OOHHHH WOW! New preprint on the host immune response in Long Covid was just posted (few hours ago), and it's more significant than the 3-gene signature!
They found reactivation of viral herpes (EBV/CMV/HSV2) and CONFIRMED PERSISTENT SARS-CoV-2 INFECTIONS! Here's a summary...
1/
IMO, this is a hugely important study, so I'm going to do my best to explain it in detail, in a way that everybody can understand!
The headline here is that a persistent/reactivated infection of (one or more of) SARS2, EBV, CMV, and/or HSV2 were found in 60% of LC patients!
2/
Simply put, they looked at the antibodies produced by "Antibody-Secreting Cells" (ASCs), a type of short-lived immune response cells!
The primary types of antibodies stay in the blood. In contrast, ASCs peak *shortly* after infection, then rapidly decline! (see screenshot)
3/
Because serum (blood) antibodies increase after infection (or vaccination), remaining high for years as a defense against new infection, they're not a good measure of *current* infections!
For example, 98% of LC and 100% of controls had serum antibodies for EBV:
4/
This is where the MENSA (Media Enriched with Newly Synthesized Antibodies) matrix created in the current study comes in.
This new tool *specifically* measures the antibodies produced by ASCs (new infections) and memory immune cells (reactivated/persistent infections).
5/20
Looking at SARS-CoV-2 antibodies for one individual across multiple infections and vaccinations (comparing serum vs. MENSA antibody levels), the MENSA antibodies decline MUCH more rapidly after each exposure.
Thus, it distinctly detects *active* infection!
6/20
Just for the uninformed losers who show up to squawk "it's the jab! it's the jab!" every time:
- All of the LC patients had pre-vaccine infections
- 97% of the LC patients had nucleocapsid antibodies in serum. Those are acquired through INFECTION, and aren't in mRNA vaccines
7/
An issue with existing research is that SARS2 (and Herpesviruses) just don't show up in PCR tests of blood. Most of the studies showing viral reservoirs are *autopsy* studies because sampling those tissues is *destructive*
MENSA indirectly samples those same reservoirs!
8/20
Antibodies produced by ASCs are only found when there was RECENTLY a replicating pathogen that the immune system needed to attack, so this test can identify the "cause of the present-day illness" and is "an immune snapshot to uncover the sources of the patient's ailment"!
9/20
They found reactivated latent infections! Here's the percentage of patients positive for *MENSA antibodies* (CR = Covid Recovered)
But *serum* levels were high for all, because these viruses are common!
10/20
But even more significantly, they found the presence of MENSA antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 (indicating *persistent* infection) in 40% of LC patients and NONE OF THE CONTROL GROUP.
To put it another way, this test has SPECIFCALLY identified persistent SARS-CoV-2 infections!
11/20
Overall, the MENSA assays found:
- HALF of the LC patients were positive for at least one of EBV/CMV/HSV2
- 60% of the LC patients were positive for at least one of EBV/CMV/HSV2 *or* SARS2
- Only 17% of the recovered were positive for even one of EBV/CMV/HSV2
12/20
IMO, 40% is the LOWER bound for people with LC having persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection, because their positivity threshold is fairly conservative, statistically speaking: SARS2 positivity is three standard deviations beyond the mean MENSA values for *recovered* patients!
13/20
The AVERAGE level of antibodies *in the LC group* was BELOW the point they set as the test positivity threshold for the MENSA assay.
If we assume intensity of persistent infection is a spectrum, this is now an optimization problem!
14/20
This study pushes us a long way toward understanding the *specific drivers* of Long Covid, given that observable chronic symptoms don't manifest after *every* infection. MENSA allows precise sampling of *currently active* infections, regardless of serum antibody levels!
15/20
It's also worth noting that they checked for the presence of active responses to autoantigens and came up empty; however, that's not a definitive answer, because their technique had limited power. But, realistically, persistent infection explains most of the symptoms!
16/20
It's unknown how the MENSA assay results will look *over time* in LC patients or how treatment impacts it, so the specifics of how it can be used as a diagnostic tool are up in the air. But that's usually something the lab companies that commercialize the tests figure out!
17/20
And, of course, that gigantic fucking Catch-22 of the week, the MENSA assay may not be reliable in immunocompromised patients due to lack of B cell activation to form ASCs. SARS-CoV-2 ALSO fucks with B cells, in addition to T cells. Fantastic.
One interesting thing to note is that this method may *potentially* be capable of detecting other chronic (and/or neurodegenerative) conditions from very early in their onset, long before symptoms are present!
19/20
IMO, this is a STRONG study, and it's a starting point for much more specific diagnostics of chronic conditions resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection—or any other pathogen!
This study is really just about the diagnostic tool, and their confirmation of viral persistence were part of proving that the tool works. This will likely end up being part of the measure treatment response, however
Also, huge shoutout to the people who routinely quote my threads with translations to other languages! We’ve got an efficient little global public health information network going!
22/20
IMO they missed a huge opportunity by not including VZV in their panel, because shingles is suuuch a common PASC! If (and only if) LC symptoms turn out to be driven PRIMARILY by latent herpesvirus reactivation (triggered by SARS2 persistence), VZV will prob be another 40%
TBD! This is really just a technical paper introducing a new *test method*, not a full blown virology research/theory paper. Also note that positives in the LC group were
- 40% for SARS2
- 47% for EBV/CMV/HSV2
- *60%* for SARS2 *and/or* EBV/CMV/HSV2
Good question! The *sensitivity* of this provisional test (i.e. not yet commercialized) was set conservatively to ensure the validity of the test results. If SARS2 persistence is ubiquitous, this positivity *threshold* will be artificially high
It's also worth noting they confirmed that the convalescent MENSA antibody levels do, in fact, remain HIGHER than the pre-pandemic baseline—and the convalescent MENSA baseline for an individual is also somewhat correlated with acute disease severity!
26/20
Here's the entire thread on the "Media Enriched with Newly Synthesized Antibodies" preprint available on one page:
That's not to say that it's impossible to use solid-state media for long-term storage. It's just that anything with durability guarantees gets prohibitively expensive quickly. Spinning hard drives—as well as DVDs and Blu-ray discs!—are your friend.
2/
- The way data is stored in solid-state media makes it much more susceptible to bit rot than other media.
- In a spinning hard drive, the moving parts are the most common point of failure.
- When you burn a DVD, that shit is fairly permanent.
3/
I wish people would understand that insurance underwriters have armies of actuaries calculating risks, and if an insurance company drops you, it's because things have changed in such a way that insuring you will take more out of the financial pool than you're putting in
1/
It sucks, but it's a direct result of the fact that humans are widely inhabiting locations that are rapidly becoming impossible to inhabit safely. If you can't find insurance for your home, it means there's a high likelihood you'll need to move soon anyway.
2/
You get insurance so that you can replace all of your stuff in the event of a disaster. When the insurance company effectively says "the risk of disaster is so high that insuring you would almost certainly cause us to lose a lot of money," it ALSO means your life is in danger
3/
So here’s the thing about some of the subtle neuro damage related to SARS-CoV-2 infection that I think a lot of people miss: some of the known deficits are correlated with things like impulsiveness and poor emotional control, so we might expect to see deficits there are well
1/
Consider how impatient people seem to be on the road in the last couple years relative to the 2010s, and I think we have a perfect example of where this is LIKELY already manifesting.
2/
This impact is particularly insidious for the person experiencing it, because poor impulse control, by definition, doesn’t really come on gradually. My biggest concern is how interactions under these circumstances will play out if this impact continues to become more common
3/
Let's review some major points in the Nukit controversy, since some people are unclear:
- Someone criticized someone's use of Nukit lanterns.
- Nukit attacked the critic because, as noted, this is how they market
- Nukit now demands "mediation" with the community (how??)
1/
So let's look at this a bit more critically. Here is the "evidence" Nukit provided that the didn't say anything racist. First of all, these aren't the comments in question, but it's worth a look anyway.
2/
Let's be clear about what happened here: Someone lamented the unequal access to protective measures and criticized someone who seems to be using a certain device to *maintain the status quo*, and the manufacturer of the device found it unacceptable.
3/
NEW STUDY! This exploratory study identifies a SPECIFIC PHENOTYPE OF LONG COVID that appears related to NEUROMUSCULAR DISTURBANCE rather than lung damage—and they've termed it Complex Ventilatory Dysfunction!
Breakdown of the paper (thread written for a general audience!)...
1/
Broadly speaking, there are two groups of acute covid outcomes involving dyspnea (shortness of breath) as a long-term symptom:
- Severe cases that may have physical lung damage
- "Mild" cases that now have ME/CFS-like features, but who have no evidence of lung damage!
2/
In this study, they explored this distinction further and identified a distinct subset of patients with a pattern of breathing abnormality that they have termed complex ventilatory dysfunction (CVD).
So how did they arrive at this conclusion? Let's dig in!
NEW STUDY! It VERY thoroughly supports the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 emerged as a zoonotic spillover event in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market—using multiple methods!
Breakdown of the paper (written for a general audience!)...
1/many (but it's worth it, I promise!)
This paper reanalyzes the same data from the April 2023 paper in Nature that cast doubt on the Huanan Market hypothesis (pictured).
In the new paper published in Cell this week, another group conducted far more detailed (and statistically sound) analyses!
2/
This new paper starts by reviewing the evidence supporting the Huanan Market hypothesis, and some of the details are FASCINATING!
To begin with, of the 174 COVID cases identified with an onset of December 2019, 32% had a link to the Huanan Market.