3.5 years.
It’s been said many times before, but it really can’t be said too many times:
It is impossible to hate the media enough.
19/19
If you found this thread, please consider sharing, and supporting this account with a follow. 🇺🇸
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“We defend the existence and the power of nations.” | Marine Le Pen demolishes CNN attempt to label her National Rally party “far right."
Amanpour is predictably incredulous: “You’re kidding me right?"
According to legacy media, any person or party that believes in national sovereignty, prioritizing the needs of citizens, border security, and an end to mass immigration is far-right.
Le Pen: "I think this use of the term far right carries a stigma and is very pejorative."
Yes, that’s exactly why they do it.
You will NEVER see the media label any leftist movement or politician — no matter how extreme — as “far left."
His headline is a lie. LePen did not say “the far right” would do anything. She expressly rejected the label.
That doesn’t stop the lies, however.
Any party that advocates for national sovereignty, strong borders and a halt to mass immigration is “far right” and must be fear-mongered.
Until the hoax went down in flames Thursday night, legacy media had promulgated The Big Lie about Joe Biden’s cognitive decline for years.
To what lengths were they prepared to go?
In the run-up to the 2020 election, PBS produced an entire propaganda film guised as a 'documentary’ to convince you that Biden had a “stutter,” and that he was engaged in a heroic journey to prove his doubters wrong, titled:
"Biden’s Stutter: How a Childhood Battle Shaped Him"
Amazingly, the film did not feature a single video clip of Biden’s lifelong "speech impediment,” and any cursory search of archival Biden clips reveals that no stutter actually exists.
The quick clips they used to demonstrate this 'stutter' were recent gaffes, deceptively edited using photographs instead of featuring the actual video.
Also note the emotional manipulation and narrative sleight-of-hand employed by featuring an interview with a writer from The Atlantic, who actually has a speech impediment.
Below is a short excerpt — which casts Joe’s struggles with cognitive decline and mounting gaffes in the 2020 campaign as the heroic fight of a bullied underdog, “hellbent” on proving his critics wrong and overcoming a lifelong disability.
North Korean state-media propagandists must blush at this level of sycophantic media manipulation.
This angle was resurrected in WAPO as recently as March of this year.
“Biden’s stutter surges into the presidential campaign."
Framed as “Trump mocking an old man with a speech impediment."
The Big Lie.
The full documentary (6 minutes), if you are, like me, interested in a study in state-media lies and propaganda.
"Fake news on social media is the crisis we’re all ignoring – trust me, I worked for Twitter."
This is an actual headline for an article by former Twitter staffer Marc Burrows, lamenting the fact that @elonmusk’s 𝕏 no longer collaborates with the Censorship Industrial Complex to police speech.
Must be election season. Yep:
"With billions of people around the world going to the polls this year, making sure voters have access to verfied, true information is critical. We cannot afford to disregard the importance of keeping a lid on the lies."
He can’t be talking about the lies like the Dirty 51 letter, right? Nope.
"We worked with Reuters and the Associated Press to debunk rapidly growing and unreliable stories. We coined the term “pre-bunk” for identifying likely misinformation before it spread. Misleading posts were labelled once they reached a certain influence threshold.
We all knew this was mission critical, because Twitter punches above its weight in terms of influence on the news agenda and public conversation – that’s why Musk became so invested. We all wanted to make it safer. Better. A force for good."
A force for good. By working with corrupt legacy media and the US govt to suppress, censor, and ban information that was inconvenient or damaging to their preferred candidates and false narratives.
This piece may as well have been written by US intelligence agencies. Maybe it was.
Full piece linked in thread. Must be read in full to be believed.
This is critical reporting from @robbystarbuck and a must watch.
Followers of this account know that a lot of information on the border/mass migration crisis is posted here — this interview expands in great detail the culpability of US/UN funded NGOs and our own govt.
FLASHBACK to the time when Hollywood openly exhorted Republican electors to overturn the 2016 Presidential election results and Donald Trump’s victory.
They called on electors to change their votes, defy the will of the people, and install Hillary Clinton into office instead.
Also worth mentioning that there’s 99% probability that every single one of these people oppose the electoral college - and would love a national popular vote.